Schenn 1-Dimensional?

by on September 11, 2008 in Uncategorized - 19 Comments

Share

>>>DISCUSS IN THE FORUMS

On Draft Day ’08, the Toronto Maple Leafs made the bold move of trading up from the 7th selection to grab Kelowna Rockets defenseman Luke Schenn 5th overall.

Leaf fans have been waiting a long, long time for a young franchise calibre to fall into their lap, and they may finally have found one in Luke. Heading into the draft weekend, Schenn had the presitigious honor of being lumped together into the group of elite four defensemen, who along with Stamkos, highlighted the top of this year’s draft class. Luke was proclaimed the most NHL ready and defensively sound blueliner among the group, but his supposed lack of an offensive game has caused some fans to label him as nothing more than a defensive stay-at-home defenseman.

First of all, Luke is more than a “reliable” defenseman. The “Human Eraser” is an absolute game breaker defensively, because he’s very smart with the puck, hits like a truck, and is rock soild in his own end. In fact, Mckeen’s Draft Guide publisher had to this to say about Luke:

“Luke Schenn might have been one of the best defensive prospects perhaps in the last 20 years. He is the kind of guy to build your defense around.”

Not bad. But what about his offensive game? Well, let’s take a closer look at that shall we?

When thinking of big, physical, elite young WHL defenders, two names spring to mind: Nashville’s Shea Weber and Calgary’s Dion Phaneuf.

Phaneuf is a perennial Norris candidate and 50-60 point getter.

Weber is an emerging young star who posted 40 points in his 2nd NHL season, and will be in the Norris discusssion for many years to come.

So how does Schenn match up against these two elite young blueliners? Let’s do some junior stat crunching:

Age 16:

Player A: (0 points in 5 GP)

Player B: 0.18 PPG

Player C: 0.25 PPG

Age 17:

Player A: 0.26 PPG

Player B: 0.40 PPG

Player C: 0.42 PPG

Age 18:

Player A: 0.53 PPG

Player B: 0.49 PPG

Player C: 0.69 PPG

Now before we do any judging, it’s important to point out two things:

#1 – Players A and C were born before the September cutoff date, and so were drafted after their age 17 seasons while Player B was born after that date, so he was drafted after his age 18 season.

#2 – Player C, who has seemingly broken out way ahead of the other two, is roughly 7 months older than Player B and 5 months older than Player A. This is important because it means that Player A played his 0.53 PPG season at age 18, Player B played his 0.49 PPG season at age 18, and Player C played his 0.42 PPG season at about age 17.5.

All things considered, all three players are pretty comparable, with Players A and B having nearly identical stats. In case you haven’t figured it out yet:

Player A is Shea Weber.

Player B is Luke Schenn.

Player C is Dion Phaneuf.

Now while Phaneuf is likely one offensive class above Schenn, Luke and Shea are very, very comparable statistically. Thus it should be of no surprise that many of the WHL scouts, and Rockets coaches (Weber and Schenn both played for Kelowna) have drawn comparisons offensively between the two. Both are large bodied, hardnosed defenders that skate very well, display poise and confidence with the puck, but don’t like to carry it a whole lot. Both have the ability to make quick, accurate outlet passes, and possess booming point shots.

So what does that mean? It means that it is a very flattering comparison for Schenn, because Weber is a fantastic young player.

While Schen still has a lot of work ahead of him to live up to his comparison, like matching Weber’s 0.74 PPG age 19 season, there is certainly some justifiable hope that he can develop into an all-around elite defender.

Like Weber, I feel that Schenn has the potential to touch 40-45 points at the NHL level, which Shea did in just his 2nd NHL season. Toss in the fact that we may have just landed the best “defensive” prospect of the last 2 decades, and you should have the makings of a future perennial all-star and top 5-10 defenseman in the NHL.

Luke Schenn one-dimensional? I think not.

It’s been a pleasure,

Alex Tran

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • ronguillet

    Excellent blog, Ace.

    I’ve noticed many sports analysts have brushes aside his offensive potential, focusing all the attention to his strong defensive game. As your stats above show, Schenn could evolve into a great two-way d-man one day… it may take more time to develop his offensive game, but if given the right opportunity (which I believe he’ll get) he could flourish in the NHL.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mapleleafsforever

    For sure. Apparrently scoring less than 40 points makes a player one-dimensional… incorrect. However, I will accept 15 points if he only flattens Spezza on a regular basis.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • I B Leaf

    This is why cliff has said he will have to really impress to make the team. and likewise he has gone out and got two very responsible d-men in the offseason. That way fans will not be yelling. “why the hell is (name AHL D prospect)out there when Schenn could do just as good and gain NHL experience. #5 picks if not players to build around are players that end up being important to the core for years. There is time for NHL experience, but time for development is now and not while in the NHL.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MeanMisterMustard

    Great stuff Ace. For what it’s worth, I will be very happy indeed if Schenn “only” ever develops into a “one-dimensional” dman a la Scott Stevens or Adam Foote. Good point totals would just be the icing on the cake.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://zedinsurance.blogspot.com Kirra

    Keep up the good work.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)