Who Woulda Thunk It?

by on October 10, 2008 in Uncategorized - 17 Comments

Share

The approach entering the ’08/’09 campaign from head coach Ron Wilson and general manager Cliff Fletcher is that performance is the primary measuring stick while results in the win/loss columns are only of secondary import.

But the need to gain confidence and a genuine belief in Wilson’s philosophy and system is crucial for this young and transitioning Maple Leafs team. The Maple Leafs couldn’t have gotten off to a better start in that regard with a 3-2 win over the Stanley Cup victors of ’08, a score-line that actually flatters the heavily-favoured Red Wings.

It must be said that this wasn’t a Red Wings team atop its game. But the Maple Leafs’ hustle, speed and enterprise played a major part in forcing mistakes from a usually stingy Red Wings team. The coaching and the execution was picture perfect, with the Maple Leafs trapping as a unit defensively and maintaining a boisterous fore-check that disrupted any flow the Red Wings attempted to establish. Two of three Leafs goals were the result of Red Wings give-aways.

The Maple Leafs concluded the pre-season looking rather unrefined. Discipline was a major downfall for the club in the primers, but the Leafs kept their feet moving and avoided the sin bin but three times, one of which was a delay-of-game penalty. The inability to clear the zone and relieve pressure was another fault, but the Leafs cleared the zone efficiently, preventing the concerted puck control game of the Red Wings from taking effect. As we all awaited the seemingly inescapable collapse, the Leafs also avoided succumbing to a spirited come-back attempt by the Wings by maintaining concentration.

Perhaps most promising of all, this is a Leafs team that’s wearing its heart on its sleeve.

Player Notes:

-Dominic Moore was heroic. Aside from scoring, he won crucial face-offs, blocked shots and, as usual, his work rate was outstanding. Dare I say it was Keon-like. Deserving of the first star.

-Vesa Toskala, period.

-It’s getting incredibly tough to justify sending Schenn down. He held his own in 17+ minutes of ice-time. Physical and very solid. Here’s one reason why you might: 0 minutes of power-play time. It might be in the best interest of developing his offensive game if he’s returned to junior where he can log ample time QBing the Kelowna power-play. The other option is to make an attempt to give him a shift or two on the PP a night for now and hopefully increase that load considerably by next season once a body or two can be moved.

-Bold prediction: Hagman will pot 25 this year. The Grabovski, Tlusty, Hagman line is a definite keeper.

-”Pavel Kubina is playing like a Norris Trophy” (Don Cherry). I actually thought he defended much better than an immobile piece of silverware, but that’s just me. The entire blue-line corps was fantastic with the exception of Carlo Colaiacovo, who looked behind-a-step.

-I worry about Stajan. He clocked in at less than 10 minutes of ice-time on the fourth line tonight. He’s really struggled to win the approval of Wilson thus far, but I’m hoping Wilson will give him a shot in a more prominent role at some point. He’ll come around.

-May it be the first of many for Nik Kulemin. He was fortunate to have the puck gifted to him at the blue-line, but take nothing away from the finish with aplomb. Once around the net, Kulemin’s instincts take over and that’s very promising. The goal should provide a much-needed confidence boost.

-Lines two and three were brilliant, but one and four left something to be desired. Blake, after a promising pre-season, returned to his old habits of taking low-percentage shots and giving the puck away. It’s tough to make adjustments to the line-up with the way lines two and three are performing, but Wilson can try White on that fourth line or Hollweg once he returns.

-It’s tough to see Stralman in the pressbox, but you don’t want to mess with the chemistry of the blue-line corps. Eventually, Stralman will probably assume Van Ryn’s spot, however.

-Bring on the Habs.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • http://www.mannhl.proboards46.com Micheal Aldred

    Hey, great article. I do think Fletcher has to make some moves and even though Stralman had a less than ok preseason, he didn’t look all that bad to me. I’ve seen worse become regulars in a Leaf uniform… Berg, Lumme, Wozniewski… much worse lol The Leafs are an exciting team this year and I’m sure, regardless of where they place, Leaf fans (or at least most) will appreciate their effort… if they keep it up

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • admin

    Hey Mike – I was discussing this possibility in the Hockeybuzz forums:

    On the discussion of moving Van Ryn for Stralman, or another defender:

    I’ve actually quite liked Van Ryn. I’ve mistaken him on a few occasions for Tomas Kaberle when he’s gliding with the puck. As you say, he’s a similar player to Stralman and thus will likely be the one replaced, but quietly I think that there’s a growing case to move Kaberle. Stralman will be a Kaberle replica IMO and when you consider the type of return out there for Kaberle (and the fact that he now may be open to trade from the sounds of it), it makes increasingly more sense.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burn

    I like the idea of the Kaberle trade. I think there would be interest for lots of team.

    Last nights game was great. The Grabs-Hagman-Tlusty line is awesome. They’re a keeper. Kulemin was great. What a release. I think VanRyn was good last night too.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Liquid

    I agree with the other posters here…. It’s time to move Kaberle (if he accepts…. he has a no trade).

    I would rather see Stralman playing.

    Sending Schenn back to improve his offensive game isn’t a bad idea either.

    Looks like we will at least have a fun team to watch this year.

    Cheers

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)