Leafs -V- Thrashers Post-Game: Rebound

by on December 30, 2008 in Uncategorized - 536 Comments

Share

Firstly, an interesting item of news – the Vancouver Canucks have acquired goaltender Jason LeBarbera from the LA Kings in exchange for a 7th round pick. Update: Hat-tip to Sarah, who points out that Curtis Sanford has been placed on the IR alongside Roberto Luongo, necessitating the deal for another ‘tender.

So the Maple Leafs close out an up-and-down December with a 4-3 overtime win over the lowly Atlanta Thrashers. After dropping three straight at the beginning of the month, the Leafs proceeded string together a successful six game stretch in which they picked up ten out of a possible twelve points. The Leafs then hit a Christmas time rut, losing three successively by a collective score of 16-4 . While Wilson is demanding increased consistency out of his young group, streakiness is often times the signature of a rookie-laden club. Capricious play has certainly been the hallmark of the re-building Leafs’ season to date.

After starting off habitually slow, the Maple Leafs largely dictated the play for the remainder of the game with a strong overall effort that deserved the two points. It looked as though the Buds were going to let the game slip through their hands after a lack of capitalization (Grabovski [x2], Blake, Stempniak) on some golden opportunities to put the two points safely away. A fortunate interference call sort of saved the Leafs as on the 4-on-3 power-play Pavel Kubina beat Johan Hedberg with a cannonading blast from the point in the extra frame.

Someone has to get to the root cause of the Leafs’ inability to start well out of the gate. My guess would be that it’s a symptom of the youngsters’ lack of confidence or belief in themselves. It’s certainly not a lack of preparation, not under Wilson’s watch. The Leafs’ propensity for putting together impressive comebacks -as well as their ability to close out games (9-0-2 when leading after two) – seems to point to the possibility that the Leafs’ play corresponds with fluctuating levels of confidence. It seems that whenever something goes the Leafs’ way, the team rides the momentum of a renewed sense of confidence and self-belief (which explains the comebacks and their ability to close out games) that isn’t there from the outset of games.

Tonight was a big rebound performance for the team as a whole but more so for some individual Leafs. First and foremost, Curtis Joseph stood tall in stopping 29 shots – a couple of which were of the big-time variety – to record his first win of the year as well as his long-awaited 450th career win (congrats!). Joseph’s breakaway stop on Jim Slater to preserve the 2-2 scoreline was huge. CuJo will be rewarded with another appearance Thursday night when the Buffalo Sabres come to town. With another strong performance Thursday, Joseph will have gone a long way in re-assuring Wilson and Burke that he can provide a supportive back-up presence. If things went awry tonight as they have in the majority of his appearances to date, as Wilson recently said himself in an interview with Mike Ulmer, Leafs’ brass would have a tough decision to make, likely to either discuss the possibility of retirement with CuJo or, even less tactful, to waive/demote him. PPP, Old Yeller may just have some life left in him yet.

Tomas Kaberle, who was a -5 over the Leafs’ last three losses, was very sharp in both ends of the ice. Lee Stempniak and Nik Kulemin, two recent residents of Wilson’s doghouse, were very active and effective offensively. Stempniak played easily his best game in a Leaf uni to date. I thought Mikhail Grabovski was quite effective up front, although he should have shot on both of his breakaways as opposed to passing and attempting to deke out Hedberg. I’m not exactly sure why Grabovski has been shafted on power-play time recently by Ron Wilson.

Your thoughts?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Garrett Bauman

    I’ve been meaning to write a bit about him, but I’m trying to track down a few more details before doing an actual post, though. I don’t want to base an entire post on what a few regular Marlie-goers (and friends of a couple of the players) have told me.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mizuno

    I am looking forward to your post about Stralman, are you going to track down the details based on the Marlies game or previous games hes played in the NHL?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Garrett Bauman

    A little bit of both, if I can. In-depth Marlie game analysis is harder to track down, but I’ll see what I can find. May have to rely on the “grapevine” for some of that, which I’d rather not do. I’ve seen more of him, and read more about his game, at the NHL level, so that part is much easier. Should have something up in the next day or so, if I’m lucky.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Daniel

    IMAGINE IF THOSE GUYS HAD LET US TRADE THEM

    carter, higgins, grabo, luca sbisa,
    we would be able to turn this thing around by next year when we signed nash

    but anyways, what do u guys actually think we could get 4 kaberle, and who do you guys think we will have in prospects by the end of march

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • vesku35

    Gus Katsaros mentioned Hodgson and a first not as a solid rumor but as an example of what the Leafs could retrieve

    to be honest that sounds steep to me, but we can’t underestimate the value of a smooth skating puck mover on the blue-line. a lot will have to do with whether or not we can move him at the deadline because teams will pay more in march than july or august

    I would be happy with just a first myself. if we could get a quality prospect alongside the first i would be ecstatic. i guess when i think about it, whoever we are gonna be dealing kaberle to is going to be a playoff team very very likely as kaberle won’t waive unless it is. he’ll probably only go to a legit contender (I agree with gus, vancouver could be a potential destination), which means the first will be in the 25 range give or take. Obviously any first rounder of any sort is a plus and it could potentially be packaged along our first to move up to grab the player burke wants. i think that may be the case as burke will pick out one player from the upper draft class and decide that’s his man, sort of like Fletcher. i think they have similar approaches to drafting from what i’ve heard

    so, if that pick is low like we can expect then may be I do expect a prospect alongside him. I think that’s still out there somewhere, possibly in Vancouver, maybe still in Philly

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Daniel

    ya i thought that hodgesen seemed too steep as well, cuz i think there would be riots if they traded that kid cuz he seems like a terrific young prospect, makes you wonder if we should had just waited, and drafted him instead of schenn

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mizuno

    I disagree with drafting Hodgson over Schenn. The Leafs really lacked defense, and that was something Cliff Fletcher was trying to adress or improve on after evaluating his team. That’s why he got Finger, Frogren and Van Ryn to develop a solid D core that Ron Wilson can work with and develop. With patience, Schenn will become a well rounded shutdown defenseman! :)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blair

    Finally a good game from Cujo where he didn’t look like swiss cheese back there. And Grabovski’s speed last night was amazing. Maybe we’ll see more of those stretch passes to Grabs while he’s in full flight – although he needs more confidence to shoot; his shooting percentage is amazing. And good on Stempniak for finally putting together some goals. He plays well, he just had that Alex Steen syndrome of not converting.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jeff Gulley

    Kaberle’s biggest disadvantage this year is that he doesn’t have that stud right-handed forward like Sundin to hit with the stretch pass. The Kaberle stretch pass from the left is a tough one for left-handed forwards to hold — Grabovski was able to last night, but it’s been awhile since we’ve seen that play unfold. Kaberle still has a ton of upside for contending teams, he’s just been displaced on this new Leaf squad.

    Nice to see Cujo get number 450. And I mean literally see….I was there last night :-)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://admin Alex Tran

    Wow an explosion of comments haha. Guess everyone was holding it in til the post-game blog game out.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafsfan41

    In regards to the game, CuJo played as well as we could have hoped for being 41 and not being in any sort of real rhythm this year.

    Grabovski, Kulemin and Hagman were lights out for the most part. I loved their work ethic. I wish they would have had more time on the PP for sure. Williams left with a shoulder injury, and that seemed to spark Stempniak. I know there are a lot of doubters out there, but I think we saw an example of what he can do. He buried a sweet pass from Poni. Toronto’s system is completely different than St. Louis, and he had zero confidence in St. Louis this year. It takes time to find where you fit. I would take Stempniak over Blake any day. Blake has been alright over the last while, but at 5 mill per year, he’s another McCabe for our blue and white…simply overpaid.

    Mitchell looked good as well, nice to see him get a little time with some other players than our current 4th line folks. Here’s what I would propose for next game’s lineup.

    Poni – Stajan – Antropov
    Kulemin – Grabo – Stempniak
    Hagman – Mitchell – Mayers
    Blake – Moore – Deveaux

    Kaberle – Kubina
    Finger – White
    Frogren – Sifers

    Did anyone see Sifers after his attempted fight?? Did he get a misconduct, or was there a message being sent to him?

    I think the key for us the rest of the year is developing a 4th line so we can roll all 4 instead of keeping to 3 and mixing in a guy or 2 from the 4th onto the top 3. Did Hollweg play in the third period (shouldn’t be in the lineup anyways)??

    In regards to Kaberle, I hope we have learned from the Sundin saga what to do and what not to do. I think we ask him if he wants us to explore a trade, if he says no, we respect his decision. If we miss the playoffs again (which looks like will happen), then we sit down with him again and explain where we need to go, thank him for his time and then deal him.

    The only concern I have with Kaberle going is the loss of offence from the blue line. Kubina has a clapper from the point, but who will feed it to him?? I also think White is much more effective as a winger than on D, but he could still play that on the point. Stralman has offensive upside, but is a liability on D in our own zone at times. I realize Kaberle is probably going to fetch the best price for us, but I would rather see Finger be the odd man out.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • sarah

    just thought i’d point out that sanford was placed on the IR, which is likely why vancouver traded for labarbara. however, once luongo and sanford are back (both week-to-week), then we can let the trade speculation begin…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://admin Alec Brownscombe

    Thanks Sarah, makes sense.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • fjsili0001

    slLAH100112 It’s my honor to meet so beautiful article, so I want to bring some healthy news to you.The MBT M.Walk shoes is very easy to find the MBT Women M.Walk shoes on line and many retailers also will provide a massive selection of cheap styles. Sometimes the price of the footwear can be very low because it is time for them to promote the new styles. the best MBT Women M.Walk Grey shoes sites will be listed one by one, and with the more words added such as clearance, discount, more better sites will come out for you.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)