Late Night Quick Hits

by on March 4, 2009 in Uncategorized - 39 Comments

Share

Couple of quick notes:

The conditional pick received in the Nik Antropov trade is determinant upon the Rangers’ playoff success. While I’m awaiting confirmation from a team official, the pick seems to be conditioned upon the the following: If the Rangers advance beyond the Eastern Conference semi-finals, the Leafs will receive the Rangers’ 4th round pick in 2010. I’ll be the first to call the likelihood of that “very slim.” Go Rangers!

What gives with a 6’6, 25 goal scorer retrieving only a mid-range 2nd rounder? Brian Burke‘s job was made immeasurably tougher by the apprehension among league general managers about the economic downturn’s implications on the salary cap come 2010/11. Draft picks and prospects were being held much tighter to the chest and weren’t about to be easily sacrificed for a rental player due up for a hefty pay raise in the summer.

The reason why Tampa Bay general manager Brian Lawson was looking to shed more salary with in excess of 6 million dollars in cap space was because the Lightning needed to descend below the league payroll’s midpoint line of $48.7 million in order to become a recepient of league revenue sharing. That trade sure was slimy, but very well played by Burke. It’s nice to see Burke’s finding innovative ways to exercise the Leafs’ financial clout in a salary cap landscape, albeit this wasn’t on the same scale of signing John Tavares to an exorbitant AHL contract with the Marlies so as to secure him when he’s NHL-eligible.

The specifics on the Leafs’ acquired picks – Burke acquired Carolina’s second rounder in the Dominic Moore deal (currently 45th overall), not Edmonton’s. Still trying to find out whether the Leafs also acquired Carolina’s fourth rounder in the salary dump deal with Tampa Bay (currently 135th) or if it was Tampa’s selection (123rd)… not that it matters that deep into the draft.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • glgbill

    Willing to give Burke a ‘B’ yesterday, including a slight uptick for creatively acquiring a 4th. Clearly, the debates we’ve all had through the years about Antro influenced his market value. ;-)

    Hopefully, more picks/prospects will be acquired by draft day…and I’ll bet that one of the 2nds will be used on a top goalie prospect. Also, it will be interesting to see how aggressively Burke tries to move up. Hopefully, it’s roster players plus the existing pick, not additional picks. We need quality and quantity.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wook

    @glgbill: So what did BB have to do achieve the grade of ‘A’ under your judgment?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CarltontheBear

    @Wook

    Weasel a 1st out of someone for Antropov :P

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Rex

    i definitely agree for brian burke to get an a he shouldve tried to weasel ottawas 1st round pick so that the islanders wont have 2 picks in the first five picks and that they shouldve tried to get another good centreman

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dan

    Hey I just want to say that everybody working on this site did a great job yesterday!
    .
    Between my blackberry, TSN and this web site I was able to get all of the updates on trades and close non-trades as they happened. Love the site, keep up the good work!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • someguy

    @jordan…you hope antro demolishes his knee?…i dont wish any crippling injuries on anyone…

    @alex tran…thanx for finding out about the conditional pick for us…i was wondering the same thing: why did no one ask him that at the conference?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Ya I dont mean injured but just anything that will keep them from winning….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HBM

    @Rex the 1st rounder that the Islanders got was the Sharks not the Sens

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • someguy

    …fair enough

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HBM

    http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=269892&lid=sublink01&lpos=headlines_nhl

    The Leafs sign a 31 y/o foward. Methinks its to keep the kids on the Marlies.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wook

    @CarltontheBear and Rex: BB isn’t a magician though…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Richard-Steven Williams

    As an overview the Tampa deal is basically a prospect for a prospect, although considering the size of his current contract I wouldn’t mind seeing Heward kept on. Big deal of the day for me: Reitz, loved watching that kid play an archetypal Burke player. Why was everyone expecting and rumoring such a big day, with worries about how the caps going to stretch at the close of the year it was always going to be a little subdued.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • deMarcus

    Damien Cox is reporting that it’s a 4th rounder if the Rags advance to the ECF

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CarltontheBear

    a 4th rounder if they make it to the ECF..? Wow, let’s not get crazy or anything.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)