Getting “O” from the “D”

by on August 14, 2009 in Uncategorized - 189 Comments

Share

The Maple Leafs finished as the league’s worst defensive team last season, giving up an astounding 286 goals, which works out to about 3.5 goals against a game. As such, much of the team’s summer remodeling took place on the blueline, which saw the departure of Kubina and the additions of shutdown defensemen  Beauchemin and Komisarek. With nearly $20M dollars committed per season through 2011 to the group of Kaberle, Komisarek, Beauchemin, Schenn and Finger, and Tomas being the only player above the age of 30, it appears on paper at least, that this will be the core of the defense for the foreseeable future. If that’s the case, how do they stack up against the rest of the league?

The first inclination one gets from that collection of names is the relative lack of offensive ability, as 4 of those 5 players come with the reputation of being defensive defensemen. Considering the fact that the Leafs relied on him for 25 minutes a night (a number that would have put him league’s top 10 for ice-time) during the second half of the season, is likely a sign that Burke and Wilson view 25 year old Ian White as a fixture in the team’s long-term plans. So with that in mind, let’s take a look at how a top six defense corps of Kaberle, Komisarek, Beauchemin, Schenn, White, and Finger stacks up against the best of the best.

In order to do that, we’re gonna first have to make a few reasonable assumptions. The first one is how to estimtae ice-time. These are the ’08-’09 averages for that top six group:

  1. Kaberle – 22 minutes
  2. Komisarek – 20 minutes
  3. Beauchemin – 22 minutes
  4. Schenn – 22 minutes
  5. Finger – 17 minutes
  6. White – 17 minutes

Beautiful. Now onto the projections. To avoid the inclusion of some tedious math, you’re going to have to trust me on this one. To project their offensive point totals, I can simply take their points per minute averages from last season and multiply them out to fit the appropriate ice-time allotments. Granted, I understand that White’s point totals include the games he played as a forward, we can also assume an increase to compensate for that overestimation due to the fact that he’d likely get more powerplay time moving forward. For Kaberle, I’m going to use his ’07-’08 numbers and assume that last year’s disappointing totals were an anomaly. For Beauchemin, it’s likely he’s going to take over Kubina’s role as the point shot on the top powerplay, so we’re going to use his ’06-’07 stats, the last time he earned top PP minutes. Here are the results:

  1. Kaberle – 47 points
  2. Komisarek – 14 points
  3. Beauchemin – 28 points
  4. Schenn – 17 points
  5. White – 20 points
  6. Finger – 24 points
  7. Total – 150 points

Last season, Toronto’s defense corps scored 160 points, so the decline is not too surprising considering the replacement of offensive defensemen Kubina and Van Ryn with Beauchemin and Komisarek. Well, is that enough offense from the blueline for a contending team? Let’s find out:

The top ten regular season teams from last season and the amount of points scored from the back end:

  1. San Jose – 203 points
  2. Boston – 184 points
  3. Detroit – 224 points
  4. Washington – 151 points
  5. New Jersey – 128 points
  6. Chicago – 202 points
  7. Vancouver – 167 points
  8. Pittsburgh -147 points
  9. Philadelphia – 141 points
  10. Calgary – 153 points

So basically, the average top 10 NHL team received 170 points from their backend last season. Two of the teams under this mark are the Capitals and Penguins, who are both blessed with the league’s top two young scorers to compensate up front. The Flyers went out and traded for 50+ points from Chris Pronger, while Calgary added 40+ points from Jay Bouwmeester. Not surprisingly, the Devils continue to be the exception to virtually any offense vs. success correlation. In case you were wondering, the lone Conference finalist not to appear on that list is the Carolina Hurricanes, who benefited from 173 points from their blueliners. The ’07-’08 champion Red Wings received 202 points, while the ’06-’07 champion Ducks received 209 points. Whatever the case, it seems that at least cracking the 170 point plateau is a good start in assessing a championship calibre defense corps.

Considering the fact that the Leafs can reasonably project themselves to about 150 points from the defense corps this year, it’s certainly not a bad start to say the least. The issues of a lack of offense or puck-moving ability from the back end have been exaggerated as previous argued by Gus as well. So what next? Well, as it stands there are a few ways the Leafs can reach that magical “170″ mark with the current group of defensemen, but they do need a few of the following to happen over the next few years:

  • Hope Kaberle regains his previous form, scoring more effectively, and starts cracking the 55 point plateau once again
  • Hope White’s breakout ’08-’09 campaign was not a fluke, and that he’s got it in him to become a 30 point power play specialist
  • Hope Schenn’s confidence with the puck and good point shot start translating into a few more points

All in all, there’s a lot to like about the makeup of the Leafs’ current group of defensemen. There is a strong emphasis on youth, with much of the group either in or about to enter the prime years of their careers. There is an underestimated amount of offensive potential collectively, particularly from Ian White and Jeff Finger. And lastly, it shouldn’t be understated that the meat and potatoes of this defense corps will be the physicality and shutdown ability each and every night. What do you guys think? Will this collection of defensemen develop into a championship calibre blueline someday?

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • TuckerThomas

    Your question should be: How many cups has Detroit won via free agency and quality scouting.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ Jonez
    Please forgive my terrible grammar. I for got the question mark.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Good.

    FUCK TANK NATION! Lick on my balls… we put up with it for awhile, but that shit is behind us. We are here to win and be competitive every night.
    .
    Being “bounced” from the playoffs in four is a possibility, but I don’t see that happening with this squad. I think they are more suited to a long physical series than other teams. I think the Leafs could give any team a run for their money over 7 games. Not to mention, they playoff time the youngsters get be more valuable than a better pick.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    Sure there have been some great stars that have gone in the top five these past few years.
    But, I a team has a much better shot at shutting down those great stars than trying to draft one.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    But, I think****

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ 2 mins
    You got it man!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HHT

    So, Garret what were the offers for Pee Wee last night?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafey_84

    @2 Minutes: So you think we’d have a reasonable shot against Boston, Washington, Pittsburgh or Philadelphia in a 7 game series where they have home ice advantage? If that’s your opinion you’re entitled to it but I wouldn’t bet we win 2 games against any of those teams in the regular season, let alone 4 games against them in the post-season…which is when most of the elite players (which we lack and they have in abundance) lack and where previous playoff experience (which most of our players lack) plays an integral role in success.
    .
    All I’m saying is, objectively speaking, any team that finishes in 8th place is going to have a hell of a time surviving for five or six games let alone winning the series. It happens, sure, but not often. I wouldn’t think it would be any different for the Leafs if they snuck in on the last day via tie-breaker.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cartika.com Andrew R

    Hello Alex and thank you for the wonderful post. The only issue I have is that the Leafs are lacking ANY other NHL, AHL or CHL player capable of filling Kaberles shoes. It is OK to suggest that Kaberle will return to previous form – I for one believe this to be true. However, Kaberle is an expiring contract next offseason – and by all accounts, the Leafs opportunity to contend is in 3 years AT BEST. As such, maintaining Kaberle, unless you possess inherent knowledge of his willingness to yet again resign at an affordable rate – was the wrong decision for this organization. It would have been wiser to give up Kaberle for a lesser return then publicly announced, and maintain Kubina (vs literally giving him away).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Leafey_84

    @Andrew R: I agree with almost everything you just said except I’m not so sure Kaberle will return to his previous form and liked the Kubina trade because I both like Exelby and feel it was necessary to free up the cap space for Komisarek. So it was pretty much Kubina for Exelby and Komisarek and only added ~$800K of a cap hit.
    .
    As long as Kaberle can maintain a high level of play and will sign an extension for at least two or three more years it will not be a mistake to keep him. However if his play dips or he walks as a free agent then Burke should have taken what he could have got. It’s a bit of a gamble, personally I think the safest bet would have been to have traded him for whatever the best offer available was…but the safest bet isn’t always the best one so let’s hope Burke made the right choice.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HHT

    To win a playoff series against a top team this year, the Leafs would need (along with consistent, stellar goaltending and that’s a BIG IF) to add some good experienced veterans up front (not sure Blake qualifies as a grizzled playoff warrior) and at least one elite scoring forward. The Leafs are miles away from being ready to contend- and if the miraculous happens and they win a round, the Leafs are going to praying, not playing to make the round after that. It just doesn’t make sense.

    Kaberle is one of our most marketable assets and Burke is choosing to ignore this.

    What were the most interesting offers for Kaberle in the last few days, Garret?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • HHT

    should read: ‘to be praying’

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)