Kessel: Waiting it Out

by on September 16, 2009 in Uncategorized - 132 Comments

Share

It took sometime to manifest, prolonged in the wake of shoulder surgery and stunted contract talks, but the September 10th news that negotiations between the Boston Bruins, Wade Arnott and Phil Kessel had come to an impasse reignited the rumor mill that has surrounded the Leafs and the Madison, Wisconsin sniper since Brian Burke first tabled Tomas Kaberle in the infamous draft day “misunderstanding.”

In the week that has passed since negotiations broke down, the value of Kessel has skyrocketed beyond the original RFA compensation of a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round selection in the 2010 draft.

With competition in the form of the Nashville Predators and, to a lesser extent, the New York Rangers, forcing Kessel’s name to the block and value up, one recently touted proposal (amid a myriad of reported proposals) has suggested the Leafs offer a prospect player, roster player and premium draft selection in an attempt to circumvent an contractual bidding war.

For his part Boston GM Peter Chiarelli has helped oil the wheels of the trade bandwagon by loudly indicating a will to match any offer sheet, albeit with every man and his dog aware that the Bruins have almost zero leeway in the cap and the likes of Marc Savard, Milan Lucic and Blake Wheeler all headed for varying degrees of free agency next summer.

Smoke and mirrors? or creative cap management? Nothing short of fiscal genius is going to keep the impressively resurgent Bruins of last year on track if they want to haggle with a Leafs organization boasting almost $6million in cap space, easily enough to entice the mercurial Kessel.

Boston may not be in a position of strength in terms of dollars, but with the Predators possessing a roomy $15million under cap and the Dustin Penner debarcle still fresh in his memory, Burke could still find the trading route a more preferable method for persuing the 36 goal scorer many are now baying to see in blue and white.   

Logic dictates that the Predators would be unlikely to match the Leafs on the trading block owing to the Tennessee franchises dependence on cheap prospects and a depth chart heavy on defence, fundamentally lacking the components Chiarelli is likely to want in return. Regardless, Nashville remain potential suitors equally hell bent on trading for the Bruins forward with dubious chips such as Alexander Radulov. 

But is Kessel likely to want to play for a well coached, but frankly backwater club?

Dependant on ambition and pride over green; arguments concerning Kessel’s disposition to southern hockey is by-the-by if Nashville decided to undercut Chiarelli in the standoff and vastly overpay for Kessel’s services, albeit significantly  improbable. Subsequently, with Chiarelli posturing as puppet master, what would be the likely cost of Burke following the trade route to secure a jewel in the Leafs currently unexceptional offensive core?

As concerns the prospect element, several names have been mentioned with the most favored being Jiri Tlusty and Nikolai Kulemin. Untested or at least unproven with the big club, Tlusty enjoyed a prosperous year in the AHL last season tallying a point a game average in his 66 outings on the farm. Only five months younger than Kessel, Tlusty has been slow in assimilating to the physical side of the North American game but his potential remains untapped.

Kulemin, on the other hand, experienced life on every line last season not to mention a scoreless five game trip to the AHL. Foregoing the inconsistencies that characterized his rookie season, Kulemin did show flashes of offensive flair particularly down the home stretch. Scoring 9 points in the final 11 games, Kulemin potted five goals and demonstrated a tenacity in front of net that belied his size.

While both have shown snippets of potential, neither are remotely projecting the kinds of output Kessel has enjoyed alongside Marc Savard or would likely enjoy even without the benefit of a bona fide setup man.

With Tlusty being more cap friendly, the Czech native would probably make a better fit in a trade particularly if the roster player turned out to be the equally cheap, utilitarian spare part Ian White who seems far and away the most likely candidate to fill out the proposal.

With a first round selection tagged on, a trade would almost seem a more preferable route to surrendering three draft selections, freeing up an extra $1.7million in cap as well as relieving the log jam in defense for an offensive talent superior to anything in the Leafs cupboard.

However this would also prove contrary to Burke’s stratagem in trading back for his original second round selection and for good reason; the Bruins are unlikely to trade Kessel for Tlusty, White and a first round selection. 1. Because they can’t afford to take on any further cap and 2. They don’t value the players offered.

More likely the Bruins are countering the Leafs offers with the increasingly outlandish rumors of recent days. Two consecutive first round selections and second round pick (no cap hit picks), or a prospect that could potentially blow up in Burke’s face were he to trade such as Kadri, Stalberg or Bozak… names doing the rounds on Bruins forums.

Often criticized for being an egotistical trading partner, Burke is known to deal to win. With little love lost between Chiarelli and Burke after the draft day debacle, BB is also keen to avoid pulling any move that could be interpreted as JFJesque or for that matter Kevin Lowe-esque. However weak the drafts of 2010 and 2011 maybe being perceived, trading two first rounders and a second round pick would be submissively masochistic not to mention a complete u-turn on the rebuilding/retooling blueprints followed up to now. Furthermore, with the excitement that is surrounding Kadri, Stalberg and Bozak following the Leafs rookie tournament, dealing away a significant prospect, even for a proven star, would certainly hollow any victory in securing Kessel.

Subsequently patience is the key to Kessel, who is after all unlikely to play until November. With the Rangers seemingly ending their interest in Kessel because of their own cap limitations, the Leafs are heads up with Nashville. While Chiarelli may like to believe he has some say in the outcome, he effectively wrung his hands of Kessel with the signing of Derek Morris. The question now remains are the silent player in Nashville willing to gratuitously overpay?… unlikely, does the Boston GM want a compensatory collection of draft picks or a compensatory collection of spare parts? And is Burke willing to go down the offer sheet route he is so loathed too?

With Chiarelli making the trade route very steep indeed despite having his hands tied, one can only hope Burke doesn’t overpay to end the standoff.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Edward Flannery

    i hate when guys call into the AM 640 and make statements such as “leafs will finish tenth no doubt”
    thats engraging i hate when people know the future

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • RJ

    If they did match , they’de be over the cap and then you offer a lot less to get Bergeron, not that Chi would trade with us at that point though.
    .
    I’d rather Burke offer White, Mayers and a 3d for for Bergeron giving the B’s enough cap room to keep Kessel, then sign Dubi to an offer sheet. Move Grabs to wing, Bergeron 1st line center, Dubi second line center.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burn

    @RJ,

    UFA age is 25.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • RJ

    @ Edward

    Likely same guy who said a year ago to buy bank stocks because they will continue to rise!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Richard-Steven Williams

    I’m not sure a team can sign a player effectively straight onto LTIR. I was under the impression if Boston wanted to match an offer sheet they would have to have the nessecary cap space to accomodate the contract outright. Regardless, even if Chiarelli was to match say a $6mill offer sheet he is stil digging a hol for the future of the Bruins with Savard, Wheeler and Lucic all seeking new contracts next summer. I believe Chiarelli isoperating from a perceived position of power as opposed to an actual position of power.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • RJ

    @ Burn

    Wasn’t sure if it was 25 or 26, either way Kessel is only 21 or 22 so not for at least 3 more years.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ndk

    burke is probably waiting for October to send the sheet in– once the salary cap kicks in. I doubt Kessel cares if burke goes the trade route or the offer sheet route. In fact he might be a little more predisposed to the trade route as it would not place a salary ceiling of 5million (or whatever the actual number is) without having to send more than a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd for him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burn

    @RJ,

    that is correct. Kessel @ 21 years old still has several years before UFA. The UFA age used to be 30, then it dropped to 27 with the new CBA, and then dropped again when they renewed the CBA.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LemonHead

    @ Burn & RJ

    I think 25 is the age to become UFA as long as you have played 7 seasons. This worked for guys like Hartnell and Bouwmeester. Could also work for guys like Kane and Stamkos in the future. I think I have that right.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Madhatter

    @ danvertising September 16, 2009 11:38 am
    “A Kovulchuk offer sheet would cost compensation of 4 1st round picks.”
    Yes, if the Leafs tendered an offer to him. I’m saying the three picks might be a mislead about Kessel. They could be used as part of a straight up trade to Atlanta if there’s any indications that Kolvachuk won’t resign.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Komas Taberle

    @ RJ thanks for the UFA info.
    In that case then Burke and Kessek can play a waiting game until Kessel is declared fit to return to NHL.
    At that time Burke hit’s Boston with an offer sheet and Chiarelli will have to scramble to fit Kessel into his cap within a week.
    If Chiarelli anticipates Burke doing this in November/ December he will have to be very proactive now and of course every team out there will smell his desperation regardless if it manifests itself immediately or a 2-3 months down the road. Other GMs will devalue his trading chips knowing that he must make trades to fit the cap.
    This would be career limiting move for Chiarelli as assets would be leaving Boston for very little in return to accomodate a player that does not want to play in Boston anymore.
    Burke and Kessel can wait this out, Chiarelli cannot as all that does is postpone the inevitable and dilute the value of any players he may want to move.
    If he does match this puts his UFA and RFA stars at risk in the summer of 2010 and he could end up losing savard, Lucic, Wheeler etc.
    Burke should just be patient and play to his strengths, he has the cap room, the player only wants to play here, the player will not be available for a couple of months and he will not sign an offer sheet anywhere else.
    Other teams will be very reluctant to trade for him if Kessel sticks by his guns and only signs on with Toronto.
    I hope Burke puts on his poker face and watch Chiarelli squirm for the next few months.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS AN OFFER SHEET FOR KOVALCHUK!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Hap_Day

    @KT – agreed.
    ~
    And if Burke goes OS, the longer he waits the worse it is for Chiarelli as the 1-year no trade provision looks to be one calendar year from the date Boston matches the OS.

    So if Boston matches and then wanted to trade Kessel, they couldn’t trade him on draft day, or before July 1st. They would have to wait until the start, or in the first month or two, of the season when most trading partners are already capped out. This definitely puts the Bruins in a bind… leading me to believe a trade will be done…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf

    Daniel Marois and Peterbeleafs are right to just wait a few weeks at least until Kessel is healthy. Even if Nashville makes a trade for him unsigned, the Leafs can come in and offer $6M front end loaded. If Nashville excepts then let it go. We shouldn’t be movng all those picks anyway.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Richard-Steven Williams

    @B Leaf longterm:
    1. Schenn
    2. Finger
    3. Kaberle
    4. Frogren
    5. White
    6. Oreskovic
    7. Van Ryn
    To explain: Kaberle and White are lowered by trade value. Finger I rate highly and believe he is largely underrated because of his contract. I like Frogren’s play and would be interested to see how he goes in the second year. I am not so hot on the long term value of Oreskovic because his positional play is at times abysmal and Van Ryn has neither a longterm place in the side, is injury prone and is potentialy trade buffer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • NewfieDave

    Guys,

    The waiting game could hurt us too. Lets say a team with cap space loses a front line forward and offers Boston a better package than they would have before the injury in a trade. Then it’s all done for TO. That is the ONLY leverage (trade) that Boston has right now and what I am sure their GM is counting on….IMO. Let’s make the offer and give up the 1st 2nd &3rd and move on. That way, Boston looks good, Toronto will if Kessel works out great and BB will save face after stating that he offered several trade scenerios before making the offer sheet. Why else do you think that the Leafs are allowing all these rumors to get out there. They want peoples expectations to increase and when we get Kessel for less than all the stated rumors us Leafers will rejoice….Kudos to BB for his smart media usage!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ravidhaliwal

    If Chiarelli wants to play hardball, Burke should just throw an offer sheet at Kessel. Chiarelli is asking way too much for a player that

    1) Bruins don’t want to pay
    2) is injured
    3) doesn’t want to play for the Bruins
    4) had one good year

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • o2baleaf

    @ Newfie Dave, That only work if Kessel wants to play where he is traded, no GM is going to give up a pile of assets to get a player that won’t sign there.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    People have to stop saying he is “unproven” and had “one good year”. He ripped it up all 3 years he played, and he is only 21. He didnt start when he was 10 years old so its hard to have more then one good year. Theres no reason you can say he isnt a 40-50 goal scorer. He has dominated ever level he played in. He scored 11 goals at 18-19 years old, 19 at 19-20 years old, now 36 at 20-21 years old. Man we need this guy. I hope the price goes down because if we get him and pair him up with Grabovski and Kulemin it will be sick. The injury thing really doesnt look that bad either seing how he only missed 24 games out of a 246 game career

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kb

    @Jordan

    You have to stop saying he is proven. Just because you keep wishing it to be, doesn’t make it so. He has had one good season on the B’s top line – and he did not “rip it up” his first 2 years. I guess by applying your logic Kulemin ripped it up last year, since his stats were comparable to either of Kessel’s first 2 years – if not better. Kessel is iffy health-wise (at this time), and in his breakout year last year he played with much better players on a much better team. You also can’t say he is a 40-50 goal scorer because he has yet to do it, and he won’t with the group forwards we have right now.
    .
    We do not ‘need this guy’. If can we get him without submitting to any of the ludicrous trade offers I’ve seen posted here recently….great – I’m all for it! If we don’t get him…..great! Life goes on, and there are other fish in the sea. Plus you have to look at this – don’t see much ‘team’ in this guy yet to date. He has only shown that he is looking out for Phil Kessel’s interests only at this point. Why would he not end up doing the same thing to us, and become a distraction like he has to the Bruins?
    .
    Honestly, I say lowball trade offer, or just shoot an offer sheet for a first and third. IMO anything else is overpaying considering Chiarelli’s cap situation – he’ll be in trouble next year if he matches. It is becoming obvious that we have the upper hand at this point. Plus Boston can’t make a trade to a team he doesn’t want to sign with, and doesn’t want to play for.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Kessel was 18 when he started in the NHL, Kulemin was 22….theres a huge difference. Stop being so high on our players

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    @ kb

    I like your logic. Agreed 100%.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jmaker

    @ Kb… Kessel only looing out for Kessel? Didn’t he lead the Bruins in Goals? Then they went on to sign other players and left him out with no room left in the cap? C’mon man.. That doesn’t show a poor attitude on his part. Kessel has to look out for Kessel because the Bruins didn’t. Simple.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • o2baleaf

    Right on kb, I could not agree more. Kessel although a good player not worth the risk of more than a1st and a 3rd, maybe prospect not named Tlusty, Kulemin, Stalberg, or Kadri

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)