Player Review: Leafs 4-0 Flyers

by on September 17, 2009 in Uncategorized - 235 Comments

Share

The baby Leafs cruised past a Philadelphia Flyers B team playing an increasingly dirty game Thursday evening. The first victory in a, so-far, entertaining pre-season; the Leafs acquitted themselves well with a lineup that could be argued weaker than that iced the night previous.

Of particular note was the game Kadri and Hagman had going on together. Great chemistry on what was a dynamite line for the night combining for the opening two goals.

With the two teams meeting again on Saturday night, the opportunity for renewed rivalry will make the rematch a tantalizing prospect, especially as the fragile Leafs of last season looked a distant memory, even with the likes of Orr, Primeau and Mayers scratched. Carcillo and Asham in particular should be deserved of some attention.

Player review:

Forwards

Hagman: First star performance and the architect of a superb night for Nazem Kadri. Combined with the young Knight superbly, worked tirelessly and confused the Flyers defence with his continued forays into open ice.

Kadri: Looked far more settled tonight and playing alongside more offensively aware partners in Stempniak and Hagman looked the real deal. Full of tricks and scored a great goal in front of his junior team fans.

Stempniak: The Stempniak of old, or the Stempniak of the Blues pre-season a year ago? Was less instrumental to Kadri than Hagman but scored hounding the front of the net.

Rosehill: So much more than a slugger, great industry and energy in the first two periods and showed a lot of heart standing up for his teammates. Could have scored late in the game and didn’t look out of place replacing Stalberg on the college line. A good game.

Stalberg: Staking a claim at the big time last night, looked a different player tonight. Struggled with the puck and showed a lot of movement but it all resulted in a whole lot of nothing. Injured in the third.

Hanson: Plays hard through the middle and got himself a goal in a crease scramble. Utilitarian and unspectacular in application.

Bozak: Suffered the quieter form of Stalberg. Still working great of the puck but needs to make more heads up plays on special teams.

Wallin: Showed himself a competent Pk’er but looked too easy to shift from the puck in corners.

Grabovski: The ire of the Flyers dirtiest plays, looked lightweight in getting repeatedly hit but got up and scored an ugly goal. Industrious, tireless and hard working.

Ponikarovsky: Aside from a few nice linkups, didn’t dominate the young offense as much as he should.

Ondrus: Looks every bit the AHLer, but what a punch when facing a beatdown. Worked hard in the corners but lacks that extra quality.

Kulemin: Hit and miss again. Assisted on Grabovski’s goal but skates in and out of shifts. Needs to apply himself more consistently.

Defence:

Schenn: Workmanlike. Took care of his end and stood up for his teammates. Did well on a 2 on 1. Prototypically astute Schenn performance and looks all the more mature.

Komisarek: Did Kabby’s dirty work and did it well. Pairing him with the fragile Czech looks like a match made in heaven.

Kaberle: So much more time, looked more at home on the bench and assisted on both goals manning the point with greater authority. Should enjoy a brighter year alongside Komisarek.

Gunnarsson: Inconsistent. At times looks settled and showed himself to be more truculent in the corners. But turned over the puck way too often and was lazy getting back after the fact.

Blacker: Once more the occasional suicidal trek forward, but was more accountable at back than he was in the rookie tournament and owned Richards and Carter on a couple of plays. Had the audacity to tell Kaberle where he wanted him on the PP. Looked good on the point.

Rogers: Solid, little more.

Goaltending:

MacDonald: Had little to do in his portion of the game but what he had to do he did well. Absorbed potential rebounds.

Reimer: Hold the knee jerk reactions, is this the kid from the rookie tournament? Pulled off several important saves and looked comfortable.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Tim

    @ Snots- SSSSSSSSSSSilly! haha….uh I’m bored. Waitin for the game.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    @ GinOshawa

    I said this to the last person who suggested waivers for guys like Stajan. THAT IS DUMB! 29 other teams will each make a claim for him. Why would you let him go for free?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    Charlie I think the Hab’s would grab him just to piss us off.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Skadlig Tvangstanke
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    That would suck. But I guess he would just have to face the punishment at the next game.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    Dished out by one…Mike Komisarek….lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • GinOshawa

    @Charlie.. sorry but no one wants these guys… not to the point where they will go out of their way to steal them from the leafs..they are OK but they are not people who teams are waiting in line to take…if possible we may be able to trade these guys (white.. stajan..ect) as a package or as as a trade to reduce cap hit.. but lets be honest.. do you see teams saying “oh my god we can get white!” no.. they will take these guys only because it will reduce thier cap hit…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    @ GinO- Again not the point, no one is lining up but people have interest. To simply say “lets put them on waivers” is not doing your job. These guys can and will help teams, your point is completely off base with the one you stated, which I believe was “bye bye”, really have a hard time with your logic.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    @Ken_Breadbox re. Gustavsson:
    ~I have decided that since Joey MacDonald probably has to clear waiver to be sent to the Marlies and Gustvasson does not, that The Goose should start the year in the AHL dominating with the Marlies. Nothing like poor competition to raise a kids confidence.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ugg boots uk

    Your article is write very well, I like it very much ~
    nike sb dunks
    ghd Hair Straightener
    adidas shoes
    adidas shoes sale
    ghd Hair Straighteners
    ghd straighteners
    GHD
    hair straighteners
    bose in ear headphones
    bose on ear headphones
    bose in ear
    bose on ear
    bose headphones for sale
    buy bose headphones
    nike dunks
    I wish you have a wonderful day!Thank you.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)