The Matt Stajan Myth?

by on December 5, 2009 in Uncategorized - 96 Comments

Share

As Phil Kessel makes his return to Boston, I can’t help but wonder why some people are still asking who the Leafs should get to play with him.

Phil Kessel has been playing with Matt Stajan for most of his time in Toronto. Phil Kessel has 10 goals in 15 games with the Maple Leafs. Phil Kessel is also on a point-per-game pace for the first time in his career. I don’t see a problem here.

Matt Stajan isn’t the greatest playmaker in the world by any means, but he knows enough to get Kessel the puck:

Sure, Stajan is prone to a bad giveaway here and there, and passes up on great scoring chances when he should shoot, but at least he is creating offence.

He’s good at making those short, 3-foot passes on breakouts or in the neutral zone, that lead to scoring chances on the other end:

Sure they are just simple little plays, but they are the right plays. They utilize Kessel’s speed. I’d much rather have Kessel playing with Stajan than a guy like John Mitchell, who would always seem to hang on to the puck too long.

Stajan has assisted on 40% of Kessel’s goals. Sure, it’s not as high as the 54% in the overblown Marc Savard myth, but decent nonetheless. Add in new linemate Alexei Ponikarovsky, and 70% of Kessel’s goals have been assisted by Stajan or Ponikarovsky.

Point is, Kessel is the straw that stirs the drink here. He doesn’t need Marc Savard. He’s doing just fine playing with a pass-first centreman and a big winger on the opposite side.

As Kessel’s become more comfortable, he’s learned how to utilize his teammates and their tendencies. They move the puck well as a 5-man unit and create space for Kessel that way.

By the way, Marc Savard is under a point-per-game pace for the first time in 6 seasons. Enjoy the game.

Follow me on twitter: @SantosDan

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • honesthockey

    Pray! Pray big time.

    It isn’t even patience. I’d have patience with this team if it had the young guys in there but this………

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    @Wook
    Stajan and Moore had very comparable statistical years in 2008-2009. Similar faceoff percentage, similar +/-, Stajan had better shooting percentage. One big difference is that Stajan has been improving every year with consistency. Moore had and has had his one moment in the sun and that is it. The numbers don’t lie. Both players being in the same contractual status as far as time is concerned. Injuries to players on teams in playoff races or teams that feel their time is now or never will be more than willing to part with a first IF the partner is right.
    PS: Moore is 29, Stajan is 25…..big difference.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Again looshV
    Opportunity!!! Moore’s first and only shot at any offensive opportunity he succeeded somewhat. And he didn’t do it with the teams top players. He did it with Blake. Huge difference.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BlueBuds
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    @honesthockey
    I hate to rain on your parade but Jason Blake was our TOP player last year, even after Dom Moore was gone. Take a look at his monthly stats and you will see he continued his pace even in Moore’s absence.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    @looshV
    Blake produced 39 of his 63 points with Moore on the ice. The next closest player was Stempniak with Blake producing 17. In the 63 games that Moore was on the team Blake produced 50 points or at a .794 pace. In the 19 remaining games he produced at a .684 pace. I would suggest further studt=y would show his production even higher with Moore on the ice. Moore and Blake worked. BTW with Blake the season previous, Stajan 33 points and a minus 11.

    Antropov and Ponikarovsky had played the previous 2 seasons with Sundin forming the top line. Why would they be considered less than line 1 except for the fact that they got saddled with Stajan.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    @BlueBuds
    Sorry if the scope of this conversation went way over your head.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    Yes Blake’s production was higher by a .11 points per game…..1.1 points every ten games. Over 19 games that’s 2 extra points. That’s not a big difference. And your reference to Stajan’s stats of the year prior lend to the proof that he has only improved every year despite his ever changing line mates. A teams first line is really defined by how many shifts per game and average ice time per game. Blake and Moore both had more than Antro and Poni. In Dom’s case only slightly more than Antro but still more.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    In any event although I would fully expect to get a second rounder for Stajan, i think the possibility does exist for a first from a competitive team; largely due to his age. He is still young.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Pazuzu

    With the young centers given time to develope with the Marlies(Bozak), and Kadri probably given a season AT MOST with the Marlies next year, Stajan is all but gone. The question for me is, do you trade him for the best pick you can get ,or, do you package him with Kaberle and get a first line forward? And how does Blake fit in? IMHO, Blake is kind of a gorilla on the Leafs back when looking forward in the rebuild/retool. RE:TOOl=JFJ.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    Blake is a huge gorilla and I have stated on many occasions that I think this is where Burke’s biggest challenge lies.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • SteveV

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a series of videos which tries to make something out of nothing. If anything, other than the first one, you’ve merely highlighted that Kessel has been a one man show.

    The little things? Every player in the NHL can do “little things”, so let us not elevate it to first line ability.

    Why don’t you show all the passes that Kessel has made, in glorious scoring position, that his linemates have missed. He would have a ton of assists already if Stajan had any finish whatsoever.

    Has Stajan played okay? Of course. Does that mean we have to try to argue that he’s a good fit for Kessel in the grand scheme. Give your head a shake :)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://leafsforlife.proboards.com/index.cgi Amoroq

    I have to admit that I’m impressed with the civility everyone is displaying in a Mat Stajan blog.

    It warms the cockles of my heart.
    :)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BlueBuds

    @ honesthockey:
    Thats you reply? Figures.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    @BlueBuds
    Not much else to say when replying to someone who hasn’t read a word of what was said before he replies. Next time read.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://leafsforlife.proboards.com/index.cgi Amoroq

    Perhaps I spoke too soon?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Perhaps you shouldn’t speak at all.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://leafsforlife.proboards.com/index.cgi Amoroq
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    @BlueBuds: Your post Dec. 6, 1:33pm, was excellent advice to those of us who would like to see and support the up and coming youth, on the Marlies. I will continue go when I can.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • topbootsmart

    We guarantee we provide the cheapest ghd, ghd Hair Straighteners,ghd straighteners, ghd hair tools in the market and 100% Quality Guarantee.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ms office 2007