Get F’ed With Ed Reminder – E-Mail us Today!

by on December 13, 2009 in Uncategorized - 14 Comments

Share

This is a reminder to all readers interested in winning Leafs tickets in the MLHS Giveaway Contest.  We’ve played 3 contest games so far (with a whopping 14 more to go) and have over 200 active players!

However, if you want to be eligible for the big prize you need to quickly e-mail [email protected] as the deadline is the end of today (Sunday) for your submission!

All we need is a VERY short blurb with some important information:

-Your name

-Display name with which you post on MLHS

-Age (must be 19 or older)

-Location (so we know you can get to the game)

-A FEW words on why you’d like to win these tickets

The main purpose of this is so we have your information.  Name and age are very important as we can’t be handing these tickets out to minors.  It also provides us with an e-mail to contact you with in the situation that you do win!

We have over 200 readers who have made predictions for this very fun contest.  Only 50 are currently eligible as they’ve e-mailed us.

Just fire off that quick e-mail by 11:59 PM tonight to [email protected].  If we don’t receive anything from you by that point, we will assume you just want to play for fun and are not interested in the tickets.  This is more than encouraged as it will be a fun month-long competition.  However, if you are not eligible to win the prize, we won’t be tracking your point totals for you and you won’t be displayed in the contest standings.  No exceptions.

Keep it under 100 words.  It’ll take no more than a minute and give you a legitimate chance to win some Leafs tickets (at this point, even people with 0 points are still in it).

The prediction thread for tomorrow night’s game against the Senators will be up tomorrow morning.

Cheers,

Nik

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Schenn

    Only thing I don’t like about this contest, is since it has started we haven’t had a Pre-game blog on any games!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nikhil Daljeet

    Haha I agree, it’s usually not my exclusive domain but after today the contest will be rolling out of its “initial stage” and I’ll be able to cut down on the extra info and include a pre-game with the posts itself.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nights

    @ Nikhil Daljeet:

    I’ve done some work (to the request of a poster) on what the standings would look like if the 1st 8 games for EVERY team didn’t count (or how well are the leafs doing compared to the rest of the league from the 9th game on).

    The most of the information is in the WSH/TOR post game thread near the end of the 13th page (near the 630 comment mark). I thought it would be nice to point that information out to you, and perhaps to see if it’s worth a topic due to the fact that the information is mis-placed for optimal distribution of the information to the readers.

    It shows that the leafs would be the most improved (standings wise) since in both : The whole league (T-28th > T-15th), and conference wise (+8. Minny is +6 in the west).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Keil

    Yes Write it up, would love to see that info

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nights

    @ Keil:

    In case you haven’t remarked, it’s already a topic with the name “Playing late of late (Minus the Eight)”. Alex was kind enough to give it it’s own topic, and there’s already a lot of discussion going on in there. Look it up!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kenneth

    Leafs
    4-2
    Hagman

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Chris Wa

    @ Nikhil Daljeet:

    just confirming that an email was received for my eligiblity.

    Thanks

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptainNB

    Leafs
    5-3
    Blake

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nikhil Daljeet

    @Chris Wa

    I do not believe we’ve received anything from you. What e-mail did you send it with?

    @Kenneth/CaptainNB

    There’ll be an official prediction thread up shortly

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • zoonpolitikon

    1) Leafs
    2) 3-2
    3) Alfredsson (fuck)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Chris Wa

    @ Nikhil Daljeet:
    I can resend the exact email if you would like?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • office
  • ms office 2007