Q & A: MLHS Chats with Psycho Lady Hockey

by on January 1, 2010 in Uncategorized - 53 Comments

Share

Recently, I had the opportunity to chat with Katrina Cady of Psycho Lady Hockey about an aspect of the game which receives less recognition than perhaps deserved: the fan experience.

Katrina was gracious enough to agree to share her thoughts with the readers of MLHS on a variety topics, including the culture of hockey in traditional and non-traditional markets, the impact of social media in terms of coverage and fan involvement, and of course, your Toronto Maple Leafs.

GB: Thank you for taking the time to chat today.

KC: No problem! I am always thrilled to talk hockey!

GB: Let’s start off with a quick introduction, for readers of MLHS who may be unfamiliar with your site. Who is Psycho Lady?

KC: Psycho Lady is essentially my alter ego. She is a hockey addict who travels around the hockey world getting into all sorts of strange situations. I think we all have a different side to our personality when it comes to sports and supporting our team, my “side” just happens to have her own website.

GB: Part of what makes your site unique is the way you approach writing about the games you attend. Would it be fair to say that your focus is on sharing the fan experience with your readers?

KC: I wouldn’t say that my goal is to share the fan experience … I really only aim to share my own. I purposely don’t include game recaps because there are a thousand other websites out there that offer that information. Truthfully, I’d rather enjoy the game than take notes about what I’m going to say about it later. And, of course, when I’m not on the road I try to stick to hockey culture, although the business side does come out from time to time.

GB: My own perspective has always been that the final outcome is only a part of the experience as a whole, and there is much more to the game than the boxscore itself. Have you found, in your experience meeting fans of all walks, that at times there can at times be too much emphasis placed on wins and losses, and the larger experience itself – that which creates the passion for the game in the first place – can be easily overlooked?

KC: Growing up in Canada, I think it’s hard to be untouched by the culture surrounding the game. Living in Toronto I find that the personal lives of the Maple Leafs are sometimes front page news in even the most mainstream newspapers. I think it’s this culture that creates the passion for the game, and sometimes I think we aren’t even consciously aware of it.

GB: Have you found this to be the case in the non-traditional hockey markets you have visited?

KC: In untraditional markets, places where hockey isn’t lurking around every corner, there is a lot more emphasis on the boxscore. It is kind of unfortunate that, in these markets, the fans will abandon their team as soon as they hit a rough spot. Then you look at places like Toronto. Those fans will continue to form the strongest community in the league even if they never win another Cup. I don’t know a single person in this town that wouldn’t jump at the chance to catch a Leafs game, and that includes Habs and Sens fans living in T.O. Here hockey means something more than wins, and losses.

GB: It certainly does, although I have often found it difficult to put what exactly it means into words, beyond simple “a love for the game”. It seems almost a transient sort of thing, something intangible and thus difficult to explain to the casual observer.

KC: One of my theories is that in less traditional markets, fans tend to be more player-centric, and in places like Toronto they are more team–centric. It’s that whole name on the front of the jersey versus the name on the back thing. When a fan base is player-centric, they can easily fall in and out of love with the whole team when a certain player gets traded or struggles. In a team-centric environment it seems that the logo symbolizes not just the present-day roster, but rather it embodies decades of history, and a hopeful future.

GB: Speaking of which, I’d be remiss if I didn’t ask for your thoughts on the current state of Toronto Maple Leafs. Here in Toronto, the team is rebuilding and an unfortunate part of the rebuilding process is the fanbase having to suffer through multiple losing seasons. What advice would you give fans of a struggling team, as their frustration naturally begins to mount?

KC: I don’t think Toronto fans need any advice in this category. They have formed a united front throughout their historical horrible periods. If I had advice for these fans, it would be to remind them that the players are aware of their support, and that their efforts as a fan go a long way in their club’s future prosperity. And, hey, if it makes you feel better, you could have a good sports betting thing going by putting money on the visiting team! [Laughs] All kidding aside, however, there is still nothing more satisfying than watching your team rise from the ashes.

GB: For me, the fan experience is all about believing in the team, and cheering them on because they are representive of not only the city, but the fans themselves. Supporting them through the dark days will make the good days all the more enjoyable, and that much more meaningful to those who were unwavering in their passion.

KC: Absolutely! It will be truly rewarding for those who have stuck by the team, when they are competitive once more. And they are closer than people realize.

GB: Let’s switch gears, for a moment, to a topic that garnered much attention this past year. The use of social apps such as Twitter and Facebook skyrocketed in 2009, giving fans, media, and players a voice, and a sense of community, unlike ever before. While many would argue that such connectivity between fans, media, and the league is a good thing, there do exist concerns over misinformation, misrepresentation, and the relative anonymity at the core of the technology. As a writer who uses social media quite regularly, where do you come out on that?

KC: In terms of news, I still only trust major sources like TSN.ca or NHL.com. So, I tend to take everything else with a grain of salt. My major issue with social media is with the players’ use of it. Some NHLers out there do a great job, while others seem to need a serious lesson in not trying to rub the noses of their fans , who have done nothing but support them through the scoreless streaks, and the numerous trades. Some player tweets I’ve seen have really offended me, even though I personally don’t follow any athletes or celebrities.

GB: Along similar lines, there has been some debate over the role of bloggers versus the traditional mainstream media. Many members of the media have embraced bloggers for their contributions (the “you’d be amazed what the average person knows” perspective) while others have been more hesitant in their approach to the rise and impacts of social media. What are your feelings about this debate, and do you believe there will be a place for both as social media technologies continue to develop?

KC: Bloggers that offer the same information in the same tone as the mainstream media will probably struggle. As I mentioned earlier, if I want that kind of information I’ll go to a major source before I go to a blog. That being said, blogs aren’t going anywhere. If anything, mainstream newspapers and magazines will likely be a thing of the past before blogs are. As a blogger, if you can bring something new to the table, beyond repeating the same stories found in the mainstream, you will succeed.

GB: The Barilkosphere certainly does have its variety, from humour blogs to game analysis to fan perspective, and just about everything in between.

KC: And that is exactly why those blogs have become so popular! They each offer something different for the fanbase to enjoy.

GB: Thank you again, Katrina, for taking the time to share your thoughts on these topics as they pertain to the unique and always fascinating culture surrounding the game of hockey. Before we close this out, I have to ask: where can we expect to see Psycho Lady turn up next in her travels?

KC: You’re in luck because I haven’t been keeping my next trip Top Secret like I normally do. I am heading to the Windy City for my first game ever at United Center. Catch me if you can!

You can read all about Psycho Lady’s latest adventures at PsychoLadyHockey.com
You can also follow her on Twitter: twitter.com/psychopucklady

[Author's note: I thought I'd do a little something different than the usual Q&A interviews with the media or with hockey personalities, and instead focus on the personalities behind some of the more interesting hockey fan sites. If you enjoyed this sort of interview, and perspective, let me know and I will seek out more opportunities to do this type of Q & A in the future.]

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Jordan

    @ danvertising:
    Poni = 2nd rounder + if traded
    Stemp=2nd-3rd
    Toskala= something
    Stajan=2nd
    theres no doubting we will get that for these players. Moore got a 2nd, HAL FUCKING GILL got a 2nd and 5th lol, and if Burke decided to deal Hagman, he would be getting a 1st rounder. Its gonna be interesting to see, but I bet one of Hagman and Poni go, and the rest will go too. Burke told us we would see Bozak and Stalberg by the end of the year, and Im thinking thats what he ment. To me keeping Bozak down is good, because whenever he brought someone up they were used in a trade, like Tlusty, Stapleton, or Pogge

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://checkingfrombehind.com danvertising

    @ Jordan:
    I know Burke’s gotta do his thing. I hope to God he has something up his sleeve to get some young talent into this organization.

    We’ve already been set back years because of the lack of 1st round picks in the 2003 and 2007 drafts. I really don’t want that to continue without picks in the 2010 and 2011 drafts.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Those teams did get lucky, because you can look at teams like ST Louis, who havnt had much success yet other then HOPING Pietrangelo
    2009 – David Rundblad
    2008- Pietrangelo
    2007 – Lars Eller, Ian Cole, Dave Perron (ALL 1st rounders)
    2006 – Erik Johnson, Burglund (pretty good but not huge diff. makers)
    2005- TJ Oshie
    2004 – Marek Schwarz
    2003- Shawn Belle
    Not saying these are all bad players, but none of them are gonna win you a cup really. Might be too early to tell but it looks like they just wasted a good 7-8 years and didnt draft any top level talent

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kostas

    @Jordan

    I agree. U need some luck when drafting players that’s why you can’t put all your eggs in one basket. ANd like I said… Drafting Crosby, Malkin, OV is a no brainer… everybody would have gone for them if they were in the position to draft those players. Chicago gets full marks from me for drafting great players. Look at teams like Atlanta, St. Louis… they’ve been drafting for how long now and look at where they are.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    Pits
    MAF = 1st over all
    Crosby = 1st over all
    Malkin = 2nd over all (behind Ovie)
    Staal = 2nd over all

    Wash
    Ovechkin = 1st over all
    Bakstrom = 4th over all

    Chicago
    Toews = 3rd over all
    Kane = 1st over all

    the only players you mentioned that were the result of Good drafting were Keith, Seabrook and Green
    the rest are the result of being absolutely terrible at the right time to scoop franchise caliber players.
    Chicago also benifited from Pits taking Staal over Toews, they wouldnt be near as good if that was reversed.
    Drafting in the bottom 4 in terribly stacked drafts is not a good model for building a team, because it doesnt always happen like that, in fact it almost never happens

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafs_17

    could throw Alexander Semin on that list too where ever u feel fit

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Neverlosehope

    danvertising wrote:

    @ Kostas:
    Where do you propose we get these great players to put with Kessel since we have no draft picks?

    I suggest trading Kessel for two seconds and a first… LOL. And if the picks don’t turn out, no problem. We embrace mediocrity like nobody else.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Lets just hope that San Jose gets booted out of the playoffs again and Marleeau doesnt resign. Kovalchuk and Marleau are the last 2 big names really, and with Kovalchuk theres not much of a chance so Marleau is our last hope lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jonez

    Jordan, either you have some sort of learning disorder, or you don’t understand that sometimes, picks are taken way off the board.

    Let me break this down for you for the third time RE: Paradis. Your argument is so stupid. He was ranked way lower than he was taken. He was the (someone correct me if I’m wrong) 44th North American skater. Nevermind the Europeans. Then your argument that nobody is taken that high without some sort of potential – need I remind you (again) that guys like Wade Belak, Boyd Devereaux, Wayne Primeau etc. were all taken in the first round? Do they have potential as well. The kid can’t even play at a PPG pace in the QMJHL, which is a joke in itself.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Neverlosehope

    Jordan wrote:
    “We now have 4 solid first rounders in Kadri, Schenn, Kessel, and Paradis (say what you want, but hes gonna be good. Nobody is ranked high in a draft that doesnt have potential).”

    We now have one decent first rounder and three players who all have potential (remember Daigle?) and yet may amount to nothing more than stellar AHLers.

    Anyone notice how invisible Kadri looked the other night against the Americans. D’Amigo looked better. Kristo? looked great. A steal by the Smurfettes in the 2nd round.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ Jonez:
    I AM stupid, so yes I guess your right. Anyone who is ranked 44th in North America at the age of 18 isnt good. Because being ranked 44th means you suck right. I mean, people on this site ARNT? happy with Kulemin, because he sucks right?…..because he was drafted outside of the 1st round (44th to be exact)…..oh and that stupid Stalberg guy, hes a bum, he was taken in the 6th round. Yup for sure hes a loser. Lets trade him. Whats with this Bozak fag too? Not even drafted or ranked in his draft year….k lets cut him, what a bum. Lets hope Gunnersson doesnt come back either, because he was drafted 194th overall. Oh and that Ryan O’reilly piece of shit sure sucks balls. Ranked 39th in North America last draft. HE WILL NEVER MAKE IT TO THE NHL!!!!…..ohh wait….crap I was wrong.
    So to be blunt your right, Im an idiot. ;)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Oh and he wasnt ranked that low the whole year by everyone:
    http://www.thefourthperiod.com/draft/midseasonranks09.html

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    http://www.nhl.com/ice/draftprospectdetail.htm?dpid=5537
    26th is pretty far from 44th I think too, but what do I know, Im just a big dumb stupid idiot…..oh and I have a learning disorder too!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://mapleleafshotstove.com Garrett Bauman

    The key is good drafting regardless of draft position. Just ask Detroit and New Jersey.

    For every Crosby, there is a Daigle. In his draft year, NOBODY suggested he would be any less than a star. There was not a single prediction, from anyone, that he would go bust.

    Similarly, in the 80s the Leafs wound up with high picks through most of the decade. Aside from Wendel Clark, who got drafted? Scott Pearson? People love to point to trading the pick that became Neidermayer, but seriously, you can’t assume the Leafs would have drafted him anyway (given their track record at that point, it’s a safer bet to say they wouldn’t have).

    The point is, draft position is only as good as the people in charge of making the selections. And even then, it’s still somewhat hit-and-miss. Sure, Washington, Pittsburgh and Chicago got some sure things. But what has Washington won, and can they build a winner when they are relatively tight to the cap? Chicago’s cap situation presents an even worse problem. Pittsburgh is, to date, the only team for whom that strategy has led to a championship.

    In the meantime, Detroit was the team of the decade based on good drafting, great development, and the managerial acumen to keep their core players in the fold. New Jersey, same story. Even Anaheim built a cup winner without top ten picks, namely through smart trades and FA signings. Buffalo has been competitive for a number of years without any top picks.

    And what of all those early 1sts San Jose used to accumulate? Any of those still on the roster? Marleau is the only one – drafted #2 overall in 1997 – and it took him over a decade to become the impact player that he is now. Smart trades, smart signings, and even smarter re-signings have been the key for that team to remain near the top of the league each season.

    There is more than one way to build a team that can be competitive, and be a winner. #1 picks are the sexy trend among fans right now, but again, the fact remains that only one Cup winner over the past decade has been built that way. High drafting is not the be all and end all … smart drafting and effective player development are the keys to the Cup.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • office
  • ms office 2007
  • http://www.lortababuse.com lortab abuse
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)