Victim of Expectations

by on February 5, 2010 in Uncategorized - 402 Comments

Share

(Be sure to check out Bauman’s pre-game article to get yourself ready for tonight’s match-up!)

Dion Phaneuf, as of right now, is not a Norris trophy candidate.

Phaneuf took the National Hockey League by storm in his rookie season, producing 20 goals as a 20-year-old defenseman. He then had a successful sophomore campaign, breaking the 50-point barrier. In his third year, he had a 10-point increase and produced 60 points, gaining him consideration for the Norris trophy at only 22 years old.

Since then, however, Phaneuf has regressed. If his on-pace numbers are realized, this will be his worst season in terms of points, although he will pass his career-low 11 goals of last season.

While those type of numbers would warrant a top-two spot on almost any defense corps in the league, it’s a little different in Phaneuf’s case.

For one, he has a cap-hit of $6.5 million through the 2013-14 season. Phaneuf’s cap hit makes him the seventh highest-paid defenseman in the NHL, joining a group of Nicklas Lidstrom, Zdeno Chara, Scott Neidermeyer, Brian Campbell, Jay Bouwmeester and Dan Boyle. So you know what kind of player the Calgary Flames were expecting. They wanted a Norris Trophy winner. Didn’t happen, and Phaneuf’s drop-off—not only offensively, but defensively— caused a backlash.

In a Calgary Sun article posted yesterday, Olli Jokinen said Phaneuf was not a cancer in the dressing room, despite certain rumours, and that the reason general manager Darryl Sutter traded him was because he was not accepted by the Calgary fans.

And why do you think that is?

Well, posting a 60-point season, getting nominated for the Norris trophy and then receiving a mammoth raise, only to struggle for the next 18 months, might do it.

But as a 24-year-old defenseman, is Phaneuf’s potential as a future Norris Trophy winner really in jeopardy?

As Gus pointed out in his article of Phaneuf’s regression in context, the rearguard played through a number of injuries while logging considerable ice-time in the 2008-09 season. Then, the addition of Bouwmeester to the Flames’ blueline cut Phaneuf’s ice-time by just over three minutes per game this season.

Also, consider that Phaneuf averaged 5:34 powerplay time-on-ice per game in 2008-09. This season, he averaged 3:46 per game with the Flames. That sort of ice-time would compare him with the likes of Micheal Del Zotto (3:53), Marek Zidlicky (3:48), Alex Goligoski (3:46), Scott Neidermeyer (3:42) and Kyle Quincey (3:41). Aside from Neidermeyer, who is 36 years old, that is not a group of elite offensive defensemen. Still, Phaneuf is ranked 7th in the NHL for PP goals in defensemen. With the Leafs, he will now log considerable ice-time with Tomas Kaberle on the PP for the remaining 25 games. Also, if Kaberle is shipped this summer, expect Phaneuf to be the Leafs’ go-to guy on the blueline.

But the point of all this is not to convince you that Phaneuf will one day win the Norris trophy with the Leafs. In fact, it’s that sort of thinking that could lead to his demise in Toronto.

While there are various reasons that could have led to Phaneuf’s downfall in Calgary, the criticism he received from Flames fans for not performing at an elite level surely did not help. Did they have reason? Sure, especially considering his salary.

But, it’s an entirely new chapter for Phaneuf in Toronto. A fresh start. A clean slate. Whatever the hell you want to say.

The point is that Leafs fans cannot regard Phaneuf as one of the league’s best defenseman. Not yet. This fan base is notorious for unrealistic expectations from their players, and it often leads to disappointment because any mistake that player makes is magnified, when it really needs to be put in context. The last thing we need is another defenseman who’s gripping the stick a little too tight and not playing his game.

If you think about it, Phaneuf, like the Leafs, is taking baby steps towards regaining his form. It would be detrimental to this team’s long-term vitality to expect instant results from a player who is 24 years old.

In time, those expectations will be warranted, but for now, patience is our best friend.

You stay classy, MLHS.

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Blue Max

    Complete lack of dominant forwards will do this to you. Though they (our guys) capitalized when they could, the Devils spent most of their time in our own end. That’s no way to maintain a lead. Hopefully it’s an issue that would be addressed soon.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    For 57 mins the Leafs played a great road game. With the second youngest team in the NHL. Last night was still a great game for this organization and a way better dislay than anything we have witnessed most of this season. Yep the game was lost. I don’t give a shit. I can see with me own eyes a way better product with a way better future.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    I saw some nice plays by the D in the dying minutes of the game. You are gonna have to weather a storm no matter what when defending a lead and part of the weathering is strong goal tending.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blue Max
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blue Max

    TuckerThomas wrote:

    I saw some nice plays by the D in the dying minutes of the game. You are gonna have to weather a storm no matter what when defending a lead and part of the weathering is strong goal tending.

    .
    Our defense is coming together nicely, but there’s only two of them on the ice at a time.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    It’s fine and dandy to support our players and understand they are gonna have bad nights, cause they are. But if we as fans become complacent, as many seem to be (cause many get offended by the criticism of our players) then what’s the point of a site like this? We need to speak the truth about our players performances. Gus blew it last knight and that’s why we lost. He knows it and that’s what’s important. I like his attitude. Way better than Vesa’s.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    I would say that 95% of our problems with this team have revolved around goal tending. That’s not a stretch either. It seems like our netminders are losing games for us. Sure we’ve made some bad mistakes as well but when every single mistake ends up in the net then that’s a goal tending problem. We all keep talking about our needs up front but it seems like we play a strong O most nights no matter who’s in the line up. But jeepers creepers we need to be able to stop some pucks. Thankfully JSG will show how it’s done again tonight.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    RED WINGS TRADE LEINO TO FLYERS FOR TOLLEFSEN http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=309159

    not a big deal I have never seen either play, Leino was pretty highly touted, but he’s 26 and apparently not playing well at all.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ TuckerThomas:

    Yea, that’s true. Wilson’s strength in Toronto so far has been getting the most out of his lacklustre forward crew. That said, I think Toronto fans also forget, that even the Richards, Carters, Getzlafs, and so forth, of the NHL, they all went through a learning curve. None of them just walked in and were stars. Yet we expect that if our players can’t become stars immediately, we should trade them, in packages, for established stars.

    In my opinion, Burke will trade Kaberle in the summer for a young forward (ie. Bobby Ryan), and package our 2nd next year, and the rights to prospects like Hayes and/or Stefanovich, for an upgrade at center ice. He says as much in his interview posted on TSN.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    Oh, I meant to include Grabovski in that package, as he would be the guy we are “upgrading”.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ honesthockey:

    I’d still prefer someone better than Grabovski headlining our team – or at least someone more likeable. What do you think of this trade, in summer, if the Sharks have cap issues:

    To San Jose: Peter Mueller, 2nd in 2011 (TOR), rights to Jimmy Hayes
    To Phoenix: Mikhail Grabovski
    To Toronto: Joe Pavelski

    Dreger says the Yotes want a young roster forward for Mueller. Grabovski would fit right in with their other Euro talent (Hanzal, Boedker, Tikhonov, Michalek, Lang, Prucha, Vrbata, etc…). Keeping Mueller into the summer could force the Yotes to match an offer sheet that would probably be the maximum compensation for a 2nd rounder. That would be extremely pricey for a player that has underperformed and isn’t happy. The Sharks on the other hand, take the rights to Mueller, and presumably, are able to resign him much cheaper than Pavelski (say 1.25 vs. ~4 million dollars), while also starting to replenish some of the picks and prospects they’ve lost over the last couple years. Toronto gets the best, but most expensive, player.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    Can Mueller play wing? If so, and Pavelski is unavailable, what do you think about a straight up Grabo for Mueller swap?

    I like Grabo quite a lot, but unless he learns how to play wing, my guess is that he would be the odd center out going into next season from BB’s point of view.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    He can play wing fine. He was drafted as a winger. I don’t know why they don’t have him there. In that interview on TSN, he practically spelled out that he’s trading Grabovski.

    Paraphrased: “we’re going to want to move Bozak down to the 2nd center position, and look for an upgrade at first line center.” And then, when asked about who he would go after, perhaps a big body like Getzlaf or Staal, he said that size wasn’t as important to him as character. He could be talking about Mueller, who isn’t exactly a tank, but if we can get Mueller for Grabovski (which I think we can, given the circumstances), then I would want to look to upgrade that even.

    Maybe we try and do a Grabovski/Mueller swap at the deadline, hope he raises his value in the last 20 games alongside Kessel, and then either earns himself a new contract, or becomes valuable enough to package for a better center (ie. Pavelski).

    That’s actually probably more likely, since Grabovski’s value would be greater at the deadline, when he could actually help with a playoff run. He would be an upgrade over Mueller in the short term. Stranger things have happened (ie. Upshall + 2nd for Carcillo).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Darkjester

    this is from Dregers Twitter

    Interest picking up in Ponikarovsky…as many as 10 teams inquiring. Likely March 3rd trade. At least 2nd rounder in return.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    @Cameron
    Not sure what you mean more likeable. As a player or as a person who I’m sure you don’t well enough to make that call.

    There is a different atmosphere on this team right now. Schenn mentioned the better dressing room. Watch what happens with Grabovski’s game now before we make any hasty decisions. My bet is we see an even better Grabovski.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie Sucks
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blue Max
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • office
  • ms office 2007