Retain One, Or Trade Both?

by on March 2, 2010 in Uncategorized - 108 Comments

Share

With the National Hockey League’s trade deadline looming, names like Alexei Ponikarovsky and Lee Stempniak are becoming increasingly popular in the Toronto Maple Leafs brass.

Fans of the Blue & White have been playing armchair general manager and have formulated a number of trades since the Olympic break. But amidst the excitement of the yearly spectacle, I’m beginning to wonder if it’s in the Leafs’ best interest to trade both Ponikarovsky and Stempniak.

After all, were they not serviceable players for the Leafs?

Take a look at Ponikarovsky’s statistics:

  • - 19 goals (3rd on the Leafs)
  • - 41 points (3rd)
  • - +5 rating (1st)
  • - 114 hits (2nd on team, 1st among forwards)

Now Stempniak’s:

  • - 14 goals (5th)
  • - 29 points (6th)
  • - 5 powerplay goals (3rd)
  • - 1:46 SH TOI/G (4th among forwards)

Ponikarovsky is 29 years old and is finding his niche as a 20-25 goal, 50-60 point player who can be a big-body presence. He has made considerable strides in his development since he played alongside former-Leaf Mats Sundin and has become the player Leafs fans were hoping for. And now we’re willing to send him off for a prospect and a second-round pick? Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t be complaining about that return, but if Ponikarovsky can be resigned for a reasonable price, would he not play an important role in the Leafs’ rebuild? He seems to fit Burke‘s mold quite well, if you ask me. And a second-round pick and a prospect is no sure thing, especially for a player who has just entered his prime.

Then there’s Stempniak. His potential 30-goal seasons are well behind him, and giving up Alexander Steen and Carlo Colaiacovo was a tough pill to swallow for a lot of fans. However, the 27-year-old can still produce anywhere from 40-50 points and is a decent penalty-killer (see here). He is just entering his prime and could probably be resigned for a reasonable price. And now rumours are circulating that he could be had for a third-round draft pick? I’m sorry, but if a third-round selection turned out to be a player of Stempniak’s ilk, I’d be a pretty happy fellow.

In fact, since the 2000 NHL Entry Draft, some of the most renowned names are: Dominic Moore, Mikael Tellqvist, Michael Rupp, Tomas Plekanec, Patrick Sharp, Matthew Lombardi, Johan Franzen, Steve Mason and Cal Clutterbuck. Some great players, but that’s among a list of over a hundred selections. I’m not suggesting a third-round pick is not valuable, but considering Stempniak’s age and the role he plays on the team, what is the purpose of trading him?

Of course, acquiring more draft picks is also important for the Leafs, and because of that I understand the necessity of trading one of the aforementioned players. But, are fans perhaps getting a little carried away with the rebuild? It’s as if every player that has been on the Leafs since the lock-out needs to be sent away to expel old memories.

And if both Stempniak and Ponikarovsky are traded, the Leafs’ offence is looking extremely bare heading into next season. Phil Kessel, Mikhail Grabovski, Tyler Bozak, Viktor Stalberg and maybe even Nazem Kadri would be leading the charge. Yikes, talk about inexperience.

Although, to be fair, one cannot predict what Burke has in the fold. Even Nostradamus couldn’t have predicted the acquisition of Dion Phaneuf. And Burke has said he will be both a buyer and seller at the deadline, so perhaps he’s targeting a couple of players to add some depth upfront.

The trade deadline is in about 26 hours, folks. Hang in there.

You stay classy, MLHS.

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Johnfergusonjr

    He would only walk away from us if Burke doesn’t want him. Kaberle obviously wants to stay here.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.hockey5.com Hockey5.com

    Both players could play the suggested role and most fans I believe wouldn’t mind Poni and Stemp but doesn’t it really come down to money/assets?

    If you ask me, production/chemistry/roles can all be replaced… and two way contracts, entry level contracts, draft picks, prospects give you flexibility.

    Lets say they resign. Poni (3.5m), and Stemp (2m) That is 5.5 million cap space. Ok, great. Now what? When are the Leafs going to compete? I’d much rather turn them over for draft picks or prospects.

    You then let your other roster guys/youngsters grow into bigger roles. With opportunities given, the rest of the guys can surely fill at least 85% of the production and even if you’re using youngsters with less experience the intangibles are not going to make a whole lot of difference to the Leafs for a few years anyway!? Right?

    So let them go, sit on/accumulate assets for the future and take your 5.5 million to Free agency for an IMPACT player, on a long term deal.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • derek

    @ Hockey5.com:
    i agree…get the pic’s and prospects and if they want to come back at a reasonable price, resign them in july. they both are useful in their own way, but get what you can now.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djglenn

    @ derek:
    KABS IS CHANGING HIS NAME…………..HE WILL NOW BE KNOWN AS
    THOMAS MATTS SUNDIN KABERLE………….PLEASE DO NOT TRADE ME LET ME WALK AWAY FROM YOUR TEAM SO I CAN SREW YOU ALL……………..TRADE HIM BURKIE TRADE HIM TO A SMALL LITTLE RUSSIAN TOWN THAT HAS A GOOD PROSPECT PLAYIN THERE…………..WE ARE GONNA BE MISSING OUT ON A BIG STEAL RIGHT NOW FOR WHAT A LATE FIRST ROUNDER………….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • derek

    SO LETS TAKE A POLL….SINCE NOTHING ELSE IS GOING ON….does burke trade kabs in the summer or sign him….i say trade so….

    trade 1, sign 0

    lets see what the score will be…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Pingback: Blender 3D Videos: 2.50 Alpha 1 Python Part 2 | Python WebDev Insider

  • ms office 2007