Fun With Numbers: Ranking Kessel’s Production

by on March 22, 2010 in Leafs News - 114 Comments

Share

About a month ago, we took a look at Phil Kessel’s production, including the on-pace numbers for this season and (theoretically) projected 82-game statistics.

With 10 games left to go in the season, perhaps it’s time we re-visit and update those predictions — this time in the context of other “name” or “impact” players to see just where exactly Phil Kessel ranks, production-wise, among the league’s elite.

As many of you know, I have remained a firm supporter of the trade for Phil Kessel that saw three future draft picks go to the Boston Bruins. Future unknowns for a 22 year old sniper whose top-line abilities at the NHL level (read: 35-40 goal scorer) are known? Sign me up. Of course, I do recognize that places me in the vast minority among bloggers and writers (for example, a blogger for The Hockey News boldly endorsed Hall and Seguin as future superstars the other day – I wonder if he’s willing to loan out his crystal ball?).

However, how many of you would have been on board with that trade if the return was Rick Nash? Or Patrick Kane? Or Eric Staal? I’m willing to bet quite a few based on comments made on this site over the past year.

Let’s keep that in mind as we take a look at the numbers, shall we?

Current Production
Player Cap GP G A Pts PPG PPA SOG
Kessel 5.40m (’14) 60 28 23 51 8 7 268
Ryan 1.90m (’10) 70 31 25 56 10 7 224
Staal 8.25m (’16) 60 23 35 58 12 10 234
Nash 7.80m (’18) 68 30 29 59 9 11 230
Carter 5.00m (’11) 72 33 27 60 11 10 310
Semin 6.00m (’11) 63 33 38 71 7 17 242
Parise 3.13m (’11) 70 33 37 70 8 13 301
Kane 6.3m (’14) 71 27 53 80 9 17 231

On Pace Production
Player Cap GP G A Pts PPG PPA SOG
Kessel 5.40m (’14) 68 32 26 58 9 8 305
Ryan 1.90m (’10) 81 36 29 65 12 8 259
Staal 8.25m (’16) 68 26 40 66 14 11 267
Nash 7.80m (’18) 77 34 33 67 10 13 262
Carter 5.00m (’11) 82 38 31 69 13 11 353
Semin 6.00m (’11) 72 38 43 81 8 19 276
Parise 3.13m (’11) 81 38 43 81 9 15 348
Kane 6.3m (’14) 82 31 61 92 10 20 267

Projected Full Season
Player Cap GP G A Pts PPG PPA SOG
Kessel 5.40m (’14) 82 38 31 69 11 10 366
Ryan 1.90m (’10) 82 36 29 65 12 8 262
Staal 8.25m (’16) 82 32 48 70 16 14 321
Nash 7.80m (’18) 82 36 35 71 11 13 276
Carter 5.00m (’11) 82 38 31 69 13 11 353
Semin 6.00m (’11) 82 43 49 92 9 22 315
Parise 3.13m (’11) 82 39 43 82 9 15 352
Kane 6.3m (’14) 82 31 61 92 10 20 267

Taking a look at the comparisons above, a couple conclusions can be drawn:

  • Phil Kessel is having a near-identical offensive season to Rick Nash, for $2.4m less of a cap hit.
  • Kessel’s projected 82-game season results in identical offense to Jeff Carter, another name Leafs fans have discussed ad nauseum the past two seasons.
  • Over 82 games, Kessel would be on pace to outscore such franchise players as Nash, Patrick Kane, and Eric Staal, all of whom play with more established linemates.  He would also be in the same goal-scoring neighbourhood as Zach Parise and Alexander Semin.  As his young linemates continue to develop, Kessel’s assist count should rise to levels consistent with the aforementioned players.
  • Alexander Semin and Zach Parise are studs … and their contracts are up after 2010-11 … just sayin’.

The long of the short of it is, the Leafs got themselves one heck of a good player in Phil Kessel. Whether or not the trade ends up being lopsided is a matter for debate three to four years from now. How the draft picks sent for Kessel turn out is anyone’s guess at this point, although it is worth mentioning that scouting projections have yet to place either in the “superstar” category.

Meanwhile, Kessel’s production has come at a rate which places him — statistically speaking (as in, factually-speaking) — among the league’s best-known “franchise” scoring forwards, in the category just below that of true superstars such as Ovechkin and Crosby.

That’s a good thing, folks.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Cameron

    @ borjefan4ever:

    he won’t move komisarek. beauchemin will go before komisarek does. phaneuf and komisarek will bury the hatchet just fine. it’s not like komisarek is no where to be found right now. i’m sure he’s been in the dressing room a number of times. he’s not recovering from injury in mexico or anything. honestly, if they can’t get over having the same girlfriend, they need to grow up.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://checkingfrombehind.com danvertising

    I’d rather keep Benn and Dallas’ first round pick than flip them for Ryan.

    Also, can we stop talking about trading Schenn. Seriously, he’s been one of our best defenders

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djstml

    yeah i think schenn is as tradeable as kessel right now, NOT GUNA HAPPEN. Anyone catch the red wings, penguin game?? I think there might just be a round 3 this year…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • borjefan4ever

    @ Cameron:

    I don’t believe the Komisarek should be moved because of some issue with Phaneuf and rights to some particular female or similar. Rather because of the roster spot and role he was brought in to occupy. Schenn can and is filling that role and then some. Komisarek’s CAP hit will be as intolerable as Finger’s currently is in a year.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Why does everybody seem to think there will be problems between Komisarek and Phaneuf??

    If Burke is able to sign a Top 6 foward (Kovalchuk, Marleau, Torres, Ponikarovsky) then I wouldn’t mind holding onto Kaberle to give the Leafs a great group defensemen.

    Kaberle – Komisarek
    Beauchemin – Phaneuf
    Gunnarsson – Schenn

    Then on foward:

    Kulemin – Bozak – Kessel
    Kadri – Grabovski – UFA
    Stalberg – Hanson – Sjostrom
    Caputi – Mitchell – Orr

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • thehumaneraser

    Darcy motherfucking Tucker coming home ! Lol in all seriousness I think Jordan tootoo would be a sweet signing kid is a horse!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    thehumaneraser wrote:

    Darcy motherfucking Tucker coming home ! Lol in all seriousness I think Jordan tootoo would be a sweet signing kid is a horse!

    Who said the Leafs should sign Tucker?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • thehumaneraser

    @ kaz so do you hate feedom or?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ thehumaneraser:

    Tootoo resigned in Nashville already.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • thehumaneraser

    @ schenn nobody said Tucker is signing here I just realized he was ufa and can’t help but have a soft spot for the guy.

    @ Cameron
    Fuck.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Angry Analyst

    Komisarek won’t and shouldn’t be moved. Burke just signed him to a 5 year deal and that would not only be a complete slap in the face to Komi, but it would also repel free agents. Who would sign here to get traded the second season of their contract (after being sidelined 80% of the first due to injury!)? Besides, Komisarek fits perfectly on the truculent and gritty team that Burke wants to build. If anyone’s moved it’s Beauchemin, he has one year left on his contract and would probably be fine with being moved to another team he likes (Maybe back to Anaheim? They’ll be a little thinner on the back end come next season if Niedermayer is moved or retires). Please guys, let’s not quit on Komi just yet. Look at Gustavsson! We’ve said he isn’t the answer at times and then we’ll nominate him for the Vezina after a spectacular outing(as stated by Ron Wilson)! Komi will come around and he’ll be that same rock solid physical presence he’s known to be. Think about how perfect it is: we’ll have Komi, Dion and Schenn on the blue line; an intimidating physical presence on each pairing.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • stz

    I agree that the kessel trade was worth the draft picks going back. However I don’t think you can justify it by comparing it to a projection comparison with Nash. I mean who are we kidding Nash is a way better overall player that can’t simply be proven by comparing stats on paper. Let’s remember that kessel is a one way player who’s job it is to score, which isn’t the case for Nash.

    Kessel should have more points than Nash that’s his role. Nash for the draft picks would have been a ridiculousy one sided trade. Good post though, good read

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://mapleleafshotstove.com Garrett Bauman

    @ stz:
    Sure, but that’s not the argument. No one will argue the two are the same on all levels — indeed, Nash brings a much more complete game to the table.

    Although in terms of “role” – Nash has just as big a scoring role on his team as Kessel – they are both top-line wingers, and as such are relied upon as the primary offensive weapons on their respective teams.

    But as I mentioned right at the top of the post, for this particular analysis I was looking at offensive production only. Statistics do not adequately measure other areas of the game (QUALCOMP and CORSI are overrated measures featuring too many x-factors), but in terms of offensive production alone – which as you mentioned was exactly the reason Kessel was acquired – I think the comparison is worthwhile.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)