The Drive For Five (non-playoff edition) *

* aka “Operation: Basement Breakout”

With last night’s loss, the Maple Leafs were mathematically eliminated from playoff contention for the 5th straight year. This was not really news – even the most optimistic of Leafs’ fans pretty much knew this to be the case since early into the New Year, if not sooner.

However, a more prevalent question regarding the season standings remains: is getting out of last place in the Eastern Conference still possible?

With five games remaining, the Maple Leafs sit in last place (15th) in the East with 69 points.  Even if the team were to win out the rest of the way, 79 points (a below .500 finish) is the best they can mathematically achieve this season.

Here’s where things get sticky.

Four teams remain within realistic reach (five mathematically, but the New York Rangers need only one point to be out of the Leafs’ reach and as such are not included in this analysis).  The Tampa Bay Lightning, New York Islanders, Florida Panthers and Carolina Hurricanes are each only 3 to 4 points ahead of the Leafs in the standings (Carolina has 73 points, the others 72).  That’s the good news.

The bad news is, each of those teams also has at least one game in hand of the Leafs (Florida has two).  Furthering the dilemma, some of those teams play each other over the course of the season’s final week and a half, which makes the prospect of catching up to a particular team that much more difficult.

In essence, Leafs’ fans will need to pin their hopes on one team to pretty much lose out the rest of the way. Oh, and they will need to find it within themselves to cheer for their divisional rivals, too … especially Ottawa and Montreal.

Having fun yet? Let’s take a closer look at the situation in chart form:

(Teams are listed in reverse order of current standings.)

TEAM Toronto Tampa Bay NY Islanders Florida Carolina
Points 69 72 72 72 73
Games
Left
5 6 6 7 6
Opposition Buf, Bos, NYR, @Phi, @Mtl @Pit, NYR, Car, Otw, Fla, @Fla Phi, Otw, Mtl, @Pit, @NJ, Pit @Buf, @Bos, NYR, Otw, NJ, @TB, TB @Mtl, @Otw, NJ, @TB, MTL, @Bos
Home
Games
3 4 4 4 2
Home
Record
17-16-5 19-12-6 20-14-3 15-13-9 20-16-3
Key Injuries Komisarek (D) Malone (W), Ohlund (D), Ranger (D), Smaby (D) DiPietro (G), Martinek (D), Schremp (F), Weight (F) Booth (F), Campbell (F) Gleason (D), Ruuttu (F)


So what can we conclude from this data? A few things:

  • The home-and-home matchup between Tampa Bay and Florida – two teams the Leafs are chasing – adds an interesting twist to the mix.  Worst-case scenario: they split those games.
  • Four points ahead of Toronto, with a game in hand, and their starting netminder (Ward) back in the lineup, the Carolina Hurricanes (who are now less-impacted by injury than the other teams within in Toronto’s reach) are arguably going to be the most difficult team for the Leafs to catch.
  • The New York Islanders may be the easiest to catch of all the teams the Leafs are chasing.  Their young players (Tavares, Bailey, Okposo, Moulson) have struggled to produce lately, and their schedule is anything but a walk in the park as they will face Pittsburgh twice, as well as Philadelphia and New Jersey.
  • Interestingly, Leafs’ fans will find themselves in the odd position of having to cheer for each of their division rivals in the ‘Race To Get Out Of Last Place’.  Each of the teams they are chasing will face at least one of their rivals at some point during their final 6 (or 7) games as all four are involved in games against the teams the Leafs are chasing.
  • On that note, here’s the really bad news: the Islanders, mentioned above as the team with arguably the best chance to stumble down the stretch, face both Ottawa and Montreal.  Florida and Tampa Bay also face off against Ottawa, and Carolina not only faces Ottawa, but also Montreal – twice.  Those in the counselling industry may be well-advised to start up a few Toronto-based support groups this week.
  • Of course, for there to be any hope whatsoever of the Leafs pulling out of last in the conference, they will need to win out themselves (putting them at 79 points), or at the very least win 4 of the last 5 (77 – 78 points).
  • Should the Leafs manage four wins (77 pts), opposition teams would need only win three games to put the Leafs out of reach. Even with an OT loss to get to 78 points, the Leafs would not have enough wins for a tiebreak under that scenario.
  • Winning out is going to be much more difficult to do, but certainly aids the task as opposition teams would have to win four games to remain ahead of the Leafs.

This final stretch, which I will dub the “Drive For Five: Non-Playoff Edition“, begins at the ACC on Thursday as the Sabres pay a visit. The Bruins and Flyers will follow, with the Leafs closing out their season (and hopefully clawing their way out of the basement) in New York and, finally, Montreal.

Should worse come to worse, and the Leafs find themselves in 15th after 82 games, there is always the (much slimmer) hope of the lottery being won by a team other than Edmonton (who have already secured last place overall) or Toronto, which would bump the Leafs out of the top two picks overall.

It could happen, although I must admit I like the odds of the Leafs winning out (or at the very least taking 4 of 5) much better than the odds of the lottery being won by a team finishing 28th or better.  And I would imagine the majority of Leafs Nation feels the same way.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

garrettbauman@mapleleafshotstove.com
twitter.com/garrettbauman

  • rustynail

    over 27,000 on the face book page for Pat Burns Hall of Fame. Whether it gets him inducted or not he’s gotta like that so many people are supporting him.

  • honesthockey

    Ben Scrivens a Leaf?

  • M9

    rustynail wrote:

    over 27,000 on the face book page for Pat Burns Hall of Fame. Whether it gets him inducted or not he’s gotta like that so many people are supporting him.

    You got a link to that?

  • rustynail

    M9 wrote:

    rustynail wrote:
    over 27,000 on the face book page for Pat Burns Hall of Fame. Whether it gets him inducted or not he’s gotta like that so many people are supporting him.
    You got a link to that?

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=108020299222767

  • DJBrianBurke

    honesthockey wrote:

    Ben Scrivens a Leaf?

    Confirmed? Another goalie prospect would be nice.

  • honesthockey

    Yeah that’s what I’m asking. I agree this would be a good signing.

  • Johnfergusonjr

    My draft day prediction is Burke trade Luke Schenn for Brayden Schenn then trades Brayden Schenn, D’Amigo and Kaberle for Tavares, DiPietro and 2011 first. Upon the flight to Toronto DiPietro mysteriously vanishes and pops up 12 years later in a sweatshop in Columbia.

  • lonsmos2

    honesthockey wrote:

    Yeah that’s what I’m asking. I agree this would be a good signing.

    so you didn’t actually hear anything just wishful thinking?

    If so I agree that it would be good to have another goalie prospect.

  • The Eraser

    I think Parks would be a pretty good pick up if we can’t land Scrivens. As far as I know he went undrafted and is available.

  • honesthockey

    lonsmos2 wrote:

    honesthockey wrote:
    Yeah that’s what I’m asking. I agree this would be a good signing.
    so you didn’t actually hear anything just wishful thinking?
    If so I agree that it would be good to have another goalie prospect.

    Wishful thinking.

  • Doc_yqx

    Kab’s denies rumors that he hates playing for Wilson !

    http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=316308

  • Bob is your uncle

    rustynail wrote:

    Is it possible Simmons made this up to increase circulation? Would Toronto media ever do that?

    Yes, when I read the article, I found myself wondering, how does Simmons know who Tomas’ close friends are, does he have access to them, and if someone was a close friend of Kaberle, why would they help create more turmoil in the press for him?

  • seanovision

    I’m not sure about that article, and in fact I haven’t even read it, but it seems somewhat interesting to me that Kubina (supposedly Kaberle’s best friend) and even Antropov were just in town and this information comes out.

  • M9

    rustynail wrote:

    M9 wrote:
    rustynail wrote:
    over 27,000 on the face book page for Pat Burns Hall of Fame. Whether it gets him inducted or not he’s gotta like that so many people are supporting him.
    You got a link to that?

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=108020299222767

    Thanks! 27,000 and counting…

  • rustynail

    jonas640

    Wilson’s latest challenge to Kaberle nothing new. Blog: http://www.640toronto.com/Blogs/EatSleepLeafs/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10105530

  • The Captain

    Ron Wilson Career Plus-Minus

    1997-78 : -5
    1998-79 : -10
    1979-80 : -2
    1984-85 : -1
    1985-86 : -2
    1986-87 : -9
    1987-88 : -4

    Career Total : -33

  • kingkessel

    The Captain wrote:

    Ron Wilson Career Plus-Minus
    1997-78 : -5
    1998-79 : -10
    1979-80 : -2
    1984-85 : -1
    1985-86 : -2
    1986-87 : -9
    1987-88 : -4
    Career Total : -33

    I think this needs a severe edit. I never knew Ron Wilson played 31 years in the NHL.

  • Waiting4LSC

    Oh please !!!!! In this day and age Kaberle would have to got the media and issue a denial whatever the facts were. RW would also have to paint over it….it’s standard protocol.

    In professional sports I don’t buy into any Coach calling out players in the media. There are far better ways to do it.

    I love the passion today, just wish there was more respect for each other. I’m on the record as not liking RW. Maybe the PP and the PK were bad because of the old guard. BB says he does not interfere with player personnel decisions, so that means it was RW who decided the line ups. Thus it was RW’s responsibility for minutes on the PP and PK, and therefore the results, and we sucked. Glad its changed around.

  • The Captain

    LOL oops!

    Ron Wilson Career Plus-Minus

    1977-78 : -5
    1978-79 : -10
    1979-80 : -2
    1984-85 : -1
    1985-86 : -2
    1986-87 : -9
    1987-88 : -4

    Career Total : -33

  • honesthockey

    The business is entertainment. It’s under public scrutiny. If the entertainer has been asked behind closed doors for the umpteenth time to perform in a different manner but refuses, then IMO the public should be advised.

  • Cameron

    @ honesthockey:

    I agree in principle, but as a fan, I think you’re handicapping the Leafs if we actually go through with that. With the way the media reacts in Toronto, all press is bad press lately. In Nashville, they can alert the media that Dan Hamhuis isn’t performing up to expectations (just a random name), but no one would care. The comment would not tarnish his trade value, or evoke any kind of discussion about the player. In Toronto, well, you need only read the comments on TSN to figure that most fans figure this means Kaberle is worthless, and should be traded for a bag of pucks….

  • peterbleafs

    B Leaf wrote:

    rpearce76 wrote:
    Why in God’s name do so many ppl talk about Marleau coming here in the summer? For starters, wasn’t it well documented that him and Wilson did not see eye to eye? Marleau was a dog under Wilson and then suddenly got his game back when he left. Secondly, even if he wanted to come here the salary he would command would probably be more than the cap space we have available and we need more than one guy. Forget it guys, Marleau is NOT coming to the Leafs. Our best bet is that we can move Kaberle and Grabo and get 2 top 6 fwds and hopefully a prospect and/or pick. Hopefully we can sign another top 6 fwd as a UFA and hopefully we can get a pick and shovel guy (Metro seems to be finished in MTL) for our bottom 6.
    Why do so many people here trade Grabovski?

    Me I would trade Grabovski to raise the return we get from moving Kaberle and to ensure there is a high minute spot for Kadri. Bozak, Kadri and Grabovski…not enough ice time for the three of them and Kadri will develop into a far more exceptional player than Grabo…and I think Bozak will also.

  • Leafs4ever

    Bob is your uncle wrote:

    This a somewhat off topic post and a specific reply to one(slightly psychotic) individual. I suggest, anyone looking for some casual hockey talk skip to the next one.

    Really? I’m psychotic?
    Look, I apologize for the name calling. And, yes everyone including you and me are entitled to their opinion. This could have been settled earlier by either one of us being the bigger man. I’m not sensitive and I really don’t usually engage in pissing contests on-line but when I say I misused the word “hits” and continually try to explain that I didn’t propose for Horton to be on the Leafs I have to wonder if I’m really the one with a problem with reading comprehension. I said that if Horton did come for Kaberle I would love it since it’s about as much as we can expect considering how Kaberle has played lately. It’s convenient for you to edit my posts in your response to spin it how you see it. Try reading all of it next time and I’m sure we’ll have no problems.
    Could I have handled it better? Yes. But I submit so could you have.

  • Bob is your uncle

    Leafs4ever wrote:

    Bob is your uncle wrote:
    This a somewhat off topic post and a specific reply to one(slightly psychotic) individual. I suggest, anyone looking for some casual hockey talk skip to the next one.
    Really? I’m psychotic?
    Look, I apologize for the name calling. And, yes everyone including you and me are entitled to their opinion. This could have been settled earlier by either one of us being the bigger man. I’m not sensitive and I really don’t usually engage in pissing contests on-line but when I say I misused the word “hits” and continually try to explain that I didn’t propose for Horton to be on the Leafs I have to wonder if I’m really the one with a problem with reading comprehension. I said that if Horton did come for Kaberle I would love it since it’s about as much as we can expect considering how Kaberle has played lately. It’s convenient for you to edit my posts in your response to spin it how you see it. Try reading all of it next time and I’m sure we’ll have no problems.
    Could I have handled it better? Yes. But I submit so could you have.

    Fair enough. I will make a couple of comments just to be clear.

    It may be that this comment by Cameron added to my belief that hits were being discussed.

    “You might as well just sign Colby Armstrong for half the price. You’ll get 20 goals, and someone who’s defensively reliable, and can also hits – which Horton doesn’t do.”

    But maybe not.

    Now, you don’t have to believe this, but my use of the word stud,in my post last night, and the way in which I used it(‘stud’), was not in reference to you. I remembered people using it in the past and it happens to be something I don’t agree with, at this time. Whether you are one of those people, I don’t know. I didn’t notice until today that you had used it in one of your posts.

    “I think his play lately will be what is remembered going into the summer. (I get your point tho, 20 games doesn’t make a career). But, he’s older, has only one year left on his contract and Horton is a young stud. My opinion is that Florida doesn’t do that deal straight up. (That being said, would love to see it happen).”

    While I will, sometimes, use only the pertinent part of someone’s post in an effort to shorten my own, or to be clear in what I’m saying, I will not edit or change the wording to alter their meaning, in order to further my own position. If I don’t think my argument stands up using an honest approach, I won’t use it. Integrity is important to me.(One of the reasons I like Brian Burke)

    Anyway, I agree, it’s time to move on, and enjoy some Leaf talk, something I hope will continue for oh… at least 43 years.