The Drive For Five (non-playoff edition) *

by on March 31, 2010 in Uncategorized - 199 Comments

Share

* aka “Operation: Basement Breakout”

With last night’s loss, the Maple Leafs were mathematically eliminated from playoff contention for the 5th straight year. This was not really news – even the most optimistic of Leafs’ fans pretty much knew this to be the case since early into the New Year, if not sooner.

However, a more prevalent question regarding the season standings remains: is getting out of last place in the Eastern Conference still possible?

With five games remaining, the Maple Leafs sit in last place (15th) in the East with 69 points.  Even if the team were to win out the rest of the way, 79 points (a below .500 finish) is the best they can mathematically achieve this season.

Here’s where things get sticky.

Four teams remain within realistic reach (five mathematically, but the New York Rangers need only one point to be out of the Leafs’ reach and as such are not included in this analysis).  The Tampa Bay Lightning, New York Islanders, Florida Panthers and Carolina Hurricanes are each only 3 to 4 points ahead of the Leafs in the standings (Carolina has 73 points, the others 72).  That’s the good news.

The bad news is, each of those teams also has at least one game in hand of the Leafs (Florida has two).  Furthering the dilemma, some of those teams play each other over the course of the season’s final week and a half, which makes the prospect of catching up to a particular team that much more difficult.

In essence, Leafs’ fans will need to pin their hopes on one team to pretty much lose out the rest of the way. Oh, and they will need to find it within themselves to cheer for their divisional rivals, too … especially Ottawa and Montreal.

Having fun yet? Let’s take a closer look at the situation in chart form:

(Teams are listed in reverse order of current standings.)

TEAM Toronto Tampa Bay NY Islanders Florida Carolina
Points 69 72 72 72 73
Games
Left
5 6 6 7 6
Opposition Buf, Bos, NYR, @Phi, @Mtl @Pit, NYR, Car, Otw, Fla, @Fla Phi, Otw, Mtl, @Pit, @NJ, Pit @Buf, @Bos, NYR, Otw, NJ, @TB, TB @Mtl, @Otw, NJ, @TB, MTL, @Bos
Home
Games
3 4 4 4 2
Home
Record
17-16-5 19-12-6 20-14-3 15-13-9 20-16-3
Key Injuries Komisarek (D) Malone (W), Ohlund (D), Ranger (D), Smaby (D) DiPietro (G), Martinek (D), Schremp (F), Weight (F) Booth (F), Campbell (F) Gleason (D), Ruuttu (F)


So what can we conclude from this data? A few things:

  • The home-and-home matchup between Tampa Bay and Florida – two teams the Leafs are chasing – adds an interesting twist to the mix.  Worst-case scenario: they split those games.
  • Four points ahead of Toronto, with a game in hand, and their starting netminder (Ward) back in the lineup, the Carolina Hurricanes (who are now less-impacted by injury than the other teams within in Toronto’s reach) are arguably going to be the most difficult team for the Leafs to catch.
  • The New York Islanders may be the easiest to catch of all the teams the Leafs are chasing.  Their young players (Tavares, Bailey, Okposo, Moulson) have struggled to produce lately, and their schedule is anything but a walk in the park as they will face Pittsburgh twice, as well as Philadelphia and New Jersey.
  • Interestingly, Leafs’ fans will find themselves in the odd position of having to cheer for each of their division rivals in the ‘Race To Get Out Of Last Place’.  Each of the teams they are chasing will face at least one of their rivals at some point during their final 6 (or 7) games as all four are involved in games against the teams the Leafs are chasing.
  • On that note, here’s the really bad news: the Islanders, mentioned above as the team with arguably the best chance to stumble down the stretch, face both Ottawa and Montreal.  Florida and Tampa Bay also face off against Ottawa, and Carolina not only faces Ottawa, but also Montreal – twice.  Those in the counselling industry may be well-advised to start up a few Toronto-based support groups this week.
  • Of course, for there to be any hope whatsoever of the Leafs pulling out of last in the conference, they will need to win out themselves (putting them at 79 points), or at the very least win 4 of the last 5 (77 – 78 points).
  • Should the Leafs manage four wins (77 pts), opposition teams would need only win three games to put the Leafs out of reach. Even with an OT loss to get to 78 points, the Leafs would not have enough wins for a tiebreak under that scenario.
  • Winning out is going to be much more difficult to do, but certainly aids the task as opposition teams would have to win four games to remain ahead of the Leafs.

This final stretch, which I will dub the “Drive For Five: Non-Playoff Edition“, begins at the ACC on Thursday as the Sabres pay a visit. The Bruins and Flyers will follow, with the Leafs closing out their season (and hopefully clawing their way out of the basement) in New York and, finally, Montreal.

Should worse come to worse, and the Leafs find themselves in 15th after 82 games, there is always the (much slimmer) hope of the lottery being won by a team other than Edmonton (who have already secured last place overall) or Toronto, which would bump the Leafs out of the top two picks overall.

It could happen, although I must admit I like the odds of the Leafs winning out (or at the very least taking 4 of 5) much better than the odds of the lottery being won by a team finishing 28th or better.  And I would imagine the majority of Leafs Nation feels the same way.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • B Leaf

    @ honesthockey:

    1)I didn’t get a bad culture feeling from Antropov like I did from Sundin and Kaberle.
    2)Like I said I love Kessel, but if you want to win it all, I think I have a point. Just sayin…
    3)agreed

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    rustynail wrote:

    @ honesthockey:
    I know but with Simmons track record and skill I thought maybe it was a typo.

    Ahh. He is king of hidden (made up) sources.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jardon

    April Fools!?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    @ B Leaf:

    I think you mean Phaneuf trade 11/10.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf

    2 Minutes for Looking so Guru wrote:

    @ B Leaf:
    I think you mean Phaneuf trade 11/10.

    Probably so. But in the words of Bob McKenzie: Right now White is playing at 100% his ceiling and playing slightly better than Phaneuf, but Phaneuf is only playing at 60% of his ceiling. If/when Phaneuf plays at 75% or better Toronto wins the trade. Well I think Phaneuf has played up around that 75-80% range and thats why I scored it the way I did. Like I said if you get into a big playoff series and Phaneuf plays 100% the Leafs will be hard to beat! Then its 11/10!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doc_yqx

    @ Sk8trBoi:

    I wasn’t being hostile,I was objecting to outright stupidity.
    Scotty Bowman couldn’t have done any better than Ron Wilson has done with the players / culture that he inherited.
    Anyone that thinks that Ron Wilson hasn’t done an incredible job with the team is out to lunch.
    The improvement, post -toskala/blake/stajan/etc, is remarkable.This is the same system of Defence/Transition/Penalty Kill that made the San Jose Sharks the top defensive team in the west for so long..

    As for your comment about growing up,sorry if I hurt your feelings by criticising your point of view,but,i don’t agree with it,and to be honest,i think I have a few years on ya,sonny..enough to learn how to spell skaterboy,

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    B Leaf wrote:

    2 Minutes for Looking so Guru wrote:
    @ B Leaf:
    I think you mean Phaneuf trade 11/10.
    Probably so. But in the words of Bob McKenzie: Right now White is playing at 100% his ceiling and playing slightly better than Phaneuf, but Phaneuf is only playing at 60% of his ceiling. If/when Phaneuf plays at 75% or better Toronto wins the trade. Well I think Phaneuf has played up around that 75-80% range and thats why I scored it the way I did. Like I said if you get into a big playoff series and Phaneuf plays 100% the Leafs will be hard to beat! Then its 11/10!

    As much as I like White, it would be interesting to see him in a playoffs. My bet is he’d get worn down real quick. It’s kinda sad to think that if he re-signs in Calgary he may never get in a playoff game if they don’t qualify this year.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    Antropov sucked as a leaf I watched that guy suck for years. He showed some skills the year we traded him and it was a good time to sell high in case it was just a fluke. It turned out it he actual was starting to finally live up to his hype 9 years later, but after watching him blow for that long, the day we got rid of him was one of the happiest days of my life and no one can take that away from me.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    wanna know what i think after reading this?

    To Hell With The Pick!! I’ll NEVER Cheer For The Sens Or Smurfs!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • astrit

    guys much s i love this young leaf team they are playing great now but for full season i think we need more talent upfront we are set on goal and defence i think exludin kaberele i dont see him on the mix much longer i would go after horton on a trade frolov and maybe armstrong and then u can make it i think if we play way we are now these three guys can make us really strong bozzak kessel horton grabovski frolov kulemin armstrong stallberg cullen sjostrom orr michell/hanson what u guys think maybe i have hi hopes thats what i want anyway thank you guys your the best

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sk8trBoi
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doc_yqx

    @ Sk8trBoi:

    I guess you’re right….you know it all,NOT…
    what do you think Ron Wilson should’ve done…had the team in first place with the mediocre talent that he inherited,
    He’s a coach…not a magician.
    Once Burke got rid of most of the deadwood,the team has improved,significantly.
    as to the unarmed man….come back when you’ve matured enough to know what wit really Is….you are the unarmed ‘boy’ in any battle of wits,

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    jonas640

    Lines tonight: Kulemin-Grabovski-Kessel. Stalberg-Bozak-Hanson. Caputi-Irwin-Mitchell. Sjostrom-Wallin-Orr

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Killerrocks

    Johnfergusonjr wrote:

    @ Killerrocks:
    Kessel has to score 40 first before he is a 3 year straight 50 goal scorer.

    If you would read what I said, was that Kessel will be a 50 goal scorer WITHIN then next two – three years, not 3 straight.

    Given that, though, I think he has it in him to score 50 or more for several years, given the improving team and getting better players to make other teams pay attention to more than just Phil.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BeLeafer

    @ Tim Horton:
    and Antro is not going to exceed what he did this year going forward

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime

    I think Ron Wilsons done a great job even the year before this one the leafs actually had some energy even though they finished seventh last which 100 times better than almost leaf playoff teams since the lockout. Even this year the first game of the year I watched the leafs play a fantastic energy filled game but our mediocrity caught up with us and Montreal took a game they had no business being in. Even losing the next ten games for the most part we played better than the other teams but mediocrity bit us in the ass and we lost a bjollion 1 goal games I think the only really disappointing part of the season was January febuary leading up to the phaneuf trade where the team had a better record than at the beginning of the season but we had zero energy and a kessel goal stole us a game or too that was the only time I doubted RW and that quickly evaporated after the phaneuf trade because the team has played with more energy than any leafs team post lockout and that’s a direct result of RW

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ksavz

    @ ry_dwsn:
    buddy ive played hockey my whole life, i think i know something about plus minus, thanks though. Watch tonights game, then do the math. You do not get a plus, nor minus on special teams, if that were the case, Steven Stamkos wouldn’t be a -1 on the season.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ksavz

    @ honesthockey:
    This i know, the person i was replying to insisted that u get a plus for a PP goal, and a minus for a goal against on the PK. Which makes no sense as plus minus is a measure of your gf-ga when even strength. Makes sense that a team with even strength would recieve a minus for gettin score on by a shorthanded unit though.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ksavz

    @ Only_crime:
    lol no kidding, we’d probably have some -40′s lolllll

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Ksavz wrote:

    @ honesthockey:
    This i know, the person i was replying to insisted that u get a plus for a PP goal, and a minus for a goal against on the PK. Which makes no sense as plus minus is a measure of your gf-ga when even strength. Makes sense that a team with even strength would recieve a minus for gettin score on by a shorthanded unit though.

    Yeah man I’m only kidding. That’s why when I see people post about the Leafs giving up on a guy like Brad Boyes like it’s a bad thing I shake my head. The guy scored 50% of his points on the PP and finishes at -20 last year. I’d be afraid to put him out at even strength! He should be a 6 minute a night player.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)