Week 24 Torontosaurus Rex

by on April 5, 2010 in Uncategorized - 109 Comments

Share

The Week 24 Torontosaurus Rex is ….

The award this week goes a player stepping up in the wake of the roster turnover and having started the season on opening night with the Leafs while splitting time this season with the Marlies.

The 24-year old winger scored three goals in Week 24, including his second two-goal effort of his young career. Rookie Viktor Stalberg (3-3-0-3) has seen his ice time increase a full two minutes in the four games since a 3-2 win over the Rangers, with a return to the power play.

Stalberg, similar to Tyler Bozak, had to learn that the grind of the NHL season as well as becoming pros was just as important as developing skills in the NHL. Stalberg played big minutes with the Marlies that he would not have received in the NHL, scoring 12 goals in 39 games (39-12-21-33) and getting used to the professional game at a high paced level.

And he struggled through periods of the schedule without making enough of an impact in games. This commitment to being a factor every game was a step in the Swede’s development and witnessed with a more physical game lately and better positioning relative to opening night.

With Stalberg, the physical, brash style that he needs to play to be successful takes time to develop against bigger and stronger opponents. Signs are positive in development and he’s coming along into the mold of a good power forward, but it’s a work in progress and a timely one.

For now, he’s shown enough to enter the final week of the season as the Torontosaurus Rex

******
An honorable mention should go out to John Mitchell (3-0-2-2) who lost his special teams time and playing a decent 13-14 minutes in the last two games, after dropping in ice time that bounced between 17-19 minutes. He was noticeable on the ice throughout the last two games, despite the decrease in ice time.

katshockey [at] mapleleafshotstove.com
twitter.com/@KatsHockey

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Cameron

    @ Alex Tran:

    Dallas has set a self imposed cap of 45 million dollars. Which means they only have 7 million dollars in space to resign Neal, 2 goalies, find a puck-moving defensemen (Martin as you suggest, who will cost about 5 million), and fill out their roster with about 4 or 5 additional filler players. That’s a tall order, and even if they had money, you can hardly depend on signing Martin, when all other teams, including the Devils, will attempt to sign Martin. Anyways, one of their wingers will certainly be in play, and Neal makes the most sense, as Benn looks like he could pot 30 next year too, but for the meagre price of 822k (whereas Neal will cost about 4 million).

    @ Andrew R:

    One of the first things Burke said upon arriving in Toronto, is that he wishes that he would have been the one to have drafted Luke Schenn. Burke isn’t going to let the fact that Fletcher drafted him interfere with who he trades. Beauchemin will be gone long before Schenn. I know you’re basing this on the fact that Burke has traded away Stralman, White, and Tlusty, all guys he did not draft, but outside of White (who he basically traded for Phaneuf), those were Euro players who could not play his system. Schenn is not even close to being in this category. He will not be moved.

    To top it all off, he’s probably currently our best defensemen.

    Burke would be foolish to trade major assets (like Schenn) for any sort of star players, be it Bobby Ryan, or Steven Stamkos. The oppurtunity to grab these players for packages that don’t center around us losing a major cornerstone will present themselves. No one trades cornerstone pieces for other cornerstone pieces any more; you tally up a package and deal that for what you want. Or, like with Kessel, you wait until a player WANTS to play in Toronto, and you lay out an offer sheet (which could very well happen with Stamkos).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    @ Cameron:
    Are you telling me you wouldn’t trade Schenn straight up for Stamkos?
    Also, what makes you think Tampa Bay wouldn’t match any offer sheet the Leafs make to Stamkos?

    I’m all for trading Kaberle to Dallas for a package including Neal, trading Finger or sending him to the Marlies and resigning Van Ryn to a deal worth around a million a year.

    Phaneuf (6.5) – Schenn (2.975) = $9.475
    Beauchemin (3.8) – Komisarek (4.5) = $8.3
    Gunnarsson (0.8) – Van Ryn (1.0) = $1.8

    Defense = $19.575 million

    Much more acceptable than the $25.525 million our current Top Six earners under contract are scheduled to make next season.

    If Burke is able to bring back Gustavsson at $2.0 million a season, combined with Giguere’s $6.0 million cap hit, it will bring our defense/goaltending total to 27.575.

    To make things easier, lets say the Salary Cap goes up about $500,000 to $57.525 next season, it will leave Burke $30.0 million to spend on his forwards.

    Kadri (1.75) – Bozak (3.725) – Kessel (5.4) = $10.875
    Neal (4.0) – Grabovski (2.9) – Kulemin (2.5) = $9.4
    Stlaberg (0.85) – Hanson (0.925) – Sjostrom (0.75) = $2.525
    Caputi (0.833) – Mitchell (1.0) – Orr (1.0) = 2.833

    Forwards 25.633

    That would leave Burke with almost $4.5 million in Cap Space. If you were to trade Grabovski in the off-season, that wouold up the total to almost $7.5 million and more than enough to bring in a player such as Marleau. Wilson could then move either Kadri or Bozak to center the second line and put Marleau on the top line (either LW or C)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ Schenn:
    That is %100 exactly what I want….bang right the fuck on!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • keon

    Listening to Dave Nonis, it sounds like the Hanson at centre experiment is likely over. Probably one of the reasons why Irwin was signed, to get that size down the middle. Hopefully they will sign Champagne as well, otherwise he goes back in to the draft this year.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    I doubt Irwin starts the year with the Leafs next year and if Hanson is truely done at center, then I believe he starts the year with the Marlies as well. Leaving the door open for Burke to sign a third line center. Off the top of my head I can only think of Lombardi and Koivu who are free agents this summer that would fit into our third line.

    Just looked on nhlnumbers.com’s free agent list and also wouldn’t mind if Burke signed any of Belanger, Morrison, Williams, Prospal, Metropolit, Niedermayer, Slater, Mair, Burish, Arnason or Malholtra to center the third line.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    John Madden is my pick

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Although if we go young I wan Darren Helm. No way he plays anything more then 4th line mins in detroit with Datsyuk, Franzen, Filuppa and even Hudler wanting back now. He’s the perfect speedy guy we need. Sorry about the bad spelling too lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Jordan wrote:

    John Madden is my pick

    Do you really want to bring in a 38 year old center that is currently making $2.75 million??

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Schenn:

    No, I wouldn’t turn down Schenn for Stamkos, obviously, but I’m saying, other ways to acquire such an asset will present itself. If Vincent Lecavalier refuses to waive his NTC, which many are saying he will, then the Lightning management may find themselves in the position where they cannot afford to pay Stamkos 7 million, on top of Lecavalier’s 10, and then the next year, Hedman’s likely 4-5 million (or more).

    They are not hockey managers, and they see assets in terms of dollars and cents. If Lecavalier won’t move, Stamkos will become expendable. Plus, if he doesn’t want to sign in Tampa, he can sort of force his way out of there. The Leafs can front end any deal in such a way that Tampa cannot match. I would rather give up up 4 first round picks for STamkos than Schenn. With Stamkos and Schenn, plus Kadri, Kulemin, Bozak, Stalberg, Phaneuf, and all our other solid talent, those would be 4 late round picks for ultimately, one of the league’s best young players and highest scorers.

    I’m just saying, we don’t have to rush to improve by trading Schenn for the biggest package available. Other oppurtunities will come along.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)