Report: Leafs, Gustavsson Agree to 2 year Deal

by on April 15, 2010 in Leafs News - 311 Comments

Share

Per TSN, the Toronto Maple Leafs have agreed in principle to a 2 year contract with pending-RFA goaltender Jonas Gustavsson. The contract is said to be worth $2.7 million in total (avg $1.35 million per season).

Gustavsson, originally signed to a 1 year contract, struggled somewhat during the first half of a season marred by heart surgery and the inevitable adjustment period required with not only a new league, but a new culture as well.  As the season progressed, so too did Gustavsson’s consistency and poise. As his comfort level grew, fans began to witness what all the hype had been about,  his performance culminating with a 7-game winning stretch during the month of March (7-0-0, 2.00 GAA, .929 SV %).

For the season, Gustavsson finished with a winning record of 16-15-9, posting a 2.87 GAA and .902 SV %.

Should Gustavsson be able to build upon the latter part of his rookie campaign — a task far less difficult with mentor J-S Giguere in the fold — the contract could prove to be a steal, and at two years is fair to both the player and the organization.

This could go one of two ways.  If Gustavsson develop into a bona-fide number one netminder, he will be in a position to earn a contract in accordance with that standing, at a point in where Giguere will be off the books.  And if, for any reason things do not work out, the team is not trapped by a long-term contract, or a burdensome financial commitment.

Unlike many high-profile NHL signings the past few years, this is a smart deal all around. And that is something quite refreshing, in a post-lockout era of teams signing off on huge financial commitments for decade-long terms.  It is also quite encouraging in light of (and hopefully impactful upon) the contract negotiations still underway with restricted free agents Nikolai Kulemin and Christian Hanson.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • dlb

    @ canucksnaphook:
    Do you think the BB and RW see any value in Rosehill or do you think he had his kick at the can and they’re hoping to “upgrade”? BB did mention he wanted to add secondary toughness.
    -
    Did Kule get traded (in your scenario)?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    FriedmanHNIC

    Jonathan Cheechoo will rejoin Senators tomorrow in Ottawa. Could we see him later in this series?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @ rustynail:

    Yeah but if you sit a guy on the bench for 57 minutes of a game he will come out with some extra energy and sometimes take some dumb penalties. He can learn from Orr, and I think he still has enough upside to play for this team.

    “secondary toughness” I think that Burke meant on the Top 9 because although fast we werent very truculent.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @dlb.

    Huge faux pas.

    No way is Kulemin traded.

    Switch out Grabbo and Kulemin.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    Kadri: Maybe he might move to wing in the future, but he’s obviously more comfortable at center, and I don’t think Burke and Wilson want to screw around with that. My guess is that he stays at C.

    Rosehill: They probably haven’t given up on him yet. This is his last year of his entry level deal so my guess is that if he doesn’t earn a spot out of camp or sometime this year, it’ll be the last time we see this guy in a Leafs jersey. I think he has a shot only if we don’t pick up another bottom 6.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    @ canucksnaphook:
    I liked Rosey but it sure didn’t look like Wilson did. I still think he will need an outstanding training camp if he’s still under contract.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Not sure what Rosehill did to piss of Wilson (douchebag) but it was good enough to keep him in the doghouse for a long period of time.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    Rosehill took some pretty dumb penalties at a time when Wison was really preaching about not taking any dumb penalties. I think that really annoyed RW to the point that he took it personal towards him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.evolutioncomputers.ca/ caper7
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.evolutioncomputers.ca/ caper7
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    @ TuckerThomas:
    He sure did when he was brought up. He didn’t get much of a shot at the start of the year so I haven’t really seen him enough to tell if he can play or not. He did go to the net and score once. More importantly I like how he can throw with both hands.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    It’s bad enough having one idiot (Orr) taking stupid penalties in a game and all you guys are talking about putting a player that plays almost the identical game as Colton into the lineup as well?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    I like Rosehill’s potential but I would have liked to see Deveaux get a shot this year too. He put up some pretty solid #’s in the A and a ton of PIM’s. I really like tough guys who can make decent plays and put the puck in the net and he’s only 26. I think if he had a decent shot he could really fit on the 3rd or 4th lines. Rosehill’s #’s as far as offence are way behind Deveaux when he was 24.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Correct Schenn I am.

    Get simpletons like Neil, Carkner, and Sutton running around in Ottawa and its nice to be able to match firepower.

    Four minutes a game wont kill you (in most cases) and its way more entertaining to watch than a soft team.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.evolutioncomputers.ca/ caper7
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ rustynail:
    Good point. Maybe he will be able to pull a Wendel but I highly doubt it. Usually, when a D-man is moved up front it’s because he had some offensive talent from the back end which he has never really displayed. I just hope Deveaux gets a shot too. That is IF he is resigned. Rosey is still under contract for next season.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    @ TuckerThomas:
    I’d settle for a 25% Wendel.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.evolutioncomputers.ca/ caper7

    I wouldn’t mind seeing Derek Boogaard join the team next season…i think he is a UFA. He would certainly add that second tier toughness and he can skate well too.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)