Leafs Defense: A Season In Review

by on April 18, 2010 in Opinion - 69 Comments

Share

Lots of reading today: Gus chips in an  analogical look at the NHL playoff series; Alex has your links with a look at potential Leaf Jussi Rynnas.

In what was Brian Burke‘s first summer on the job with the Toronto Maple Leafs, it was clear from the get go that he put an onus on improving specialty teams, and also team defense.  The brash Toronto GM made a lot of moves as it related to improving these areas, and on paper they looked like a sure recipe for change and improvement.

And as we found out once again, like we’ve been told so many times before, even the best laid plans never seem to go off as smoothly as one would have wished or hoped.

It was a season in which the Maple Leafs struggled again on the defensive side of things, sitting second last in goals against in the league, while also struggling to right the wrongs that plagued their specialty teams.

The Leafs finished last in penalty kill this season, though one can make the argument that the numbers were improving as the season wound down.  The powerplay, was especially dismal though, notching just 14% efficiency.

As a rule, your specialty teams should add up to 100.  With the Leafs PK  at 74.6, and the aforementioned inept powerplay of 14, the Leafs come in at a disappointing 88.6 combined score.

A big reason for those numbers was the play from the back end, as well as early letdowns from the goaltending.  However, while some defenseman may have struggled, others proved to be a potential diamond in the rough for a rebuilding franchise.

Tomas Kaberle: 7g, 42a, 49pts -16

Another year, another batch of rumours regarding the future of Kaberle with the Toronto Maple Leafs organization.  And really, for the first time since the rumours started, it seems highly likely that Kaberle, at least for his sake, is finally starting to openly acknowledge the idea that he may be playing in a different colour uniform next season.

For his part, Kaberle had another good year from the back end.  Logging over twenty-two minutes a game, Kaberle finished second in team scoring, and was flirting with the idea of leading the team in overall scoring as a defenseman, until Phil Kessel turned up his game a notch toward the end of the season.

Kaberle was, at most times, steady for the Leafs this season, and his plus/minus is more indicative of the amount of ice time he saw against other teams top lines.  A near 50 point season has become the norm from the smooth, puck moving defenseman, and while he tailed off a bit towards the end of the year, Kaberle showed a stronger willingness to shoot the puck and manufacture the play.

His time in Toronto may be up, and if it, he may be hard to replace.

Overall Grade: B+

Francois Beauchemin: 5g, 21a, 26pts, -13

If there was anyone who needed to be told the simple rules of K.I.S.S. this season, it would be Francois Beauchemin, and no, I am not talking about the makeup clad rock band.

Keep It Simple Stupid.

It’s an old adage, but simply put, one that never goes out of style.

When the Leafs signed Francois Beauchemin in the offseason, I don’t think there was a Leafs fan who wasn’t happy with the acquisition.  At a cap hit of $3.8 million, the Maple Leafs thought they had paid a reasonable amount of money for a player who rose to the occasion in order to shut down the oppositions top lines, all the while adding a steady physical presence, a veteran voice, and an above average slap shot from the point.

What they got, instead, was a guy who pressed too hard, and tried to do too much.

Beauchemin’s first month and a half as a member of the Toronto Maple Leafs was dismal, as he routinely pinched when he should have backed off, zigged when he should have zagged, and was frequently torched by opposition’s top snipers en route to his minus 13, second only to Tomas Kaberle.

Beauchemin did rope it in defensively  a bit towards the end of the season however, and his points totals were on par with those he put up in Anaheim, at the time in his career where he really established himself as a solid shutdown defenseman with a little bit of offense to his game.

In no way is the following grade any indication of the type of player I know Beauchemin can be.  It’s more a reflection of the type of player he was, in his first season in blue and white.

Overall Grade: C

Luke Schenn: 5g, 12a, 17pts, +2

It was a tale of two players when it came to the season that second year d-man Luke Schenn had.

In the first half of the season, he looked very much like a sophomore enduring a slump.  He looked lost in his own end, lacking confidence with and without the puck, and was even benched early in the year, as a way of Ron Wilson trying to give his young defenseman a break.

In the second half of the season, Schenn did get better, although it wasn’t exactly the type of season Leafs fans perhaps envisioned.

Schenn had three more points in his second season in the league, and upped his goal total from two to five.  It’s no secret, however, that his game started turning around when the Leafs acquired Dion Phaneuf.

The addition of Phaneuf seemed to make Schenn more confident, and more willing to use his size to his advantage.  While he still needs to work on his timing, and use his body more in front of the net and crease battles, Schenn fought off a terrible start to the year to turn things around for the better.  Still, the early season blunders will drag his mark down a bit.

Overall grade: C+

Carl Gunnarsson: 3g, 12a, 15pts, +8

Far and away the surprise of the Leafs season on defense, and perhaps as a whole, Gunnarsson seemingly came out of nowhere to grab a spot on the team, and once he did, never looked back.

A John Ferguson Jr. draft choice, Gunnarsson made the team out of camp with his smooth skating, confident puck moving, and his overall hockey smarts.  It’s interesting to note that the stats totals above were all posted in 43 games, as Gunnarsson missed time due to an elbow injury.

A 7th round pick, 194th overall, Gunnarsson is taking a path eerily similar to current defenseman Tomas Kaberle, which is interesting, because it may be the emergence of the young Swedish defenseman that makes Brian Burke and Co. feel comfortable enough to deal Kaberle this summer.

Gunnarsson’s plus 8 led the team, and he was one of only two players who finished the season in Toronto that were a plus defenseman (the aforementioned Schenn was the other, while Ian White was also a plus player in Toronto, before being traded to Calgary.)

Along with Stalberg up front, and Gustavsson in between the pipes, the Maple Leafs have a young, Swedish born player at every position who is making a difference, and looks to be a key core of the team.  Through all the bad headlines that the Leafs defense produced this year, Gunnarsson made it all worth it with his stellar play.

Overall Grade: A

Jeff Finger:  2g, 8a, 10pts, -11

A couple of things jump out when you look at the stats of Jeff Finger.

First and foremost, that is a pretty decent amount of points, particularly when you consider he only played 39 games.  However, the -11 is glaring, particularly for a guy who was brought in here at $3.5 million (as right or wrong as that may be) to shutdown players, and prevent goals.

It’s quite tough to grade Finger to be honest.  How do you assign a grade to someone who was so seldom used?

The bottom line is, for the remainder of his tenure with Toronto, however long that may be, Jeff Finger will be shadowed every move by his hefty price tag, an unfortunate anomaly in today’s salary cap world.  While he may actually be a steady defenseman if given the proper playing time and used in the proper situations, the Leafs aren’t getting the most bang for their buck for Finger.

Overall grade: D

Dion Phaneuf: 2g, 8a, 10 pts, -2 (numbers in Toronto only)

Paint me as a kool-aid drinker if you wish, but the Toronto Maple Leafs changed drastically for the better on that fateful last day in January.

Brian Burke had just completed his first blockbuster trade of the day, jettisoning role players who had been with the team for some time, perhaps too long, and changed the culture by moving them in exchanged for Dion Phaneuf, the once highly touted defenseman who fell out of favour with the Calgary Flames organization.

And while some Leafs fans were unimpressed with Phaneuf’s offensive contributions, it’s the things that don’t necessarily show up on score sheets that make Phaneuf an integral role to the team, and the probable next captain of this storied franchise.

He came to the team and instantly became a vocal leader, transforming the swagger of the team in the process.  His on ice presence was felt as well, as Leafs players began to play more physical, following the example of the bruising defenseman.

His ten points in 28 games weren’t too shabby either, but his minus 2 may be cause for concern, although one could argue that he was getting used to a new system, and playing a ton of minutes for the club down the stretch.

Overall Grade: A-

Garnet Exelby:  1g, 3a, 4pts, -8

Like Jeff Finger, I found myself struggling to assign a grade for Exelby based on his performance with the Toronto Maple Leafs.  Like some in Leafs Nation, I was rather excited to hear they had gotten Exelby in a deal with Atlanta on July 1st.  While I always considered myself one of the few fans Pavel Kubina had during his time here, I thought Exelby would be a great addition to the club in it’s shutdown, physical 3rd pairing on the back end.  Exelby’s bone jarring hits made him a fan favourite in Atlanta, and I was looking forward to seeing that in Toronto.

And I’m still waiting.

With all seriousness, and all due respect to Exelby, he never did find his way in Toronto, and that could be for a number of reasons really.  First and foremost, he may not have meshed with the system of Ron Wilson and his staff.  In my opinion, however, the real issue was with the amount of games he played.

While I am not saying Exelby deserved to play more games, I felt personally that the short leash he had with Ron Wilson really made him tepid and timid as it related to taking the chances and risks that it takes to deliver a devastating hit like he became famous for.  I don’t think he had the confidence to try it, because he was afraid to make a mistake.

Overall grade: D-

Mike Komisarek:  0g, 4a, 4pts, -9

If anyone is disappointed with the inaugural season for Mike Komisarek in Toronto, count the hulking Michigan born defenseman among them.

A true gamer at heart, Komisarek didn’t come close to making the type of impression he wanted with fans, largely due to his lack of chance because of injury.

Komisarek battled shoulder issues in his final year with Montreal, and while he did get it corrected in the summer through surgery, he found himself back under the knife mid-season, shut down for the year once again.  During his brief time with the Leafs, he looked slightly lost, trying to do too much to make an impression, not unlike Beauchemin.

He did show flashes of the strong, physical, and intimidating play that Brian Burke expected when he signed him, but he wasn’t healthy nearly enough, and some question whether he was even physically ready to start the season in the first place.

Call me a players writer, but I am going to protect Komisarek a bit, and give him an incomplete.

Overall grade: Incomplete

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • keon

    Wow, I don’t agree with much of this, but to each his own.
    .
    Kaberle started off fine, but was downright putrid for most of the season, In the month of October, 12 games, he had 17 pts, after that 32 in his last 70. No one should be happy with those numbers. I’ll give him a D and will be waiting patiently for his departure on draft night.
    .
    Beauchemin tried to do too much early on, as did Komisarek, but the guy is part of the backbone of this team. Leader, chews up huge minutes, plays against the best. The only thing that stops him from getting an A is his early play… instead he gets a B.
    .
    Schenn, the same as above for the most part. To me he warrants the C+, possibly a B-.
    .
    Gunnarsson, agree on the A, very consistent for a rookie playing his first North American hockey.
    .
    As for Phaneuf, how can he not get an A+ for what he brought to this team and the turnaround he helped provide. The guy is an absolute stud, you need to look past the +/- and look at his his overall game and the leadership his brings.
    .
    As for the rest, not really fair to rate Komisarek, I agree, Exelby and Finger also played less significant, less than stellar roles. Both deserve failing grades.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    LOL a player’s writer… hopefully this helps attract the FA’s this summer haha

    A pretty fair grading for those guys I’d say. Luke looked very confident the last little while once Dion showed up. He needs to get nasty over the summer and he will make our top 4 dmen a real bitch to play against. Even Gunnarson isn’t a push over… I totally believe Gunnarson could step in as Kaberle’s replacement if he keeps this up. He might not be as fantastic with the puck, but I already believe he’s better in his own end.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    @ keon:

    Kaberle started off better than fine in the 1st half. He was playing great. I do agree he probably should have been a B, but are we really going to argue + and -? (i do not mean+/-) lol

    Also, Phaneuf can’t get an A till he starts getting that cannon through and improving this PP! It’s like in school when the teacher wouldn’t give you A+ because they knew you were capable of even more.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    By no means am I blaming Phaneuf for PP woes. He’s pretty much the guy they focus on shutting on the PP. Just saying until he starts putting up the points, he won’t recieve an A+ only because we know he is capable of doing it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafsFTW

    -schenn deserves a B or B-, being the only player besides Gunnarsson with a +/- above 0.
    -exelby just stopped hitting after the calendar hit 2010. He had some nice hits before that though which made him stand out. Now I dont trust him

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://checkingfrombehind.com danvertising

    Both Kaberle and Schenn would be a B or B-

    The rest I agree with.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kaz

    Great post Derek, I agree with most of what you wrote.

    Beauchamin was really a disappointment, I would give him a D+. I mean, the guy can’t skate, he was pretty bad positionally, he took more ill-timed pinches than the rest of our defensive core combined, and his point shots either missed the net or hit the pads in front of him more often than not. I really don’t understand why he played so many minutes.

    Also, in regards to +-, he was probably our worst defender in that sense given the ratio of times he was on the ice when we or the opposition scored on an empty net. By that I mean, Kaberle was always on the ice when the opposition had an empty net goal and he was never on the ice when we scored an empty netter. Beauchamin on the other hand was always on the ice when we potted empty netters and usually on the ice when we surrended one. I know this seems like over-analyzing but…

    Finally, I would give Schenn a B or a B- at the very least. I think he showed more of a willingness to move with and control the puck which is a real positive comapred to his tentativenss with the puck last year.

    cheers,

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ kaz:
    -
    How can he not skate? I can’t count how many times he skated back into the play and broke up a rush with a diving poke-check. He kept pace with Scott Niedermayer the last 3 years.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    I thought Schenn had a solid B season. I believe he was better in all stats from the year previous and looked more confident with the puck as the year went along.

    I blame it on poor training (God he looked slow early) and trying to do to much. He also worked his ass off after practice when the others had left the ice. I like the attitude.

    B.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kaz
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FuckTheHabs

    If anybody is expecting a return of a prospect, roster player & 1st rounder for Kaberle, you are, without a doubt, out of your fuckin MINDS. There is no way in hell Burke gets that unless a team is OH SO DESPERATE. As of right now, I don’t see that team anywhere in the league. Maybe a mid-level prospect and a 1st rounder.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lukethenuke

    Phaneuf: A-/A
    Kabby: B-
    Schenn: B-/B
    Gunnerson: B+
    Beachemin: C+/B-
    Komi: N/A
    Finger: D-
    XLBY:D-

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    I’m on the side of Kaberle’s going nowhere. Burke won’t get his asking price and has assessed Kaberle to be a valuable asset.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Andyd513

    Schenn should definitely be a B. Lets not forget that he was paired with the over extending Beauchemin to begin the season.

    Personally I don’t get people’s arguments that “Beauchemin plays lots of minutes”…

    So what?? At what point of this season did he EARN those minutes?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Andyd513:
    -
    Wilson’s not a moron, contrary to popular opinion. He wasn’t just playing Beauchemin for the fun of it. How quickly people forget that Beauchemin was also leading the team in ice-time when we were winning a lot down the stretch.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://mapleleafshotstove.com Garrett Bauman

    Good stuff … though I have a slightly different perspective on two of the assessments.
    .
    In short, I would probably flip the Schenn and Kaberle grades.
    .
    Kaberle had a great first half, but the second half has to drop his grade lower than a B+ overall. Particularly down the stretch, he was terrible in all three zones. He had some great seasons here, but this season was not one of them. Gets a solid C, nothing more.
    .
    Schenn, on the other hand … well, what did people expect? Rebuilding team, limited in their ability to score goals, and he’s a sophomore playing the most difficult position to learn … and yet he still avoided the negative column for +/-. In fact, he improved greatly in that regard, which is stunning considering the team in front of him couldn’t score, and the goaltending behind him was atrocious for 3/4 of the year. Nobody expects him to be a 40 point player, just a reliable shutdown guy who brings a physical edge and forces the opposition to gameplan around him. He’s not there on that last part of it … but the +/- was good considering the team, his hit total was very good, and he showed a willingness to take some offensive chances. That earns him a solid B+ in my books (based on realistic expectations for a young shutdown defender).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2

    I think Schenn would have been much better if Wilson hadn’t screwed around with him for half the year trying to play him on is off side, only when he moved him back did he play up to his potential

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • creasemonkey

    @ lonsmos2:
    totally agree about Schenn the more he played the stronger and faster he played

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Schenn is a bit better then what you said, but agree other then that. HAHAHAHAHA so technical, fun to read

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • creasemonkey

    @ Jordan:
    on a side topic how money contracts do we have total for next year and whats the limit

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LeafsRyan.

    Kaberle + Stalberg for Neal + Grossman + 3rd.
    .
    Sjostrom + Hayes + 3rd for Sharp + Sopel
    .
    Sign Coly Armstrong for a cap hit of 1.75 million
    .
    James Neal – Nazem Kadri – Phil Kessel
    Nick Kulemin – Tyler Bozak – Patrick Sharp
    Chris Hanson – Brayden Irwin – Colby Armstrong
    Jay Rosehill – Wayne Primeau – Colton Orr
    .
    Dion Phaneuf – Luke Schenn
    Carl Gunnarson – Mike Komisarek
    Francois Beauchemen – Niklas Grossman
    Brent Sopel
    .
    Jonas Gustavsson – Jean Sebastian Giguere
    .
    Salary cap = 58 million
    .
    2 million in cap space
    .
    The following season you then have about 10-15 million in cap space with guys like Giguere, Sopel and other players possibly via trade off the hooks.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @LR.

    Not a bad effort.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    I think Chicago will trade Byfuglien, Bolland and Versteeg, and also eat Huet and Sopel’s contracts, before they trade Patrick Sharp. That’s not to say your package isn’t sufficient, but just that Sharp isn’t available.
    -
    And while that trade is probably fair for Kaberle, there’s not very much point in making that deal if you’re Burke. Stalberg has a lot of potential, and could easily put up 20 + goals and 40 + points next year. Neal will put up about 25 and 60. Is that upgrade worth Kaberle? Grossman is useless to us. I think Dallas is one of the few teams willing to overpay to land Kaberle. Things are aligning for a perfect storm that might allow Burke to rape a trade with Dallas.
    -
    I also think we tend to get carried away with other team’s players. Neal is good, but he’s also surrounded by an absolutely awesome forward core. He gets a lot of space because of the attention that Richards, Ribeiro, Morrow, Benn, Ott, and Eriksson command. His stats would likely regress temporarily in Toronto.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ creasemonkey:
    no idea, but someone on here does. They were talking about it the other day. Im not too familiar with the rules yet. If you know a site with them post it up though!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)