Leafs sign Jussi Rynnäs

by on April 21, 2010 in Leafs Prospects - 540 Comments

Share

Brian Burke has picked up yet another wallet. According to a Finnish report, the Toronto Maple Leafs have agreed to terms on a two year deal with Finnish free agent goaltender Jussi Rynnäs. Jussi is still just 22 years of age, and is coming off a stellar year in the Finnish SM-Liiga in which he posted a 2.50 GAA and a 0.929 SV%. Rynnäs is still at least a couple years away from being NHL-ready, and will start next season splitting time with James Reimer for the Toronto Marlies. Jussi was arguably this year’s most coveted free agent goaltender, along with NCAA netminder Ben Scrivens, whom the Leafs had also been linked to over the past couple weeks.

Courtesy of our friends over at PPP, here is a translation of the news article:

“Rynnäs moves to Toronto

Jussi Rynnäs, who attracted NHL teams interest during this season, will continue his career on the other side of the pond (Atlantic ocean). The goalie’s new club is Toronto Maple Leafs. Satakunnan Kansa was the first one to break the news.

There was a big competition for Rynnäs during the whole spring. Finally the man chose Toronto to his destination, which he believes is the best place for him the develop to NHL level goaltender.”

Dallas must really be starting to hate Burke and the Maple Leafs now. The Toronto Sun reported yesterday evening that the sweepstakes for the “Finnish Monster” were coming to an end, but that the Dallas Stars were the supposed frontrunners to secure Jussi’s services.

It’s bizarre that Rynnäs would choose to sign with a team that would have arguably three other goaltenders above him on the depth chart, but it appears that the influence of Francois Allaire is not to be underestimated. As Jonas Hiller, Craig Anderson, and Ilya Bryzgalov have shown, if you work hard and show that you can play, you will get a chance to succeed in this league.

That’s likely the scenario that Burke was pitching and the one Jussi is hoping for: the chance to come in and further develop his skills to a point where he can push Reimer/Gustavsson for the role of the Leafs’ future between the pipes. If he shows that he can be a quality goalie, he will get a chance either here or somewhere else, of that there is no doubt. So the primary concern for the youngster at this point is to get a chance to work with the world’s top goalie coach and anything else can come later. This is where a GM’s history of treating players the right way can become so valuable: no goalie under a Brian Burke regime has been refused the chance to succeed in the NHL.

As mentioned above, Rynnäs is still quite raw and it will take some time before he is molded into a capable NHL netminder. Standing at 6’4 205 lbs, he possesses a nice frame and quick reflexes, but much like Gustavsson, can struggle with positioning and rebound control. Andy Strickland mentioned last month that as many as 18 NHL teams were pursuing the late-blooming Finnish goaltender.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • lonsmos2

    can somebody shut McGuire up fuck he’s annoying.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2

    McGuire is having a lovefest with the whole Montreal team tonight…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • azzurri1963

    Do you guys honestly think the Oilers would trade the 1st overall pick for Schenn. I like Luke and think he will only get better as he gets older but he will not be an impact player offensively. He is a Scott Stevens type player but I think his skating is his weak point and will keep him from becoming the scorer powerplay type guy Scott was. Adding the extra bulk this past season seemed to slow him down even more. If Luke were traded it would take a lot more than just Schenn. I don’t think the Oilers would do it for Schenn and Kabs. We can dream though. Make it happen Burkie.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mike cigan

    there is no way that we are getting a 1st rounder boys, count it out, we’ll get maybe 1 or 2 2nd rounders if he’s crafty enough and he has proven he is!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs

    I think of all the top 10 drafting teams that Tampa would be a reasonable target to trade away their pick for some more developed talent and maybe Florida could be convinced to trade away their 3rd overall pick. Kaberle plus one of the young prospects would get their 1st and another player. Hell Florida has to be desperate enough to get to the playoffs that they might do the 3rd overall for Kaberle even up.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2

    Just what Washington needs is fuckin McGuire screaming down at ice level that Washington has too many men on the ice. Fuck I hate the turtle man.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    How can you say that a Scott Stevens type player is not an impact player offensively? People always seem to forget that for the first part of Stevens’ career he was very good offensively, putting up season with over 20 goals and even a 72 point season.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2

    so I wonder how the Sens feel when they look back at trading Brooks Laich for Peter Bondra

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mike cigan

    shortie for Wash!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    haha…..shawty!!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2

    yahoo Washington shorthanded tie it up

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    I like Camerons trade proposal bringing in Blum+ in exchange for Kaberle. Nashville’s D is already pretty young, they are ranked 1st on HF; they have more D prospects than you can shake a stick at, and no Veteran leadership in the back end.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mike cigan

    @ peterbleafs:
    only if he’s a 1 or 2 d-man

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs

    Cameron is never right he is only extensive in his thought processes.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    peterbleafs wrote:

    Cameron is never right he is only extensive in his thought processes.

    It’s just an idea not speculation… But yeah he’s the EK… of ideas…?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs

    Cameron is way smarter than Ek, his ideas are good, just too complicated to come through.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    lonsmos2 wrote:

    dlb wrote:
    @ Schenn:
    Could we trade Kaberle to get to first overall? What else would we have to package?
    If we could I would prefer that but I would guess for Edmonton to sell it to their fans it would have to start with Schenn a good western boy. I still doubt Oilers would do it anyway.

    Aww jeez. Sorry, I was being facetious trying to suggest we could get to the top of the prospects ranking, first overall…
    .
    But how about then (not facetiously): could a trade package with Boston be worked out that would include Kaberle and the #2 overall pick? Where’s Cameron to break it down properly? Kaberle’s the type of player BB could trade to a rival I assume (for all his skill, Kaberle is still soft). Boston is up against the cap somewhat. Is there anyone we can take off their hands (i.e. Ryder?) and flip them a cheap player or prospect (one of the Mitchell’s or Hamilton) that would allow them to make another move? Are those guys even remotely attractive to Boston? I don’t really care too much about missing our draft pick, but I didn’t want to completely dismiss your reply…count me as one who wants to keep Schenn. Not even for Hall.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    peterbleafs wrote:

    Cameron is way smarter than Ek, his ideas are good, just too complicated to come through.

    Yeah, Cameron, 3 ways never happen! Just ask my girlfriend…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • NewfieDave

    Isn’t it ironic that Habs fans want to Boo the American anthem while at the same time want to seperate from Canada. Make no wonder true hockey fans from the real Canada cheer for any other team than the Habs!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • NewfieDave
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • o2baleaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)