Revisiting the Kaberle Situation

by on May 5, 2010 in Analysis - 521 Comments

Share

It’s Leafs Nation’s tired but pivotal debate that dates back to the trade deadline of 2008: Should the Leafs move Tomas Kaberle?

It seems the debate should now be reframed into a new context considering Kaberle’s current contractual situation: Should Brian Burke trade or re-sign Tomas Kaberle?

Give Burke credit for sticking to his word to the point where we should maybe stop questioning it. Since the deadline of 2009, Burke has remained steadfast in his management approach to what he considers an extremely valuable asset: he’ll listen to offers, and if one meets his lofty trade demands, he’ll run it by the NTC-equipped Kaberle (quite different apparently from asking him to waive). The latter part is no longer relevant. Though it’s known Kaberle’s preference is to stay, he can be traded without the Czech’s consent as of the 2010 NHL Entry Draft. What remains relevant is that, ostensibly, Burke still thinks as highly as ever about Kaberle, believing him to be a premium puck-mover and consummate professional, and will only move him for the right price. Shopping Kaberle to the highest bidder is seemingly not in the cards.

For Kaberle’s part, some have suggested his fall off in the back half of last campaign was a symptom of his own realization that his time in Toronto is coming to an end. That is, however, all conjecture at this point.

In what’s become such a polarizing debate of mixed perceptions, one universal truth is that the peak of Kaberle’s trade value has come and gone. Kaberle is entering next season in the final year of the highly economical contract significantly responsible for boosting his market price. There is no question this weakens his return value to an extent; at the draft, teams aren’t as urgent to overpay. At the trade deadline of 2011, he becomes a rental.

That’s not to say he’s no longer the most marketable asset on the Leaf roster. Something in the neighbourhood of a decent young talent and a first remains within the realm of the realizable. The fact does remain that a suitor has yet to submit an offer in Burke’s playing field, and therefore it will most likely require a little compromise from Burke if he’s to consummate a deal for the 32 year old.

I do not believe Kaberle’s slowed production in the second half of the 2009-10 campaign, when he posted a mere 18 points in 45 games after a 31-in-32 start, will weigh too heavily into trade negotiations as it relates to concern on the part of potential suitors. Most general managers will look at Kaberle in the context of what he could accomplish in their respective team’s jersey based on his skill set as opposed to any statistical shortfalls in his recent performance on a miserly Toronto club. Many will look at Kaberle’s 49 points this season and wonder what he could accomplish if surrounded by more high-end talent than in recent seasons; perhaps a return to his 67-point form of 2005-06.

The Re-Sign Price:

A terrible last half to the campaign still left Kaberle in the top ten in defensive scoring, in tenth place itself where one point separated tenth from sixth.

Defenceman ’09-10 Points Salary
Mike Green 76 $5.25M
Duncan Keith 69 $5.5M
Dan Boyle 58 $6.66M
Chris Pronger 55 $6.25M
Sergei Gonchar 50 $5M
Tobias Enstrom 50 $3.75M
Mark Streit 49 $4.1M
Niklas Lidstrom 49 $7.45
Tomas Kaberle 49 $4.25

(excluding Drew Doughty, who is on an entry-level contract)

Tomas Kaberle is not on the same level as the likes of the HHOF-bound two-way elites Chris Pronger and Niklas Lidstrom, who earn in the $6-7.5M range. Nor is he likely to be placed in the same class as a Tobias Enstrom, a youngster at 25 who experienced a bit of a breakout season, or Mark Streit, who is the same age as Kaberle but is a late bloomer with only three seasons of 40+ point production to his name. The answer is in between; likely, Kaberle’s asking price is in the neighbourhood of $5 – 5.5 million. Just how much of a “hometown” (effectively so, as Kaberle was drafted out of Kaldno, Czech Republic and sees Toronto as his North American home) discount Kaberle would sustain to remain in the city he loves is unknown, but the range listed seems realistic. The 32-year-old will also likely be looking for a term that will secure him in one spot into his late thirties – likely a four or five year deal – at which point he can mull over his career options and make a decision to either retire or continue on a one or two year deal if he’s got it in him.

The Case for a Trade:

Is Kaberle at $5-5.5 million worth more to the Leafs than his potential trade value? I’d argue the time to trade him is ASAP. One reason is that I believe the Leafs have – by committee – puck-moving ability spread throughout their defense core, and two is that I believe last season was the beginning of a downward spiral of Kaberle’s performance if he remains in Toronto.

As Wook points out, Kaberle’s production post-Phaneuf deal regressed to but six points in 24 games. While it’s known that Kaberle’s five-on-five TOI took a hit after Phaneuf’s arrival,  his powerplay TOI among Leafs defencemen remained the highest in competition with Phaneuf as he manned the point with Dion during man-advantage situations. The numbers back this up: Assuming there wasn’t a major fluctuation in penalties drawn in the final 24 games of the schedule, Kaberle’s 168:58 on the powerplay in the final 24 represents 29% of his 3:68:55 total on the season. 24 games of the schedule also represents 29% of the 82 games Kaberle appeared in for the Leafs this season. And during those final 24 games of the schedule (post-Phaneuf deal), the Leafs’ powerplay went a shockingly terrible 9 for 101, equating to a 8.9% success rate (Leafs’ PP on the year was last in the league at 14%).

Kaberle’s game by game powerplay time in the final 24 games of the season:

Powerplay TOI
1:20
4:34
7:44
3:37
9:20
3:18
5:16
2:28
2:55
3:59
1:00
4:21
3:53
7:46
7:06
1:51
3:48
5:07
7:28
3:25
7:45
2:56
6:01
Total: 106:58
Season Total: 3:68:55

% of Total: 29%

24 GP/82 GP = 29%

Kaberle has that reputation as an elite powerplay quarterback that developed out of his chemistry with Bryan McCabe and Darcy Tucker which led to some big point totals over the years. But increasingly you have to wonder if Kaberle’s pass-first predictability has become easy to read for other teams, and that the opposition is overcompensating towards the shooter and quelling the Leafs’ blueline threat on the powerplay. (this dates back to when McCabe’s point totals began to slide, and was apparent with both Beauchemin and Phaneuf this season).

Meanwhile, Kaberle was playing very few minutes on the penalty kill, typically less than a minute per game. Five on five, he averaged below 17 minutes this season, facing the second easiest competition among Leaf blueline regulars and posting a -16 in the process.

When put together, it’s all rather worrying.

Looking at the overall picture on the backend, Carl Gunnarsson (we may only be seeing the beginning), Luke Schenn, Dion Phaneuf, Francois Beauchemin all have reliable first pass ability. With a roster make-up likely to be geared towards an up-tempo, hard forechecking approach, this could very well suffice.

For my money, it all makes the case that Brian Burke should strike while the iron’s still hot.

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • RJ

    @ AussieLeaf:
    I agree that Dallas is one of the teams that is a good fit for Kabs with Clb, Van, Buf, Was, Ana being others.
    .
    IMO though there is no way anyone trades for Huet and sends him to Europe. He was better than half of the goalies in the league last year (way better GAA, SO, W , (he had a lower sv%, but that is becaues Chi only gave up 15-20 shots a game)than any of ours) and would be an upgrade to many teams. (see Philly, Edm, if Fla trades Vokoun, Dal, NYI, etc, etc). Now it is true that Chi has cap problems, everyone is aware of that, but that doesn’t mean they will give away 1st and 2nd round picks to others to help pay their bills. I’m sure with all the teams that need goalie help someone will take Huet for even a 7th round pick, that is much better than them giving up him and their first just to get him off the books. They would be better off shipping out him and Cambell in two seperate deals for two 7th round picks, I think they will get more than that by the way, but that would solve all their cap problems and they would still have their own picks. Or they are not a cash strapped team by any means (and this years playoff revenue will help that), so they can actually afford to bury contracts to if it comes to that, so can NYR, why wouldn’t they trade a 7th for Campbell and bury Redden, right there, for a 7th round pick they get a massive upgrade.
    .
    My point is I don’t think Chi will be shipping out any 1st or 2nd round picks to help them get rid of cap problems, they will not get the returns they should on some players, but there are lots of desperate, crazy GM’s out there that will pick up the phone and offer him something.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    God, I love Bob Cole.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    Healy is such a bitch … i’d like to punch the smug bastard in the face

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    and even more for Lappierre. Fucking douche bag.

    But yeah healy needs his bag pipes shoved right up his ass

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kbart101

    I’m really beginning to like the way Matt Cooke is playing.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    NICE HIT BY ADAMS! nice clean hit too he even crouched down a bit to make sure it wasn’t a head shot

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Keil

    in the slow motion Adams looked like he hurt himself it was so hard, and Poni is a healthy scratch?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • AussieLeaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie

    Keil wrote:

    in the slow motion Adams looked like he hurt himself it was so hard, and Poni is a healthy scratch?

    Quote from Healy: “I don’t get why Ponikarovsky and Fedotenko were scratched, they’re both physical guys”

    What fucking Ponikarovsky did Healy watch?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Keil

    Haha I on the other hand never thought he was a physical player, but he would be a good guy infront of the net.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • AussieLeaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kingkessel

    Sit down, Habitards.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Hine

    @ 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru:

    Poni looks completely out of place playing for the Penguins. Guy seems like he is 5 steps behind on every play.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    To whoever is saying Huet will be picked up for an actual return, I have to say, that is ridiculous. Huet is complete garbage. The only reputable stat he has is his wins, and that comes from playing for the Hawks. His stats are all below average otherwise, and that’s with a team that spends 80% of the game in the offensive zone and gives up very minimal shots. Given the circumstances, those stats are embarassing. There was nothing wrong with Philly’s goaltending this year, except that their goalies kept getting hurt. Emery was great before he got injured, Leighton proved himself a starter calibre goalie before he was injured, and now Boucher has kept them alive in the post season. All of them are better than Huet, and all of them would cost next to nothing to resign versus assets and a 5.625 million cap hit.
    -
    Consider that the Ducks had to take on Blake AND Toskala just to get rid of Giguere, who is infinitely better and more proven than Huet, and also not signed as long. For Huet, it will take a salary dump plus picks. And to the question about why Chicago wouldn’t just bury players themselves, well, finances matter to some teams. Saving 11 million + in worthless salary is preferable to management when compared with completely unnecessary late round picks. The Hawks don’t need picks – what they need is the cap space to keep the team they have. Championship calibre teams don’t value picks as much as players. You have to look at it from perspectives that might differ from the Leafs’.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Pretty sure I cannot stand Subban. Cocky little prick shoving guys after the whistle like he is tough….somebody fill him in.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Pretty sure I wish the Leafs had Subban!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    @ Schenn:
    i conquer

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    @ canucksnaphook:
    I’m with Schenn…and who doesn’t shove people after the whistle in hockey?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    hahaha my new name for the Habs is The Habsbeens. They have no future and live in the past. Pitts will finish this in 6 and Habsbeens fans will be back down to earth and talking about their history again.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kingkessel

    i fucking love this song!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DJBrianBurke

    2 Minutes for Looking so Guru wrote:

    hahaha my new name for the Habs is The Habsbeens. They have no future and live in the past. Pitts will finish this in 6 and Habsbeens fans will be back down to earth and talking about their history again.

    lol nice. But Subban is the next Norris/Calder and Halak is the next triple Vezina winner.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kingkessel

    FUCK.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)