Wilson: The Man for the Job?

by on May 9, 2010 in Opinion - 201 Comments

Share

Ron Wilson, an alumnus from Providence College, was playing for Davos in the Swiss National League A in 1985 when pivotal Minnesota North Stars defenseman Craig Hartsburg was injured. Embroiled in a battle for a playoff spot, Minnesota were in tough to find a stabilizing replacement to hold down the North Stars backend whilst Hartsburg recovered. Ron Wilson, a standout collegiate defender who never rose above major league stopgap, became the go-to-guy having already played 13 games for the North Stars the season previous. A span that bullet pointed five seasons in Switzerland.

A grizzled journeyman by age 30; Wilson would provide stellar coverage in Hartsburg’s absence securing an presence on the North Stars blueline in the 1986-’87 season before completing his NHL playing career with Minnesota a year later.

Of itself, Wilson`s resurgence was not a particularly miraculous story of its age but its significance lay with the deal brokering agent who brought Wilson back to the bigs after years in the hockey hinterlands; the onetime captain of the Providence College Friars in Wilson’s senior year – Brian Burke.

Still a green player agent in ’85, Burke would later be named Senior Vice President of Hockey Operations in Vancouver hired by his Maine Mariners AHL coach Pat Quinn. During Burke’s tenure, Wilson would take his first steps as a head coach in the NHL becoming an assistant for the Vancouver Canucks.

It’s a timeline that proves that friendship and networking can take you a long way in hockey if you put yourself in the right place at the right time. Going on to coach the US team at this year’s Winter Olympics having been named by Leafs and Team USA GM Brian Burke in April 2009; just how far friendship will take Ron Wilson in Burke’s momentum building rebuild will depend on how the Leafs exit the gates this fall.

Logic dictates the leash will be ever tighter on Wilson headed into next season. With Olympic handshakes 18 months removed come October, Burke will be expecting an ever more coherent and moulded roster to achieve something greater than the sum of its parts.

Indeed, having overseen a theoretically superior ’09-’10 iteration of the Leafs depreciate from 81 points in his maiden season to 74, Wilson is going to have to ameliorate a club increasingly bearing the fingerprints of one of the league’s most respected administrators.

And no amount of backslapping will stop Burke from pulling the trigger on Wilson if the Leafs once again fail to stick the pace for the duration of the regular season, not with excuses tiring and Burke’s reputation on the line.

With summer likely to bring further upgrades to the Leafs roster, Wilson will have to draw from the oftentimes inspirational play the Leafs managed in ’08-’09 with a ragtag collection of players that was spliced from one tumultuous administrative reign to another.

Where the Leafs of two seasons ago were a chippy underdog on any given night; the Leafs of last year, weighted by unreasonable expectation, rolled over frequently and often bringing a sharp focus on the cost of the Kessel acquisition; a player part recovered from injury on a team already dead in the water when he debuted.

Burke won’t have enjoyed the subsequent scrutiny of his feisty business operations. The Kessel trade was idiosyncratically his and yet the situation on the ice was neither the direct fault of Burke or Kessel.

“Run and Gun” was what Wilson brought to the table upon his arrival, a prelude to Burke’s era, a West Coast style that placed the onus on the attacking game. It was the stimulus for the early overachievement in 2008 and the subsequent pinpoint for collapse at the beginning of last year.

Building from the net out was the Burke blueprint and whilst Gustavsson provided a significant upgrade to the ailing play of Vesa Toskala , it was the blueline that experienced the greatest overhaul last summer. With the signings of Komisarek, Beauchemin and to a lesser extent Exelby, Burke bolstered the defensive corps with two tried and tested NHLers, Beauchemin a minute-muncher on Burke’s Stanley Cup winning Anaheim team, and a serviceable and truculent stand-in.

With the likes of Schenn, Kaberle, White and Finger filling in the gaps, the Leafs defence appeared one of the most solid and multifaceted in the Eastern conference.

Then, after a reasonably successful pre-season, came the implosion. Amid the revolver door of draftees, prospects, free agents and roster players who made up the Leafs defence in September, nobody really knew how the new faces would mesh come the regular season, least of all into Wilson’s heavy pinching system. The reality was not well at all.

Sans Kubina and an injured Van Ryn, the rotation of defence was little changed from the year before but the systems had altered. Where the ’08-’09 Leafs played to their limits with a responsible defensive game, the Leafs opened up with an uncalculated and desperate offensive D that handcuffed new signees and old hands alike. Wilson’s game plan was tailored to fast-footed D-men underrepresented in Leafland, the result was endless odd man rushes headed the other way and the crux: Beauchemin.

A positional defender, unspectacular by trait, Beauchemin failed to adapt his game to Wilson’s stratagem to such an extent that every mistake was magnified tenfold further worsened by the slow-skating sophomore-slump being experienced by his partner Luke Schenn. This left Komisarek holding the can of truculence on defence which frequently resulted in horrible, untimely penalties that only exacerbated the Leafs other major bug bear: Penalty Killing.

What do the ’94-’95 Mighty Ducks of Anaheim and the ’09-’10 Leafs have in common other than sharing Ron Wilson as a head coach? They are the last two teams to finish bottom in both penalty killing and powerplay percentages, albeit the Leafs have the distinction of being the first team to achieve this onerous watermark in the thirty team era.

While one could point to the minutia of execution, a broader assessment of the Leafs special teams (at least prior to the addition of Dion Phaneuf) could be “mindless.” The same powerplays, played out hundreds of times over to a degree that even a casual observer could turn clairvoyant on where the puck was going while the collapsing PK suffered from a similar issue to that of the defence: Player Combinations.

Wilson never nailed his combinations, opting instead for a season long line juggling experiment. When you look around the cream of the NHL’s top defensive teams and the league’s top penalty killing units you see one thing – consistency; the same players in the top 4 spots on D, the same players manning the PK units. Endless fondling of defensive partners and PKers only served to suggest one thing; either Burke had staffed the Leafs with duds or Wilson was jamming a square peg of a gameplan into a round circle of talent.

One could argue the former, that Beauchemin and Komisarek where little more than complimentary D-men on their former teams alongside Niedermayer in Anaheim and Markov in Montreal; but a far likelier appraisal, considering the pedigree of Kaberle and the promise of Schenn, is that Wilson failed to tailor his strategy to the limitations Burke had on realising his vision of an ’06-‘07 Anaheim team in blue jerseys.

Burke once said that “losing has a corrosive effect on a player,” a typically eloquent response to a culture that has enshrined the Leafs from top to bottom for the best part of a decade. Wilson is a coach that knows what it is to win but the fading sense of accountability he wrought in his first year has left the organization cold. Now he is tasked with bringing a young core of forwards and the likes of Schenn and Gunnarsson onward to the Promised Land with a prickly nature at odds with the ultimate objective.

So should Wilson remain head coach going forward? For all the shortcomings that bore out on the ice last year for Toronto the successful tandem of Burke and Wilson at the Olympics (a position unquestionably owed to Providence College) with a fundamentally young team points to yes.

At least for now.

Entering with lower-than-usual expectations, the USA rode the traditional combination of grit, size and skill all the way to a gold medal showdown. Sporting a wheelhouse line of Backes, Ryan and Drury; Wilson’s team USA demonstrated how relentless forechecking and bullying grind could propel a team with a modicum of talent all the way. It also illustrated the Leafs roster shortcomings and paradoxically Wilson’s own failures in Toronto.

Subsequently the question remains whether Wilson can channel his Olympic mojo into a full regular season and apply a system that is symbiotic with the tools at his disposal. If he can`t, and quickly, there will be no more turning to the failings of Vesa Toskala.

After all friendship can only take you so far.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Julie Sucks

    None of us can be GM…we’re all cunts.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ Julie Sucks:
    For sure. But straight up, Kessel > Cammalleri IMO

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie Sucks

    Gili wrote:

    your all cunts. the leafs should hire gary roberts. ex leaf to get the young guys in shape, won a cup and has done a whole hell of a lot more with the teams hes been on then anyone on the roster now. cant stand reading the elitest posts that idiots like you have. its not like anyone here REALL|y has any idea whats going on so how can you juudge. grow up. count chocula.grow up

    This is the post of the year. We may as well shut down the site. There’s no point in going on.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie Sucks

    Jordan wrote:

    @ Julie Sucks:
    For sure. But straight up, Kessel > Cammalleri IMO

    Yep, for sure…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    From what I seen of Kessel in the Olympics, I wasn’t impressed with his play during high pressure situations. Cammelleri in THIS YEARS playoffs is money, plus he was on pace to score 30+ to 40 goals in the season. They are both 2 similar style players and I hope Kessel proves me wrong, but I would take Cammelleri right now if I was a playoff team.
    -
    He is also the reason why I wouldn’t be scared to take a flyer on a smallish player such as at the draft and such. Him and Gionta are just 2 examples of smallish players doing well in the NHL. Aslong as they are skilled and play their role, there is room for every player of any size. Include Priase and Kane, hopefully Kadri soon.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie Sucks

    @ DIGGLER:
    It’s good to see small players having a chance. I don’t miss the garbage hockey of the 90′s at all.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    @ Julie Sucks:
    They bring that element of speed and craftiness, its as if every team has a Gilmour or something now.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    @ Diggler
    Kessel is a ppg player in the playoffs (9g 5a in 14games), just sayen

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    @ jaredoflondon:
    Yeah I remember, and Boston was a well built playoff team.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    @Diggler
    right, and we know Kessel cant score without Savard!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    @ jaredoflondon:
    He couldn’t until Bozak came along.
    -
    Just as a question, are your saying Kessel was the leader of Boston when they went on that run last year in the playoffs??
    -
    To me Cammalleri is scoring the goals when needed and asked upon.
    Kessel is a Leaf and proud of it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    remember too that cammalleri has only has 2 30+ goal years so far and is 27. Kessel has 2 at 22. Kessel scored 36 goals at age 20-21 years old. Cammalleri scored 5 in 28 games at that age. Kessel is wayyyyyyy further along then him right now. But only time will tell

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    @Digger
    that should have had a =P after it, but still
    Kessel was scoring fine at the start of the year without Bozak, then he hit a cold streak when the lack of a training camp caught up to him. Sure Bozak helped, but many of Kessels goals were all him, he is a rush scorer and doesnt need someone feeding him tap ins to score.

    No, I’m not saying Kessel was a leader, just that he scored at a PPG pace, but I do remember a goal or two of his being pretty clutch. I’m not trying to discount Cammalleri as a hockey player at all, just that Kessel himself has proven that he can preform under pressure.
    The Olympics, sure he wasn’t exactly impact, but then Cammy wasnt even on team Canadas radar.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CarltontheBear

    Fuck I hate the Habs so much

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    I just like Cammalleri, I think he is a cool, calm, clutch player. Players like him, and Savard and even Gionta are later bloomers that have become key figures on hockey teams, and I don’t think anybody would question here their value on a team such as the Leafs right now?
    May I bring this up too that goal scoring isn’t everything. Roenick scored over 500 goals, 4 times in his first 6 years scored 40 goals or more, and he never won the most important thing in hockey, a Stanely Cup ring. Just saying.
    But I love Kessel, he’s a Leafs. I prefer him hands down over players like Semin or Frolov, that’s for sure.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DIGGLER

    Hey, Winnipeg back in the bid for a team, that’s pretty sweet!!
    I wonder how Bettmen feels about this??

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    The only problem with saying you’d rather have Cammalleri, Hall/Seguin, a 1st and a 2nd than Cammalleri and Kessel is the fact that with Cammalleri starting the year for the Leafs is that they wouldn’t have got off to such a bad start and would have finished alot higher than 29th in the league. Therefore we wouldn’t have been getting Hall or Seguin with our first round pick.
    Then if the Kessel trade was still made, there is no way Boston would be getting a Top 10 pick with the Leafs 1st rounder this summer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    As for Burke’s job as a GM so far, it hasn’t been as great as people are making it out to be.
    Sure he signed a few good undrafted free agents from college (Hanson, Bozak and Irwin) and Europe (Gustavsson, Rynnas). The Phaneuf and Giguere trades were also great and the deal to bring in Caputi for Ponikarovsky can’t really be judged yet.
    .
    How about trading Kubina and Stapleton to Atlanta for Exelby and Stuart?? Then going on to sign Komisarek with the Cap space gained in the deal. I don’t really see that trade swaying in Burke’s favour. Personally I’d rather have Kubina over Komisarek and Exelby never found his game on the Leafs this year.
    How about trading Stralman and Stuart for Primeau and a 2nd? I believe Stralman is going to develop into a solid defenseman and although the 2nd round pick was nice, Primeau wasn’t really needed.
    That second round pick was intregral in acquiring Kessel, which could end up being one of Burke’s biggest mistakes if Hall or Seguin turn out to be Superstars.
    He got ripped off in the Steampniak deal, but nobody could have seen Lee tearing up the league like he did in Phoenix.
    Also, signing Beauchemin wasn’t really neccessary, although I don’t believe he’s as bad of a defenseman as people on here are making him out to be. Just for the record, he leads all Team Canada players in Ice Time at the IIHF World Championships this yaer. I just feel that $3.8 million should have been put towards signing a forward.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kb

    @ Schenn:
    .
    I’d rather have a healthy Komisarek (which we didn’t get) over a healthy Kubina – who right now be walking out the door for free as he was in the exact same situation that Kaberle finds himself in this off-season (NTC window). And Primeau > Stuart, while 2nd = Stralman. Funny enough, I didn’t see Calgary lambasted for trading Stralman for a 3rd. But hey that’s just my opinion.
    .
    Random thoughts…..just looked at deeply at some of the threads on HF Boards for the first time, and I saw what might be the biggest collection of slack jawed yokels who know less than zero about hockey. Unreal how all things Leafs are worthless, and all players on their own teams are superstars in waiting, or superstars right now. I laughed out loud several times….glad to see that there are people with room temperature IQ’s (or below) willing to share their valuable insight for all to see.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BeLeafer

    @ DIGGLER:

    remember Kessel is 6 or something years younger than Cammalleri. When Cammalleri was 22,23 he wasn’t doing that much and took a bunch of seasons to really become a goal scorer, while Kessel can and has scored 30 goals twice already by the age of 22.
    When Kessel is his age and in the playoffs, he’ll be lighting the lamp and scoring crazy clutch goals.
    lets all relax on the mike Cammalleri talk, he’ll fade away in Montreal as his contract goes on,…..

    man watching the canadiens is painful, Pittsburgh needs to put them away when they get the chances.. aren’t their coaches realizing that Montreal is collapsing all 5 guys to the middle of ice/?…. work around it…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BeLeafer

    @ Schenn:

    I don’t mind most of Burkie’s moves.. I do agree that the Kubina one was not right, if he waited longer after July/1st he coulda got more than Stuart and Exelby.
    But I’m happy to have a younger Komisarek over Kubina.. watch how he comes back next year healthy and ready to be a leader and play is heard out.. he’s going to have a sick season.

    Bottom line is that Burke has gutted and brought in some youth, depth and key guys like Kessel, Phaneuf, Giguere , Bozak and Komi… plus he’s going to add some more talent this summer via FA, the Kabby trade and possibly swindle away some valuable pieces from chicago… I have this sense that we’re going to see a team in camp that is much more hungry and talented that the one that was on the ice last season

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • KeonClark

    Bottom line is the reason why we were last on both the PP and PK is that this team lacks talent, heart and role-players (defensive specialists, faceoff specialists, offensive minded defensemen etc.) As much as I want to blame Ron Wilson for the atrocious special teams, i think he did the best that he could with the players he had.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Kubina making 5mil at 33 years old
    Komisarek making 4.5 mil at 28 yearss old.
    I would take komi all day

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime

    Jordan wrote:

    Kubina making 5mil at 33 years old
    Komisarek making 4.5 mil at 28 yearss old.
    I would take komi all day

    I don’t understand why people hate FA dman after the first year playing D in the NHL is so tough if you go back and look at the statistics of FA defenseman after there signed almost all of them have an off year. Let Komi play a whole season before he becomes the goat. It takes significant time for a dman to learn his new pairings and a new system.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Julie Sucks

    I don’t know about Wilson yet. I’m leaning towards hating him, but I’ll give him another 3/4 season or so. He has to get the PK and the PP going, no matter what. Perhaps most importantly, he has to find a way to get Dion back to where he was 3 years ago. If we have a stud D-man like that, everything else will follow, IMO. The fact is, and I may get flamed for this, he’s riding the coattails of his first 2-3 seasons. His last 2-3 have been a fraction of his previous success. He was a beast before, and for whatever reason he stopped progressing and may have in fact regressed. Bottom line – he’s got to put up BIG points this year and in the future. I like Detroit’s philosophy: you don’t pay big money to D-men who don’t put up big points. By that way of thinking, at this point, Dion’s grossly overpayed.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)