Prospect Season in Review: Ryan, Reimer, Champagne

by on May 13, 2010 in Leafs Prospects - 111 Comments

Share

After stockpiling up on picks during the past couple drafts as well as cornering the European and college free agent markets, the Maple Leafs‘ farm system is beginning to reap the rewards of unprecedented depth and talent. In the first installment of our MLHS “Prospect Season in Review” series, I’ll be taking a look at three of the team’s top prospects: Kenny Ryan, James Reimer, and Joel Champagne.

Kenny Ryan: Forward, Windsor Spitfires

Drafted: 2nd round, 50th overall in 2009 by Toronto

The Good: During Toronto’s first draft under Brian Burke‘s tenure, you could see a clear shift in the organizational draft strategy: a primary focus on character, toughness, and size. Kenny Ryan fits this bill perfectly. Described by scouting director Dave Morrisonn as a “linebacker on skates”, Ryan is built for the aggressive, physical forecheck style of play Burke has been famous for implementing in Anaheim. Much like Kulemin, Ryan puts a lot of work in the the dirty areas, consistently winning the battles in the corners and along the boards. He doesn’t have what you would call high hockey IQ, but he’s a responsible role player who can be counted on to perform whatever task you assign to him. In that sense, he’s the kind of grinding workhorse all good teams need, especially come playoff time.

The Bad: Ryan drew much criticism from the NCAA ranks when he decided to forgo his Boston College commitment in order to play for the Windsor Spitfires. At first glance, it seemed like a great fit. Kenny would have the opportunity to play alongside fellow 2009 Leaf draftee Jesse Blacker as well as suit up for one of the most explosive junior offenses in the country. Alas, it didn’t work out quite as well. Ryan spent much of this past season in a support role, struggled with consistency, and just couldn’t find a way to put it together on the scoresheet. Ryan produced an underwhelming 35 points in 52 games, and just 5 points in 19 playoff games. He was never billed as a future high scoring NHL’er, but he does have strong offensive instincts and a hard, accurate shot.

The Future: With several prominent offensive players graduating from Windsor this season, it’s likely that the Maple Leafs will use the opportunity to send Ryan back for one more junior season with the hope that he can benefit from the increased ice-time. For Kenny to find himself donning a Maple Leaf jersey within the next few years, he will have to work to improve his skating a little bit but more importantly, he needs to find a way to be consistently productive every night. That doesn’t necessarily have to be in the offensive end of the ice, but he cannot allow his scoring struggles to dictate his play in the defensive zone. With that said, there is a lot to like about Ryan’s game and the upside is there for him to become a two-way winger who can chip in about 20 goals a year at the NHL level.

James Reimer: Goaltender, Toronto Marlies

Drafted: 4th round, 99th overall in 2006 by Toronto

The Good: After he led the ECHL’s South Carolina Stingrays to the Kelly Cup and earning a Finals MVP award in the process, I took notice of Reimer as a dark horse breakout candidate in the 2009 Maple Leafs Annual. It was the first time in his career that Reimer had the luxury of playing with a half decent team in front of him, and he flashed some considerable upside. He plays a very simple style, displaying good understanding of angles and positioning, using his entire 6’3 frame to line up pucks without a whole lot of movement in the net. This season, James took advantage of the Justin Pogge trade by grabbing the reins as the Marlies’ top goaltender with an outstanding 2.25 GAA and 0.925 SV%. Unfortunately, his breakout season was shortened to just 24 games due to injury.

The Bad: Honestly? There’s not a whole lot negative I can say about how Reimer performed this season. The biggest knock against him might just be the lack of professional experience, but that’s hardly a red flag. He doesn’t have the pure athleticism of a guy like Luongo or Gustavsson in terms of agility and reflexes, so skeptics might be a little tough on him when it comes to projecting his ultimate upside at the NHL level. But once again, goalies like Tim Thomas, Chris Osgood and to an extent even Jimmy Howard have shown that the mental aspect and understanding of the game may be just as important, if not more so, than the god-given physical gifts.

The Future: With the recent signings of Ben Scrivens and Jussi Rynnas, it’s a little unclear what the immediate future holds for James Reimer. He’s by far the most seasoned and polished of the group, so it stands to reason that he would be the Marlies starter going into next season with one of the two as his backup, and the other down in the ECHL. However, there has been speculation that Burke may use his new-found goaltending depth to dangle Reimer as a trade chip either in a multi-player deal or to recoup a draft pick in one of the first two rounds. Wherever he eventually lands, the potential is there for Reimer to be at least an excellent NHL backup with an outside chance at being a quality everyday starter in the right defensive system.

Joel Champagne: Forward, Victoriaville Tigers

Drafted: 5th round, 129th overall in 2008

The Good: Another product of the team’s recent “the bigger the better” draft motto, Champagne is an imposing physical specimen standing at 6’4 220 lbs. Joel is an excellent on the draw, spending the majority of the past three seasons among the league leaders in faceoff percentage. Offensively, he took a step forward late last season after coming over to the PEI Rockets via trade, and carried that momentum over into the ’09-’10 campaign. He scored 79 points in 65 games split between two teams, and followed that up with an impressive 13 points in 16 playoff games, something that he couldn’t do last year.

The Bad: Despite decent offensive totals, Champagne doesn’t possess the hands or skill he would need to become a top six forward at the NHL level. He is being groomed as a shutdown centre for the bottom six group, but still has a lot to learn. He needs to use his body more effectively along the boards and to play with a sustained level of physical intensity. Joel’s skating is also below average, so he will have to make his living in the dirty areas during offensive zone setups, but at this point in his career, he isn’t overly effective in front of the net.

The Future: At the time of the draft, scouts raved about Champagne’s size and faceoff ability, explaining that those two skills alone should be enough for him to carve out a role as a defensive faceoff specialist ala Joel Otto. Champagne will likely spend the next couple seasons on the Marlies, and if the coaches there can succeed in helping him round out the rough edges of his game, we could see him become a fixture on the roster as the team’s third or fourth line centre of the future.

A big thanks to everyone for their kind wishes and comments in the previous thread. Despite the increased workload and responsibility, I will definitely remain a regular around these parts. You can’t get rid of me that easily!

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Doorman

    Luke: Its all good! I have got one of those; but Living in Alta; I never new thats what it was called. CUTE!

    Speaking of Roberts; A good friend of mine in Calgary told me Roberts had Invited Luke Schenn and Nazrim Kadri to his Place up in Muskoka for the summer. To do a complete body
    and training workout. I think thats a great Idea.

    ; P

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Michael Stephens wrote:

    On a completely unrelated note, anyone else going to see Them Crooked Vultures tomorrow at the ACC?

    What are the Voltures?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • luke

    Michael Stephens wrote:

    On a completely unrelated note, anyone else going to see Them Crooked Vultures tomorrow at the ACC?

    .
    I’m a huge Foos/Nirvana fan – been to 3 Foos concerts, but TCV really don’t appeal to me for some reason.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Switch to new thread. Mr Aldred is being sneaky!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @Luke

    No foolin, I’ve seen the Foo Fighters play twice in Toronto and once in Detroit.

    @Doorman

    Them Crooked Vultures is a ‘super group’ of sorts. Josh Homme of Queens of the Stone Age, Dave Grohl of the Foo Fighters, and John Paul Jones of Led Zepplin.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Holey christ guys: The only name I know is Jones from Zep. Sorry!

    Barry Manilow is good though!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • luke

    Doorman wrote:

    Holey christ guys: The only name I know is Jones from Zep. Sorry!
    Barry Manilow is good though!

    It’s funny because you’re old ; p

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Schenn

    Did anybody else see Kadri on Sportsnet’s Memorial Cup Preview last night?
    He said that he took a week off after the season and has been doing some pretty unique dryland training with his trainer (can’t remember his name).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Luke: Wait for it! Cause old age is coming at you fast! Its just around the next corner.

    And the bitch of it; Is it does not slow down or stop; Until you do!

    Cheers.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Just my pal…now looking what to purchase. Thinking remington 870 tactical.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    naw just for coyotes that get to close to the property (if they did) or the occassional street punk.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    @ Canuck:

    In that case 50 cal for sure! Long distance. Sorry to say that an 870 is an old cal. and is slow
    Not much accurate distance there. If you want some advice on guns or ammo. Ask I will
    try to answer. I know my shit. Guns Guns and Guns. Army 22 years.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    870 isn’t a cal.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    yeah…870 is the model of shotgun. its a 12 gauge. ……

    http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/shotguns/model-870/model-870-express-tactical.aspx

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Canuck: Your right. My mind was on the Bulits.
    I own 3, 870 pump actions ( different Guages.)

    They are with out a dobt thye best shot guns on the mkt.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    50 cal is also totally useless in a civilian setting, too big for hunting, too expensive for fun shooting and guns themselves are wildly expensive and hard to find

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    jaredoflondon wrote:

    50 cal is also totally useless in a civilian setting, too big for hunting, too expensive for fun shooting and guns themselves are wildly expensive and hard to find

    I agree: How close do you get to a coyotes. Not very in my life in alberta. Its al long distance.
    Of course 50 cal is expensive. Do you want to kill coyotes.
    Its a new era in 50 cal. thats the normal sniper cal. 2730 meters record.
    If you cant afford a gun we should not be talking.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    @ Doorman:
    you dont need to be 2kms away from a coyote to shoot one, and you can get pretty good range out of a 308 or 300 short mag. Which you can buy for 500-700 dollars. You want a 50BMG rifle you are paying the better part of 2 grand. Just because I can’t afford a Ferrari doesnt mean I cant buy a corvette

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Canuck: 870,s are very good on street punks, grizzly bears, and who ever else decides to be
    uninvited.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • luke

    I’ve got to agree with Jared, seems a little much. All of those things you mentioned can be dealt with using a .22, if you know what you’re doing.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Doorman wrote:

    Canuck: 870,s are very good on street punks, grizzly bears, and who ever else decides to be
    uninvited.

    that is my hope. With a little #4 shot just so the wife can handle it as well. May have to get her own .20 gauge. Pink of course.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    Canuck: 20 gu. use slugs. and ssg,s. or # 1. or 2.s. Thats best ammmo.

    You have the same choice with the twelve Guage. But double odd buck covers it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)