’09-10 Player Reviews: Mikhail Grabovski

We’ve partnered up with Pension Plan Puppets to bring to you a Player Review series, where we will be evaluating and grading the 2009-10 season for every Leaf who featured in a significant number of games for the Blue and White last season, with an eye towards 2010-11.Today we feature Mikhail Grabovski, profiled by Garrett Bauman.

The Summary:

Talented albeit inconsistent, Grabovski has held down the second-line centre job in Toronto for two seasons, with mixed results.  A flashy player who scored 20 goals in his rookie season, Grabovski’s tenure in Toronto has featured as many moments of offensive brilliance as head-scratching decisions (both on the ice and off).

Listed at 5’11″ and a generous 182 lbs, the feisty 26 year-old Belarussian plays a much more aggressive style than his size would indicate. Although he has done a passable job in the #2 centre role, questions remain as to whether he fits GM Brian Burke’s long-term vision of the club. Under contract for two more years, the enigmatic forward may find himself on the trading block should a top centre become available (via trade or FA) to the Maple Leafs.

Year Team GP G A Pts +/- PIM S S%
06-07 Canadiens 3 0 0 0 -2 0 5 0.0
07-08 Canadiens 24 3 6 9 -4 4 23 13.0
89-09 Leafs 78 20 28 48 -8 92 120 16.7
09-10 Leafs 59 10 25 35 3 10 126 7.9

The Good:

Grabovski followed up an impressive 20-goal rookie campaign with a respectable sophomore year, posting 35 points in 59 games, during which he missed nearly two months with a broken wrist.  An impressive stickhandler and puck-protector, and possessing deceptive speed and superb agility, Grabovski is at his best when operating down low along the boards and behind the net.  He has a hard, accurate wrist shot (16.7 SH% his rookie year) which he is not afraid to use, and a nifty array of breakaway moves in his arsenal.

An underrated defensive player, Grabovski’s two-way game has grown by leaps and bounds under coach Ron Wilson: during his time in Toronto he has emerged as an excellent forechecker and has displayed a growing commitment to the backcheck (his CORSI and GVT placed him among team leaders in both categories last season).  He is fearless on the ice, skating full-force through the danger areas and willfully absorbing the subsequent physical punishment to make a play.

The Bad:

A streaky player, Grabovski has a frustrating tendency to disappear for short stretches of four to five games at a time, on several occasions throughout the season.  His ability on the draw remains a work in progress, as he has posted a  faceoff win % below the 50% threshold each of the past two seasons (although to his credit he did improve from 44.5% in 2008-09 to 49.8% in 2009-10).

Grabovski also has a knack for letting his emotions get the better of him, often allowing aggressive opposition play to throw him off his game. During the past two seasons, he was suspended for shoving an official, and arrested (although later released) after a bar fight during the Olympics. Maturity, both on the ice and off, will be required if Grabovski is to fulfill his potential in a Maple Leafs uniform.

The Ugly:

Despite his obvious talents, the major flaw in Grabovski’s game is his selfishness with the puck.  His numerous attempts to skate through the entire five-man opposition unit by himself, rather than make use of his teammates, reminds fans on a far-too-regular basis of one Sergei Berezin (the original ‘Do-It-Yourself’ artist; Bob Vila has nothing on him).  Grabovski is by no means a terrible playmaker — his vision and passing abilities are quite good — but he doesn’t make the decision to use his teammates as frequently as the coaching staff would prefer, often to the detriment of what appear to be quality scoring opportunities in the making.

Noteworthy:

Grabovski’s ’09-10 giveaway-to-takeaway ratio of 1.3/1 (actual numbers: 40/30) is perhaps his most revealing statistic, highlighting his propensity to turn the puck over while skating into the the opposition, but also his ability to generate a similar number of opposition turnovers on the backcheck.

Audience Participation:

Now it’s your turn. In the comments, rate Gabovski on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential, and your expectations for the season.

Discussion:

What is the likelihood we will see Grabovski suit up for the Maple Leafs in 2010-11? Do you think he will be traded in the off-season, during the season, or finish the year as the Leafs’ second-line centre?

Tags:

  • flappypaddle

    According to capgeek Leafers just resigned Alex Foster for what its worth….

  • Schenn

    To make things simple, lets assume the current roster of 14 players the Blackhawks currently have signed for next season are equal to the Salary Cap.
    They have to sign Ladd ($2 million), Eager ($1 million), Skille ($1 million), Hjalmarsson (2.5 million), Hendry (800K) and Niemi ($3 million).
    Thats a combined estimated $10.3 million that they’ll tie up by signing 6 of their 15 RFAs.
    If they bury Huet in Rockford, they’ll save $5.625 million, but would likely call up Crawford, who makes 800K. which would lower the savings to $4.828 million.
    Those moves give them 12 forwards, 6 defensemen and 2 goalies, but leave them $5.472 over the cap. That means they would have to shed about $7 million more in salary, when you consider the two players they remove need to be replaced at about 750K each.

  • Only_crime

    offside12 wrote:

    Only_crime wrote:
    offside12 wrote:
    @ Only_crime:
    Madden and Burish are UFAs… they stil have 7 or 8 key RFAs to sign.. then they have to replace the UFAs they let walk… please just give up.. no one here is agreeing with you so i dont think everyone else is wrong
    who are the RFA’s? you still havent mentioned one.
    F Ladd, Andrew » RFA – $1.6m
    F Skille, Jack » RFA – $1.3m
    F Eager, Ben » RFA – $1.0m
    F Davis, Nathan » RFA – $0.8m
    F Brophey, Evan » RFA – $0.8m
    G Niemi, Antti » RFA – $0.8m
    D Brennan, Mike » RFA – $0.8m
    F Fraser, Colin » RFA – $0.7m
    D Hjalmarsson, Niklas » RFA – $0.6m
    D Hendry, Jordan » RFA – $0.6m
    G Toivonen, Hannu » RFA – $0.6m
    D Sawyer, Jean-Claude » RFA – $0.5m
    F Hobson, Adam » RFA – $0.5m
    F MacArthur, Peter » RFA – $0.5m
    F Bickell, Bryan » RFA – $0.5m
    there you go you fucking retard

    BRO theres only a handful of names that will count against the cap next year if resigned and theres not a single name on that list that chicago NEEDS to retain… nice try though trade sharp cause they want to resign colin frasor way to back up your point and if you want to call me a fucking retard lol and make leaf fans look bad go ahead

  • offside12

    Only_crime wrote:

    offside12 wrote:
    Only_crime wrote:
    offside12 wrote:
    @ Only_crime:
    Madden and Burish are UFAs… they stil have 7 or 8 key RFAs to sign.. then they have to replace the UFAs they let walk… please just give up.. no one here is agreeing with you so i dont think everyone else is wrong
    who are the RFA’s? you still havent mentioned one.
    F Ladd, Andrew » RFA – $1.6m
    F Skille, Jack » RFA – $1.3m
    F Eager, Ben » RFA – $1.0m
    F Davis, Nathan » RFA – $0.8m
    F Brophey, Evan » RFA – $0.8m
    G Niemi, Antti » RFA – $0.8m
    D Brennan, Mike » RFA – $0.8m
    F Fraser, Colin » RFA – $0.7m
    D Hjalmarsson, Niklas » RFA – $0.6m
    D Hendry, Jordan » RFA – $0.6m
    G Toivonen, Hannu » RFA – $0.6m
    D Sawyer, Jean-Claude » RFA – $0.5m
    F Hobson, Adam » RFA – $0.5m
    F MacArthur, Peter » RFA – $0.5m
    F Bickell, Bryan » RFA – $0.5m
    there you go you fucking retard
    BRO theres only 2 names that will count against the cap… nice try though and if you want to call me a fucking retard lol and make leaf fans look bad go ahead

    Hahahaha youre just a joke…

  • Only_crime

    offside12 wrote:

    Only_crime wrote:
    offside12 wrote:
    Only_crime wrote:
    offside12 wrote:
    @ Only_crime:
    Madden and Burish are UFAs… they stil have 7 or 8 key RFAs to sign.. then they have to replace the UFAs they let walk… please just give up.. no one here is agreeing with you so i dont think everyone else is wrong
    who are the RFA’s? you still havent mentioned one.
    F Ladd, Andrew » RFA – $1.6m
    F Skille, Jack » RFA – $1.3m
    F Eager, Ben » RFA – $1.0m
    F Davis, Nathan » RFA – $0.8m
    F Brophey, Evan » RFA – $0.8m
    G Niemi, Antti » RFA – $0.8m
    D Brennan, Mike » RFA – $0.8m
    F Fraser, Colin » RFA – $0.7m
    D Hjalmarsson, Niklas » RFA – $0.6m
    D Hendry, Jordan » RFA – $0.6m
    G Toivonen, Hannu » RFA – $0.6m
    D Sawyer, Jean-Claude » RFA – $0.5m
    F Hobson, Adam » RFA – $0.5m
    F MacArthur, Peter » RFA – $0.5m
    F Bickell, Bryan » RFA – $0.5m
    there you go you fucking retard
    BRO theres only 2 names that will count against the cap… nice try though and if you want to call me a fucking retard lol and make leaf fans look bad go ahead
    Hahahaha youre just a joke…

    haha kay bro trade sharp so they can retain colin frasor sounds like chicago has some tough choices you should have applyed for the vacant tampa GM job

  • Schenn

    @ Only_crime:
    Only 2 names that will count against the cap? Name them!!
    I’ve got atleast 6 mentioned in my earlier post:
    1. Ladd
    2. Skille
    3. Eager
    4. Niemi
    5. Hjalmarsson
    6. Hendry

  • Only_crime

    Schenn wrote:

    @ Only_crime:
    Only 2 names that will count against the cap? Name them!!
    I’ve got atleast 6 mentioned in my earlier post:
    1. Ladd
    2. Skille
    3. Eager
    4. Niemi
    5. Hjalmarsson
    6. Hendry

    its either ladd or skille one will be in the minors or traded. eagers wont get much that leaves niemi and hjalmarsson … do you really think hendry will make the team?

  • offside12

    Schenn wrote:

    @ Only_crime:
    Only 2 names that will count against the cap? Name them!!
    I’ve got atleast 6 mentioned in my earlier post:
    1. Ladd
    2. Skille
    3. Eager
    4. Niemi
    5. Hjalmarsson
    6. Hendry

    Im just gonna stop.. i know this guy’s wrong and so does everyone else

  • Doorman

    Boy: Am I glad I stayed out of this One!

  • flappypaddle

    Schenn wrote:

    To make things simple, lets assume the current roster of 14 players the Blackhawks currently have signed for next season are equal to the Salary Cap.
    They have to sign Ladd ($2 million), Eager ($1 million), Skille ($1 million), Hjalmarsson (2.5 million), Hendry (800K) and Niemi ($3 million).
    Thats a combined estimated $10.3 million that they’ll tie up by signing 6 of their 15 RFAs.
    If they bury Huet in Rockford, they’ll save $5.625 million, but would likely call up Crawford, who makes 800K. which would lower the savings to $4.828 million.
    Those moves give them 12 forwards, 6 defensemen and 2 goalies, but leave them $5.472 over the cap. That means they would have to shed about $7 million more in salary, when you consider the two players they remove need to be replaced at about 750K each.

    I wonder if they would do:
    Hanson and Mitchell for Versteeg or: Byfuglien, Brouwer for Stalberg and Hanson

  • flappypaddle

    Oh and just for the record it looks like Chi needs 2 defense man on the cheap I am wonder if it would be worth it to trade Blacker, but package him with Finger for someone like Versteeg and Ladd.

  • kingkessel

    Holy fuck, well, thank you to all who was put someone in their place while I was out.

  • BeLeafer

    @ Only_crime:
    all the bonuses from Chicago winning the cup has caused them to be screwed even more… Sharp, Versteeg and one more forward are gone.. then they have to figure out the plan for Huet..

  • derek

    really wish “idiot” would shut the #$% up, he has no clue….CHICAGO NEEDS TO SIGN 9 GUYS AND HAS MINUS 5 MILLION IN CAP SPACE TO WORK WITH….maybe he will get it now….but i doubt it….