’09-10 Player Reviews: Mikhail Grabovski

by on June 12, 2010 in Uncategorized - 614 Comments

Share

We’ve partnered up with Pension Plan Puppets to bring to you a Player Review series, where we will be evaluating and grading the 2009-10 season for every Leaf who featured in a significant number of games for the Blue and White last season, with an eye towards 2010-11.Today we feature Mikhail Grabovski, profiled by Garrett Bauman.

The Summary:

Talented albeit inconsistent, Grabovski has held down the second-line centre job in Toronto for two seasons, with mixed results.  A flashy player who scored 20 goals in his rookie season, Grabovski’s tenure in Toronto has featured as many moments of offensive brilliance as head-scratching decisions (both on the ice and off).

Listed at 5’11″ and a generous 182 lbs, the feisty 26 year-old Belarussian plays a much more aggressive style than his size would indicate. Although he has done a passable job in the #2 centre role, questions remain as to whether he fits GM Brian Burke‘s long-term vision of the club. Under contract for two more years, the enigmatic forward may find himself on the trading block should a top centre become available (via trade or FA) to the Maple Leafs.

Year Team GP G A Pts +/- PIM S S%
06-07 Canadiens 3 0 0 0 -2 0 5 0.0
07-08 Canadiens 24 3 6 9 -4 4 23 13.0
89-09 Leafs 78 20 28 48 -8 92 120 16.7
09-10 Leafs 59 10 25 35 3 10 126 7.9

The Good:

Grabovski followed up an impressive 20-goal rookie campaign with a respectable sophomore year, posting 35 points in 59 games, during which he missed nearly two months with a broken wrist.  An impressive stickhandler and puck-protector, and possessing deceptive speed and superb agility, Grabovski is at his best when operating down low along the boards and behind the net.  He has a hard, accurate wrist shot (16.7 SH% his rookie year) which he is not afraid to use, and a nifty array of breakaway moves in his arsenal.

An underrated defensive player, Grabovski’s two-way game has grown by leaps and bounds under coach Ron Wilson: during his time in Toronto he has emerged as an excellent forechecker and has displayed a growing commitment to the backcheck (his CORSI and GVT placed him among team leaders in both categories last season).  He is fearless on the ice, skating full-force through the danger areas and willfully absorbing the subsequent physical punishment to make a play.

The Bad:

A streaky player, Grabovski has a frustrating tendency to disappear for short stretches of four to five games at a time, on several occasions throughout the season.  His ability on the draw remains a work in progress, as he has posted a  faceoff win % below the 50% threshold each of the past two seasons (although to his credit he did improve from 44.5% in 2008-09 to 49.8% in 2009-10).

Grabovski also has a knack for letting his emotions get the better of him, often allowing aggressive opposition play to throw him off his game. During the past two seasons, he was suspended for shoving an official, and arrested (although later released) after a bar fight during the Olympics. Maturity, both on the ice and off, will be required if Grabovski is to fulfill his potential in a Maple Leafs uniform.

The Ugly:

Despite his obvious talents, the major flaw in Grabovski’s game is his selfishness with the puck.  His numerous attempts to skate through the entire five-man opposition unit by himself, rather than make use of his teammates, reminds fans on a far-too-regular basis of one Sergei Berezin (the original ‘Do-It-Yourself’ artist; Bob Vila has nothing on him).  Grabovski is by no means a terrible playmaker — his vision and passing abilities are quite good — but he doesn’t make the decision to use his teammates as frequently as the coaching staff would prefer, often to the detriment of what appear to be quality scoring opportunities in the making.

Noteworthy:

Grabovski’s ’09-10 giveaway-to-takeaway ratio of 1.3/1 (actual numbers: 40/30) is perhaps his most revealing statistic, highlighting his propensity to turn the puck over while skating into the the opposition, but also his ability to generate a similar number of opposition turnovers on the backcheck.

Audience Participation:

Now it’s your turn. In the comments, rate Gabovski on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential, and your expectations for the season.

Discussion:

What is the likelihood we will see Grabovski suit up for the Maple Leafs in 2010-11? Do you think he will be traded in the off-season, during the season, or finish the year as the Leafs’ second-line centre?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • rockydundas

    Only_crime wrote:

    but lets be realalistic reimer and a 3rd round pick for sharp? give me a fucking break.

    Gotta agree with you there. If Burke is offered that, he takes it in a nano second… whatever that is!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie

    @ Only_crime:

    They have 15 players to sign, including Niemi and Byfuglien..

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ksavz

    PS: I bet Carter is expendable in Philly now btw, especially after he had the game winning goal on his stick in game 6 but threw it right at Niemi’s face instead of the gaping left side of the net. Think they’d take Kaberle, Grabo, and Reimer for Carter + a pick?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    @ Only_crime:

    What you’re saying is just not true. They are already over next season’s cap without including all the millions in bonuses that need to be added on, and they only have 14 players signed and about 8 notable RFA’s who all want raises. They are totally fucked because the 29 other teams are going to milk this situation until Chicago goes into full bargain mode.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie

    Does anyone know what time the Press COnference is scheduled for?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    McKelvie wrote:

    Does anyone know what time the Press COnference is scheduled for?

    mapleleafs.com is starting their coverage at 2:30

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kb

    @ Only_crime:
    .
    It’s your fantasy. Please check you numbers, I’m not going to argue with someone who doesn’t take the 30 seconds to look up the fact that the Hawks are over the cap this year and are currently over the cap next year. This little snippet from CAP GEEK should make things clearer for you regarding next year. Please note that I know the cap will probably go up by a couple of million, but you also have to take into account that the bonuses that some of the Hawk players got for winning the cup do not appear on here. So yes, they are OVER THE CAP FOR NEXT YEAR ALREADY!!!
    .
    2010-2011 Chicago Black Hawks
    .
    ROSTER SIZE 14
    AVERAGE AGE 26.86
    SALARY CAP $56,800,000
    PAYROLL $57,598,003
    BONUSES $0
    CAP SPACE $-798,003

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • offside12

    @ Only_crime:

    Dude, you’re jut an idiot.. they have only 14 players signed and a cap hit of 58.8 mill.. they still have to give niemi a raise by at least 2 mill.. 7 other RFAs.. and still have to fill out he roster.. they have like 5 millto sign 7 or 8 guys… fucked. Youre an idiot regardless though.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • derek

    @ Only_crime:
    you really should do your homework….the hawks are over the cap….plus they need to pay the 4 million in bonuses to the like of toews and kane and a few others….that 4 million comes off their cap next year….so with the cap expected to be 58 million…take off the 4 million that leaves them with 54 million to play with…they currently have 14 players signed at 57.5 million…so they need to do alot of work to get under the cap…..so yeah state your case….when someone tells you your wrong…look into it before arguing more….because it make you look like more of an idiot…i hope i helpped you out here offside12….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • offside12
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    .@ Only_crime:

    capgeek updates on a regular basis. nhlnumbers is the one that hasn’t updated in months

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    @ derek:

    Well said. Just to add to that, RFA’s like Niemi and Hjalmarsson are going to get offer sheets from other teams, putting Chicago’s management directly on the spot to shed salary so they can match.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    @ Only_crime:
    i don’t think they are as screwed as some people do but no one has been this screwed by the cap since it has been part of the CBA. http://www.capgeek.com/charts.php?Team=11&salary_cap_mil=58&salary_cap_thou=800&reload=Reload+Chart
    With 14 players signed and a cap of 58.8 mil they have 1.2 mil left in space. Minus 1.3 for going over the cap this year leaves them with – 100,000 in space. Lets say they get rid of Huet and Sharp so add $9,525,000 cap space. At this point they have 9,425,000 in space and 12 roster players. Minus 3 mil from that for Niemi (RFA who won the cup… Cam Ward got 2.7 for taking his team to the finals in his rookie year with worse stats) That leaves 6.4 mil… Andrew Ladd will probably be signed for about 2 mil… That leaves 4.4 with a 14 man roster… Hjalmarsson will probably get around 3 mil but to be safe i’ll say 2.5… That leaves 1.9 mil to sign about 6 more players including Skille, Eager, another goalie… Kyle beach’s cap hit is 1.2 mil if he gets called up. So yeah they are in pretty deep.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • offside12

    @ Only_crime:

    Madden and Burish are UFAs… they stil have 7 or 8 key RFAs to sign.. then they have to replace the UFAs they let walk… please just give up.. no one here is agreeing with you so i dont think everyone else is wrong

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    McKelvie wrote:

    @ Only_crime:
    They have 15 players to sign, including Niemi and Byfuglien..

    .
    Byfuglien is signed for this year. And will be RFA next summer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Double Dion

    Okay lets play a little game here. In todays press confrence, how many times will Burke use some kind of made up medaphore? Over or under 9.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime

    Double Dion wrote:

    Okay lets play a little game here. In todays press confrence, how many times will Burke use some kind of made up medaphore? Over or under 9.

    haha i like that ill take the over

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • RJ
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • offside12
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • offside12
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)