’09-10 Player Reviews: Carl Gunnarsson

by on June 15, 2010 in Uncategorized - 64 Comments

Share

We’ve partnered up with Pension Plan Puppets to bring to you a Player Review series, where we will be evaluating and grading the 2009-10 season for every Leaf who featured in a significant number of games for the Blue and White last season, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up we feature Carl Gunnarsson, profiled by PPP:

“The Summary: It has become almost comical to hear Brian Burke try to defend JFJ at every turn. I wonder if Burke took the parody twitter account to heart and feels obligated to counteract the impression that he thought that JFJ was ‘retarded’ when the opportunity arises. He does it whenever Tomas Kaberle’s limited no-trade clause is used and he will probably start doing it whenever Carl Gunnarsson is mentioned. I wonder if JFJ might have had a successful career with the Leafs if he had just been in charge of scouting.

The Good

Anytime you get a 7th round pick facing the third toughest competition alongside the worst teammates you’ve done something right with your player development.  Throw in having the third best GVT among defencemenon your club and taking the fewest offensive zone face-offs and you might have a player on your hands. His Corsi relative to his competition is also 3rd among defencemen and considering his zone start is actually quite impressive. But the best part is that despite all of this he is still paid the least among the defencemen.

More here.

The Discussion

What do the Maple Leafs do with Carl Gunnarsson? Do they re-sign him as soon as possible or do they wait to see if he will regress in his second season?

Audience Participation

Rate Gunnarsson below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • rpearce76

    @ long_suffering_leaf_fan:
    I got a feeling Philly is making a play for Price, which might be a deal involving Carter.

    They will most likely go for a couple of cheap journey-man type defenders to fill spots 6 and 7

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BloodonIce

    See, Philly is a team that I think would like Gunnarsson. He’s good, and he’s cheap. Kaberle+Gunnarsson for Carter, and maybe a D prospect.

    Philly’s D looks like:

    Pronger-Timmonen
    Kaberle-Coburn
    Gunnarsson-Carle

    Huge improvement over having Parent-Krajicek as their first pair. Plus their cap hit stays about the same, and they still have tons of forward depth.

    Leafs get a forward that they desperately need, and can fill the back end with some combo of Aulie/Holzer/MVR/Finger/UFA signing for now.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • GordonBombay
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BloodonIce
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • zoonpolitikon

    rpearce76 wrote:

    @ long_suffering_leaf_fan:
    I got a feeling Philly is making a play for Price, which might be a deal involving Carter.
    They will most likely go for a couple of cheap journey-man type defenders to fill spots 6 and 7

    I can see Philly trying to do a straight up swap of Carter for Vokoun. FLA has Markstrom as the goalie of the future and Philly could certainly use a goalie that’s going to help them win now. I think they’d be in better shape to resign Emery rather than trade for an unproven Price.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rpearce76

    I will be honest with you guys. I am a huge Brodeur fan, I worship the guy. But after the season he had, and especially the olympics, as a GM theres no way I give up a 28 yr old talent like Semin for Marty. I’d rather sign Turco or Nabakov and keep my guy. Also, Pretty sure for Semin washington could command Price and possibly another prospect or pick from Montreal or Josh Harding + out of Minnesota.

    I know Brodeur is a winner and all but I can’t see Lou trading him within the conference and making him a rental player after spending his entire career as a Devil.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • GordonBombay
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bring the Cup Home

    the only way we’d ever get ryan is by offering a VERY rich package…..say……Kaberle + Gunnarsson + Kadri. Or Kaberle + Stalberg + Aulie + Reimer perhaps. And I wouldn’t want to do that deal.

    Just get me a young top 6 forward, or an even younger top 3 (ie. star) prospect for kaberle, and I’m happy. add others through free agency.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jaredoflondon

    @ Bring the Cup Home:
    there is no package the leafs can come up with will not be blown out of the water by Nashville(they were in on kessel, they’d be in on Ryan), L.A. they need a scoring winger to replace frolov or any of a dozen other teams

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Canadian kid

    Kabs – Stalberg – Blacker – for Carter + a dman….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bring the Cup Home

    agreed jaredoflondon.

    thing is, since the kessel deal, and the phaneuf deal, our cupboard is much more bare than many teams. you are right that LA or Nashville could offer (and afford to lose more) young talent in return for Ryan.

    the fact that there are 28 other teams out there bidding for the same guys we are in any trade scenario gets lost on this site sometimes. that still doesn’t explain how we got phaneuf for what we offered.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • looshV

    8 for sure. With a name like Gunnarsson how can’t you have boners for this kid?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • twiztedmike
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)