’09-10 Player Reviews: Mike Komisarek

by on June 18, 2010 in Uncategorized - 170 Comments

Share

We’ve partnered up with Pension Plan Puppets to bring to you a Player Review series, where we will be evaluating and grading the 2009-10 season for every Leaf who featured in a significant number of games for the Blue and White last season, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up we feature Mike Komisarek, profiled by Alec Brownscombe.

The Summary: Mike Komisarek entered the 2009-10 season on a new five year, 22.5 million contract (4.5 per) with hopes that the change of scenery to different albeit analogous surroundings would help restore his ’07-08 form after a setback of a  ’08-09 season. In a year of injury  and acrimony (including charges of a lack of focus), Komisarek would sit among league leaders in giveaways and seemed to reach a breaking point in his embarrassing bouts with Milan Lucic in the playoffs. While Komisarek overcomplicated his defensive game and was often caught out of position as a result, the silver lining remained Komisarek’s team-leading 191 hits and top five shot block total.

The hopes were that Komisarek could eat some minutes on a reformed Leafs blueline, add a physical presence, simplify his defensive game and help resuscitate a moribund penalty kill. These hopes are now delayed a season as ’09-10 became mostly a write-off due to a season-ending shoulder injury that limited the New York native to a 34-game campaign.

The Good

Komisarek averaged 205 hits over a full 82-game season if you extrapolate his 85 hits in the 34 games he played, which would be good enough to put him top ten league-wide. So there’s little doubt Komisarek brought the physical edge that was expected of him when he was healthy.

Komisarek also maintained a decent shot blocking total of 5 BkS/60.

High hit and shot block totals (historically top ten league wide) are the two assets Komisarek can always be counted on to bring to the table.

The Bad/Ugly

Granted, an analysis of Komisarek’s Goals Versus Threshold and many other defensive statistics is to be taken with a grain of salt given that the Leafs’ nearly-winless October represented a major slice of his season, but Komisarek’s -0.7 GVT leaves him last among Leafs blueliners.  Brought in to help the penalty kill, Komisarek’s 16.19 goals against per 60 minutes of 4-on-5 ice time (second worst on the team next to Kaberle) looks pretty terrible, but again this was mainly accomplished during a time of disastrous goaltending and general disrepair across the line-up.

Komisarek did not kick the giveaway bug that plagued him in ’08-09 when his 89 giveaways in only 66GP left him seventh worst league wide. If you extrapolate his 36 giveaways in 34 GP, he sits at 86 GvA in 82GP. To make a positive out of a strong negative, this is a slight improvement on his last season’s total based on the averages, but this still would’ve left him tied for second worst across the league. If it’s any consolation, he would’ve been tied with Roman Hamrlik, who the Habs pay 5.5 million a season, and just ahead of Jaroslav Spacek, Komisarek’s supposed replacement.

There is a some cause for concern about Komisarek’s ability to stay healthy after in early January he injured the same shoulder that caused him to miss 16 games the season prior. With the right shoulder now surgically repaired, hopefully this is now an ailment of the past.

Komisarek seemed mostly guilty of trying to do too much when things didn’t go the Leafs’ way early. In ’10-11 he will have to get back to playing within his capabilities.

Audience Participation

Now it’s your turn. In the comments, rate Komisarek on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Darkjester

    @ Jordan:
    White

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LarryP

    Dirk_Diggler wrote:

    Kaberle only had one point less than Gonchar last year. Gonchar was playing the powerplay with the likes of Stall, Crosby, Malkin, Kunitz, Letang and only put up one more point that Kaberle. Kaberle would get way more points on a better team.

    Sure, but you haven’t addressed the signability issue. Buffalo is the likely destination if he goes anywhere. Blogtastic wrote:

    @ LarryP:Ur right in that some of the kabs deals posted have bordered on the ridiculous, ex. Ryan, getting our 1st back.
    But what u fail to see is that it is a buyers market for goalies and a sellers market for dmen. Take for example if u where a gm and needed a top 2 dman and a starting goalie. Would u be licking ur chops at a free agency pool that consisted of volchankov and hamuis or nabokov and Turco. Alsoo take into consideration that 99% of people agree that Montreal could have got more, and with bb doing his due dilegence and starting a biding war, you really think we will get the same or less as they got???? Nevermind that kabs is a better player. You sir are a meathead! And I will laugh at you when the trade goes down. Thanks for coming out!

    Meathead is the name you are stuck with, spelling aside.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LarryP

    @ jaredoflondon:
    At least Dan Boyle had the guts to waive his NTC.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ LarryP:
    I think SJ would be nice because they are succh a contender. But I totally agree. For a good returrn the teams are limited

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • keon

    @ LarryP:

    You’re forgetting one very major aspect of why Halak was traded, he is eligible for arbitration. It’s all fine and dandy for St. Louis to qualify him and keep his rights, but if they low ball him and he wants say $4.5 M, he probably has a pretty good chance of winning, or at least getting very close to his target salary. Also, don’t forget, if he doesn’t want to play in St. Louis he won’t, it’s his choice. These two factors combined reduce his value by quite a bit.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LarryP

    Jordan wrote:

    @ LarryP:
    I think SJ would be nice because they are such a contender. But I totally agree. For a good return the teams are limited

    SJ would be lovely for anyone else, but they know he won’t extend and might sulk out the remaining year. Regier knows he has BB by the gonads and won’t make more than a token offer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LarryP
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ LarryP:
    Who knows though. Kaberle is just pulling the “I want to stay card”. Who else would he sign with if its not Toronto? Whoever trades for him if its the right price. I can’t see him screwing a team over who actually wants him.
    I think he and another goalie is what they need. Nabokov is good. But I think he’s too small to be a big game guy and play the butterfly style that you need these day. Same with Toskala, players are too fast and good to play the floping style

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    theres one big thing that everybody is forgetting when it comes to kabby. you especially LarryP so listen closely my good man.
    Brian Burke doesn’t want him back. Hes done here. Kabby is going to be traded and we are going to be left with a full set of Dmen next year so who really gives a fuck if he only wants to play in toronto? Burke doesn’t, I sure as hell don’t care and the other GMs in this league dont care either. Simple fact is even if he wanted to come back here after his contract expires next year we still wouldn’t have room for the guy.
    So with that in mind wouldn’t you think that he would greatly consider resigning with the team he is traded to? To the team that gives up good assets and expresses the desire to have him there? To the team that by next year he’ll know? I rest my case.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bring the Cup Home

    i’d give him a 1/10 for the first 20 games or so.

    then i’d give him a 6/10 for the next however many until he was injured.

    then a zero for not playing.

    but….in the week or two before he got hurt, we saw the solid 8/10 komisarek that we signed. he was in there. wait until this year. and more importantly, wait until the playoffs. this is the type of guy you want in the playoffs. he needs to keep it simple, lay big hits, and block shots. nothing more. if he does that all season, he’ll get a 9/10 from me.

    i say he ends up top 20 in hits this year (which is damn good), and top 10 in blocked shots. if he keeps it simple and doesn’t give up stupid breaks, that is all i ask.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LarryP
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    So, back to Komisarek…

    I’m pretty skeptical of his value in toronto right now. He needs to impress in the pre-season and he needs to impress in the first quarter of the season. And yet – as alluded to in the article – he played like ass this past season because he was trying to impress. So he has to impress by being a steady, rock solid defensive contributor and PKer. He’s far too slow to be pinching (I’m vaguely concerned by the number of big & slow d-men the leafs will be dressing for next season) and while he can be nasty, he should save that aspect of his game for crease clearing in the playoffs. I want to see a cool Komisarek who will know better when to pick his spots. Otherwise he’s gonna be a bloody albatross with that contract and term.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    @ Michael Stephens:

    Maybe he was trying to impress, but I think his struggles stemmed from the fact that he was not 100% at any point this past season. He was tentative with his physical game for that reason, and didn’t seem to have the strength and aggression that he had with Montreal. I fully expect a bounce-back season, especially with the fact that Wilson will probably ease him into his minutes.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blogtastic

    @ LarryP:So who’s ass is easy to nail to a wall??? Exactly.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Mine is!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Blogtastic

    @ Jordan:Haha! Naw, ur solid dude.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ Cactus:
    It’s fair to suggest that even from the beginning Komisarek’s season could have been considered a write off. I’m worried that Burke was sold a bill of goods though. I’m also concerned that due to his staggeringly low offensive totals, it will be hard to quantify his role on the team. I really hope that Komisarek can be a room presence, and can combine with phaneuf or beauchemin to play some serious shut down minutes. But right now I can’t really share in your cautious optimism.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kinger

    I’ll roll with komi on my team any day, he has good leadership, he’s a HUGE shutdown d man, top 10 in hits, kinda what we need eh?, top ten in blocked shots, another what we need?, who cares about his offensive skills, Burke will make up for that, Komi is the D man you need to succeed, and to win in the playoffs, He will be great, I’m happy we have him on our team.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kinger

    Not too mention he sticks up for his team mates, and is one of if the the most involved in the community, he’s just a great guy to have on a team

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    @ Kinger:
    I agree. It doesn’t matter that he doesn’t put up 30+ pts, he wasn’t brought here for that. He was brought here because, to quote BB “it seemed that everytime a trainer went onto the ice because of an injury, it was our trainer” Hes keeping the competition honest along with Orr and to some extent Schenn (he’ll fill this role much better at about the age 23-25 when he fills out into a grown mans body)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)