’09-10 Player Reviews: Wayne Primeau

by on June 22, 2010 in Uncategorized - 340 Comments

’09-10 Player Reviews: Wayne Primeau
Share

We’ve partnered up with Pension Plan Puppets to bring to you a Player Review series, where we will be evaluating and grading the 2009-10 season for every Leaf who featured in a significant number of games for the Blue and White last season, with an eye towards 2010-11. Today we feature Wayne Primeau, profiled by Garrett Bauman.

Wayne PrimeauSummary:

Acquired via trade, Primeau was brought in to provide a veteran presence to a young locker room, add grit to the fourth line and fill the role of defensive faceoff specialist.

Although he did not particularly stand out during his 59 games, Primeau was relativley effective in his limited (albeit important) role. An unrestricted free agent, he is unlikely to return barring a substantial paycut from the $1.4m he earned last season.

Year Team GP G A Pts +/- PIM S S%
09-10 Leafs 59 3 5 8 -1 35 47 6.4
Career 774 69 125 194 -95 789 885 7.8

The Good:

Best-known for his faceoff skills, Primeau won 55.3% of his draws, good for second on the team (behind only Christian Hanson) among regular centres who appeared in more than 30 games. Pleasantly surprising was the respectable -1 plus/minus rating he managed to record, despite filling a predominately fourth-line role on a team with the league’s 29th-ranked goaltending.

The Bad:

By no means the most fleet of foot among NHL forwards, Primeau was often caught chasing the play as opposed to initiating it, and at times struggled to maintain his check or win the race to a loose puck. Accordingly, the majority of his ice time was spent in the defensive zone, as reflected by his negative CORSI (-2.85), second-worst among regular Leafs’ forwards. A healthy scratch on 9 occasions, Primeau also missed 13 games due to various injuries.

The Ugly:

Primeau has never been considered an offensive threat during his 14 years in the NHL, and last season was no exception as he recorded the lowest point-per-game totals of his career (0.135). With a TOI/gm of only 11:02 (lowest among Leafs forwards playing more than 2 games), Primeau had only minimal opportunities to generate offense. At this stage of his career, he is best suited for a limited role as a defensive faceoff specialist, a role for which many teams may find difficult to set aside a roster spot.

Noteworthy:

24 of the Maple Leafs’ 30 wins in 2009/10 came with Primeau in the lineup.

Discussion:

Did Wayne Primeau fill his role adequately, or did you expect more of an impact? Do you think he will be back next season, or should the fourth-line centre role be given to a prospect (or perhaps rotated among several prospects)  in the system?

Audience Participation:

Now it’s your turn. In the comments, rate Primeau on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential, and your expectations for the season.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • keon

    Not a big fan of anything Boston has, unless it’s Chara and we all know that’s not a possibility, so screw it.
    .
    Can’t see Burke wanting Savard at the age he is, 33 on July 17th. Kaberle will be traded for something younger I believe.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    @ doktordave:
    Tucker is a different story. He is similar to Blake, they didn’t produce consistently like Savard has. This year was a down year for him but I think a reunion with kessel would put his numbers back to respectability. Also with Orr, Schenn, Komi and Phaneuf already on the team he’s pretty well protected.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    Leadership schmerdship I guess. Who needs leaders when we have the almighty Ronnie behind the bench.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    It must suck for Florida fans,they were in the middle of a rebuild and now have to start it all over.But I think Tallon will turn them around just like he did chicago.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • keon
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • doktordave

    Guys I would expect Burke to chase if we have 4 spots to fill this summer:

    C – Malholtra (Wilson would love to have his 2-way talents). Upgrade on one of Primeau/Lundmark/ Mitchell.

    W – Torres – (Only if he’ll play for about $2 Million).
    or Colby Armstrong – Upgrade on Wallin, though perhaps slower.

    D – Andy Sutton – Big upgrade on Exelby, may cost more, but worth it.

    then either Free agent or trade (depends on UFA or RFA):
    Frolov / Madden / Neal / Ladd /Tedd Purcell/ Brian Little or Artyukhin.

    Only a couple of these guys might push us towards the cap…or they might be more affordable than earlier thought.
    We’d add size, grit, and maybe a little skill to allow the young guys to have a little extra room next year. If Braden Schenn were movable for Kaberle and Hanson, then I think we might have a sweet future…of course THAT is a big maybe.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • doktordave

    @ 4evrblue:
    I like Tucker, but not back in Toronto. He’s really had 3 poor seasons in a row now. So I think he’d be really only good for a role-player job and as much as he’d love to be a leaf again, he’s nearing retirement and likely would not take bottom 6 money to play here again. Maybe if this looked like the year for a big Cup run, and he could go out in a blaze of glory? If we are talking Tucker, maybe look at him come the mid-season trade deadline? There are cheaper healthier younger options out there.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    Ksavz wrote:

    @ creasemonkey:
    NTC goes back into effect. He waives it for the circumstance, he doesnt lose the ability to choose where he wants to go bc he agreed to a trade. Definitely doesnt make u dumb for not knowing that though lol.

    I actually have always heard your way, but one time I heard that once it’s waived it’s gone. And it was from a knowledgeable guy, I think Spector but I don’t remember.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • doktordave

    @ 4evrblue:
    QUESTION:
    If we signed Tucker as a UFA, would we still be on the hook for his buy-out money?

    Maybe we could get him for a spare if he signs for the league minimum? He could actually save the Leafs money then. (Laugh)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ryash

    Don’t know if he will make it to July 1,….since things appear to getting slimmer, ..
    Cullen???

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    I don’t know why people are putting Kessel and Bozak on different lines after seeing how well they played together.

    How can one doubt that bringing Savard here is a good idea? At a $4 million cap hit, he’s a steal. Look at guys like Tkachuk, Guerin and Recchi and how they’re still contributing at their age.

    If he starts doing shit and retires, he’s off the cap. If he gets laid out, then he’s on LTIR and we get to use that space. You can’t nix a trade just because you don’t want the guy leaving to do better than the guy coming.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn

    I think the reason people are putting Bozak and Kessel on seperate lines, is because as good as they were together, Kessel was even better with Savard as his center.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie

    Schenn wrote:

    I think the reason people are putting Bozak and Kessel on seperate lines, is because as good as they were together, Kessel was even better with Savard as his center.

    Obviously I’m not talking about if Savard were on the team!!!!!!!!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Jordan
    -
    He brought in Niedermayer and Selanne for free though, and that is what you are missing. He never would have traded for Teemu Selanne, or given up his best asset for Scott Niedermayer. These are the kind of guys you add for free. Even though there is no one like that available this year, eventually there will be. Until then, Burke will trade for young talent. Sooner or later though, he’ll hit one out of the park in free agency.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)