Savard Makes Sense

by on June 28, 2010 in Opinion - 333 Comments

Share

If Brian Burke is contemplating the idea of acquiring Marc Savard, the Toronto Maple Leafs may be on the verge of adding a substantial piece to its rebuilding plan.

That may sound strange considering the playmaking center is nearly 33 years old and is the beneficiary of a seven-year contract, but there are other factors at play that makes this rumor an enticing one.

It’s no secret the Leafs are considerably bare not only down the middle, but in forward depth as well. The acquisition of Savard would provide the Leafs with the elite centerman they’ve been yearning since the departure of Mats Sundin. Savard may lack the size of the ideal number one centerman, but it’s his offensive flair that makes him such an alluring target.

Granted, Savard’s contract secures his services until the age of 39, which is reason for concern. With a modest cap-hit of $4.007 million dollars, it’s the length of his contract that could pose serious problems in the future should the Leafs remain within the realm of mediocrity. However, it’s the nature of the business to take risks that could potentially make or break a general managers career. It’s why us hockey nerds live off trade rumours.

What Leafs fans must also consider is how this would affect the development of top prospect, Nazem Kadri. Personally, I think the acquisition of Savard would relieve some pressure off Kadri, who at 19 years old, is expected to crack the Leafs roster and make an immediate impact next season. With Savard in the picture, Kadri could learn the ropes on either the second or third line and develop at his own pace, rather than be placed in a situation where he must carry the load. If Kadri proves to be NHL-ready, then he and Savard could provide the Leafs some depth at center.

But what about the assets the Leafs would have to relinquish? The thought of trading Nikolai Kulemin to the Bruins is an uncomfortable one, I won’t lie. However, it should be mentioned that many of us Leafs fans sometimes have a habit of overvaluing the team’s players. And that’s not to take anything way from Kulemin, whose work ethic and defensive play were at times unparalleled by his teammates. It is, however, fair to mention that his offensive upside is somewhat limited, as he can be described as more of a grinder.

While the Leafs would lose a valuable young forward in Kulemin (and whatever else is packaged along with him), Burke would still have his top trading chip in Tomas Kaberle if the rumor comes to fruition. And if he can manage to acquire a young top-six forward in exchange for Kaberle’s services, then suddenly the risks of the potential trade would decrease significantly. It seems far-fetched, but the options are at Burke’s disposal.

There are concerns that Savard may struggle with the lingering affects of his concussions, but it should be mentioned that prior to last season, Savard played 320 of 328 games post-lockout. Just something to keep in mind for those who fear he may be Eric Lindros version 2.0.

The rumor seems to have divided Leafs Nation, but if you ask me, I don’t see the harm in acquiring a first-line player for such a cheap demand.

There’s nothing complicated about it. The Leafs need offence, and Savard can provide that.

As always, interested to read your thoughts.

You stay classy, MLHS.

[email protected]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Charlie
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • refaeL

    I wouldn’t want Spezza or Richards. They would be prohibitive acquisitions from a cap standpoint. Grabbing Savard is riskier, but still allows Burke to hit the home run, as a guy like Kovalchuk could still be added.
    .
    That would be the intent by signing Savard, I think. Kovalchuk is very familiar with Savard, and I believe had at least one 50+ goal season playing with him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    wasted years wrote:

    I am not on board for throwing out a kid who has shown he can fly and score in this league for Savard. (limited action and horrible line mates) We have Boston over a barrel here and I think giving up on Stalberg is a bad idea.

    .
    Although it’s a popular argument here (limited action), it doesn’t hold water. Stalberg played 14:36 min/gm this year. Kessel played 14:03 min/gm in his first season with Boston.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron

    @ Charlie:
    Yeah, that’s my bad. Looks like everyone is wanting to get out of Boston.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Charlie
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rpearce76

    Just had a thought for a good 2/3rd line in a few years that we could give a cool nickname too..

    D’amigo/DiDo/Stalberg

    all 6th round picks, the 666 line, the evil line, the devil’s line, etc etc

    yeah, it is a slow day at work…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burkie_s Bollocks

    @ flappypaddle:
    Hahaha… Nice…

    Sounds like you might’ve been a little inspired by Patrick Roy…

    Pretty sure you can get Richards to sign/re-sign for less than his current deal next season…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    @ flappypaddle:
    If Richards was available, Toronto would have to outbid every other interested team, which almost surely wouldn’t happen. If this Savard thing doesn’t pan out and Kadri/Bozak need another year to develop into a first line center, we can just sign him as a free agent without having to give up assets.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mun

    I think most people including myself share your sentiments. However, we have to maximize our assets and we only have one, Kaberle. So i’m assuming that a trade for Richards would require Kaberle but then you’d only have one impact player. By trading for Savard you still could get a Clowe type plus a pick or prospect etc

    I know this is simplistic but would rather Savard, another top six forward and pick/prospect for Kaberle and spare parts OR just Richards?

    The point is given the situation surrounding Savard you wont get even remotely the same type of return for his ability using Grabo and spare parts as bait.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Stanley goes to White Kessel
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burkie_s Bollocks

    @ Cactus:
    True…But list the teams that have a need for a No.1 Center and $7.8M in cap space available?

    Only I can think of… Didn’t research this, just off the top of my head so there may be more..

    Nashville? Columbus? Florida? St. Louis? LA?

    Florida is rebuilding, so no…
    Columbus could put in a good bid but they would have $16M tied up in two players… so … maybe…
    Nashville? Potentially but they just offloaded Arnott for salary reasons and have their own cap situation… Very strict about building through the draft and not trading away futures.. so maybe…
    St. Louis? Probably would be the biggest bidder…
    LA? They have the cap space but will be after Kovalchuk first and would prefer wingers…

    I do agree that you could get him for free next year if he doesn’t re-sign but we were hoping for the same with Thornton, Nash and others…

    Just a thought…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn

    I know this issue is from 6 pages ago, but it looks as though there was a clitch in the system as “Ron Guillet” corrected the first post, which was made by “Jordan”
    I think what happened is Ron Guillet made a post and it showed up as Jordan for some reason.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gary Shields
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • wardus

    I’d love to get Spezza or Richards, but I don’t see it happening from a cap point of view. Never mind the fact that we’d have to give up much more to get them than we would for Savard at this point. (If we’re to believe all the media reports… but where there’s smoke there’s fire.) With Savard on board we can lure Kovi and then use Kabs for some younger cap friendly talent. Perhaps we could get Voracek and a first, or Tangradi and a first, or something similar.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rpearce76

    I got a feeling something is going down… Twitter is dead quiet right now…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kaz
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DefenceWinsChampionships

    TSNBobMcKenzie Waivers, likely for buyout purposes: Cheechoo, Ott; Nokelainen, Vandermeer, Phx; Koistinen, Fla; Kotalik, Cgy.
    .
    Steve Ott? Lessens the chance of Richards and/or Neal NEEDING to be moved. He’d make a good third line center and is a Burke-type guys for sure. And as a UFA he won’t be asking for nearly $3 million again. Could be worth a look.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • matto
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • New Leafs Dynasty

    @ DefenceWinsChampionships:

    he meant cheechoo is from ottawa……ott, nokelainen vandermeer phx

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DefenceWinsChampionships

    @ New Leafs Dynasty:
    Damn haha

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)