Leafs Face $1.4 million Cap Penalty Next Season

by on July 2, 2010 in Leafs News - 83 Comments

Share

Bad news. According to the fine folks over at CapGeek, the Chicago Blackhawks aren’t the only team facing cap penalties next season. Here are the basics: a team is allowed to surpass the official salary cap by a “bonus cushion” maxmium of 7.5% for performance bonuses, such as those written into virtually every rookie contract. However, this number is then deducted from your maximum salary cap allowance for the following season.

For example, since winning the Cup, the Blackhawks received plenty of media attention when it was pointed out that Toews’ bonus for the Conn Smythe, among others, would push them well over the cap limit. As a result, the Blackhawks will face a $4.157 million penalty for this upcoming season. The Maple Leafs meanwhile will also have $1.4 million deducted from their limit this coming season, thus setting an internal budget at $58 million rather than the league wide $59.4 million.

This certainly sheds some light on Dave Nonis’ curious “$4 – 5 million” estimation of the Leafs’ remaining funds on the AM640 the other day, as opposed to the previously assumed $6 – 7 million range. Suddenly, the reasons for the Leafs’ lack of major movement during the first couple days of unrestricted free agency makes a little more sense. The Maple Leafs were the league’s youngest team after the trade deadline last season, icing a total of 9 players on bonus-laden entry level contracts (Bozak, Kulemin, Irwin, Kadri, Hanson, Stalberg, Caputi, Gunnarsson, Schenn). Of these players, Bozak was the only one with a maximum value entry level contract valued at $3.725 million.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • slowburn

    Do the Leafs have a Cap penalty heading into next season?
    .
    It seemed there was some disagreement on the actual numbers from last year.
    I’ve read through the discussion, but I’m still not sure.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    Alex Tran wrote:

    Did anybody see the email exchange I posted?
    CapGeek says not to look at the archives to figure out the $1.4 million figure, because they got this figure straight from a high ranked league source.
    I think you guys might be very surprised at how well connected these guys are.

    Your right, I trust cap geeks numbers more than anyone else. I was just looking into the whole LTIR dispute, but as far as I can tell we didn’t go over for that. Someone obviously achieved there bonus which is what put us over the limit.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kb

    @ Alex Tran:
    .
    Oh, I got the same e-mail too. I understand they may be well connected, but being well connected doesn’t automatically preclude mistakes from occurring. Strange that the mainstream media has not picked up on this yet though…..
    .
    I am just trying to wrap my head around how with Van Ryn’s season long injury (and the Leafs not having a D-man making under $800,000) – plus the Leafs almost being at the daily cap each and every single day last year – is how could the injury replacement salary be significantly less than any salaried D-man on the club? Doesn’t make sense – especially when you factor in the Kessel, Mitchell, and Komisarek LTIR injuries would have to automatically add extra injury replacement salary as well.
    .
    The only way I can see that no salary gets added for injury replacement is if none of those players was replaced on the roster when they were down with their injuries.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TRV

    I read the article in Capgeek, there are 9 teams with penalties. Bos was hit as well for over a million.

    At 58 million, I think the BB does not have a choose put to move a D-man. If we keep Kabs and Finger, with Hanson signed for a 1 million and Caputi on the roster. That leaves a little over 900k for a forward. Which means no Kadri.

    BB needs to move Kabs and Finger to free up over 7 million.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • kb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ TRV:
    It doesn’t really free up 7 million, as whomever is brought in via the Kaberle trade will undoubtedly have a cap hit of some form. Best case scenario, Burke can get a top 6 with a lower/less substantial cap hit than Kabs and bury Finger.
    This actually goes back to the thought as to why we’d never be able to wrangle Kovalchuk. the mid-season moves by the Leafs brought in talent and pedigree (Phaneuf and Giguere), but also at the cost of a lot of the Leafs cap for the next season. There are always hidden aspects to the cap, and the 12 million in space we had got halved by mid afternoon july 1 with 6+ going to versteeg/armstrong and then taken down even more with Kulemin/Mitchell and then again with the bonus penalty.
    The Leafs REALLY have to trade Kaberle now for a solid offensive contributor, as Burke cannot easily sell the Leafs faithful on this team making the playoffs as they currently stand. Of the forwards, only Kessel and Versteeg are proven and consistent (if only two consecutive seasons can qualify consistency) 40+ point scorers. Bozak, Grabovski, Kulemin and Armstrong could (and based off the ice time they are likely to receive, should) hit that and then some. But as it stands, the Leafs are sporting a seemingly pop-gun offense.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • budha

    did anyone else notice on the Capgeek balance sheet that Kadri isn’t included on the NHL charts. His 1.75 million (assuming he makes the team next year) would really only leave us with about 2 mill in cap space left

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)