Leafs, Sweatt Remain Apart On New Deal

by on July 12, 2010 in Leafs Prospects - 801 Comments

Share

Just a month ago, the Chicago Blackhawks were the envy of the National Hockey League.  Having finished off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games courtesy of a Patrick Kane overtime goal, the Hawks had climbed to the top of the mountain, and had risen out of what could once have been considered obscurity years earlier, to build a winning team, and break the Stanley Cup drought that loomed over the franchise for so long.

And while many general managers stood in jealousy and envy of Stan Bowman and his management team for the feat they had just accomplished, not one GM was going to envying Bowman in the days following.

For the Chicago Blackhawks, winning the Stanley Cup came at a price, and it was rather large.

Since they won the Stanley Cup, the Blackhawks have made many moves, tearing down their roster that brought them their once elusive championship.  Fan favourites were shipped out in favour of draft picks and younger players, on cheaper contracts.

One of those trades involved Kris Versteeg, a trade Brian Burke was all too happy to accommodate.

Burke acquired Versteeg in a trade with the Blackhawks just prior to the opening of NHL free agency.  The Toronto GM, looking to make a move before the market opened, and the prices dramatically inflated, traded three prospects-Phillippe Paradis, Chris DiDomenico, and Viktor Stalberg-to Chicago for Versteeg, a swift skating forward with a great wrist shot.

Perhaps lost to some in that deal, was the inclusion of Bill Sweatt, his rights anyway, that came to Toronto along with Versteeg.  Sweatt, a forward at Colorado College, represents a player with speed to burn, seemed to really shift the balance of the deal, at least in the minds of Leafs Nation, and perhaps rightfully so.

Sweatt had 109 points in 143 games with Colorado College.

However, nearly two weeks after the trade went down, and the Toronto Maple Leafs have been unable to reach an agreement with Sweatt and his representatives, something that while Burke has been quiet on, certainly has to worry him.

Sweatt’s agent was quoted as saying last week that while the Maple Leafs gave what they felt was a generous offer, the idea of going to unrestricted free agency may be too tempting.

And while we certainly aren’t fortunate enough to be privy to the negotiating process, how frustrating must it be for Burke to see the management team of Sweatt tell the public that the offer was generous, and yet still, his client has not signed it.

Perhaps like Nikolai Kulemin, the entire situation is being slightly blown out of proportion because of the city it is happening in.  Some fans I have spoken to have been quick to call Sweatt a prima-donna who overvalues himself, and doesn’t deserve to be calling his own shots this early into his professional career.

Others are more patient, agreeing that this is likely part of the negotiation process, and things will get worked out before the August 15th deadline.

At least, for the Leafs part, I hope so.

Sweatt is apparently drawing plenty of interest from teams around the league who would be interested in adding his services to their roster.  As far as the Maple Leafs are concerned, there has been no indication that they are out of the running for his services, and all signs point to the fact that they continue to work towards a deal as we speak.

Just like the argument that was made for Tyler Bozak and Christian Hanson, the same can be applied for Bill Sweatt.

While the on ice product in Toronto is certainly nothing to brag about, the current situation in Leafs land appears to be fitting for young players.

A new general manager, and plenty of playing time headline just part of the reasons why Toronto would be among the better fits in the league.  Sweatt could likely step into the Maple Leafs lineup next season, or at least be given every chance to do so.

And what can be made of the trade if the Leafs are unable to sign Sweatt, and he ends up siding with another franchise?  While we certainly won’t know for years which team won the deal per say, not being able to sign Sweatt, or losing him to another team, would seemingly tilt the deal further in the Blackhawks favour.

For their part, the Leafs involved in the deal were at the Blackhawks prospects camp, and all spoke very excitedly about getting to Chicago and carrying on the winning tradition that the Hawks have restored in the Madhouse.

Let’s hope for the Leafs sake, the players they acquired have similar designs, to restore a winning tradition to Toronto.

And let’s hope those players include Bill Sweatt

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • corykc11

    @ Cameron:
    So Cameron, you want to give up Grabovski, a 2nd and a prospect to get a 3rd line centre…I know they’re thrying to fast track this rebuild, but that is way too much to give up for Dubinski, dont get me wrong he is a solid player, but I wouldn’t give up a 2nd and a prospect for him let alone throwing grabovski into the mix

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • djamon
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    @ dnksdad:
    Haha..yep that about sums her up for me.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    I hope that Slats feels the same way. I’d love Dubinsky. He just makes so much more sense for us in that 3rd line center hole than Grabovski does.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Brian Burke is bringing sexy back!
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lescott

    Steen doesn’t have the shot, the hands or the agressiveness that Versteeg brings with him. That said, Steen is sharp and crafty in his own way. Maybe you can compare them in that they’d fill similar time in a game but I don’t think they’re the same type of player.

    I hate Grabo.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Brian Burke is bringing sexy back!
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lescott

    I appreciate a good VER.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    Verbeauty.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Kostas

    @Andrew R

    Wow… First off, try reading people’s comments before you put words into their mouths. I never once said a damn thing about Steen. I was purely commenting on all the people that have been putting Versteeg down. Not once did I say Steen is a bad player. Secondly, how about you apologize to me for putting your ignorant self on a fucking pedestal by falsely accusing me of comment I never made.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • acedanger

    I wonder why no one is talking about Hjalmarsson and the 3.5 mil contract he just signed with the Hawks cuz of an offer sheet from SJ? These guys are FUCKED now. How the hell are they gonna fill out their roster? They still need to sign Niemi! I know they can bury Huet but thats no where near enough.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • boguscharlie

    @ acedanger:
    would be a better topic than the Versteeg-Steen clap-trap crap!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    lescott wrote:

    I appreciate a good VER.

    Haha…Ver….batim

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    @ acedanger:
    okay, how about we do Robert Slaney + 6th rd pick in 2011 for JackSkille….. thats all I got lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ lescott:
    Who doesn’t?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • derek

    that would b quite the line if san jose cud pull that off…kovalchuk-thorton-heatley….althought it would cost about 25 million….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burkie_s Bollocks

    @ Cameron:
    Couldn’t agree more about wanting to forget the Toskala deal or 97% of everything JFJ touched but Couture has Stud potential.
    I like Dubinski also and I agree about him fitting Burke’s third line mold better than Grabs ( and who wouldn’t want an athlete nicknamed “Doobie”) but Grabs alone should get us at least Dubinsky from a Euro-loving (not that there’s anything wrong with that) fool like Sather

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ acedanger:
    -
    With Huet buried, they’ll be able to manage. With this roster:
    -
    Brouwer – Toews – Hossa
    Stalberg – Sharp – Kane
    Beach – Bolland – Kopecky
    ______ – Reasoner – Morin
    -
    Keith – Seabrook
    Campbell – Hjalmarsson
    Vishnevsky – _________
    -
    Scott
    -
    _______ – Crawford
    -
    They’ll have about 800K to fill out the roster. So yea, you’re right, another trade may be necessary now, but it is fairly manageable from this point.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • derek

    new blog up…..

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Schenn:
    -
    Yea, I know, but you know what I mean.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burkie_s Bollocks

    @ Schenn:

    Haha. Welcome back…Semantics but basically part of the eventual package SJ got from JfJ for Toskala…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    Just looking over the numbers again for the Blackhawks, and I think it’s worth pointing out what a horrendous job management did this summer in managing the cap and keeping the team together. They are in a position now where they gave up Byfuglien, Versteeg, Eager, Burrish, Ladd, Sopel, and will almost certainly have to lose Niemi and/or Sharp still to remain under the cap, unless they can now find a taker for Campbell. However, moving Campbell will still cost draft picks and prospects, just like he would have a month ago.
    -
    Had Bowman simply asked for Campbell’s list of 8 teams, he could have sent a memo to all of them saying “Listen, if you take Campbell, I’ll throw in any and all of Ladd, Eager, Fraser, Skille, Aliu, and a 1st and 2nd round picks from the next two years”. You think there’s any chance Campbell is still a Hawk if he’d done that? No way. Someone would have bitten the bullet and taken that contract on. Then he could have comfortably buried Huet and Sopel (if a trade didn’t present itself) and the team would look like this:
    -
    Byfuglien – Toews – Kane
    Brouwer – Sharp – Hossa
    Versteeg – Bolland – Kopecky
    -
    Keith – Seabrook
    Hjalmarsson
    Vishnevsky -
    -
    (Scott)
    -
    ______ – Crawford
    -
    He would have had 6 million to fill out the roster with two defensemen, Niemi, and a 4th line. It would suck to lose that much prosepct depth, but the team would have a chance at repeating for the Cup. And if you’re that competitve, do the picks really matter? I doubt the fans would be crying about the lost picks and prospects if the Hawks were in the thick of Cup contention 2 years in a row. In hindsight, just horrendous management by Bowman.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)