Parsing the CBA: the Slide Rule
There has been a certain degree of consternation among Maple Leafs fans of late regarding the number of SPCs (Standard Player Contracts) the team has on the books. Many have expressed concerns that the Maple Leafs are near the league maximum, and fear the situation could adversely affect the team’s efforts to continue to re-tool the club into a playoff contender.
A quick glance at the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), however, tells us the situation is not so dire as some would have us believe. The reason? A seldom-discussed clause, unofficially dubbed the “Slide Rule”.
In order to fully understand the Slide Rule and how it could in certain respects serve to alleviate the Maple Leafs’ contract limit predicament, it is essential to first examine the NHL’s player limit regulations as stipulated in the CBA.
In Section 1 (“Definitions”) in the CBA, the limits on the number of player contracts, and number of players a team can hold rights for, are defined under the term “Reserve Lists”. A Reserve list is defined in Section 1 as
… the list of players to whom a Club has rights including all Unsigned Draft Choices, all Players signed to an SPC (whether or not currently playing in the NHL), and all Players who have signed an SPC but who have subsequently been returned to Juniors. A Club may have on its Reserve List, at any one
time, not more than 90 Players …
From this list of 90 players to which the club owns rights, a maximum of 50 and minimum of 24 may be signed to an SPC at any one time. Any team operating below the minimum or above the maximum limits is subject to a penalty of the loss of draft picks.
The 50-SPC limit is the number you most often read/hear about, as only those players with an SPC are eligible to play in the NHL.
Currently, the Maple Leafs’ Reserve List contains a total of 49 SPCs.
Note: many have suggested the number is 48 following the signing of Marcel Mueller, but it is actually 49 as the Maple Leafs have extended a qualifying offer to RFA Christian Hanson. A qualifying offer is what allows a team to retain its negotiating rights to a player who has reached RFA status. Terms of the CBA dictate only unsigned draft choices (obviously) and players returned to Junior are exempt from the SPC limitation; therefore unsigned-but-qualified RFAs must be counted as part of the 50-SPC limit.
The Slide Rule
As alluded to in the definitions above, players signed to SPCs who are returned to Junior prior to playing 11 NHL games do not count towards a team’s SPC limit. Instead, those players would “slide” off the 50-SPC list while remaining on the larger 90-man Reserve List.
In the case of the Maple Leafs, both Jesse Blacker and Jamie Devane fall under this category (Nazim Kadri does not, as his Junior eligibility is up). In the event that both Blacker and Devane are sent back to Junior prior to playing 11 NHL games, the Maple Leafs would free up two additional slots within the 50-SPC limit.
Current 50-SPC Reserve Lists for all NHL teams, including players subject to the Slide Rule, can be found at CapGeek.
Looking forward to your thoughts as always,
[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman
- 630 comments
- Collapse All
Mike84 wrote:
Wow Mikko Koivu got a 7 year deal @6.75m a yearlol, that’s ridiculous… look at this guys numbers, I know he’s their captain and all but they vastly overpaid here.. no way he’s worth more than $5mill a year (and I think that’s a stretch) … wow
The arguement that Grabovski would not be on a cup winning team is a mute point really. The Leafs aren’t even a playoff team yet. Grabovski has only got 2 yrs left on his contract and Kadri has played only 1 reg. season game. It will be at least 3yrs before the Leafs will even get a sniff at the cup, so there is lots of time to develope players and add to the mix. No need to rush anyone into the top 6 forward position, it may be a matter of a top9 bottom 3 thing for a season or so to slowly develope the 3-4 good prospects we have.
It’s kind of hard to really peg Grabovski other than a guy who can be easily knocked off the puck and should probably use his line-mates better. But who has he played with in his time here? Kulemin, Poni, no one near the skill level of Kessel or even Versteeg, so I’m more than happy to see what he can bring with better line-mates.
Bottom line is Grabovski will not be on your cup winning team.. like Jordan and u other possers say book it. You can’t win with players like that.
On his own Bozak is a solid NHL #2 centre. But when your building a team to contend for a cup you have to diversify..
The Shaker wrote:
@ honesthockey: Are you his brother? Dude, all i said was there is not room for both Grabs and Bozak as 1-2 centre. Now if he goes into the corner with say Jordan Stall..who is coming out of the corner with the puck.. be honest.Bozak runs to the bench afraid? Come on man. Would he have a hard time with Joe Thornton or Vinny Lecavalier? Yep. Not many centers wouldn’t. That’s why I’m all for a big third line center for those 3-2 games.
@ honesthockey: Are you his brother? Dude, all i said was there is not room for both Grabs and Bozak as 1-2 centre. Now if he goes into the corner with say Jordan Stall..who is coming out of the corner with the puck.. be honest.
The Shaker wrote:
Your #1 and #2 centre can not be both soft players, sorry not under the plan laid out by our fearless leader.????
The Shaker wrote:
@ honesthockey: Sure he throws the odd hit but yes he would be considered soft the same way Jason Allison is considered soft.The odd hit? He had 52 in 37 games. Prorate that. His speed with those hits gave the team a forecheck presence that wasn’t there for a couple of years. Is he gonna drop the mitts? No. But soft he isn’t. He wins his share of battles.
Your #1 and #2 centre can not be both soft players, sorry not under the plan laid out by our fearless leader.
@ honesthockey: Sure he throws the odd hit but he’s he would be considered soft the same way Jason Allison is considered soft.
@ Mind Bomb</ Maybe I am, but you convienently didnt answer why burke gave him that kind of money if he hates Grabovski ? Peace Have you heard of supply and demand? That offseason there was not much out there that BB could target for his postion. Can't loose an assett for nothing, especially when Cliffy traded away a second for his sorry ass. To be short BB had no other options.
The Shaker wrote:
@ Jordan: IMO, Grabs is a skilled player who on too many nights is invisible. Now with Bozak as our #1 or 2 centre who would be considered a soft player, no room for an addition # 1 or 2 centre who would also be considerd soft. Therefore Grabs is a goner IMOBozak soft?
@ Jordan: IMO, Grabs is a skilled player who on too many nights is invisible. Now with Bozak as our #1 or 2 centre who would be considered a soft player, no room for an addition # 1 or 2 centre who would also be considerd soft. Therefore Grabs is a goner IMO
The Shaker wrote:
@ Mind Bomb: I guess you are in tight with BB to know he turned down a Second rounder for him.. Please, the media also said that Kaberle was being trade for Wayne Simmonds.. do not beleive everything you read or hear..Maybe I am, but you convienently didnt answer why burke gave him that kind of money if he hates Grabovski ? Peace
The Shaker wrote:
@ honesthockey: Maybe from your perspective.Ok explain what is wrong with this deal.
@ Mind Bomb: I guess you are in tight with BB to know he turned down a Second rounder for him.. Please, the media also said that Kaberle was being trade for Wayne Simmonds.. do not beleive everything you read or hear..
@Jordan Easy, Kessel is an elite top 6 forward on a good team, Grabovski could not make it into a good teams top 6. It is not where we are now, it is where we are going to be.. you follow.
http://www.google.ca/m/search?q=Grabovsky&aq=&oq=&aqi=&fkt=&fsdt=&csll=&action=&site=images&gl=ca&source=mog<oken=2fb2940c#i=3 That doesn’t help also




