The FanPost

Why the Maple Leafs should make the playoffs in 2010-11‏

By: Joe Cino

Everything that could have gone wrong for the Maple Leafs in 2009-10 did. A combination of cold streaks, underperforming veterans, bad goaltending and a slew of injuries capped off a basement finish. The roster has been fine tuned, with additions like Giguere, Phaneuf and Versteeg chief among them, but by and large most of the roster is the same as last year’s iteration. With so many holdovers from the previous year, are the playoffs a realistic goal for the Maple Leafs? I believe that they are, with Corsi ratings, Goals versus Threshold and the realistic impact of the new Leafs taken into account.

We’ll start things off on a positive note with the Corsi ratings for the team last season. Popular hockey blog The Puck Stops Here recently wrote an article detailing the high team Corsi rating for the Maple Leafs in 2009-10 (found here: http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.php/psh/comments/torontos_high_team_corsi/).  Corsi is a fairly simple stat: it simply logs the shots directed at the opposition’s net and shots directed at their own net for a given player when they’re on the ice. A high Corsi +/- for a player indicates that they are generating more offensive pressure than their opponent. A high team Corsi suggests that a team as a whole is getting more chances than their opponent to score goals. With that said, the team Corsi rating for the Maple Leafs in 2009-10 was +422, good for third best in the league.

As The Puck Stops Here outlines, the rebuttal that the Leafs were often losing and thus had more chances because the other team was playing defensively is not valid. The other four bottom five teams do not hold a candle to the team Corsi Toronto has:

Edmonton Oilers: -730

Toronto Maple Leafs: +422

Florida Panthers: -782

Columbus Blue Jackets: -304

New York Islanders: -382

So it’s clear that the Maple Leafs will pressure their opponent more than they are pressured, so why the terrible record? The answer is simple: the most important position in the new NHL is goaltending. Vesa Toskala was nothing short of abysmal. He played 26 games for the blue and white this season, picking up a 7-12-3 record to go along with his 3.66 GAA and .874 SV%. Gustavsson was then thrust into the spotlight before he was ready, leading to the culmination of a 16-24-11 record before the Giguere trade.

What happened after the Giguere and Phaneuf trades is another story. Their new record was 13-10-5. Doesn’t look all that impressive until you stretch it out over 82 games, where it becomes 38-29-15, which would be good for 91 points in the standings. The Eastern Conference is notoriously weak and a record culminating in 91 points would have been good enough for 7th place, leapfrogging both Montreal and Philadelphia. This is all well and good on its own merits, as it suggests that the Maple Leafs would have been in the hunt for a playoff spot if they had competent goaltending all season. However, it is important to take note of the castoffs and additions to the roster in the past season.

Goals versus Threshold is a very complex and important personal stat that tracks a player’s offensive and defensive contribution to his team. A high GVT suggests a player either very skilled at offense or defence, but it can also suggest a complete player in both ends of the rink. Here is the GVT of the current Maple Leafs:

Phil Kessel: 10.7

Tomas Kaberle: 9.3

Nikolai Kulemin: 7.2

Mikhail Grabovski: 5.1

Carl Gunnarsson: 4.9

Luke Schenn: 4.8

Francois Beauchemin: 3.5

Tyler Bozak: 3.5

Jean-Sebastien Giguere: 3.0

John Mitchell: 2.6

Dion Phaneuf: 2.1

Jeff Finger: 1.2

Luca Caputi: 0.5

Fredrik Sjostrom: 0.1

Christian Hanson: -0.5

Mike Komisarek: -0.7

Jonas Gustavsson: -1.6

Colton Orr: -1.7

Of importance to note is that games played do factor in rather heavily to GVT, making the GVT for Giguere, Phaneuf, Gunnarsson and Bozak rather impressive. Of these players, Hanson is the one most likely to be on the Marlies next season. Komisarek had a very poor season riddled with injuries, so some kind of bounce back should be expected. Gustavsson didn’t start showing signs of his potential until late in the season when he calmed down a tad, so his GVT is understandably low. Colton Orr is a goon who doesn’t score and doesn’t play defence, so his GVT doesn’t really mean much in the grand scheme of things.

These numbers are encouraging, but perhaps the numbers of the players that left are most positive. Some players had good GVT stats on the Leafs: White at 7.9, Ponikarovsky at 7.6, Hagman at 6.2 and Stajan at 5.1. Others did not: Blake at 3.2, Stempniak at 2.1, Stalberg at 0.5, Mayers at -0.1, Lundmark at -0.1, Tlusty at -0.3, Exelby at -0.4, Primeau at -0.8, Wallin at -1.2, MacDonald at -1.4 and finally, Toskala at -15.3. We gave up some decent players, but we also gave up a lot of bad players. In addition, our season acquisitions and call ups of Giguere, Phaneuf, Gunnarsson and Bozak further improved the roster.

Now we finally come to the offseason acquisitions. Versteeg had a GVT of 9.4 playing on the Blackhawks’ third line, which is unbelievably impressive. Colby Armstrong’s 4.5 is pretty good for a third line player, especially considering his defensive GVT is higher than his offensive GVT. Lebda finished with a 0.9 on Detroit, par for the course with a number 6 defenceman.

In conclusion, the Leafs generate more chances than their opposition, purged the team of bad players and personalities and brought in a slew of players that do the job better. If the numbers are to be believed, the Leafs would have made the playoffs with a good goalie this year, so one has to assume that they will be in the hunt in 2010-11. When you factor in the potential impact Nazem Kadri could have on our offense as well as the return for a possible Kaberle trade, the fortunes of our Maple Leafs seem to be going up.

Congrats and job well done on excellent and thorough academic exercise by Joe. He’s looking to get into amateur sports writing, so be sure to provide him with plenty of constructive feedback.

Reminder: Send all FanPosts and MailBag questions to alex.tran@mapleleafshotstove.com

  • rockydundas

    @ Craigory:
    Hmmmm….my simple math skills says that makes you 25! Quite a bit younger than me…I’m 40 (ugh!) What part of town did you live in? I lived off of Creighton Road for most of my life…went to Central Park School then Central Public.

  • daverleafsfan

    Since we are talking about character veterans like johnson.. I would love these guys to become leafs during Burke Tenure as Gm… Paul Gaustad or Jason chimera….. they guys are pure hard working warriors… good defensively, will go through a brick wall for any of their team mates and are good for 25 to 30ish points playing third line minutes. I know everyone says we have too many 3rd liners.. just saying these are guys i would definately target…

    Gaustad is a beast on the face off.. good on the pp and 6’5. Go get him burkie hah.

  • gunner_36

    light’em up wrote:

    [Team] [Available Cap] [Roster Spots Taken]
    New York Islanders $27,282,683 [21]
    Atlanta Thrashers $26,461,667 [16]
    Colorado Avalanche $23,795,833 [20]
    St. Louis Blues $17,168,334 [21]
    Nashville Predators $16,745,833 [20]
    Los Angeles Kings $16,104,166 [18]
    Tampa Bay Lightning $16,020,584 [17]
    Anaheim Ducks $15,551,250 [21]
    Phoenix Coyotes $14,218,750 [21]
    Edmonton Oilers $14,068,000 [21]
    Dallas Stars $13,379,167 [21]
    Carolina Hurricanes $11,969,167 [20]
    Florida Panthers $10,419,999 [22]
    Washington Capitals $8,555,705 [19]
    Is there a home somewhere there for Finger?

    Colorado needs physical D-Men, and Finger is a former Av. The Isles wanted some gritty D, And should probably want to male it to cap floor.

  • gunner_36

    moimoi28 wrote:

    gunner_36 wrote:
    If we get Clowe for Kaberle, and sign Johnson, the lineup is stacked. Every linebhas size, grit, physicality, skill (well maybe not the 4th line)
    Clowe-Bozak-Kessel
    Versteeg-Kadri-Armstrong
    Kulemin-Grabovski-Sjostrom
    Brown-Johnson-Orr
    Mitchell
    Mueller
    Irwin
    Caputi
    Phaneuf-Schenn
    Gunner-Komiserak
    Lebda-Beauchemin
    finger
    Gus
    Giggy
    Ryan Johnson had the worst Corsi in the entire NHL at -25.something. I’m not saying this stat is the be all and end all. But it does show the player’s ability to control the puck. Which he has none of which mean’s he has too block more shot’s because he is liability with the puck. Just saying.
    .
    Also, anyone notice that Finger has a higher Corsi than Lebda and he block’s more shot’s than Lebda does. So not only does he create more offence than Lebda, he also help’s keep it out better. Mind you he does cost over 2 million more than Lebda.

    Few reasons for Johnsons low Corsi.

    1 . He plays a lot of SH minutes. Typically you get
    ore shots against than for.

    2. He plays a SH style all the time. Dump thebuck in, chase a d cyp
    cycle, he rarely shoots.

    Don’t worry, Johnson is safe defensively, but this stat relies on creating offense, which Johnson doesn’t do, and neither did linemates, Rypien, Glass, or Hordichuk.
    And Poni had the highest Corsi on the Leafs, so…

  • http://MapleleafHotstove Beathoven

    I’m guessing the Leafs lineup will look something like this,though who knows what other moves Burke might do.
    Kulemin-Bozak-Kessel
    Clowe?–Kadri-Versteeg
    Torres?Belanger?-Armstrong
    Caputi-Hanson-Orr
    Phaneuf-Beauchemin
    Komisarek-Schenn
    Gunnarsson-Lebda
    Sjostrom
    Brown
    Mueller
    Giguere
    Gustavsson

  • BeLeafer

    Richard-Steven Williams wrote:

    With Maholtra you pay for his faceoff abilities. Guys consistently one of the best in the league. Plus he is a diamond in the community, just ask Blue Jackets fans.

    Malhotra will help the Nucks, but they overpaid him and gave him a NTC… bizarre

  • gunner_36

    Beathoven wrote:

    I’m guessing the Leafs lineup will look something like this,though who knows what other moves Burke might do.
    Kulemin-Bozak-Kessel
    Clowe?–Kadri-Versteeg
    Torres?Belanger?-Armstrong
    Caputi-Hanson-Orr
    Phaneuf-Beauchemin
    Komisarek-Schenn
    Gunnarsson-Lebda
    Sjostrom
    Brown
    Mueller
    Giguere
    Gustavsson

    Sjostrom over Torres any day. Plus Sjostrom is a top 3 penalty killer in the league.

  • gunner_36

    BeLeafer wrote:

    Richard-Steven Williams wrote:
    With Maholtra you pay for his faceoff abilities. Guys consistently one of the best in the league. Plus he is a diamond in the community, just ask Blue Jackets fans.
    Malhotra will help the Nucks, but they overpaid him and gave him a NTC… bizarre

    He’s from the area, and his wife (Steve Nash’s sister) is also from there, so that’s why he got a NTC.
    The Canucks needed someone reliable in that 3rd line centre spot (not Welwood), and they probably got in a bidding war.

  • NewfieDave

    Question for discussion:

    If BB does not receive a fair offer for Tomas Kaberle could he be a top 6 forward with his puck moving skills and also quarter back the PP. I know most will agree that he is not a physical player but his finesse with the puck and passing ability far outweighs that…in my opinion.

  • doktordave

    50 Mission Cap wrote:

    doktordave wrote:

    -
    I remember reading last year sometime that Finger actually would’ve preferred a demotion to the minors as opposed to sitting in the press box… not only would he get more playing time, but he’d make more money because he wouldn’t have to pay into escrow…

    I doubt that would be his feeling, as playing in the AHL would reduce his value for his NEXT contract and he isn’t that old. If you want an NHL career, you want to be playing NHL minutes.

  • lescott

    Cino, nice write-up. I’m not going to bother reading through all of the posts to see if this is already been said, but you might also want to make note of the fact that we took a lot of bad shots, or we had a lot of bad shooters. Blake and Stempniak would have accounted for a great deal of our shots for, whereas whomever was shooting against us may have been able to score goals.
    We took a lot of bad shots because our team didn’t have the skill-set or the creativity to make the incisive passes that would have created better opportunities. I would suggest that Ron Wilson saw the weakness up front and coached the team to fire-at-will, and that would also partially explain why we outshot so many of our opponents in losses. Of course the other half of the story is the defense and the goaltending, which you have covered.
    If you are looking for constructive criticism as Alex suggests, don’t write, “In conclusion”. The article flowed well, and then that point struck like the forced, hard, artless writing of a science student.

  • 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    Sjoey should be included in any 3rd line. I loved what I saw from him… he’s exactly the 3rd line kinda guy I want. Might not score, but he stiffles the opposition.

  • lescott

    @ NewfieDave:

    Kaberle can’t be a forward, his kind of smooth, measured and patient puck-handling works great for carrying the puck through the neutral zone against forecheckers and forwards stuck guarding the middle of the rink. When you get into the offensive zone everything is constrained and condensed.
    Is Kabs the guy you want fighting on the boards to get the puck out, or racing out to the point to block a shot or even forechecking in the offensive zone?
    No, Kabs gift is his ability to read the directions and speeds of the players around him and start the play by making the right move and then the right pass. Kabs isn’t going to drive by defensemen in their own zone with one of his head fakes, nor is he going to want to get punished by guys like Pronger.
    Ian White, another d-man with a bag of tricks, could be a forward because he has the grit and aggressiveness to be direct — like the willingness to shoot.
    Kaberle as a forward would be like if you slowed down Kessel by half and told him not to shoot.