The Intangibles of Jiggy

by on July 30, 2010 in Opinion - 970 Comments

Share

Since joining the Toronto Maple Leafs, Brian Burke has worked feverishly to distance the club from the atmosphere of mediocrity which pervaded during the years of mismanagement that came before.

While upgrading the playing staff and reducing the age demographic of the locker room are the two most apparent hallmarks Burke has placed upon the Leafs, his backstage upgrading of the administrative, coaching, scouting and medical departments have the potential to leave considerably longer legacies.

After all the right combination of the above are what set good organizations apart from great ones.

Subsequent additions such as Dave Nonis, Dave Poulin, Steve Kaspar, Rob Cowie, Andy Playter, Marty Dudgeon and Andy Belza are all likely to play key roles in the evolution of the club and its players in the years to come and the exhaustive list (especially in the amateur scouting department), shows just how extensively Burke has purged the system.

Aside from his front office hires, perhaps Burke’s most significant coup was wrestling Francois Allaire from his former employers in Anaheim and naming him the Leafs goaltending consultant.

Amid a myriad of flaws, the Leafs weakness in net has been an overbearing Achilles heel for the best part of a decade and the addition of Allaire in June 2009 illustrated Burke’s dedication to building from the net out. A model he further proved committed to when he added Swedish phenom Jonas Gustavsson to the Leafs after a lengthy courtship that concluded, without coincidence, a mere month after Allaire was named to the coaching staff.

Small wonder Gustavsson jumped at the chance to work under the tutelage of Allaire. While few goaltending coaches come as indomitable as the Quebecois, fewer still come with his reputation. As the architect who shaped lanky rookie Patrick Roy’s raw talents into a Hall of Fame career, Allaire is a coach who demands respect and never was this more apparent than when Vesa Toskala failed to show it.

A throwback to the era of JFJ and a detrimental egotist to boot, Toskala’s inability to work with Allaire hammered the final nail in his wretched Toronto career and probably the last chance to redeem his status as a legitimate NHL number one.

Yep, it’s a case of checking your ego at the door if you want to work with Allaire. For all his fieriness on the ice, Roy was an attentive pupil in Allaire’s class and by-all-accounts; Gustavsson is proving an equally dedicated student.

But the exit of Toskala also brought another name into The Monster’s developmental curve, one whose influence could prove invaluable in a crucial sophomore year for Gustavsson.

Salary-dumped in the trade that rid the Leafs of Toskala, J-S Giguere is a player who attributes his career successes, including a Stanley Cup, to the influence of Allaire and contrary to Toskala, one who has nothing but respect for Allaire’s ability to not only impart his wisdom to developing goalies, but also reviving the careers of jaded veterans.

Of course, as any good coach will tell you, sentiment is best left for retirement and Allaire was quick to outline the terms of his reunion with Giguere.

Speaking the day after the trade Allaire said:

“He’s not just coming here to play goal, He’s coming here as a role model, to Jonas (Gustavsson), to James Reimer, to all our goalies. He’s a guy our young players can (aspire) to, to see what it takes to make the NHL, on and off the ice.”

Call it a job description; as a former Conn Smythe winner Giguere is a goalie who still feels he has what it takes to be a number one somewhere in the NHL, but he also knows how to work with Allaire and with last months exit of goaltending coach Corey Hirsch to St. Louis, Giguere will be increasingly relied upon as an locker room extension for Allaire.

And could there be a better choice?

Considering the Leafs are on the hook for the final $7 million instalment of the four year $24 million deal penned by Burke in Anaheim, many see the Montreal native as an anchor to this summer’s spending ambitions while few expect he will be a Leaf upon next seasons conclusion.

The latter assumption seems a fair appraisal. With Gustavsson hoping to cement himself as a bona-fide NHL starter and the Marlies looking to host a battle royale in audition for Gustavsson’s backup circa 2011-12, the depth chart of Gustavsson, Rynaas, Reimer and Scrivens looks flusher than the Leafs have perhaps ever been in net. As a consequence the services of Giguere (and his wage expectations) will likely be superfluous pending an explosion of youthful puckstoppers this year.

Subsequently a safety net, albeit an expensive one, Giguere should prove a tremendous upgrade over the corrosive play of Toskala.

Indeed transcending corrosive, to backtrack on the contemptible era of Giguere’s trade-mate; Toskala’s abysmal performances provided a thorn in the side of Gustavsson’s development last season. Souring the atmosphere and stinking up the blue paint, Toskala did little to lighten the workload for the then-rookie. Subsequently falling out with Allaire, Toskala provided an increasingly disruptive backdrop amid a season of challenges for the 25 year old Gustavsson whose process of adapting to North American hockey coincided with the worst start to a regular season in Leafs history. An onerous distinction made possible by the fellow Scandinavian he was splitting ice time with.

In such hindsight, the $3 million price increase between Giguere and Toskala is small beans considering the former comes with a reputation of calmness and has the potential to fulfill a mentoring role Vesa Toskala could never come close to assuming.

Giguere can also play a bit too; which will come as a relief to those tired of watching Gustavsson mop up games long-lost last fall.

Suiting up for 15 contests in the blue and white after the trade, Giguere posted a 6-7-2 record with a team leading 2.49 GAA and an impressive .916 save percentage. While his superior numbers were the product of playing behind a Leafs defence and PK much improved over what Gustavsson had endured, the former deposed Ducks starter showed he could still get the job done.

Of course, few feel Giguere will amount to anymore than training wheels in the early part of next season, timesharing the Leafs net until the organization sees fit to let The Monster run with it. Entering into a developmental year with only the faintest glimmer of playoff aspirations, the Leafs can swallow some bad play from the sophomore Gustavsson while having Giguere to steady the ship if the Buds have a shot at the post season.

It’s a healthy situation for Gustavsson and Giguere and one both will be looking to capitalize on. Gustavsson will benefit from having genuine proven competition. Meanwhile Giguere can play mediator to Allaire, advisor to Gustavsson and shop himself behind a theoretically settled Leafs defence as a capable veteran.

With the dressing room trending younger Giguere may be one of only 3 or 4 players north of 30 years old next season and while he still feels he can be a number one, he is unlikely to let personal ambitions get in the way of helping Burke and Allaire develop the next crop of Leafs goaltenders, as well as schooling a youthful group of forwards on the nuances of distracting his league contemporises.

Subsequently Giguere is providing intangibles for which there is no price tag. On such a young team, Burke couldn’t have acquired a more trusted and classy veteran asset.  While Giguere’s time with the Leafs maybe limited too little over a year depending on the Leafs standing come the trade deadline, his experience has the potential to be a tremendous foundation for both Gustavsson and the Baby Buds.

At a $6 million cap hit, one can point at Giguere as an overpriced Huet or Theodore, but in actuality with a mere season left before he enters free agency, Jiggy could prove one of Burke’s shrewdest on-ice investments.

A role model to root for, even if he leaves most of his legacy in the hands of The Monster.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • reversethecurse67

    @ rustynail:
    I have on TV…but people saw Alex Daigle play, and every time a guy who gets picked 10th becomes an amazing player and the guys 6-9 dont even come close to his results, what about the guys who saw all of those guys play.
    -
    Its uncertain…IMPOSSIBLE. IM-POSSIBLE. nobody can tell how many poiints Kadri will score next year; how many goals…how effective his forecheck will be….or his defensive awarness.
    -
    But i CAN tell you how Bobby Ryan probably will be….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Kadri+Beauchemin would be a great deal IMO

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • reversethecurse67

    @ Richard-Steven Williams:
    There are exceptions to everything…..i guess you could make an argument for the extreme. And BTW, like i am explaining to a few people right now: Nobody saw Gustavsson play ONE GAME yet. People kn ew how good Toskala was, his numbers, spoke for themselves. He came off a seeming injury year and was expected to bounce back, just like many great players often do.
    So why would we annount the monster #1 again?
    (i have to go for perogies, fresh made, sorry cannot talk anymore)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Jordan wrote:

    Kadri+Beauchemin would be a great deal IMO

    Ughhhh.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • reversethecurse67

    @ honesthockey:
    Goddamit, i have to do the Brett Favre just to get facts straight.
    Read above. Maybe last page. It made it VERY CLEAR that Bobby Ryan produced at a higher clip without playing with Perry and Getzlaf.
    Now please, no more stupid comments, i HAVE to go!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • reversethecurse67

    @ honesthockey:
    Oh, and what’s with your olympics comment? Better teammates, defense, everything
    YIKES MAN
    Malone had 6 points and Ryan 2 points does that mean Malone > Ryan? Does that mean Malone makes the line of Stamkos or Lecavalier……

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/MLHS_RSWilliams Richard-Steven Williams

    You know it boils down to this we trade Kaberle AND Kadri. I think it blows up in our face, call it a hunch. It seems some of you are valuing Kaberle real low or written him of completely, considering his point production and Kadri’s potential I would take those two for Ryan. So yeah its a good deal for Anaheim.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry

    Perhaps the most compelling argument in this Kaberle + Kadri for Ryan debate is the fact that Kadri had been a Smurfs fan all his life… do we really want someone like that on our team?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    reversethecurse67 wrote:

    @ honesthockey:
    Goddamit, i have to do the Brett Favre just to get facts straight.
    Read above. Maybe last page. It made it VERY CLEAR that Bobby Ryan produced at a higher clip without playing with Perry and Getzlaf.
    Now please, no more stupid comments, i HAVE to go!

    Better prove that one because DobberHockey says you are wrong.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DefenseWinsChampionships

    @RSW
    Fair enough. That was a better argument than most people have given so far. I would personally like the deal because Ryan will be a star now, and potentially elite later on. Kadri has the elite potential too, but will probably take longer to make an impact, and is less of a sure thing to be any sort of impact player. And no, I don’t just want to win now. I wouldn’t trade Kabs and Kadri for a 30+ veteran superstar or anything like that. Ryan helps both now and later, much like Kessel. To each his own, I guess. This whole thing started when, (I think it was peterbeleafs), said something to the effect of “what the hell are you thinking?!”.
    .
    Oh and just a side note, Ryan was picked under Burke’s management too.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LeafsRyan.

    @ honesthockey:
    would you do Kaberle + propsects not named Schenn or Kadri

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/MLHS_RSWilliams Richard-Steven Williams

    @ DefenseWinsChampionships:

    I think with Seguin, he never played within the Leafs system, I have no sentiment toward him and couldn’t care less if he turns into a 50 goal scorer, I will always look at it as a chance to draft him lost, but without the sentiment some have built up around that selection. Kadri I’ve grown to like and want to see how he pans out in that respect its harder to lose him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    LeafsRyan. wrote:

    @ honesthockey:
    would you do Kaberle + propsects not named Schenn or Kadri

    Depends on who the prospect is but it would be a real NHL long shot IMO. IMO Kaberle has more value to the Ducks today than what Ryan would have to the Leafs. So again Kaberle for Ryan or look elsewhere.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/MLHS_RSWilliams Richard-Steven Williams
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    What speaks volumes to me is the fact that the entire contract dispute with Ryan and Anaheim revolves around Ryan wanting to take the least amount of years so that he can be FA eligible quicker. Do we really want to take a chance on this guy when he seems dead set on testing the market? Why give Kaberle AND Kadri for for a guy who will jet the second his contract is up?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LeafsRyan.

    @ honesthockey:
    They would never do Kaberle for Ryan straight up… we would have to add some high quality prospects like Aulie, Damigo or Riemer

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie

    @ honesthockey:

    No, it’s just logic for everyone who doesn’t overrate Kaberle.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)