The Intangibles of Jiggy

by on July 30, 2010 in Opinion - 970 Comments

Share

Since joining the Toronto Maple Leafs, Brian Burke has worked feverishly to distance the club from the atmosphere of mediocrity which pervaded during the years of mismanagement that came before.

While upgrading the playing staff and reducing the age demographic of the locker room are the two most apparent hallmarks Burke has placed upon the Leafs, his backstage upgrading of the administrative, coaching, scouting and medical departments have the potential to leave considerably longer legacies.

After all the right combination of the above are what set good organizations apart from great ones.

Subsequent additions such as Dave Nonis, Dave Poulin, Steve Kaspar, Rob Cowie, Andy Playter, Marty Dudgeon and Andy Belza are all likely to play key roles in the evolution of the club and its players in the years to come and the exhaustive list (especially in the amateur scouting department), shows just how extensively Burke has purged the system.

Aside from his front office hires, perhaps Burke’s most significant coup was wrestling Francois Allaire from his former employers in Anaheim and naming him the Leafs goaltending consultant.

Amid a myriad of flaws, the Leafs weakness in net has been an overbearing Achilles heel for the best part of a decade and the addition of Allaire in June 2009 illustrated Burke’s dedication to building from the net out. A model he further proved committed to when he added Swedish phenom Jonas Gustavsson to the Leafs after a lengthy courtship that concluded, without coincidence, a mere month after Allaire was named to the coaching staff.

Small wonder Gustavsson jumped at the chance to work under the tutelage of Allaire. While few goaltending coaches come as indomitable as the Quebecois, fewer still come with his reputation. As the architect who shaped lanky rookie Patrick Roy’s raw talents into a Hall of Fame career, Allaire is a coach who demands respect and never was this more apparent than when Vesa Toskala failed to show it.

A throwback to the era of JFJ and a detrimental egotist to boot, Toskala’s inability to work with Allaire hammered the final nail in his wretched Toronto career and probably the last chance to redeem his status as a legitimate NHL number one.

Yep, it’s a case of checking your ego at the door if you want to work with Allaire. For all his fieriness on the ice, Roy was an attentive pupil in Allaire’s class and by-all-accounts; Gustavsson is proving an equally dedicated student.

But the exit of Toskala also brought another name into The Monster’s developmental curve, one whose influence could prove invaluable in a crucial sophomore year for Gustavsson.

Salary-dumped in the trade that rid the Leafs of Toskala, J-S Giguere is a player who attributes his career successes, including a Stanley Cup, to the influence of Allaire and contrary to Toskala, one who has nothing but respect for Allaire’s ability to not only impart his wisdom to developing goalies, but also reviving the careers of jaded veterans.

Of course, as any good coach will tell you, sentiment is best left for retirement and Allaire was quick to outline the terms of his reunion with Giguere.

Speaking the day after the trade Allaire said:

“He’s not just coming here to play goal, He’s coming here as a role model, to Jonas (Gustavsson), to James Reimer, to all our goalies. He’s a guy our young players can (aspire) to, to see what it takes to make the NHL, on and off the ice.”

Call it a job description; as a former Conn Smythe winner Giguere is a goalie who still feels he has what it takes to be a number one somewhere in the NHL, but he also knows how to work with Allaire and with last months exit of goaltending coach Corey Hirsch to St. Louis, Giguere will be increasingly relied upon as an locker room extension for Allaire.

And could there be a better choice?

Considering the Leafs are on the hook for the final $7 million instalment of the four year $24 million deal penned by Burke in Anaheim, many see the Montreal native as an anchor to this summer’s spending ambitions while few expect he will be a Leaf upon next seasons conclusion.

The latter assumption seems a fair appraisal. With Gustavsson hoping to cement himself as a bona-fide NHL starter and the Marlies looking to host a battle royale in audition for Gustavsson’s backup circa 2011-12, the depth chart of Gustavsson, Rynaas, Reimer and Scrivens looks flusher than the Leafs have perhaps ever been in net. As a consequence the services of Giguere (and his wage expectations) will likely be superfluous pending an explosion of youthful puckstoppers this year.

Subsequently a safety net, albeit an expensive one, Giguere should prove a tremendous upgrade over the corrosive play of Toskala.

Indeed transcending corrosive, to backtrack on the contemptible era of Giguere’s trade-mate; Toskala’s abysmal performances provided a thorn in the side of Gustavsson’s development last season. Souring the atmosphere and stinking up the blue paint, Toskala did little to lighten the workload for the then-rookie. Subsequently falling out with Allaire, Toskala provided an increasingly disruptive backdrop amid a season of challenges for the 25 year old Gustavsson whose process of adapting to North American hockey coincided with the worst start to a regular season in Leafs history. An onerous distinction made possible by the fellow Scandinavian he was splitting ice time with.

In such hindsight, the $3 million price increase between Giguere and Toskala is small beans considering the former comes with a reputation of calmness and has the potential to fulfill a mentoring role Vesa Toskala could never come close to assuming.

Giguere can also play a bit too; which will come as a relief to those tired of watching Gustavsson mop up games long-lost last fall.

Suiting up for 15 contests in the blue and white after the trade, Giguere posted a 6-7-2 record with a team leading 2.49 GAA and an impressive .916 save percentage. While his superior numbers were the product of playing behind a Leafs defence and PK much improved over what Gustavsson had endured, the former deposed Ducks starter showed he could still get the job done.

Of course, few feel Giguere will amount to anymore than training wheels in the early part of next season, timesharing the Leafs net until the organization sees fit to let The Monster run with it. Entering into a developmental year with only the faintest glimmer of playoff aspirations, the Leafs can swallow some bad play from the sophomore Gustavsson while having Giguere to steady the ship if the Buds have a shot at the post season.

It’s a healthy situation for Gustavsson and Giguere and one both will be looking to capitalize on. Gustavsson will benefit from having genuine proven competition. Meanwhile Giguere can play mediator to Allaire, advisor to Gustavsson and shop himself behind a theoretically settled Leafs defence as a capable veteran.

With the dressing room trending younger Giguere may be one of only 3 or 4 players north of 30 years old next season and while he still feels he can be a number one, he is unlikely to let personal ambitions get in the way of helping Burke and Allaire develop the next crop of Leafs goaltenders, as well as schooling a youthful group of forwards on the nuances of distracting his league contemporises.

Subsequently Giguere is providing intangibles for which there is no price tag. On such a young team, Burke couldn’t have acquired a more trusted and classy veteran asset.  While Giguere’s time with the Leafs maybe limited too little over a year depending on the Leafs standing come the trade deadline, his experience has the potential to be a tremendous foundation for both Gustavsson and the Baby Buds.

At a $6 million cap hit, one can point at Giguere as an overpriced Huet or Theodore, but in actuality with a mere season left before he enters free agency, Jiggy could prove one of Burke’s shrewdest on-ice investments.

A role model to root for, even if he leaves most of his legacy in the hands of The Monster.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • honesthockey
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • honesthockey

    Do I want Bobby Ryan as a Leaf? You bet. Would I give up Kadri or Schenn in a deal to get him? Not a prayer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

    Cactus wrote:

    What speaks volumes to me is the fact that the entire contract dispute with Ryan and Anaheim revolves around Ryan wanting to take the least amount of years so that he can be FA eligible quicker. Do we really want to take a chance on this guy when he seems dead set on testing the market? Why give Kaberle AND Kadri for for a guy who will jet the second his contract is up?

    .
    Exactly why Burke won’t involve Kadri or Schenn in a deal for Ryan. Just doesn’t make sense. I’d do Kabs + prospects for Ryan though..and hope like hell he re-signs down the line.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitch92

    Here is a question to ponder. Why does the majority of people here have such a hard on for Silver but complete distain for Alex Semin? The dollars would be similar for the first year anyway. Semin has a year remaining with a cap hit of 5.0 and would likely resign for 5.5 – 6.5 depending on the market and term. Silver would probably sign a three year deal for 5.0 – 5.5 per. Silver is a bonafide 30 goal scorer on the second line whereas Semin is a bonafide 40 goal scorer on the second line. Semin has the proven skill to immediately jump to first line duty and likely could get near 50 goals with the added ice time and better linemates (Bozak/Kadri and Kessel). He would be out of Ovi’s shadow and would play first PP minutes as well. Silver would probably be given first line duty by default but would not come close to 50 goals, perhaps 35.

    The reason I ask is that I see Semin as having elite potential and those type of players simply do not become available very often. I think Ryan will be a decent power forward for many years but I doubt he will become a consistent 40 or 50 goal scorer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie

    @ honesthockey:

    He’s a 4 time all-star because everyone else on the team was shit… for 4 years.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gucci Little Piggy

    Is Derek Roy a Leaf yet?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Kaberle
    FOR
    Savard+Wheeler
    Trade Grabovski somewhere for a pick
    still seems like one of the most possible trade ideas. They added Seguin and already have Bergeron and Krejci. They added Horton so Wheeler moveable
    Kulemin-Savard-Kessel
    Wheeler-Bozak-Versteeg
    Sjos-Kadri-Armstrong
    Brown-Mitchell-Orr
    Phaneuf-Beauch
    Komi-Gunner
    Schenn-Lebda
    JSG
    Gus
    that leaves 5 mil cap space to keep Finger up and another 1 or 2 forwards for spare

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafs89

    I know how we can increase Kab’s value. Let’s all go to LA and beat down a couple of their defenceman….. with a truck.. no hand to hand. they’re too big.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cactus

    @ Whatmeworry:
    Bowman–>Niemi.
     
    Based on what he was saying about Corey Crawford, I think that Chicago might actually let Niemi go. I wonder which team will scoop him up, or trade for him. It would be funny if it’s Philly.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitch92

    @ lonsmos2:
    Sorry I checked it after I posted. Still I think the deal makes sense as both Kaberle and Semin have one year remaining. We might have to sweeten the deal with a prospect or pick. Semin would play hard this year to try to earn his next contract and if we are progressing toward becoming a contender he would likely resign. If he doesn’t pan out we cut our losses and use the money on one of the other big names next year.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Only_crime

    Jordan wrote:

    Kaberle
    FOR
    Savard+Wheeler
    Trade Grabovski somewhere for a pick
    still seems like one of the most possible trade ideas. They added Seguin and already have Bergeron and Krejci. They added Horton so Wheeler moveable
    Kulemin-Savard-Kessel
    Wheeler-Bozak-Versteeg
    Sjos-Kadri-Armstrong
    Brown-Mitchell-Orr
    Phaneuf-Beauch
    Komi-Gunner
    Schenn-Lebda
    JSG
    Gus
    that leaves 5 mil cap space to keep Finger up and another 1 or 2 forwards for spare

    Amen that would be a GREAT trade for the leafs although I think we’d have to add one of the marlie 4 to get it done. I also love those top two lines although I might try kadri on savards wing for a few games just so kadri gets a chance to have a nice transition to the NHL level instead of just throwing him to the wolves.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry

    You know it is slow when the last thread went up yesterday and has only twelve posts, and this one, “where the action is”, has slowed to a crawl….

    Here’s someone’s (James O’Brien?) opinion on the top teams for next year. What, no Leafs?

    “The Washington Capitals are on my short list of ‘Teams who look promising even though it’s only July.’ I’d like to see what the Chicago Blackhawks do with their goalie situation to truly assess their quality as a team, but I think they’d make the list. You know what, let’s list them for fun right now.

    Capitals
    Blackhawks
    Pittsburgh Penguins
    Philadelphia Flyers?
    Vancouver Canucks
    Detroit Red Wings
    San Jose Sharks
    Obviously this list is ridiculously preliminary and each team has some problems.”

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://twitter.com/MLHS_RSWilliams Richard-Steven Williams

    @ Whatmeworry:

    I’d take a Datsyuk or Kulemin as well mind.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • reenergized

    @ LeafsRyan.:

    Actually turns out your right , my comment was meant for that Ballard dude … so sorry

    and btw, I think your an ass as well ….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Whatmeworry
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)