12 Burning Questions: Will Mike Komisarek Have A Bounce Back Season?

by on August 19, 2010 in 2010-11 Season - 233 Comments

Share

In part three of his 12 burning questions series, Derek Harmsworth looks at whether Mike Komisarek can rebound from a tumultuous first season in Blue and White.

It’s no secret that Brian Burke likes his hockey teams to be, for the most part, big, nasty, and in your face physical.  He also has a penchant for looking for players from his home country of the United States, but as he said, he would sign players who were from the moon if they could play the game.

Last summer, Burke’s first free agency period with the Toronto Maple Leafs, it seemed all too fitting that he would target one of the nastiest, meanest, American born defenseman on the market, to give the Toronto Maple Leafs some much needed snarl.

That player was Mike Komisarek, a New York native who had honed his skills with the University of Michigan before being drafted by the Montreal Canadians in 2001.  Komisarek had made a name for himself in Montreal, becoming a fan favourite for his strong physical play, his in your face attitude, and his willingness to drop the gloves and defend teammates when needed.

Only the snarl the Leafs thought they got seemed more like a wimper.

Indeed, year one in a Toronto Maple Leafs uniform didn’t go exactly as planned for Komisarek, who spurned his former club, the Montreal Canadiens, in order to jump ship in hockey’s most decorated rivalry.

The Leafs signed Komisarek to a five year deal, with an average salary of $4.5 million a season, which seemed like a number most of us could live with, considering what Komisarek brings to the team, and considering how the numbers in the open market seem to escalate.

The reaction was split amongst Leafs Nation however.  Komisarek wasn’t coming off his best season in Montreal, a season that saw him suffer shoulder woes, and a fight with Milan Lucic in which his play was not quite the same upon his return.  Despite this, there were many Leafs supporters who felt that Komisarek would be a welcome addition to the Leafs back end, a player who loves to play on the edge, brings an intimidation factor, and carries himself as a leader both on and off the ice.

However, like a lot of plans, it didn’t work out like everyone thought.

Komisarek struggled mightily in the first few months of the season, something head coach Ron Wilson and GM Brian Burke chocked up to “trying too hard” to make an impact.  Komisarek was simply trying too hard out of the gate in order to make a positive impression among his teammates, and more importantly, the fans.

The issue being, of course, that like a good offensive lineman, Komisarek is on top of his game when you talk about him as little as possible.

A strong, physical player who carries himself on his defensive zone play, Komisarek was caught out of position too many times in the opening games of the season, and the result was a poor plus/minus, and a difficult start to his tenure as a Leafs player.

Things only got worse for the hulking blue liner, as Komisarek reencountered the shoulder woes that stunted his previous season with the Montreal Canadiens.  On February 3rd, 2010, it was announced by the Leafs organization that Komisarek would be shut down for the season.  surgery would be required to correct the shoulder injury would end his season, and his chance to represent team USA at the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver.

For Komisarek, it was a devastating way for his first season in Toronto to end.  A frustrating finish to a frustrating season.

It hasn’t been all for naught however.  The lost season, and the struggles while he was on the ice (he recorded only 4 points, and was a minus -9, second worst on the team) have certainly seemed to serve as motivation for the year to come.

Komisarek has been working hard in the off season since resuming workouts a few months ago.  He has taken to Twitter as one of the first and only members (alongside Colby Armstrong, and perhaps a few others) of the Toronto Maple Leafs to interact with fans of the team on such a level.  He has taken to updating fans on his progress, routinely posting photos of him hitting the ice, or gym, at the Mastercard centre for excellence, the practice facility of the Leafs.

He has also been busy throughout the summer promoting the Toronto Maple Leafs on other levels as well.

Komisarek makes a conscious effort to be a regular on the charity circuit for the Leafs, whether it be making visits to local schools and hospitals, or teaching kids at hockey camp, or taking in a game of surprise shinny.

All this, of course, isn’t surprising to anyone who knows Komisarek.  Leafs GM Brian Burke has gone on record before, speaking glowingly about the type of stand up person he (Komisarek) is off the ice, and was long considered to be a strong personality for the vacant captaincy of the Leafs, before an injury and a trade for Dion Phaneuf derailed those plans.

A full, healthy season from Komisarek, and it becomes less and less clear over which player would wear the C for Toronto this upcoming season.

However, in listening to Komisarek talk, it seems that having a letter on his jersey or not will not change the game he plays on the ice.  Though he did wear an A with Montreal and during his brief time with Toronto, it is clear to those close to the team that he will command attention, and the room, whether he has a letter stitched on the jersey or not.

For the Leafs to have success this year, it is integral that Komisarek have a healthy campaign in which he can return to the game that made him one of the defenders who was hard to play against, night in and night out.  This observer can remember many a nights post lockout where Komisarek routinely shadowed former Leafs captain Mats Sundin-not an easy frame to keep in check-with regularity, and seemingly with ease.

And while the depth of the Toronto Maple Leafs defense, at least as it stands right now, indicates that the team may be able to withstand a few injuries to defenders, one can argue that Komisarek is a player who needs to be in the lineup more often than not for the Leafs to improve their defensive zone play, and playoff chances.

Along with Tomas Kaberle, Dion Phaneuf, and Luke Schenn, they make a formidable top four, who, when on their game, can likely match up among the best in the Eastern Conference.

The Maple Leafs have made a lot of changes since the Brian Burke era began, but perhaps none more epitomizes the GM’s brash style off the ice, than the way Komisarek plays on the ice.  All reports indicate that he has put in a tremendous amount of hard work off the ice to ensure that his play on the ice improves dramatically over last seasons lost year.

And for the Leafs organization and their fans, they can only hope all the hard work put in turns into a positive output.  It has become clear that for Komisarek, as long as he injury free, he is likely going to be a factor for the Leafs this year.

A favourite quote of mine, from an unknown author, states that “some people dream of success…while others wake up and work hard at it.

When it comes to Mike Komisarek and his road back to being a healthy and effective player with the Toronto Maple Leafs, you could argue that no one this summer has been up earlier.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Sk8trBoi

    @ flappypaddle:
    O.K but I’m guessing not too many more.
    And Calgary? Really?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dan hockey fan

    @ Sk8trBoi:
    I am not using Lucic as if he was the only player our first two lines have to worry about. The only team our first two lines don’t have to worry about are the Smurfs. If Armstrong, Caputi, Rosehill or Orr are on the ice with Kessel then Lucic and all other tough first line players would watch their manners. When the puck is in the offensive corner not one D went to the aid of the forwards last year, supposedly because they don’t want a face off outside the blue line. What a pile of crap. Rosehill is not projected to make the Leafs this year. Armstrong plays right wing the same as Kessel. Orr was never used last year on the first line. Caputi is the only one that could possibly find himself on the first line with Kessel yet most say he might not even make the Leafs.
    Until Burke gets a first line power left winger, Wilson should play Caputi, Rosehill or Orr there.
    You will then see Bozak and Kessel over achieve. I am not saying Caputi, Rosehill or Orr are first line players but they are better at protecting Bozak and Kessel when they are actually on the ice with them. You don’t need three skilled players on a line, only two and the third one if he can protect them is better than a skilled player with no moxie, as long as he can skate with them and bang in some garbage goals.
    Wilson can not make the trade for the proper first line winger he can only play the players that are available to him. For the same reason Wilson should play Armstrong with Kadri.
    We finished 29th last year, not just because of our goaltending and poor defensive play, but because it was easy for other teams to play against our top two lines.
    It would be interesting to see the fighting minutes of all teams top two lines and actually compare to our top two lines. I think that stat would illustrate my point.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sk8trBoi

    @ Dan hockey fan:
    Let the scorer’s score and the plumbers plumb. A game lasts 60 minutes and there’s plenty of time to get a guy’s jersey number.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36

    flappypaddle wrote:

    http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/34808-Ten-American-Hockey-League-games-to-be-broadcast-live-on-CBC.html
    I thought this was kinda cool I always wished more AHL games where aired.

    Me too.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri

    @ Dan hockey fan:
    Maybe in the old NHL, times have changed, you can’t put TIe Domi on your first line anymore, atleast IMO (offense is too much of a necessity with the high pace). Caputi works, but i think Kulemin works better (forecheck wise). If it comes down to a scrum, the Big boys on D can help out.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sk8trBoi

    @ Nazem.K-savzri:
    Exactly!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36

    @ Dan hockey fan:
    Caputi was going to be Crosby’s winger this year, so I don’t see why he can’t be Keasel’s. He’s better offensively than Orr, Brown and Rosehill.
    .
    Caputi-Bozak-Kessel
    Kulemin-Grabovski-Versteeg
    Sjostrom-Kadri-Armstrong
    Brown-Mitchell/Hanson-Orr
    .
    the 2nd line is the only one you worry about. But Grabs is crazy and would probably fight a lot of guys. Kulemin is solid. Versteeg will fight smaller guys. Both him and Grabs are balls of fire, while Kulemin is strong.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Sk8trBoi

    @flappypaddle
    Fair enough.
    But I’m sure you’ll agree with me, this year’s version of the Leafs is a heck of a lot tougher than it’s been in recent years.
    And could be one of the tougher teams in the league.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    I like the topic now. Toughness is way more enjoyable to talk about. Fuck the Kessel trade and the Kabs saga for now. Lets start all agreeing with each other about how tough we are gonna be for years to come.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DefenseWinsChampionships

    I did a little bit of research on players picked in the draft from 1995-2005 in order to see if the Kessel trade was good or not at the time it was made. It can safely be assumed that the Leafs were reasonably expected to end up with a top-15 pick in both the 2010 and 2011 drafts. So I looked at forwards picked in the first 15 of each of the 11 drafts I reviewed. I also looked at 2nd round picked forwards and 3rd round picked forwards, (a 2nd was in the Kessel deal too, and a 3rd was given up to aquire that 2nd round pick). I chose which forwards I would rather have than Kessel (only forwards because Kessel is a forward so it’s easier to compare to them, and it is a large enough sample size that the %s should work out the same as if I included other positions) Here are the results:
    .
    1st 15 overall picks – 104 forwards taken, 22 I’d rather have than Kessel.
    2nd round picks – 213 forwards taken, 1 I’d rather have than Kessel.
    3rd round picks – 196 forwards taken, 1 I’d rather have than Kessel.
    .
    So that’s…
    22/104 x2 (because there were two first round picks) for 44/104, or 42.31%
    1/213 for 0.47%
    1/196 for 0.51%
    .
    Add them together, and you get 43.29%. This is well below 50%, showing that the odds were much better that the Leafs would end up with the best player in the deal. Even if you want to add 5% as a margin of error due to a possible bias being invloved (which I think I avoided very well), it still looks like the Leafs had a better chance of ending up with the best player in the deal. Now I know that if there were 2 players drafted that were both just slightly worse than Kessel, that maybe we still lose, so this isn’t a perfect system, but it should help show why Burke made the trade. And remember, Burke considers getting the best player in the trade to be a win.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle

    @ Nazem.K-savzri:
    I still hope Caputi can develop into the role of a Clowe or Lucic, he has put up numbers in every league so he does have talent and I think this year could be pivotal for his development hearing that he has put on weight and got stronger does really impress me. Depending on what happens in the remander of the offseason I wouldnt be agains giving him 10 games or so on the top line to see if he can hack it. Or atleast during the pre-season let him try to show what he’s got. If he cant do it atleast we have Mueller and Irwin to give a shot down the road. Kulemin to me is a great fore checker and awesome defensive guy but on and ideal team I think he projects more of a 2nd or 3rd line guy with his skills. But and unreal 3rd line guy, think about it how good of a team do you have if you have three 3rd line guys that can put up close to 20?

    Caputi Bozak Kessel
    D’Amigo Grabo Versteeg
    Kules Kadri Army?
    Brown Goc Orr

    Phaneuf Schenn
    Franson Komi
    Kaberle Gunner

    Gust
    Giggy

    Trade Beauchemin + Sjoie + Reimer + Mitchell to Preds for Franson + Goc

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    Burkes love for toughness will never be misconstrued as a mistake. Thats what I love about him. Do I agree with everything he’s done? No! But I like his vision and attitude towards what makes a team a winner and it’s brought hope that we’ve never had before. Too much hope in some but at least there is a hope.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36

    Anaheim: Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry, Bodie, Voros, Parros, Chipchura, Sutton, Brookbank, Festerling
    .
    Atlanta: Byfuglien, Kane, Thorburn, Cormier, Ladd, Eager, Brashear, Slater, Boulton, Bogosian, Valabik, Hainsey?, Sopel?
    .
    Boston: Horton, Lucic, Wheeler, Campbell, Thornton, Chara, Seidenberg, Stuart, Ference, Boychuk, McQuaid
    .
    Buffalo: Grier, Gaustad, Kaleta, McCormick, Niedermayer, Stafford, Myers, Rivet, Montador, Weber
    .
    .
    4 teams in, is our collection looking so impressive?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Nazem.K-savzri

    Versteeg-Kadri-Kessel
    Kulemin-Bozak-D’amigo
    Caputi-Grabovski-Armstrong
    Brown-Mitchell-Orr
    =
    If EVERYTHING went right. (Kadri become an instant super star, D’amigo continues on his rapid improvement, Caputi’s training pays off, Kulemin continues to flourish) LOL, big dreams, but ya might aswell start them somewhere! That by far would be my favorite lineup to WATCH. Growing pains OBVIOUSLY, but thatd be reallll fun to watch. PS: i know this isnt going to happen, so point your torch somewhere else, but id still like to see it, would be sooo exciting. This kinda lineup would make a habs fan think they were goin to the cup, its a good thing its our lineup, we’re used to losing. (not that they arent lol, theyre just ignorant)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36

    @ flappypaddle:
    That trade has us giving up WAY too much.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • gunner_36

    @ TuckerThomas:
    Welwood is no longer on Vancouver.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Colton Orr is The Sheriff

    @ TuckerThomas:
    What if its fruits or vegetables??

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DefenseWinsChampionships

    Colton Orr is The Sheriff wrote:

    @ TuckerThomas:
    What if its fruits or vegetables??

    He has other uses for those than just eating. Especially bananas and carrots. He’ll still fight for them.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)