Pre-Season Game #4: Leafs vs. Flyers Rematch

by on September 24, 2010 in Game Day - 640 Comments

Share

An intriguing top line of Kris Versteeg, Tyler Bozak and Phil Kessel will feature in tonight’s rematch with the Flyers following the Leafs‘ 11-round shootout win over Philadelphia last night at the John Lebatt Centre in London. The trio is the most skilled iteration of forwards the Leafs’ roster has to offer, and combined with Dion Phaneuf and Tomas Kaberle on the blueline (who will also dress) represent an interesting potential powerplay option for coach Wilson. The results with the man advantage tonight, then, will be well worth monitoring.

Phaneuf and Kaberle will have to do a much better job managing the powerplay from the point than what we witnessed in the opener against the Senators. As a unit, movement was lacking and Kaberle’s pass-first predictability combined with Phaneuf’s forced shots (hitting shinpads more often than the opposition’s net) to waste multiple five on three opportunities. Kaberle has to do a better job at keeping the opposition guessing; the Senators penalty killing forwards were consistently cheating on Phaneuf’s side and #15 played right into their hands (this isn’t a new problem; I still blame it for ultimately hurting the effectiveness of the McCabe-Kaberle powerplay tandem). Phaneuf for his part needs to a) find the lanes and b) HIT THE FREAKING NET.

Hopefully Captain Dion can shake off the visible signs of rust he displayed last time out. He’ll skate alongside Carl Gunnarsson 5-on-5 according to the Globe and Mail’s Leafs Beat.

Jean Sebastien Giguere will see his first action of the preseason, looking to pick up where he left off last season. Jussi Rynnas will back him up, and will look to rebound after a tough first outing if he takes over part way through.

Also appearing in his first primer is the young and gigantic Keith Aulie, who will skate alongside other “Big Four” member Simon Gysbers. Burke‘s comment over the summer on members of the big four having a good shot at pushing for a spot at training camp has not quite lived up to the billing so far, as Mikus, Gysbers and Holzer have all been solid but not spectacular. We’ll see what kind of impression Aulie can make tonight.

A second line of Nikolai Kulemin, Mikhail Grabovski (who have shown strong chemistry together in the past) and Clarke MacArthur represents an interesting experiment as well.

Wayne Primeau, at camp on a professional tryout after his contract with the Leafs expired July 1, will center the fourth line. He faces a lot of competition down the middle, but with Nazem Kadri looking AHL-bound so far and John Mitchell failing to show much of anything, perhaps he can work his way onto the roster with some energetic, hard-forechecking and defensively-responsible shifts.

Here is the full line-up courtesy of Leafs Beat:

Forwards

Versteeg, Bozak, Kessel

Kulemin, Grabovski, MacArthur

Hamilton, Brent, Crabb

Orr, Primeau, Brown

Defence

Gunnarsson Phaneuf

Kaberle Komisarek

Aulie Gysbers

Goal

Giguere (starter)

Rynnas

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Cameron

    @ Jes:
    -
    They don’t review goals in pre-season. It most certainly was a goal, and it would have counted in regular season – no biggie.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    Jordan wrote:

    Hahahhaahhahahaha Stalberg of the 2nd line with Chicago. That will never fly

    Oh yes it will … I still have our predictions of how many points Stalberg will get this year, I got him at 60 pts, you have him at 35. We’ll see :)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Still, they have a number of wingers better then Stalberg

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    long_suffering_leaf_fan wrote:

    tmlfan wrote:
    I would be the happiest fan if the defence was this on opening night
    Phaneuf-Kaberle
    Komisarek-Gunnerson
    Schenn-Richmond(This kid has grown on me_
    Lebda
    Ummmm no Beauch ? you would play Gunnerson, Schenn, Richmond and Lebda over a guy who was just on Team Canada in the World Championships

    Yes. I personally cant stand Beauch

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Doorman:
    -
    It has more to do with line composition than skill level. In the playoffs, when the Hawks wanted to produce more offense, they’d make their lines Toews with Hossa and Brouwer because of the puck protection and puck possession skills those players have – they felt this would help Toews score, and it did. They would put Sharp between Versteeg and Kane, because all three are very quick, and they would surprize players with speed, and of course, all three could finish. Then they would put Bolland with Byfuglien and Ladd for a hard-nosed checking line. Whenever Ladd was out, Kopecky would take his spot. The Hawks aren’t going to change their style because of a few lost players – they’re still going to want to play fast and offensively minded. So you fill in those blanks with the best players you have. Because of his speed, Stalberg is the closest thing they have to a Versteeg replacement, and should be funcitional enough next to Sharp and Kane. Likewise, Beach might be the better player, but his frame and physicality make him an ideal 3rd liner in that system.
    -
    It’s possible Quenneville changes his style a bit, and goes with a top-six bottom-six, but I doubt it. Within 2 years, the Hawks will have filled in all their blanks adequately, so why change what works? Much like the Leafs last year, Wilson could have played a trapping style to get more success, but the end-goal was to be a forechecking team, so why bother for a few extra wins? It’s the same for the Hawks, they could stockpile their top six, and go with a weak bottom six, but the end goal is to get back to what they had last year, so why bother?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    tmlfan wrote:

    long_suffering_leaf_fan wrote:
    tmlfan wrote:
    I would be the happiest fan if the defence was this on opening night
    Phaneuf-Kaberle
    Komisarek-Gunnerson
    Schenn-Richmond(This kid has grown on me_
    Lebda
    Ummmm no Beauch ? you would play Gunnerson, Schenn, Richmond and Lebda over a guy who was just on Team Canada in the World Championships
    Yes. I personally cant stand Beauch

    IM willing to bet you will be whisteling a different tune after 20 games this year!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dan hockey fan

    There are many coaches that never put three skilled players together on a line. That is what power plays are for. Three players can not all have the puck or shoot the puck at the same time. Therefore someone is being wasted. One player that can carry the puck and pass. One shooter who develops chemistry with the playmaker. Keep these two together and find the right player who can dig for the puck, forecheck, backcheck and cover the skilled player’s back. Sometimes speed is needed if the two are going to dump and chase. The third player can definitely be a grinder. Some of the best lines are built without putting three skilled players on it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Doorman

    @ Cameron:
    Its just to piss off My Good friend Long Suffering! LOL!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    -
    I’m highly concerned about what you think of my credibility.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    Doorman wrote:

    @ Cameron:
    Its just to piss off My Good friend Long Suffering! LOL!

    *Shakes his fist in the air at Doorman

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dan hockey fan

    The Hawks will miss Byfuglien’s contribution, big time. He is what is missing on the Leafs top two lines and power play. Your third player on a line does not have to be a so called skilled player, just has to have the missing ingredients that any particulay line misses.
    We have to hope someone like Caputi can give us that this year.
    Byfuglien was a D before given this role. I would even try Brown or Rosehill. Don’t know if they could do what Byfuglien did but Chicago did not know that either before trying.
    I have heard Altanta might move Byfuglien back to D.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    Doorman wrote:

    tmlfan wrote:
    long_suffering_leaf_fan wrote:
    tmlfan wrote:
    I would be the happiest fan if the defence was this on opening night
    Phaneuf-Kaberle
    Komisarek-Gunnerson
    Schenn-Richmond(This kid has grown on me_
    Lebda
    Ummmm no Beauch ? you would play Gunnerson, Schenn, Richmond and Lebda over a guy who was just on Team Canada in the World Championships
    Yes. I personally cant stand Beauch
    IM willing to bet you will be whisteling a different tune after 20 games this year!

    I really hope my opinion will change but Last season he was ALWAYS making bad Passes and Pinches. If he can somehow regain the form he had in Anaheim then yes i wouldnt mind him being on this team but if he is the same defenceman as last year then i say let him either play in the minors or on another team.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jes
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Jes:
    -
    I think they thought Kessel kicked it in.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BOGEYMAN

    St Louis apparently needs a proven defenceman, has cap room,and depth at centre. Would they consider trading Berglund for Finger, Mitchell and Stefanovich, or something like that?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    -
    I didn’t insult anyone. I was just making a point, that you can’t justify a point by saying “because the tv guys said so”, or “ask the media”. I don’t see the guy who I was actually having the conversation with getting angry with me, as I think he was sensible enough to see that I wasn’t actually calling him an idiot. Obviously, the same cannot be said for yourself.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)