Game Day Thread: Panthers at Leafs (7 p.m., Sportsnet)

by on October 26, 2010 in Game Day - 917 Comments

Share

Paul Bereswill/Getty Images

One of the more effective line renderings of the 2009-10 campaign has been reunited for tonight’s match-up against the Florida Panthers at the Air Canada Centre. Nikolai Kulemin and the struggling Kris Versteeg have swapped places in the top six, with Kulemin rejoining Tyler Bozak and Phil Kessel on unit one and Versteeg uniting with Clarke MacArthur and Mikhail Grabovski on the second line. Here’s hoping sparks fly and the Leafs re-establish themselves offensively after a recent dry spell of only four goals in their last three.

In theory, Wilson’s change seems to balance the top two lines a bit better. Kulemin brings a left handed shot, a bigger body down low and a sorely needed net presence on the powerplay to the first trio; Versteeg a right handed shot to the second (previously lines one and two were all right handed and left handed respectively). Versteeg is also now out of the top match up, which could be beneficial as he looks to gain confidence and get his season on track.

Kulemin also adds an element of playmaking to the first line that could help Bozak’s production along; where Versteeg and Kessel are more shoot-first, Kulemin – while owning a good shot of his own as well – is more of a capable and willing passer. Versteeg for his part must cut down on the turn overs and simplify his game; his -4 rating is not reflective of his ability at either end of the ice.

The only player with the dubious honour of a worse plus/minus than Versteeg at the moment is captain Phaneuf (-5). At this point it seems to be mostly a byproduct of trying too hard and lacking discipline in his decisions of when to pinch and join the rush. Picking your spots better and limiting turnovers were more than likely points of emphasis for the coaching staff not only for Phaneuf but partner Francois Beauchemin and the team as a whole. The Leafs as a collective have 86 giveaways in 7 games, the third highest total in the league.

The Leafs have lost their last two against the Panthers but split last year’s four game season series. In both losing efforts, the Maple Leafs ran into hot Florida goaltenders, first getting shut out by Tomas Vokun in a 2-0 loss in late January and then mustering only one past Scott Clemmensen on 42 shots in a 4-1 loss in March. Thankfully the Leafs still won, but Bryan McCabe scored twice against the Leafs in game two of the season series in early January and he comes into tonight as the Panthers’ assists leader with five helpers through six.

The Leafs hold a definite physical edge and must use this to the full advantage tonight. Their 195 hits place them sixth league wide whereas Florida sits dead last by a fair margin with just 96. The Panthers are also the least penalized team in the league (Cory Stillman is the goon with a team-leading 6PIMs) at a mere 5.5 penalty minutes per game. The Leafs’ powerplay is slipping itself (now 19th at 12.5%), but Florida sits last in that category with just one goal in 23 man advantage situations (4.4 percent success rate). Given the Panthers are .500 despite that incompetency, they seem to be playing pretty good 5-on-5 hockey at the moment. In other words, the Leafs must continue to play physical and cash in on the PP chances if they get ‘em.

Jean Sebastien Giguere will be back between the pipes tonight in hopes of a rebound performance after conceding five in Philadelphia. Giguere wasn’t at his best but must have felt like the ice was tilted toward his net after facing 45 shots. I like the decision to go right back to him instead of letting him sit on that one.

Toss your predictions in the comments.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • peterbleafs

    Injuries happen, good thing is we have depth now at every position, even goal tending with Reimer. Army being out is a loss but then every other team has key losses too. Big deal.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    Now we find out how deep we really are. This was bound to happen and will be an excellent opportunity for Caputi. If Versteeg can’t go then I expect Hanson to be called up as he can play wing or center

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Guy_451

    IBleaf wrote:

    IBleaf wrote:
    Its not even about not wearing the jersey, its about the way you said it like your almost blaming MLSE for the fact you dont have a jersey. Ive beeen lucky to have always had leaf tickets and I wont even bring my friends with me if they wont wear one.
    Question: Does not owning a Leaf Jersey make you anyless of a fan? IMO, yes it does, no explanation needed.

    It’s not about the fact I’m not wearing a jersey, but it is? I’ll be sure to tell all the poor kids I know that they might as well cheer for someone else, because they don’t like the leafs enough to steal a jersey to wear. If you say something, you have to explain it, or else the argument doesn’t have a chance of being considered logical.
    -
    I don’t blame MLSE for me not having a jersey. They don’t owe me anything. All I said was their ticket prices knock a large segment of the population out of getting a chance to watch the Leafs live.
    -
    You’re obviously well-off/connected if you can get leaf tickets all the time. That would explains why you don’t understand what I said.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • IBleaf
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle

    Brophy has been on a roll lately!
    http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2010/10/27/brophy_kessel_showing_hart/

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bring the Cup Home

    i’d love to see caputi in the lineup for a month. just too bad that army went down. he is VERY good for us. caputi better try his best to play the way Army does.

    i’d love to see him play his way onto the team. he and army on the same line could be fun. who knows, maybe throw luca on the 2nd line in place of versteeg and get him to do one thing and one thing only: go to the net. stay in front of the net. be around the net.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle

    Just a thought, but ” if” Steeg is out what about a line-up off.
    Kule’s Bert Ernie
    Mac Grabo Caputi
    Sjoie Brent Brown
    Mitchell Zigo Orr

    The reasoning behind is it unless Army goes on longterm IR then Kadri would eat some of the newfound capspace.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Guy_451
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    (d) Bona-Fide Long-TermInjury/Illness Exception to the Upper Limit. In the event that a Player on a Club becomes unfit to play (i.e., is injured, ill or disabled and unable to perform his duties as a hockey Player) such that the Club’s physician believes, in his or her opinion, that the Player, owing to either an injury or an illness, will be unfit to play for at least (i) twenty-four (24) calendar days and (ii) ten (10) NHL Regular Season games, and such Club desires to replace such Player, the Club may add an additional Player or Players to its Active Roster, and the replacement Player Salary and Bonuses of such additional Player(s) may increase the Club’s Averaged Club Salary to an amount up to and exceeding the Upper Limit, solely as, and to the extent and for the duration, set forth below. If, however, the League wishes to challenge the determination of a Club physician that a Player is unfit to play for purposes of the Bona-Fide Long-Term Injury/Illness Exception, the League and the NHLPA shall promptly confer and jointly select a neutral physician, who shall review the Club physician’s determination regarding the Player’s fitness to play.

    (i) A Club seeking to exercise the Bona-Fide Long-Term Injury/Illness Exception must simultaneously so notify Central Registry and the NHLPA, in writing, before any Player replacing an unfit-to-play Player shall be permitted to play with the Club;

    (ii) The Player Salary and Bonuses of the Player that has been deemed unfit-to-play shall continue to be counted toward the Club’s Averaged Club Salary as well as count against the Players’ Share during the League Year in which the Player is deemed unfit-toplay (including during the period such unfit-to-play Player is on a Bona Fide Long-Term Injury/Illness Exception Conditioning Loan to another league);

    (iii) The total replacement Player Salary and Bonuses for a Player or Players that have replaced an unfit-to-play Player may not in the aggregate exceed the amount of the Player Salary and Bonuses of the unfit-to-play Player who the Club is replacing;

    (iv) The replacement Player Salary and Bonuses for any Player(s) that replace(s) an unfit-to-play Player may be added to the Club’s Averaged Club Salary until such time as the Club’s Averaged Club Salary reaches the Upper Limit. A Club may then exceed the Upper Limit due to the addition of replacement Player Salary and Bonuses of Players who have replaced an unfit-to-play Player, provided, however, that when the unfit-to-play Player is once again fit to play (including any period such Player is on a Bona Fide Long-Term Injury/Illness Exception Conditioning Loan to another league), the Club shall be required to once again reduce its Averaged Club Salary to a level at or below the Upper Limit prior to the Player being able to rejoin the Club. To the extent any Player who is unfit-to-play becomes fit to play during the period of the Roster Freeze set forth in Article 13, the provisions of this Section 50.10(d)(iv) requiring a Club to come back into compliance with the Payroll Range shall supersede the provisions of Article 13 restricting transactions during the Roster Freeze;

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • flappypaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    @ flappypaddle:
    Yes

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    new thread is up

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)