Canada’s Team Visits Toronto

by on November 13, 2010 in Game Day - 784 Comments

Share

The Vancouver Canucks are hoping a visit to the ACC won’t do much to halt their recent winning ways.  Other than a brief speedbump against Montreal on Tuesday, Vancouver has been nearly unstoppable, going 7-2-1 in their last ten games.  This makes it a tough assignment for the Leafs, who won’t have an easy time snapping out of a six-game slide against Roberto Luongo and the Canucks.  Toronto will be hoping that recent call-ups Nazem Kadri and Keith Aulie inject some life into their slumbering squad.  Fans will be hoping that management didn’t jump the gun with Kadri, putting him in the limelight at the peak (hopefully…) of Toronto’s struggles.

Really, has the title “Canada’s team” ever been as clearly belonging to one team in recent history?  Not that I’ve ever been a fan of that term (often thrown around by certain media outlets), because it too often gets ugly and complicated due to “geographical envy” (eg. Montreal fans displeasure at national Leafs exposure).  But in the purest sense, Canada’s best NHL team right now is undisputed.  With the rebuilding state of Edmonton and Toronto, the “decent, but not a contender” status of Montreal, and the absolute chaos that is Calgary, Vancouver takes the cake almost by default.

That doesn’t mean they don’t have a wide arsenal of strengths and skills that can put a team down.  Toronto will obviously have to be wary of Vancouver’s skilled players, specifically on the powerplay, as the Canucks shoot a lethal 30% on the man-advantage while on the road.  They will also have to fight hard to gain control of the puck after faceoffs, as Vancouver is one of the handful of teams higher than Toronto when it comes to success in the circle.  If the Leafs can find solace in any statistic, it’s that the Canucks sit in the bottom-half of shots against per game.  If Toronto manages to come out strong and pressure a Canucks squad that hasn’t been as sharp on the road, this will be an exciting, fast-paced game with a ton of hits (both teams sit in the top 10 for that category).   But if the Leafs put forth another disorganized offensive effort, Vancouver will capitalize on the league’s most giveaway-prone club and it won’t be pretty.

Here are some other quick notes and lineups for tonight’s tilt:

-Kadri will have to maintain the effort and attention to detail he has put forth in the AHL recently.  He will be playing on the wing with Bozak and Kulemin, a line that coach Wilson thinks will “show us what he can do offensively with the puck”.  Nazem will have to stay with his game (not try to do too much) to have an impact, although his success at even strength is very much a question mark at this point.  One area in which Leafs fans should see an immediate impact will be on the powerplay, as Kadri has the capacity to move the puck quickly and accurately.  More importantly, the currently anemic man-advantage could use any sort of injection at this point and Kadri should deliver that.  For a closer look at the ramifications of Kadri’s debut and Burke‘s reaction, check out this bit from Ron.

-J.S. Giguere has had a rough time with the Canucks in recent years.  The Leafs goaltender has posted a porous 4.70 GAA and 0.817 SV% in his last three games against the Orcas.  This is an unsightly contrast to Roberto Lungo’s 3-0 mark against Toronto, while sporting a 0.929 SV%.  Thus the home team will be looking to solve Luongo and also fend off Alex Burrows, who has racked up 7 points in his last four games against the Leafs.

-Mikhail Grabovski has found his stride.  After a slow start, the Belarussian pivot has 3 points ( including 2 goals)  in his last 3 games.  For a young team with the players that Toronto has, success will ultimately depend on the consistency of purported impact players.  Nikolai Kulemin and Clarke MacArthur are the only two of Toronto’s scoring forwards that have performed at/near their maximum levels through this first part of the season.  Kessel started strong, and faded of late.  Grabovski has come on hard, but was under-performing early.  Kris Versteeg’s mojo dried up after the preseason, and has yet to be rediscovered.  With the defense and goaltending that have been on display, Toronto will find success with a consistent output on the part of these players.

Slumps are made to be broken, but this is as hard a team to break it on as any.  If Toronto gets a much-needed spark from Kadri and Aulie and emerge victorious over Vancouver, Leafs Nation will let loose a collective sigh of relief.  If the Leafs sink again, especially in the underwhelming, pseudo-apathetic manner in which they have recently, Toronto media headlines will likely make the descent from dramatic criticism to apocalyptic forewarnings.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forwards

MacArthur-Grabovski-Kessel

Kadri-Bozak-Kulemin

Sjostrom-Brent-Versteeg

Orr-Mitchell-Brown

Defense

Kaberle-Schenn

Beauchemin-Komisarek

Aulie-Lebda

Goalie

Giguere

Vancouver Canucks

Forwards

D. Sedin-H. Sedin-Burrows

Raymond-Kesler-Samuelsson

Torres-Malhotra-Hansen

Glass-Blizniak-Rypien

Defense

Edler-Bieksa

Alberts-Rome

Hamhuis-Ehrhoff

Goalie

Luongo

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

    Top Cheese wrote:

    On D, Aulie played an excellent first game, love his size and skating ability. He could be a cornerstone shutdown guy for a long time. Hopefully he continues to develop. I could see he and Schenn being monstorous in 2 or 3 years.

    According to Watters (yeah, I know) on his show yesterday evening…a lot of people are saying about the Dion trade that Aullie was the one that got away from Calgary and will be the steal of that trade. Dude’s highly touted and I look forward to seeing more from him down the line (agreed completely about him and Schenn being monsterous).

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis

    TuckerThomas wrote:

    Also Otis. The day this site becomes flooded with Habs trolls or trolls from other teams I can guarantee you the disclaimer will go up.

    Andrew R is no Habs fan..he`s just a disgruntled,seen this movie too many times Leafer.
    I can relate with him…as most pre Ballard era guys can.
    PS
    Compared to schlumps like Watters and Berger…he`s optimistic about our future.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ Tim:
    Noise makers. Bring extras.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafs_17

    @ Tim:
    ya pick me up i need a ride lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Stanley goes to White Kessel

    Burkie always talks about how a good hockey trade benefits both clubs, addresses different needs for each and leaves the room open for future trades with no bad blood. As this is his position, and if other GMs respected him, why do so many GMs seem to try to rape him over a barrel when they smell he really wants to trade. He could have done the same thing to Chicago but instead offered a respectable package for Versteeg. He must get pissed at the insulting offers he gets from GMs thinking they can ‘outsmart Burke’.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    TuckerThomas wrote:

    @ Tim:
    Noise makers. Bring extras.

    Done buddy!
    leafs_17 wrote:

    @ Tim:
    ya pick me up i need a ride lol

    Consider it done bro, we are Keswickians after all…lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Seriously though, how can Andrew be right when it is November? honestly are you kidding me? Hes just the typical guy who wants to disagree with everyone around him so he can feel like hes the smartest guy and sees everything other people miss. Our team is actually good. We have a lot of young core pieces, alot of veteran pieces, and even if he doesnt want to admit it, we have cap space

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    Killkabs wrote:

    did anyone else think at the start of the game that the leafs were trying to find a sweet a la stamkos for kessel?

    I’m sorry I don’t know what your trying to say.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cartika.com Andrew R
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Killkabs

    @ Black_Hawk:
    sorry I meant to say it kind of looked like the leafs were trying to find a sweet spot for kessel to shoot the puck kinda like stamkos at the top of the circle I was just asking if anyone else thought that

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gary Shields
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Heres my stab at next years roster look right now:
    Nikolai Kulemin ($2.350m) / Mikhail Grabovski ($2.900m) / Phil Kessel ($5.400m)
    Clarke MacArthur ($2.500m) / Tyler Bozak ($2.750m) / Nazem Kadri ($1.720m)
    Fredrik Sjostrom ($0.850m) / Kris Versteeg ($3.083m) / Colby Armstrong ($3.000m)
    Colton Orr ($1.000m) / Christian Hanson ($0.650m) / Mike Brown ($0.850m)
    / Luca Caputi ($0.833m)

    DEFENSEMEN
    Dion Phaneuf ($6.500m) / Mike Komisarek ($4.500m)
    Luke Schenn ($2.750m) / Tomas Kaberle ($5.000m)
    Keith Aulie ($0.733m) / Carl Gunnarsson ($1.000m)
    Brett Lebda ($1.450m) / Francois Beauchemin ($3.800m)

    GOALTENDERS
    Jonas Gustavsson ($1.350m) /James Reimer ($0.850m)

    BUYOUTS: Darcy Tucker ($1.000m)

    CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
    (these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
    SALARY CAP: $59,400,000; CAP PAYROLL: $56,820,000; BONUSES: $1,000,000
    CAP SPACE (23-man roster): $3,579,999
    So with 3.5 mil + if we use Beauchemin with his 3.8 mil thats 7.3 mil cap space we can use to get one player (or more depending on who else goes the other way)
    Im happy with that lineup if we bring in another center

    Kulemin-????-Kessel
    Macarthur-Grabo/Bozak-Kadri
    Versteeg-Grabo/Bozak-Armstrong
    Sjostrom-Brown-Orr
    That to me doesnt scream “WE ARE FUCKED FOR 10 YEARS” like “some people” say

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bon Scott was a Leaf fan

    Tim wrote:

    @ Killkabs:
    Agree, tons of later round picks become surprise players, its up to the individual and their development both physically and mentally plus their level of commitment.

    I’m more than happy with Burkes picks last June. Obviously because Burke knew we didn’t have a first and second….that he made our scouts emphasize their attention around who would be drafted from 2nd round and up (especially on anyone pegged higher that happened to slip through). I think we did faaar more homework on these guys than other teams. Burke (and company) knew we wanted Ross, McKegg, and Olden (among others). I have more faith in these picks than I would have put in previous 2nd/3rd/4th rounders. I think we could be pleasantly surprised in a few years.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ Andrew R:
    I’m sorry Andrew. This slump got the best of me. I’ve been classless on more than a few occasions.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    Wooohooo. I’ve eclipsed 6000 posts. I’m officially one of those trolls that live in their grandma’s basement.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Killkabs

    @ Bon Scott was a Leaf fan:
    agreed I just think alot of people on here and just generaly stuck on the 2 first rounders we gave for kessel when really there is a bigger picture there was no way we could
    ve known we would be giving up that high of a pick but it doesnt mean it will pan out either in the long run.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    All we have to do is forget about the 2011 1st rounder IMO. Other then that and our team is looking really good. Building and getting better every game

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • drock24
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Killkabs

    @ drock24:
    LMAO totally agree!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim

    Jordan wrote:

    All we have to do is forget about the 2011 1st rounder IMO. Other then that and our team is looking really good. Building and getting better every game

    We could trade for one, land someone picked in the first, land another college kid that equals a first or pick up another RFA or UFA, so the whole point is redundant if that happens.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)