Better… but not enough

by on November 14, 2010 in Uncategorized - 403 Comments

Share

Frank Gunn/Canadian Press

Mired in a 7 game losing skid, the Toronto Maple Leafs turned to two young rookies as they looked to spark a surge back into the win column. Summoned by GM Brian Burke on Friday, Nazem Kadri and Keith Aulie   debut on the grand stage and spotlight of hockey Night In Canada for a game against the Vancouver Canucks.

In Kadri the young draft pick will be looked upon to give the sputtering Leafs offence a much needed boost, while playing on a line with Tyler Bozak and Nikolai Kulemin. Head Coach Ron Wilson touched on Kadri’s capabilities and what he expects from the London Ontario native.

“We want to surround Nazzy with detail [oriented] people so that he can show us what he can do offensively with the puck,” Wilson told reporters. “So hopefully that line is able to click. And you’ve got to remember that they’ve only played one practice together but in theory I think it can work.

“Nazzy has the skills that our power play needs and if he does here what he’s been doing in the AHL on the power play then it will pick up some steam I think.”

Necessary to ease the tension, the Leafs came out with a jump and were able to secure the all important first goal. Francois Beauchemin snapped a shot, deflecting off Frederik Sjostrom and passed Roberto Luongo. The early goal lifted the Leafs bench, leading to a Phil Kessel power play goal, ending his 7 game point slump and sending the Leafs to a 2-0 lead.

Looking to find a way back into the game, Christian Ehroff exaggerated the effects of a John Mitchell hit, sending the Canucks to the power play. Causing an uproar on the Leafs bench, Daniel Sedin slid one passed J.S. Gigeure, putting his team on the board. Late in the first period with the Canucks pressing, the Leafs found themselves scrambling in their own end before a wide open Ryan Kesler beat Gigeure with a one-time shot, tying the game at 2.

In a second period filled with strange and theatrical calls, the Canucks ended up on a power play and Ryan Kesler made it 3-2 on his second goal of the game. Maintaining their compete level, the Leafs were able to generate momentum, leading to a Mikhail Grabovski goal and tying the game at 3.

The third period revealed an exciting back and forth affair with both teams trading chances and each goaltender equally up to the task. Poised and on his game, Roberto Luongo gave his team the confidence they needed with many great saves, keeping the Leafs from taking the lead. J.S. Gigeure played a solid game and turned in what was a great performance until he was handcuffed by a Mason Raymond shot, giving the Canucks a 4-3 lead and the eventual game winner. The goal deflated a fragile Leafs group and with the net empty, Dan Hamhuis recorded his first goal as a Canuck, sealing the 5-3 victory.

Although they once again were unable to pull from their losing skid, the Leafs showed signs of life and dictated the play throughout most of the game. Skating well and moving the puck, the line of Tyler Bozak, Nazem Kadri, and Nikolai Kulemin created many chances but could not beat Roberto Luongo, who was the Canucks best player on the night. Kadri who looked tentative to begin the game, eased his way into the action and set up a few chances for his line-mates, while registering 1 shot on goal. Perhaps not the breakout performance he would have preferred, Kadri can look to this game and build from it while making a case to remain with the Leafs.

With a chance for a much needed point, perhaps even two, the game seemed destined for overtime. The soft goal on J.S. Gigeure took the life from the Leafs, and after the game Head Coach Ron Wilson touched on the play.

“We could have had one point, maybe two. The third period was our best period in two or three weeks. The circumstances of the winning goal weren’t very good. Giggy played great all night but we needed a stop there. He would be the first to tell you he had to have that shot. But we kept pushing and we had some great opportunities. I thought our young guys played well, but when it mattered Luongo made some great saves to keep his team in the lead.”

With the strong effort and visibly improved play aside, the Leafs losing streak stretches to eight games and have only 1 win in their last 12 outings. Perhaps a fun and relaxed atmosphere can remove the sting of this loss as the group is scheduled to showcase their talents at the teams Skills Competition on Sunday. Their performance in this game should result in Ron Wilson keeping his lineup in tact as they prepare to host the Nashville Predators on Tuesday. While it is tough to take pride when losing, remaining positive is a must for this team in order to find its way out of a very tough situation.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • The Thrill

    wow! i excpected to come on here STARTING a convo on Stalberg and you guys are already talking about him haha….man that hurt to watch him play today even before he scored….
    -
    so far this season….Stalberg>Versteeg
    -
    I remember i was sitting in the bar for wings and i seen the trade on the TV and actually yelled in anger of Stalberg getting traded…then i got convinced that Versteeg was gonna be a great pick up, but so far this season he looks like a younger version of Jason Blake…=(

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • surfsimply
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    10-3 for you.
    9-4 for me.
    You didn’t gain much on me in the FL. But you might have jumped a position or two as you were the big winner in our division.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ Jordan:
    You’re not far wrong, Jordan. Versteeg has got to quietly put up a ten game span of really determined, effective, statistically measurable play and the Leafs have to actually win some games because of him. The polarizing effect this fanbase can have on a player is insane…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Wow, Gaborik is just amazing. Imagine if they ever had him in Pittsburg with Crosby

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ The Thrill:
    -
    I felt the same when the trade happened, but I’d like to give it more time for sure. You can see Versteeg coming on now. I knew when it happened that it had the potential to look bad even if Versteeg was as billed. Stalberg is playing with Kane and Sharp, and Versteeg is playing with Brent and Sjostrom (although he couldn’t make it work with Bozak and Kessel either). This is a massive upgrade for Stalberg, and a massive downgrade for Versteeg. Hopefully Versteeg will show us the play he had in Chicago, and improve as the forwards around him improve. The prospects in the trade don’t bother me though. DiDom is damaged goods, as much as I like him, and he has 1 point in 10 games this year. Paradis is future NHL 4th liner. It’s pointless to care about them.
    -
    An important lesson though, and one I always preach when we come up with trade proposals on here. Do not underestimate the value of a player being buried in depth and surrounded by talent. A lot of people wanted Fleischmann in the summer, but he would be useless without a strong core to insulate him. Players like that are a no-no. Hopefully Versteeg isn’t one of them.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Uncle Otis:
    -
    Ugh, he says he will accept the list, and the list has been given twice. Kaberle has said it is not his intention to hurt the franchise. Why are we arguing semantics? It’s all a game of words, but at the end of the day, Kaberle will either resign, or submit the list. There’s nothing to suggest otherwise given what we know from the past two deadlines.
    -
    EDIT: And yes, I do know this. When asked on TSN last year, Burke admitted to receiving a list of 3 teams, and admitted to trying to trade him. What more do you want?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TuckerThomas

    @ Jordan:
    I’ll admit that Stalberg is most likely better than I thought. His limited ice still has him some nice stats. Definitely a tally for the nay sayers.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    @ Cameron:
    I thought Stalberg got a upgrade on talent.
    .
    But also please stop talking about how we lost the trade it doesn`t make us feel any better ;) .
    Not talking to you Cameron but the people who keep talking about it,we got Versteeg and when we get into to the playoffs he will show you his worth.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Jordan:
    -
    I like to also remember in this Versteeg/Stalberg debate that we traded Jimmy Hayes and a 3rd two years from now (easily replaceable) for Greg McKegg and Brad Ross.
    -
    To CHI: Stalberg, DiDomenico, Paradis, Hayes
    To TOR: Versteeg, McKegg, Ross

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    Cameron wrote:

    Jimmy Hayes and a 3rd two years from now (easily replaceable) for Greg McKegg and Brad Ross.

    I don`t remember trading a third rounder I think that was for Olden because we had to move up to get him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ TuckerThomas:
    -
    Holy Jebuz, it seems like all I do is post on here and you’re still just flying past me in the post count.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Black_Hawk:
    -
    Ah, you are correct, it was Olden not McKegg. Still, in my opinion, Ross and Olden are far more likely to be NHL’ers than DiDom, Hayes and Paradis.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Uncle Otis:
    -
    Ha, well, I don’t gamble money, but sure, what do you want? I will guarantee you that you are reading too much into these comments, and that Burke does not actually intend to just walk away from Kaberle – especially with the market going dry for free agency. He will resign him, or trade him at the deadline, with odds on the Devils as the favorite.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Black_Hawk

    @ Cameron:
    Yeah I love Dido but Mckegg has way more potential.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Uncle Otis:
    -
    Well, that’s been my position on Kaberle for months, so why would I change it now to gamble with you?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Uncle Otis:
    -
    Yes, he will be turned into an asset we actually want, I stand by that. He himself is an asset we’d actually want though. :)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Wow a full fledged vagina argument…..

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)