Army Of One

by on December 6, 2010 in 2010-11 Season - 303 Comments

Share

It can be safely said that Saturday night’s tilt between the Boston Bruins and the Toronto Maple Leafs will go down as one of the best hockey games of the year.  It had a little bit of everything; bone crunching hits, jaw jarring fights, ridiculous saves, last minute heroics, and a shootout victory that included a killer backhand, and a former Bruin getting at least some measure of revenge.

With all that action in mind, it is somewhat ironic that the player who stood out the most in my mind was someone who didn’t even get his name on the scoresheet.

Colby Armstrong returned from injury and joined the Leafs top line, paying immediate dividends in the Leafs 3-2 shootout victory at home on Hockey Night In Canada this past Saturday.  Armstrong had missed time with an injured hand.

And while some people thought pinning the losing streak on the loss of Armstrong and Phaneuf was just a crutch to stand on-and maybe it was-there is no disputing how important a player like Armstrong is to his teammates, and this franchise.

Nicknamed Army, in part a play on his last name, in part a play on the aggressive unselfish style he employs on the ice, the gritty winger was signed by the Leafs this past summer to a three year pact.  And while he isn’t desolate when it comes to getting himself in the goals and assists columns, Armstrong brings things to this hockey team that cannot be measured in stats alone.

Saturday night was a prime example.

Returning to a team that was in a state of flux, having lost tough games to Tampa Bay and Edmonton, Armstrong provided a spark for the team, and set the tone in what was one of the more physical encounters of the year for the Leafs.  He was strong on the puck in the offensive zone, responsible in the defensive zone, and did his best to channel his inner Gary Roberts in front of the net, trying to wreak havoc for Bruins goalie Tim Thomas, who played out of his mind in the loss making two save of the year candidates in the process.

Perhaps the sticking image from Saturday night’s win will be the moment Armstrong took a page out of yesteryear, mixing it up without a bucket.  Somewhere along the way he had his helmet lodged from his head, but continued to skate on in the play for a considerable time.  He wasn’t just on the ice either, he was engaged.  He mucked it up along the corners, went hard at the opposition, and continued to make sacrifices for the better good of the team.  He paid for it at the end of the shift when he was rammed, unprotected head first, into the glass, a hit that sent him down to the ice.

He didn’t miss a shift.

He also got back to being his usual play on the edge self, constantly antagonizing Bruins defenseman and captain Zdeno Chara, seemingly rattling the big giant.

Despite the injury, Armstrong has come as advertised when Leafs GM Brian Burke made the play to bring him to Toronto.  He is a hard worker, decent hands, and a strong physical presence.  And that’s just on the ice.

Off the ice he continues to be one of the straws that stirs the drinks for the hockey club.  Much like he did in Wilkes-Barre, Pittsburgh, and Atlanta, Army stands as one of the locker room leaders, someone who knows how to set examples and lead the way, but at the same time does the job of bringing the group together, and keeping them loose when the time is right.

Whether the losing streak that endured following his injury can be directly related to Armstrong or not, there is no denying his importance to the team.

Aulie Does Is Play Solid Hockey

When the Toronto Maple Leafs announced on January 31st that they had traded for Dion Phaneuf, Fredrik Sjostrom, and Keith Aulie it was Phaneuf, the more heralded player, who grabbed most of the headlines.  However, the other components in the deal are shaping up to be just as integral to the rebuilding process as Phaneuf.

Sjostrom is a quality bottom six player, strong on the forecheck, and a smart two-way player.

Much like Sjostrom, Aulie is quietly and efficiently putting together an effective campaign during his time with the Toronto Maple Leafs.  A towering defenseman, Aulie is doing everything he can to try and stay at the NHL level, and has been impressive in doing it.  Always looking calm and confident with the puck, he is a physical defender who thrives on shutting down the opposition.  On Saturday night Aulie played a career high 21:07, and is proving to be a reliable player that the coaching staff can rely on.

Who knows, we may someday see a reunion of Luke Schenn and Keith Aulie rekindling their shutdown days with team Canada’s World Junior team.

And if he keeps it up, he may just force the Maple Leafs hand in keeping him on this team, even when Phaneuf returns from injury.

Have any questions?  Email them to me at [email protected]

follow me on twitter HERE

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • tron

    Kostas wrote:

    lol what about Malkin? If he were to become available like some of you have suggested, would you rather him or Richards?

    Good question. I am going to stick with Richards though. He is a more accomplished and experience athlete. The Canadian factor is big for me

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Troy

    @ Kostas:
    Malkin is young and better imo, but will cost a lot more.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Top Cheese

    @ tron:
    That’s the response I was hoping that line would generate….glad you are looking forward to getting absolutely dominated!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    lol you guys are nuts. We wont get both Semin and Richards. Richards is the only possible one. Why the hell would Semin come here? Why would Burke even sign him? He wouldnt go after Kovalchuk, so I doubt he wants Semin. I would like Semin but like others said, I dunno how much heart he has, and who knows until he proves it. I would just offer Dallas
    Macarthur+Beauchemin+Reimer/Ryanns/Scrivens
    Gives then a top 4 defence, great prospect, and some help to still make a push with macarthur
    Armstrong-Richards-Kessel
    Kulemin-Grabo-Kadri
    Sjostrom-Bozak-Versteeg
    Brown-Hanson-Orr

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPiuD24JV2U 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FlappyPaddle

    http://www.640toronto.com/Blogs/EatSleepLeafs/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10170407

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPiuD24JV2U 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    tron wrote:

    Emery I know for sure, played for the Greyhounds and hung out with a couple of my buddies, definitely heavy into it.

    lol it really is funny how many people have seen that guy do blow.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lukey DeSchennion

    Macarthur+Beauchemin+Reimer/Ryanns/Scrivens

    I would not include Ryanns in a deal for richards
    he looks like he may have a future
    I would for sure include Scrivens tho hes a good goalie but he is being
    killed with depth
    I think he could be a AHL starter next year just not with us

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    Lukey DeSchennion wrote:

    Macarthur+Beauchemin+Reimer/Ryanns/Scrivens
    I would not include Ryanns in a deal for richards
    he looks like he may have a future
    I would for sure include Scrivens tho hes a good goalie but he is being
    killed with depth
    I think he could be a AHL starter next year just not with us

    If not then NYR will get him

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron

    @ ingy56:
    @ 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru:
    It’s a shame, he could have a good career. Not considering his hip. I loved watching him fight Peters though with that big ass smile on his face the whole time

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FlappyPaddle

    Jordan wrote:

    Lukey DeSchennion wrote:
    Macarthur+Beauchemin+Reimer/Ryanns/Scrivens
    I would not include Ryanns in a deal for richards
    he looks like he may have a future
    I would for sure include Scrivens tho hes a good goalie but he is being
    killed with depth
    I think he could be a AHL starter next year just not with us
    If not then NYR will get him

    I honestly think Sather is going to give up alot to get him, I think along the lines of a Gilroy and Stephan maybe a pick aswell. Sather realizes he cant ride Lundqvist forever with out getting the team to the next level. And having Richards and Gaborik together along with the likes of Frolov, Dubinsky and Callahan not to mention Anisomov looks to be the real deal. They could be contenders and they have a really good yound d core to boot.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FlappyPaddle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jordan

    @ FlappyPaddle:
    Richards will have to waive though. Thats the key. Hes 30 now and probably has so many quality years left. If I were him I would be going to the Leafs, sens or somewhere canadian and a huge market. He never had that yet

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FlappyPaddle

    Jordan wrote:

    @ FlappyPaddle:
    Richards will have to waive though. Thats the key. Hes 30 now and probably has so many quality years left. If I were him I would be going to the Leafs, sens or somewhere canadian and a huge market. He never had that yet

    The Rangers are a bigger market then the Sens but I agree I think he will go to a big market team to clear his name about not being able to perform under the spotlight.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dsu24

    FlappyPaddle wrote:

    Jordan wrote:
    Lukey DeSchennion wrote:
    Macarthur+Beauchemin+Reimer/Ryanns/Scrivens
    I would not include Ryanns in a deal for richards
    he looks like he may have a future
    I would for sure include Scrivens tho hes a good goalie but he is being
    killed with depth
    I think he could be a AHL starter next year just not with us
    If not then NYR will get him
    I honestly think Sather is going to give up alot to get him, I think along the lines of a Gilroy and Stephan maybe a pick aswell. Sather realizes he cant ride Lundqvist forever with out getting the team to the next level. And having Richards and Gaborik together along with the likes of Frolov, Dubinsky and Callahan not to mention Anisomov looks to be the real deal. They could be contenders and they have a really good yound d core to boot.

    I agree, I think that Sather will push his chips ALL IN when it comes to Richards. Only shot we have is July 1.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPiuD24JV2U 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    dsu24 wrote:

    I agree, I think that Sather will push his chips ALL IN when it comes to Richards. Only shot we have is July 1.

    I bet Gilroy would be part of the deal. Word was they have been shopping him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • FlappyPaddle

    2 Minutes for Looking so Guru wrote:

    dsu24 wrote:
    I agree, I think that Sather will push his chips ALL IN when it comes to Richards. Only shot we have is July 1.
    I bet Gilroy would be part of the deal. Word was they have been shopping him.

    I still think Gilroy is a guy I would love to have signed. He might not be the game breaker like thought but there is still a ton of potentail there.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)