By the Numbers: Joffrey Lupul

by on February 10, 2011 in Analysis - 345 Comments

Share

Photo Credit: Mark Blinch/Reuters

In the aftermath of yesterday’s trade with the Anaheim Ducks, in which Joffrey Lupul joined the Toronto Maple Leafs, many fans expressed concern over two years’ contract term at a somewhat high dollar figure for what was perceived to be declining production.

Although it is very easy to get caught up in the base stat lines (goals, assists, points), what might be surprising to some is Lupul’s rate of production has actually remained fairly consistent during the past three seasons prior to 2010-11. Despite last season and the start of his current season being cut short due to back surgery and a subsequent blood infection, a quick look at his per-game statistics reveal few recent changes in the winger’s season-to-season productivity.


.

Season GP G/Gm A/Gm Pts/Gm % Pts PP ES TOI PP TOI
10-11 ANA 26 0.19 0.31 0.50 46.2 11:08 2:05
09-10 ANA 23 0.44 0.17 0.61 7.1 13:00 2:06
08-09 PHI 79 0.32 0.32 0.64 30.0 13:09 2:16
07-08 PHI 56 0.36 0.46 0.82 45.6 13:17 3:38
06-07 EDM 81 0.20 0.15 0.35 28.6 12:34 2:58
05-06 ANA 81 0.35 0.31 0.66 43.4 11:21 4:38
03-04 ANA 75 0.17 0.28 0.45 23.5 11:24 2:11
AVG/Gm 0.28 0.29 0.57 32.1 12:26 2:50
Over 82 82 23 G 24 A 47 Pts 15 PP Pts

.

A Few Notes:

– In his first go-round with Anaheim, Lupul received primarily 3rd line ice time at ES, with a promotion to top-line PP duty leading to a pronounced surge in production during his second season (05-06).

– After being traded to Edmonton, Lupul’s numbers declined across the board. He bounced between 2nd and 3rd line at ES and 1st and 2nd unit PP during a disasterous season, one which many felt was a product of the pressure of being a local hero in such an intense hockey market.

– In Philadelphia, Lupul’s steady production reflected regular 2nd line duty, although roster depth limited his powerplay time in his second season there (as evidenced by a sharp decline in both Pts/Gm and % PP Pts).

– Back in Anaheim, Lupul continued to thrive in a 2nd line role (in spite of an awful powerplay) until shelved by back surgery. Having missed training camp and preseason, Lupul found himself in a 3rd line role with only 2nd unit PP time upon returning to action two months into the current season.

– In a three-season span from 2007-08 through 2009-10, Lupul produced at a rate of 0.82, 0.64, and 0.61 points per game, and in 2005-06 produced at a rate of 0.66 P/Gm. It’s worth noting that over a full 82 games, the difference between a rate of 0.66 and 0.61 P/Gm amounts to 4 points (or 1 pt per 20 GP).

– Interestingly, while Lupul’s powerplay production declined significantly in 08-09 and 09-10 (which follows suit with his PP TOI), his overall point output remained consistent, an indication of improved production at even-strength.

– Lupul’s best seasons have come when he receives a large amount of PP time. The exception to this is the 08-09 season, when a deep Philadelphia roster saw him bumped to the second powerplay unit; despite the loss of over a minute of PP time per game, he still managed to produce 30% of his point total with the man advantage.

– On four occasions over 6.5 seasons thus far, Lupul has scored at a per-game goals rate which, in an 82-game season, would equal or exceed 26 goals (0.32 g/gm * 82 gm = 26 g). The only seasons he scored at a lesser rate were his rookie season, the down year in Edmonton, and this current season (first back from injury).

– Although I was unable to find exact statistics for this, many observers commented that Lupul’s best hockey is played from his off-wing (the left side).  With the Leafs needing help at left wing, and with top-six ice time available, the conditions appear favorable for Lupul to return to form.

.

Reasonable Expecatations

For his career, Lupul has compiled a 0.57 points per game average.  As of today, this would place him 136th league-wide.  Theoretically, if you consider there are 180 top-six forward jobs in the NHL (30 teams x 6), this would place Lupul smack in the middle of the 91-180 range … or, the 2nd-line player range.

Of course, such analysis is admittedly flawed in that 3rd liners on some teams do outperform 2nd liners on other teams, but the base point is valid: numbers-wise, Joffrey Lupul is a decent 2nd line NHLer. As for whether his contract is perhaps too rich for where he stands, that is neither here nor there, for it is the product (as put so aptly by Leafs’ GM Brian Burke) of another GM’s error in judgment.

In terms of full-season production, Lupul’s career “over a full 82 games” average works out to 23 goals and 24 assists. Based upon a rate of production higher than his career average over the two-and-a-quarter seasons prior to his injury, similar numbers certainly appear to be a reasonable expectation provided he is able to remain healthy and maintain a 2nd line role.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • MikeTheMan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ryash

    @ ingy56:
    Ingy,…about the Fisher trade,..I believe what I heard was that if the Preds make it to the first round then the pick is a third round,..if they get through the first round and further the pick becomes a second in ’12

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @ yesby:

    Tucker left us with something…….we are still paying for his buyout !!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BurkiewillFINISHthis

    I want to bne noticed. But I am not. I wanna gawd damned red border.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ MikeTheMan:
    -
    No, but almost certainly we could have at least moved the contract for very little in return instead of paying the buyout for 6 years if he’d accepted a trade. The Avs turned around and paid him 2.25 million per for 2 years after that, so clearly he had value.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    simmonssteve steve simmons
    Why I’m not sure about the Mike Fisher deal: Yea, the Senators get a first round draft pick. But it’s going to be a late pick in a bad draft
    -
    Simmonds is right on this one.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ BurkiewillFINISHthis:
    I noticed you…r flashy watch

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • BurkiewillFINISHthis
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • What can Brown do for you

    I dunno if i’d take Bailey, we already have Bozak. Comeau maybe but i dunno, I think we have better options…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • What can Brown do for you

    So ideally what is it we are looking to get in return for Kaberle? I’m interested to see what your guys responses are.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ Jordan:
    I jus don’t think it was a great a trade as Ottawa would like us to think.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Michael Stephens

    @ Jordan:
    I’d argue that Fisher provides more to a team than Lupul does. That said, the Leafs got a better return on their trade than the sens did. Nashville will make the playoffs – as always. And then quickly bow out – as always.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gili

    does anyone know a good link to stream the game on?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • daverleafsfan

    do the redwings still have interest in giggy? we should trade him to them for prospect mitch callahan… one of the toughest kids in the whl… and is on a point per game pace..already has a 20 goal season under his belt… i do remember someone on here brang that trade up… checked out some of his videos… kid is a beast of a player.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bleedingblu

    Kuliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!! Nice!! Come on Kessel keep trying!!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bleedingblu

    @ Gili:
    http://atdhenet.tv/33903/watch-new-jersey-devils-vs-toronto-maple-leafs

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)