By the Numbers: Joffrey Lupul

by on February 10, 2011 in Analysis - 345 Comments

Share

Photo Credit: Mark Blinch/Reuters

In the aftermath of yesterday’s trade with the Anaheim Ducks, in which Joffrey Lupul joined the Toronto Maple Leafs, many fans expressed concern over two years’ contract term at a somewhat high dollar figure for what was perceived to be declining production.

Although it is very easy to get caught up in the base stat lines (goals, assists, points), what might be surprising to some is Lupul’s rate of production has actually remained fairly consistent during the past three seasons prior to 2010-11. Despite last season and the start of his current season being cut short due to back surgery and a subsequent blood infection, a quick look at his per-game statistics reveal few recent changes in the winger’s season-to-season productivity.


.

Season GP G/Gm A/Gm Pts/Gm % Pts PP ES TOI PP TOI
10-11 ANA 26 0.19 0.31 0.50 46.2 11:08 2:05
09-10 ANA 23 0.44 0.17 0.61 7.1 13:00 2:06
08-09 PHI 79 0.32 0.32 0.64 30.0 13:09 2:16
07-08 PHI 56 0.36 0.46 0.82 45.6 13:17 3:38
06-07 EDM 81 0.20 0.15 0.35 28.6 12:34 2:58
05-06 ANA 81 0.35 0.31 0.66 43.4 11:21 4:38
03-04 ANA 75 0.17 0.28 0.45 23.5 11:24 2:11
AVG/Gm 0.28 0.29 0.57 32.1 12:26 2:50
Over 82 82 23 G 24 A 47 Pts 15 PP Pts

.

A Few Notes:

– In his first go-round with Anaheim, Lupul received primarily 3rd line ice time at ES, with a promotion to top-line PP duty leading to a pronounced surge in production during his second season (05-06).

– After being traded to Edmonton, Lupul’s numbers declined across the board. He bounced between 2nd and 3rd line at ES and 1st and 2nd unit PP during a disasterous season, one which many felt was a product of the pressure of being a local hero in such an intense hockey market.

– In Philadelphia, Lupul’s steady production reflected regular 2nd line duty, although roster depth limited his powerplay time in his second season there (as evidenced by a sharp decline in both Pts/Gm and % PP Pts).

– Back in Anaheim, Lupul continued to thrive in a 2nd line role (in spite of an awful powerplay) until shelved by back surgery. Having missed training camp and preseason, Lupul found himself in a 3rd line role with only 2nd unit PP time upon returning to action two months into the current season.

– In a three-season span from 2007-08 through 2009-10, Lupul produced at a rate of 0.82, 0.64, and 0.61 points per game, and in 2005-06 produced at a rate of 0.66 P/Gm. It’s worth noting that over a full 82 games, the difference between a rate of 0.66 and 0.61 P/Gm amounts to 4 points (or 1 pt per 20 GP).

– Interestingly, while Lupul’s powerplay production declined significantly in 08-09 and 09-10 (which follows suit with his PP TOI), his overall point output remained consistent, an indication of improved production at even-strength.

– Lupul’s best seasons have come when he receives a large amount of PP time. The exception to this is the 08-09 season, when a deep Philadelphia roster saw him bumped to the second powerplay unit; despite the loss of over a minute of PP time per game, he still managed to produce 30% of his point total with the man advantage.

– On four occasions over 6.5 seasons thus far, Lupul has scored at a per-game goals rate which, in an 82-game season, would equal or exceed 26 goals (0.32 g/gm * 82 gm = 26 g). The only seasons he scored at a lesser rate were his rookie season, the down year in Edmonton, and this current season (first back from injury).

– Although I was unable to find exact statistics for this, many observers commented that Lupul’s best hockey is played from his off-wing (the left side).  With the Leafs needing help at left wing, and with top-six ice time available, the conditions appear favorable for Lupul to return to form.

.

Reasonable Expecatations

For his career, Lupul has compiled a 0.57 points per game average.  As of today, this would place him 136th league-wide.  Theoretically, if you consider there are 180 top-six forward jobs in the NHL (30 teams x 6), this would place Lupul smack in the middle of the 91-180 range … or, the 2nd-line player range.

Of course, such analysis is admittedly flawed in that 3rd liners on some teams do outperform 2nd liners on other teams, but the base point is valid: numbers-wise, Joffrey Lupul is a decent 2nd line NHLer. As for whether his contract is perhaps too rich for where he stands, that is neither here nor there, for it is the product (as put so aptly by Leafs’ GM Brian Burke) of another GM’s error in judgment.

In terms of full-season production, Lupul’s career “over a full 82 games” average works out to 23 goals and 24 assists. Based upon a rate of production higher than his career average over the two-and-a-quarter seasons prior to his injury, similar numbers certainly appear to be a reasonable expectation provided he is able to remain healthy and maintain a 2nd line role.

Looking forward to your thoughts as always,

[email protected]
twitter.com/garrettbauman

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • KeviN
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • KeviN
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gary Shields
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McGruff

    @ Burtonboy:

    Cool thanks. So he’s about 10,000% more legit than Ek?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://mapleleafshotstove.com Garrett Bauman

    @ lonsmos2:
    Cheers, glad you enjoyed it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://mapleleafshotstove.com Garrett Bauman
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • zoonpolitikon

    Kurt!! wrote:

    @ only crime
    ya i hate to say but orr is kinda usless he is not a good hockey player and is to picky with his fights they are always staged and never really give us a boost
    with 4 lines with guys who can actually play hockey we are much better
    what is our record with orr out of the line up?
    that being said I would never say to orrs face he is not a good hockey player because he is a monster

    He’s played 46 games of the Leafs 54 this season. Buds are 4-4 w/o him in the lineup. Not sure about last year.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Omac13

    About the Versteeg thing goin to Nashville and Burke wanting to much,

    My guess is that Burke wanted Colin Wilson

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf

    I wonder if Atlanta would do Phaneuf for Bogosian?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lonsmos2
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • darthkader

    @ B Leaf:
    Great young defender who’s been struggling this year for an over-rated 6.5 million defender? I wouldn’t do that trade if I was Rick Dudley..

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • zoonpolitikon
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • leafs_20

    This article might have already been posted but it’s from Pierre Lebrun, talks about Kaberle and Versteeg trades and such.

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/4544/lebrun-more-maple-leafs-to-leave-town

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dawriter67

    All I know is this. Burke will get an offer then go to Kabere (even if the Rangers are on the list of teams he wants) what’s going to happen is that Kaberle will hem and haw. Then unbuckle his pants and simply slowly shit all over Burke’s Gucci shoes.

    He does that every year. No way that Burke gives him a NTC again plus a raise in the 5 mill range. Makes no sense. That kind of offer would cripple our forward opportunities. We have some young prospective defence men who can take his spot next fall.

    And if he waives, I’ll be like..holy shit but there’s no such thing as ‘holy’ shit either. The “A” on his sweater is in the wrong position. It needs to be moved to another latitude and longitude.

    He will be gone July 1st unless we trade his “right to negotiate” when the season is over.

    I just want him gone. I don’t care about his numbers or his gay first pass. He’s a wimpy defense man who apologizes for hitting an opposing player.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    Any new rumours? Not made up ridiculous trade proposals by us

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    B Leaf wrote:

    I wonder if Atlanta would do Phaneuf for Bogosian?

    -
    Ughgh, why would WE do that?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @ Potsy:

    Just fromLebrun that Kabs is willing to waive, or implying he wlll.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    Just read back a couple pages, and can’t believe the absurd things I’m hearing about Bogosian. How can you guys possibly be so high on a -15 defender who’s put up 11 points in his 3rd NHL season, and doesn’t get any of the big assignments? Verteeg +? No thanks.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    canucksnaphook wrote:

    @ Potsy:
    Just fromLebrun that Kabs is willing to waive, or implying he wlll.

    Csh,
    Why did Lebrun get that impression? I got some inside info that it was originally kabs that was supposed to go to Ana but he decided against waiving.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/4544/lebrun-more-maple-leafs-to-leave-town

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Potsy:
    -
    I know I’m often accused of bashing other team’s players/prospects, but my God, so many on this site completely over-rate anything that isn’t wearing a Leafs jersey.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ McGruff:
    Your guess is a s good a s mine when it comes to this stuff.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)