Versteeg to PHI for a 2011 1st, 3rd

by on February 14, 2011 in Leafs News - 1,610 Comments

Share

It’s all speculation, but one has to wonder if Kris Versteeg wanted to take a run with a competitor and Burke‘s hand was forced on this one. A 24-year-old, 20-goal scorer, whose two-way game is in very good company, for a low first and a 3rd? It may be for futures, but it’s hard to see good value in this and it seems more than a little out of character for Burke. There may be more to this story yet, with lots of time left before the February 28 trade deadline (and the draft, and free agency).

I’m looking at this deal with three possible explanations in mind:

1) Versteeg wanted out. Burke took what he could get; wanted James Van Riemsdyk as rumoured but couldn’t get him out of Philly. The picks weren’t a bad consolation prize when he was backed against a wall. When asked what he’d miss about Toronto, Versteeg replied “the guys in the room I had a good relationship with, and that’s about it.”

2) Burke is scrapping the retool and full-out rebuilding. Even so, as a 24-year-old Cup winner on a decent contract, he’s not a player you trade under the premise you’re rebuilding.

3) It’s a precursor to Burke landing his number one center (or a top line forward). Burke has gained cap space ($3M outbound) and a useful trade chip in a first if this is the case (rarely do you see big names move without a first involved in the package). I usually don’t like speculating about deals leading to other deals (those fail safe Eklund “dominoes”), but you never know.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • dtime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mun

    @ Ensign:

    Why? Well first I think he is highly overrated in terms of his impact on the team and the game. He has progressively gotten worse over the years and I feel we need a change of direction. He is the last piece of the horrible Muskoka 5 mishap. I will submit the last point is more of my own issue than an objective view of his actual skillset.

    But here is the bigger issue. You cannot pay him $5 million for Kaberle when you already have $6.5 million invested in Phaneuf, $4.5 million on Komi, and the upcoming raise of Schenn which will put him at $3 million. It makes no sense financially and will continue to perpetuate our problems upfront. It is a salary cap system. We need to move on. Our team will be no worse without Kaberle next year. I am confident of that.

    This is why I am happy with Burke’s vision to basically say, we cannot afford him or being able to move Versteeg half way into a season, or Beauch with a year left. He does not get emotionally attached or drink his own cool aid. Same should be done with Kaberle and should have been done a long time ago. The offer from the Sharks in the summer for their 1st and a top d prospect, would have been ideal IMO. Now we have to run the risk of no return at all.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ingy56
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dtime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dtime
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    new blog is up

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Gby

    dtime wrote:

    A thought: who quarterbacks our PP next year after Beuch, Kabby and Steeger are gone? For god sakes not lebda

    Brad Richards

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Mun

    @ dtime:

    Thats the big question. Gardiner is the man of the future for that position.

    Scary thing is, even with these guys, our PP is/was horrible!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • ionsys

    My hunch is that the secrecy around Kabs is because BB has already agreed in principle as to what the Leafs will get back from Boston (and maybe NYR as well) and so BB has given Curran say 48-72hrs to finalize a 3-5yr deal for Kabs with one of either Boston or NYR

    If Kabs accepts Boston term sheet then deal is completed and BB gets the agreed pkg from Boston–If Kabs accepts NYR term sheet, then BB has to accept the previously agreed package from NYR

    I think both deals are likely being done solely on the basis of Kabs ageeing to the term sheet of one of these 2 teams—not simply a rental and we’ll see basis.

    I strongly suspect that Burke already knows what he will get if one of these teams’ term sheet is accepted by Kabs

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)