Crabb nets first, Leafs crack Sabres in Buffalo

by on February 16, 2011 in Uncategorized - 936 Comments

Share

Bill Wippert/NHLI via Getty Images

In what has to be considered to be a fairly monumental win for the Leafs in Buffalo (their first in eight games), it was fitting that Joey Crabb tallied his first goal as a Leaf and helped lead the club to a hard-earned 2-1 victory.

On a nationally televised tilt against the Sabres, the Leafs went in to Buffalo and took two points from a game that they truly deserved to win. That isn’t to say I wasn’t yelling at the television a few times in the dying moments.

Toronto played as good a road game as you could ask for, and after J.S. Giguere was forced to leave the game after only twenty minutes, James Reimer came in and played great in relief (as if we would come to expect anything less).

The victory puts the Leafs at six points away from a playoff spot, as New Jersey handed the Hurricanes a loss at the Prudential Center. Right now the Canes and Leafs each have 24 games remaining. I know, this is all too much for me to handle as well.

Phil Kessel continues to pick up steam, racking up another tally after his big night in Boston on Tuesday. Punches in bunches with #81 – it will never change, we just need everyone to embrace it.

The positive you can take from Kessel’s drought this year, however, is that he played quite well despite the dry-up in goals. As long as he can continue to do that as the team improves around him, he’ll become much more dangerous as he heads into his prime.

I thought Joffrey Lupul had a great game in Boston on Tuesday and he turned in another good outing tonight against the Sabres. Yet to light the lamp for Toronto, he still has three points in four games, all on Kessel markers. Lupul looks like a real top six forward and if he can stay the course, the Leafs can come out of the Beauchemin trade way ahead. Small sample size, so we’ll see what happens.

A few stats:

Tops in ice time for a Leafs defenceman: Phaneuf at 26:31 (giving Schenn a break I suppose).

For a Leafs forward: Nik Kulemin at 20:40 (can this guy do any wrong? Nope)

Mikhail Grabovski led the team in shots (6) but was held scoreless and was the only minus player.

Mike Komisarek played a little over twelve minutes. Hey, at least it’s not eight.

***

From Alec Brownscombe:

-Without getting ahead of oneself, Joffrey Lupul has shown considerable promise in his first three games and brought an element of size and physicality that wasn’t exactly advertised upon the news of his arrival. His willingness to engage physically and put his solid frame to work has opened up space and opportunity for Kessel. Again, without getting too excited, the early successes of his line with Bozak and Kessel gives hope the Leafs could receive some consistency out of a second forward line outside of Grabovski’s.

Lupul’s addition, contingent upon his continued effectiveness on that line, has also so far helped Wilson establish a clearer top six, bottom six model that has fewer players playing above their head. A bottom six of Sjostrom – Boyce – Hanson and Rosehill – Brent – Crabb allows the likes of Brent and Crabb play within their roles and capabilities and both did great work defensively tonight. Could we be seeing what Burke meant when he said Versteeg didn’t really fit the mold?

-It was nice to see the Leafs bear down and not let James Reimer’s mistake on Buffalo’s lone goal cost them and potentially some of Reimer’s confidence. For me, it was Reimer’s first goal allowed that was a case of “well, he really should’ve had that one” and the Leafs clamped down well defensively to make sure the goal was purely academic.

-Keith Aulie registered a career high 23:50 minutes of ice time.

-There was a bit of early luck involved in this win, but I suppose it was about time after taking more than their fair share of beatings in the building. Winless in their last seven at the HSBC, the Leafs started five of those contests two goals down after twenty minutes of action. Bad starts were killers, and if the post didn’t come in handy after Komisarek decided to take an early-game fishing expedition then this game might have gotten away from the Leafs again early.

-Six points away from the eighth placed team Carolina with the same number of games played sounds deceivingly within reach, but the Leafs have 24 games remaining and need 34 points if they simply want to reach 90 points. The Habs qualified at a surprisingly low 88 points last season, but the prior to that, eighth placed teams qualified with the following point totals since the lockout:

Season Team Points
’09-10 Montreal 88
’08-09 Montreal 93
’07-08 Boston 94
’06-07 Islanders 92
’05-06 Lightning 92

Something like 16-5-3 would give the Leafs a shot. Essentially, the Blue and White would have to sustain the form we’ve only seen in three or four game spurts over 20+ games. It’s a huge ask (not to mention the March schedule from hell) but I suppose the best way to approach it is the cliched way – one game at a time.

Next up is two opponents below them in the Eastern Conference standings in the Senators and Islanders. Four points for the taking, in other words, if the Leafs were serious about this remote playoff drive. Then again, if Kaberle is on the way out before February 28 as many would have you believe, even Burke couldn’t convince us the towel hasn’t been thrown on the 2010-11 season.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • rpearce76

    I don’t know why the assumption is that if we end up with 2 1st rounders that we’d pkg them for a higher pick. I’d be happier taking 2 in the middle than 1 higher – unless it was top 5 maybe. If I was going to move the picks I’d rather move them to teams who are doing flat out rebuilds for more tangible assets who could help us now. For example, maybe Col would take 2 of those 1st picks for Stastny? Maybe ATL would take 1 plus a lower pick or prospect for Bogosian? There are deals to be made, there are teams who see value in first round picks even if they are not top 10.

    In the end though, I’d be fine with using them to take 2 kids in the first round. Odds are one of them would develop into something and as I’ve said before our scouts look like they are doing good work so why not give them a ticket to the big show.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • PrairieLeafFan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bronson

    @ Cameron

    So who do you want from Boston for Kaberle?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    scrivens_30

    @chansler Who knew twitter was addicting?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    For the record, you’re right, I am exaggerating Colborne’s shittiness, but he is no longer an exciting prospect, and his stock really has fallen. You could very well be right, and he could become a good player, but the knocks against him are not things you typically learn. First of all, his offense disappeared playing against men, and his lack of heart and physicality was magnified. It’s possible he overcomes these things, but highly unlikely. He would be pretty low down on our prospect depth chart:
    -
    Aulie
    Reimer
    =======
    Kadri
    D’Amigo
    Blacker
    Gardiner
    McKegg
    Nicholls
    Colborne
    Ross
    -
    Yay! It’s a fine guy to have, it just doesn’t help us any time soon.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    colborne is a big softy, think joe thornton

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    Penthouse wrote:

    colborne is a big softy, think joe thornton

    Does he have Thornton’s hands?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • PrairieLeafFan

    Penthouse wrote:

    colborne is a big softy, think joe thornton

    If he can break 80 points a season consistently I would not complain that much….just sayin

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail

    garrettbauman

    BREAKING NEWS: KABERLE not yet TRADED. #Leafs #KillingMeSoftly

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    bronson wrote:

    @ Cameron
    So who do you want from Boston for Kaberle?

    -
    This would be my ideal trade:
    -
    To BOS: Kaberle
    To TOR: Caron, 1st in 2011 (BOS), 2nd in 2012 (BOS)*
    -
    *conditional on Kaberle resigning, otherwise becomes a 4th
    -
    Then I would turn around and do something like this:
    -
    To PIT: Caron, 3rd in 2011 (PHI)
    To TOR: Goligoski, 5th in 2011 (PIT)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    definitly not joe thornton skill, just joe thornton size and pussyness

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rpearce76

    If I’m Burke what I do is play Boston and Vancouver off one another targeting one of their 3 best prospects, a roster player, and the 1st pick. Both are in similar situations and wanting to make a cup run.

    One of them would buckle under the pressure. Neither has had a good run in a long time and would be fucking crazy to let this slip through their fingers. And despite what other guys are saying Kaberle is the top prize when it comes to PMD’s available right now.

    If I was as close to a cup as Boston or Vancouver I’d easily make this deal.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • DWC

    Fuck market value. What really matters when moves are made is what effect they will have on the team. Kaberle’s probably still got a few more years of good hockey left in him, and is extremely hard to replace. Late first round picks and decent prospects are nice to have, but in reality, are long shots to ever have a significant impact on the franchise. Unless a second deal is in place to get a guy like Goligoski or Del Zotto, we might as well just re-sign Kaberle. .
    .
    You can’t just sit around and hope that Blacker/Gardiner/etc. becomes the kind of player Kaberle is, because:
    .
    A – It’s very unlikely (Nothing against them, but Kaberle’s a special player)
    B – It will probably take a very long time if it does happen (Wanna miss the playoffs another 5 years?)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ Cameron:
    David Pagnotta
    TheFourthPeriod David Pagnotta
    I’ve heard whispers that Leafs like Colborne and Caron, but NOT confirmed and no idea if B’s would part with either.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dougy
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    Penthouse wrote:

    colborne is a big softy, think joe thornton

    great to see everyone saying what they HEAR before they actually see the guy play. thats what i hate about here, everyone is too quick to judge with no basis

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    @ jordan

    hey buddy, im using the same scouts you are, so you killed your own arguement

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    Penthouse wrote:

    @ jordan
    hey buddy, im using the same scouts you are, so you killed your own arguement

    lol, all i know is hes a great prospect. few year down the road he could be a homerun

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ Jordan:
    -
    Find me where I said age doesn’t matter? I’ve said that people develop at different rates, but that is talking about the NHL. Obviously a 6 foot 5 near 21 year old has a bettter chance in the AHL than 5 foot 11 19 year old. 13 months, but two years of hockey experience separates them. He was an 8C in hockeyfuture’s before he was in the AHL. Since then, Kadri has become a PPG player, and Colborne a half point per game player. They aren’t even in the same league talent wise.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • JCG
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    U-Kno wrote:

    I think Boston winning the cup would piss me off more then Kaberle walking for nothing

    that’s how i feel too. i don’t want any BOS fans thanking me for Kaberle unless i can remind them to check back with me in a couple of years

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    he could be, the size and vision could make him a very good player, but the willingness to drive the net and toughness isnt very teachable. you can’t really teach Balls

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dougy
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)