Critical Times For Burke

by on February 17, 2011 in 2010-11 Season - 786 Comments

Share

As rumors swirl regarding Tomas Kaberle’s future in Toronto, the blueprint general manager Brian Burke has imprinted for the Toronto Maple Leafs is anything but definitive—but that doesn’t make it any less effective.

With the departures of Francois Beauchemin and Kris Versteeg, Burke has managed to not only add some prospects to the cupboard, but relieve some cap space for acquisitions via trade and/or free agency . If Burke and Bruins GM Peter Chiarelli reach an agreement and Kaberle decides to waive his no-trade clause, the Leafs would free even more cap space assuming the team doesn’t acquire a bloated contract in return—which Burke is apparently willing. Considering Kaberle is eligible for free agency this summer, it’s hard to envision a lucrative return from the Bruins for his services. That’s not to say the Leafs won’t be able to acquire some important building blocks moving forward, but Kaberle won’t net an impact player of such caliber as, say, Jeff Carter.

If, hypothetically, Kaberle is traded, what might be the next phase in Burke’s plan to restore the Leafs to respectability? Depending on the contracts the Leafs absorb between now and July 1, Burke could have upwards of $15 million to fiddle with in the free agent waters. Despite the lack of depth in this year’s free agent pool, Burke intends on being active. As Dave Nonis has stated, Kaberle will be replaced in the off-season if he is traded or tests free agency. Players potentially available come July 1 include Andrei Markov, Kevin Bieksa, Bryan McCabe, Ed Jovanovski, Eric Brewer, Joni Pitkanen, Christian Ehrhoff, James Wisniewski and more. And if you think that list if bare, that of the free agent forwards, besides Simon Gagne and Brad Richards, is littered with marginal second and third-liners.

Does this mean Burke intends on entering the bidding wars for Richards and offering a long-term, lucrative contract for the 30-year-old? Richards would undoubtedly upgrade the top-six and provide the Leafs with a legitimate first-line center for Phil Kessel, but is he the knight in shining armor that will push the Leafs into the playoffs for the first time since the lockout? Perhaps, but committing significant amounts of money to free agents—especially with Dion Phaneuf and Mike Komisarek on the roster for three more seasons— could prove costly.

But these are the types of risks that must be taken when rebuilding on the fly, rather than a traditional rebuild through the draft. It’s possible the next couple of seasons will determine Burke’s fate in Toronto, as the results of his rebuilding method should come to fruition by then. But it’s hard to criticize his methods even if it does fail when you consider that he has made the Leafs the youngest club in the NHL and has imported a decent amount of assets despite the team’s supposed dire state.

If a first-line center and top-four defenseman are brought into the fold, the Leafs could progressively rise in the Eastern Conference standings within a couple of years as its core develops. While many analysts cite that the Leafs lack the core to realistically contend for the Stanley Cup, it’s premature to determine that considering very few of its key players have reached their prime. I understand patience is wearing thin after 40 years, but it doesn’t mean every decision the Leafs make will lead to failure. If Burke’s method has proved anything, it’s that there’s at least realistic hope in Leafs Nation that brighter days are ahead.

The Leafs’ fate, however, hinges on Burke’s plan to acquire such talent in the off-season. Considering the limited amount of star players in the free agent pool, Burke may have throw considerable amounts of money at free agents in order to avoid another season with the same questions surrounding his team. Otherwise, trading draft picks and/or prospects for proven talent would only contradict his plan.

For a team that is attempting to harvest as many draft picks and prospects as possible, free agency is the perfect opportunity to avoid relinquishing such assets via trade.

It’s going to be an exciting summer for the Leafs.

You stay classy, MLHS.

[email protected]

Follow me on Twitter at: http://www.twitter.com/#!/RonGuillet

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • mitchsteel09

    Cameron If Finger is picked up on re-entry waivers would we be on the hook for his 1.75 million dollar salary for just this year? or for the duration of his contract.

    I assume just for this year. And in that case i doubt he would be picked up.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    mitchsteel09 wrote:

    @ Kurt!!:
    Definitely not enough. Stastny has been putting up huge numbers and is only 25. It is quite possible that with the right set of wingers he could develop into a 100 point player. His best year in the PPG sense was 71 points in 66 games in 2007 as a sophomore, with almost no talent to play with. He is annually a point per game.

    -
    Hejduk and Wolski are hardly “no-talents”. His cap hit makes him less valuable than he otherwise would be. 90% of the teams interested in him would be looking to send big salary back as well, which defeats the purpose for them. If they are moving him, we have a huge advantage. Remember, he’s also a 2nd line center right now. Duchene ousted him easily, and the fanbase has pulled a Komiarek on him, constantly pointing out how much he gets paid.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    If kaberle wanted to raise his stock he should show he is a playoff performer. I personally don’t think he is, but if he were looking to cash in big there is no doubt he will want to be traded to increase his value.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    mitchsteel09 wrote:

    Cameron If Finger is picked up on re-entry waivers would we be on the hook for his 1.75 million dollar salary for just this year? or for the duration of his contract.
    I assume just for this year. And in that case i doubt he would be picked up.

    -
    No, the duration of the contract. Dallas is still paying for Avery both money wise and on the cap.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • peterbleafs

    With Ottawa getting Craig Anderson today then we may be in for a hot motivated goalie on Saturday night.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    @ Dougy:
    we really won’t know if Kaberle’s irreplaceable until he’s gone

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • zoonpolitikon

    mitchsteel09 wrote:

    @ Kurt!!:
    Definitely not enough. Stastny has been putting up huge numbers and is only 25. It is quite possible that with the right set of wingers he could develop into a 100 point player. His best year in the PPG sense was 71 points in 66 games in 2007 as a sophomore, with almost no talent to play with. He is annually a point per game.

    I don’t see how Colorado would be desperate enough to unload Stastny, not yet anyways. Only the Islanders and Thrashers spend less and with Colorado’s young talent, they could be legit contenders in the next couple of years. Hejduk will likely resign at discount to retire an Av and if they really want Fleischmann he could probably be had for the same if not less than he is making now. There’s no immediate need for Colorado to give away Stastny.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Potsy

    @ B Leaf:
    @ JP:
    Guys, if this trade happens, I pose the question, Have we ever been this prospect rich?
    We Also forgot Matt Frattin

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Loric
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    @ Cameron:

    At the time Wolski was a 40 point guy. And yes hedjuk potted 29 goals, but what i was referring to was the fact that he was a sophomore and lead his team. It’s not like he was sheltered from top lines or anything like that.

    I agree he could be had but bozak and first? i dunno bro.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dougy
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Cameron

    @ mitchsteel09:
    -
    Not saying he could be, just saying he’s not really an elite player that’s worth giving up the farm for.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    @ zoonpolitikon:

    There is immediate need, they cannot afford him.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • JP

    Potsy wrote:

    @ B Leaf:
    @ JP:
    Guys, if this trade happens, I pose the question, Have we ever been this prospect rich?

    Not in my humble opinion…very excited for the next few years!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B Leaf

    peterbleafs wrote:

    With Ottawa getting Craig Anderson today then we may be in for a hot motivated goalie on Saturday night.

    Saturdays game will be like the cup finals for the Sens. They will want to play spoiler. Leafs better be ready in front of a loud crowd wanting nothing short of 2 points.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Dougy
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Loric

    reporterchris Chris Johnston
    Jonas Gustavsson got a hair cut. The long mop is a thing of the past.
    49 seconds ago
    .
    Just like Grabs. Cuts off the mop and starts playing great.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Uncle Otis

    Cameron wrote:

    @ Uncle Otis:
    -
    What a joke. Eat the shit man. Eat the shit. .

    It’s a tasty dish.
    I like the “trade” as reported…but I know you’d do better.
    Cameron for GM

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    @ Cameron:

    Personally I consider 80 point forwards to be elite (just as i do for 30+ goal scorers). I think you agree though that he does have 100 point potential?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • JP

    Loric wrote:

    reporterchris Chris Johnston
    Jonas Gustavsson got a hair cut. The long mop is a thing of the past.
    49 seconds ago

    Good, carrying around all that hair was f**king with his heart.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • creasemonkey

    @ peterbleafs:
    i agree Ive watched Knight play alot as well, was much better when he was hiding behing Kadris 3 points a night lastyear, may I ask where youve seen him play

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)