Morning Mashup: Sharks, Lightning Go Up 2-0

by on May 2, 2011 in League News - 67 Comments

Share

On a night where two giants were expected to make good quality comebacks in their respective series comebacks just weren’t in the hockey gods’ cards. Both the Washington Capitals and the Detroit Red Wings find themselves down in a hole trailing 2-0 after two games played with Washington losing both games in their own building.
 
If the old saying of “You’re never in trouble in the playoffs until you lose at home” is true then Washington is really up the creek without a paddle. What is happening to the Capitals? Is it the Guy Boucher 1-3-1 adaptation of the trap? Is it Tampa’s relentless work on the forecheck, or is it the spectacular veteran goaltending from Dwayne Roloson? Could be the almost perfect playoff PP of the Lightning. I’d argue that it’s a combination of all four things coming together at just the right time for Guy Boucher’s men. Not to mention the play of Marty St. Louis who currently stands 2nd playoff scoring. His main partner in crime isn’t Steven Stamkos who, although improved, still hasn’t matched his regular season heights. No, that mantle goes to Vincent Lecavalier, their captain who proved very captain like last night scoring the OT game winner. Washington is indeed controlling the play for most of those two games but does so with a distinct individualistic taste. There are not going hard to the net and their stars are trying to do too much, but most importantly, they are not winning puck battles and playing like last year’s Capitals. We all know where that got them.
 
Don’t look now but the Sharks are now 6-1 in their last seven playoff games against the Red Wings. What other team can ever claim such dominance? It might be true that all their wins were 1 goal games, but that speaks volumes for San Jose’s willingness to win. This may be a very even matchup, but the Sharks are finding ways to win. Tale of the tape – crowding the crease. Joe Thornton and other grey sea creatures sprayed Jimmy Howard with so much snow he might end up with a fever after this one. An almost perfect game by the Sharks special teams killing off 5 Detroit powerplays before giving up a PP goal and scoring one themselves courtesy of our very own Ian White. Same as with Luongo and the Blackhawks one could say that the Sharks are in Howard’s head now. The most surprising thing for me is the turnaround of Joe Thornton. He’s been a beast all these years but never really played playoff and Cup winning hockey until this year. Backchecking, playing a good physical game this might not be a 100 point plus Joe Thornton but is the kind of Joe Thornton that has 6 points in his last 6 playoff games and could very well lift the Stanley Cup.

Onto your mashup with Greg

Leafs Links:

Could young stars be the answer for Leafs?

Steve Simmons looks at the possibility of the Leafs tendering offer sheets to the likes of Steven Stamkos, Shea Weber and Drew Doughty.

Playoff Links:

Sharks put Wings in deeper hole

Former Leaf defenseman Ian White scores the game winner in San Jose’s 2-0 victory over Detroit.

Lightning shock Caps in OT

Lecavalier nets the overtime winner to give the Lightning a 2-0 series lead going back to Tampa.

Predators top Canucks in OT to even series

Recap from Nashville’s Game 2 win on Saturday night.

Gretzky rookie card goes for $94,163

Gretzky card sells for highest price ever paid in an online auction Sunday.

World Championship Links:

Canada crushes France 9-1 at hockey worlds

James Reimer is now 2-and-0 at the World Championships after a 22-save performance against France.

Your Say:

Did you expect the Lightning to have a 2-0 series lead heading back home to Tampa Bay? Are they a darkhorse to make it all the way to the finals? Will the Red Wings respond in Game 3 at home on Tuesday against the Sharks?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • Ensign
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    You can go suck eggs. When you compare me to Simmonds you have crossed the line buster :)
    -
    I’m not certain what he has said with regard to Penner other then he was pissed about what happened . Burke just doesn’t impress me as being the type that would offer sheet anyone . I know what he said at the year end interview but Burke has been contradictory many times before.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    Burke said he didn’t like the way he was blindsided with the Penner offer sheet, not that he is against them entirely.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ensign

    @ Burtonboy:
    BB has said he has no problem with offer sheets..they are one of the tools available to GM’s. The Penner situation was related to the contract he was offered. BB doesn’t believe in contracts like that and he felt like he got screwed. He’s said multiple times he’d use an offer sheet. That being said, I don’t think we can table one this year as we don’t have the draft picks..I believe it has to be YOUR draft pick.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    @ Ensign:

    It would be draft picks for next year. So we can.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    Burtonboy wrote:

    I know what he said at the year end interview but Burke has been contradictory many times before.

    Sorry about the Simmons thing. Just comparing quotes, not men. lol
    As far as contradictions go, I have never heard Burke say he is against offer sheets. In fact, he has said, more than once that he sees them as a legitimate tool for a GM.
    EDIT: I think what BB didn’t like was the lack of an attempt to make a deal with him before the offer sheet was made.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ 4evrblue:
    @ Ensign:
    Maybe he will, I have no idea what goes through Burke mind. I know its part of the CBA and all but is it really an accepted practice amongst GM’s. I don’t remember it being used very much but it may be more common than I realize.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • cobourg

    Stamkos doesn’t disappear. He was on a slump for the final 15 games because he was playing through an undisclosed and under-reported shoulder injury.
    -
    Adding Stamkos would be just ridiculous. He is easily worth 4 first rounders. Burke has shown he can easily add first rounders.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    I had to fire back on that one LOL .

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    also to answer my previous question, since the lockout Penner has been the only player to be successfully offer sheeted. Kesler, Vanek, Backes, Bernier and Hjalmarsson were all offer sheeted but matched. Knowing this does anybody think its at all possible to OS any player that is at all good? You would basically have to overpay tremendously with picks and money.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ensign

    @ mitchsteel09:
    ah ok thanks!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mitchsteel09

    @ cobourg:

    Stamkos had 30 goals in like his first 35 games, and finished the season with 45. I agree he is worth 4 first rounders if they are mid to late ( which we can almost guarantee with this team) but the contract you would need to give him is not worth it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    Bob is your uncle wrote:

    Burtonboy wrote:
    I know what he said at the year end interview but Burke has been contradictory many times before.
    Sorry about the Simmons thing. Just comparing quotes, not men. lol
    As far as contradictions go, I have never heard Burke say he is against offer sheets. In fact, he has said, more than once that he sees them as a legitimate tool for a GM.

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    Its more my impression of the man himself than anything has said. He talks a lot about ethics and the like which leads me to believe he wouldn’t do it. I may be totally wrong on this but its the feeling I get from listening to him sometimes.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    Burtonboy wrote:

    @ Bob is your uncle:
    I had to fire back on that one LOL .

    Yeah, I know. I reread it and thought ‘he’s gonna have something to say about that’. And there you were. lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • rustynail
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bob is your uncle

    rustynail wrote:

    second that it screwed up market values.

    Right. I was just thinking to myself that this was part of it too.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    New blog up eh .

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)