MacArket Value

by on May 30, 2011 in Free Agency, Opinion - 151 Comments

MacArket Value
Toronto Maple Leafs' Clarke MacArthur, right, celebrates with teammate Nikolai Kulemin (41), of Russia, after scoring the tying goal against the Washington Capitals during the third period of an NHL hockey game Monday, Dec. 6, 2010, in Washington. The Maple Leafs won 5-4 in a shootout. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
Share

AP Photo

Though I’m quite aware of the upcoming contract negotiations between Brian Burke and recent overachiever Clarke MacArthur, I’ve yet to give it too much thought until now.

MacArthur is one of five of the team’s restricted free agents, including Luke Schenn, Tyler Bozak, Carl Gunnarsson and James Reimer.

Usually when the conversation arose about his pending new deal I just passed it off with “Yeah, he’ll get a raise like Kulemin‘s or something.”

What was I thinking? Clearly I’m an idiot.

Comparing MacArthur’s negotiations to Kulemin last summer is basically useless. In fact, it’s pretty tough to find many comparisons that make a lot of sense, given the sudden surge of points from Mac-A this past season.

If MacArthur were on an entry level contract and suddenly broke out, it would be a different story. But he’s been around a little while – a 26 year old with parts of five NHL seasons under his belt. In fact, he actually had to take a paycut from 1.4 million to 1.1 just to sign with the Leafs.

Perhaps we could look at his other linemate as a comparable. Mikhail Grabovski was rewarded with a 2.9 million dollar contract coming off a 48 point campaign in 2008-09. While his value to the Leafs in unquestionably higher than MacArthur, he’s yet to score more points in a single season than MacArthur’s 62 this past year.

MacArthur’s enormous jump in point total is, for the most part, due to a major increase in assists. With 41 this past season, his assist total eclipsed even his highest point total previously (35). So it’s quite possible (or, absolutely certain) that his climb in points is due to playing on a strong line with two great goal scorers.

During the 2009-10 season with both the Sabres and Thrashers, MacArthur poured in sixteen goals. He improved on that number with the Leafs, but only by five. Still, contract negotiations will surely be a little strange regardless.

When you look at the fact that Nik Kulemin received a raise from 1.4 million to 2.3 million after only a 36 point season in 2010, it’s difficult to imagine MacArthur expecting any less. But is he any more valuable than Kulemin? Definitely not.

Furthermore, can MacArthur expect any less than the three million being paid out to Colby Armstrong? After a 62 point season, how could he? Of course, everything isn’t all about points. But they do help.

Another decent comparison would probably be Tomas Fleischmann of the Colorado Avalanche.

After a solid outing with the Capitals in 2009-10 where he nabbed 51 points on a great offensive club, Fleischmann was rewarded with a one year contract to the tune of 2.6 million dollars. Similar in age to MacArthur (Fleischmann is only a year older), it seems the Czech-born centre is a pretty good starting point when it comes to predicting the type of contract MacArthur will receive.

While I doubt that MacArthur wants to sign another one-year contract, I really don’t see Burke going above two.

The Atlanta Thrashers walked away from a 2.4 million dollar arbitration award for MacArthur in 2010, paving the way for him to eventually wear blue and white. I don’t expect him to garner much more than that in 2011, as he’ll probably sign a two year contract in the area of 2.7 – 2.9 million.

If things fall apart (doubtful) I’m sure Burke is under no real pressure to keep MacArthur around. As impressive as he’s been over the past season, I’m sure there are plenty of players eager to take his place.

Email [email protected] and follow on twitter

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    did they eliminate the other grabovski play? i remember he had two plays in the tsn tourney

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TMhellSE

    @ Cameron:
    Speaking of online polls. Moose! ;)

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    i just voted for grabo 10 times.. he was up 50.1 to 49.9 and refresh and hes down 50.2 to 49.8.. wtf is going on

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron

    TMhellSE wrote:

    @ Cameron:
    Speaking of online polls. Moose!

    -
    Never!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Ryan Fancey

    Interesting; Matt Moulson has a cap hit of 3.1 starting next season. He’s yet to have as many points as MacA, but back to back 30 goal campaigns. Just another name to think of when it comes to comparables.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    i single handedly tied the score i think

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn

    LukeSchenn wrote:

    i just voted for grabo 10 times.. he was up 50.1 to 49.9 and refresh and hes down 50.2 to 49.8.. wtf is going on

    I guess there must have been 2-3 people voting for Sedin at the same time??

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TMhellSE

    @ Ryan Fancey:
    I’d pay that much for Molson. Not sure about Moulson.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    mirtle James Mirtle
    “EA SPORTS NHL 11 simulation engine has predicted that the Canucks will beat the Bruins in seven games.”
    1 minute ago

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    LukeSchenn wrote:

    i single handedly tied the score i think

    Ha-ha Grabs is back in the lead

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    @ long_suffering_leaf_fan:
    ive been voting non stop for half an hour
    i was starting to get discouraged

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    @ LukeSchenn:
    LOL!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TMhellSE

    Cam, great post on the Kings. (so pony’s available. hmmm.) Reminds me that other teams are trying to get better and not just waiting for leafs to catch up.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.mapleleafshotstove.com Schenn

    LukeSchenn wrote:

    @ long_suffering_leaf_fan:
    ive been voting non stop for half an hour
    i was starting to get discouraged

    If Grabovski wins, I will contribute it to you and I voting constantly, haha!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tim Horton

    I’ve been voting to… ad its only gone up like .03 percent must be a lot of votes involved… Someone posted on the facebook chat “Agreed with below. Both goals were good, not great. Goalie was super weak on Grabo’s goal and it wouldn’t be here if he didn’t score. I have to give this one to Henrik”
    -
    I’m pretty sure none of these would be candidates for play of the year if they didn’t score, douche..

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    @ Schenn:
    grabos is better though.. im just voting for the guy who deserves it
    the situation
    tie game minute left steps around and scores on the vezina trophy winner come on now
    and he did it all on his own
    where hank got a beauty pass
    he made a nice move but we see it 10 times a year

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • long_suffering_leaf_fan

    You have to remember Grabs had just got his bell wrung by Chara before that, that is what makes that goal so amazing

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • U-Kno

    If they were smart they would put all the Canadian team plays in one division. The voting has nothing to do with the play itself, just they guys jersey. I actually thought the 2 saves vs the Leafs were the 2 best plays (Thomas and Ward) but had to go up agaisnt Price and I’m pretty sure not too many Canes fans were voting.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    @ Tim Horton:
    im the guy who told that guy hes on crack lol

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    I’ve been voting Grabo non-stop for the past hour…….. And it’s only changed .6 percent? WTF?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)