MacArket Value

by on May 30, 2011 in Free Agency, Opinion - 151 Comments

MacArket Value
Toronto Maple Leafs' Clarke MacArthur, right, celebrates with teammate Nikolai Kulemin (41), of Russia, after scoring the tying goal against the Washington Capitals during the third period of an NHL hockey game Monday, Dec. 6, 2010, in Washington. The Maple Leafs won 5-4 in a shootout. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
Share

AP Photo

Though I’m quite aware of the upcoming contract negotiations between Brian Burke and recent overachiever Clarke MacArthur, I’ve yet to give it too much thought until now.

MacArthur is one of five of the team’s restricted free agents, including Luke Schenn, Tyler Bozak, Carl Gunnarsson and James Reimer.

Usually when the conversation arose about his pending new deal I just passed it off with “Yeah, he’ll get a raise like Kulemin‘s or something.”

What was I thinking? Clearly I’m an idiot.

Comparing MacArthur’s negotiations to Kulemin last summer is basically useless. In fact, it’s pretty tough to find many comparisons that make a lot of sense, given the sudden surge of points from Mac-A this past season.

If MacArthur were on an entry level contract and suddenly broke out, it would be a different story. But he’s been around a little while – a 26 year old with parts of five NHL seasons under his belt. In fact, he actually had to take a paycut from 1.4 million to 1.1 just to sign with the Leafs.

Perhaps we could look at his other linemate as a comparable. Mikhail Grabovski was rewarded with a 2.9 million dollar contract coming off a 48 point campaign in 2008-09. While his value to the Leafs in unquestionably higher than MacArthur, he’s yet to score more points in a single season than MacArthur’s 62 this past year.

MacArthur’s enormous jump in point total is, for the most part, due to a major increase in assists. With 41 this past season, his assist total eclipsed even his highest point total previously (35). So it’s quite possible (or, absolutely certain) that his climb in points is due to playing on a strong line with two great goal scorers.

During the 2009-10 season with both the Sabres and Thrashers, MacArthur poured in sixteen goals. He improved on that number with the Leafs, but only by five. Still, contract negotiations will surely be a little strange regardless.

When you look at the fact that Nik Kulemin received a raise from 1.4 million to 2.3 million after only a 36 point season in 2010, it’s difficult to imagine MacArthur expecting any less. But is he any more valuable than Kulemin? Definitely not.

Furthermore, can MacArthur expect any less than the three million being paid out to Colby Armstrong? After a 62 point season, how could he? Of course, everything isn’t all about points. But they do help.

Another decent comparison would probably be Tomas Fleischmann of the Colorado Avalanche.

After a solid outing with the Capitals in 2009-10 where he nabbed 51 points on a great offensive club, Fleischmann was rewarded with a one year contract to the tune of 2.6 million dollars. Similar in age to MacArthur (Fleischmann is only a year older), it seems the Czech-born centre is a pretty good starting point when it comes to predicting the type of contract MacArthur will receive.

While I doubt that MacArthur wants to sign another one-year contract, I really don’t see Burke going above two.

The Atlanta Thrashers walked away from a 2.4 million dollar arbitration award for MacArthur in 2010, paving the way for him to eventually wear blue and white. I don’t expect him to garner much more than that in 2011, as he’ll probably sign a two year contract in the area of 2.7 – 2.9 million.

If things fall apart (doubtful) I’m sure Burke is under no real pressure to keep MacArthur around. As impressive as he’s been over the past season, I’m sure there are plenty of players eager to take his place.

Email [email protected] and follow on twitter

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • tmlfan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron

    @ tmlfan:
    -
    Thanks. I wish I had time to edit them before posting.
    -
    What do you guys think of calling the site hockeynerd.com?
    -
    After all, that is what I am…

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPiuD24JV2U 2 Minutes for Looking so Guru

    Mac Attack is sick. He should be resigned for 2.5 for 3 years. Kuli won’t have a problem with that since Mac’s been in the league longer.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Penthouse

    @ cameron

    its market-able enough

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mjs18

    Hello all,

    I’ve just been reading in the weeds the last couple of months and I used to post under some old accounts. Taking the summer off so to speak, will be back in full force soon.

    Quick question:

    @ Cameron:
    Are you starting an MLHS version website for the Winnipeg Jets? I see you’ve started something and I think you’ve stated before you’re from the Peg. Is that what you’re up to?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron

    @ tmlfan:
    -
    I was going to, but I like talking about all hockey. I am going to include a Jet in the banner, and give the Leafs and Jets separate menus.
    -
    @ mjs18:
    -
    That’s the goal.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mjs18

    @ Cameron:
    Sweet, that’s pretty cool. I’m wondering if this is a profitable venture or one just for fun? This site makes some money I assume, could be a great move on your part.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://cameronhockey.wordpress.com/ Cameron

    @ mjs18:
    -
    I would like to make a little bit of money out of it, but if I don’t, I won’t be too upset about it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • McKelvie
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    Cameron wrote:

    What do you guys think of calling the site hockeynerd.com?

    what’s the site right now? or where’s this article people are referenceing/
    i like hockeyhoser but you might need to buy it off someone. how could you possibly combine the Maple Leafs and Winnipeg … huh … LeafsWin

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    20 minutes of constant -vote-refresh-vote, and we went from 50.08% to 51%! I need some help here to sink Sedin!
    http://www2.tsn.ca/showdown/2011/

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    i’m in a meeting and it’s difficult to follow along here today

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • mjs18

    @ Cameron:
    I would assume that it all depends on site traffic. Could be interesting but I think any Canadian team would be popular. Best of luck with it.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    @ MacInMoscow:
    i am committed to helping until i see it go over 55% … but then i have to get back to work

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • GreekLeafer

    I bet the Eberle goal will win and I’m fine with that. I think I voted Eberle over Grabo earlier in the tournament, lol. This current bracket is NO CONTEST Grabo’s to lose.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • TheDoor

    MacInMoscow wrote:

    20 minutes of constant -vote-refresh-vote, and we went from 50.08% to 51%! I need some help here to sink Sedin!
    http://www2.tsn.ca/showdown/2011/

    I have been helping since I saw Sedin take the lead now I have to go back to work. I will check back later on

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    @ Cameron:
    I hope they call themselves the Winnipeg Prairie Crocus, that would be FAWESOME

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • dlb

    holy shit balls, i’m the 1 000 000 th visitor!?!?! that’s FAWESOME

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • tmlfan

    DarrenDreger Darren Dreger
    The waiting continues. True North is waiting for Atlanta Spirit to complete some of its legal fine tuning. It’s now an hour by hour wait.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)