To Laich Or Not To Laich?

by on June 4, 2011 in Free Agency - 249 Comments

To Laich Or Not To Laich?
Share

Would look good as a Leaf. His wallet would too.

The Leafs need a first line center. Misconception or truth? Watching this team throughout the season I’d say it’s need is right. But, if the golden goose in the form of Brad Richards lands in a city not named Toronto, how do we get that top end skill at center? Is there a free agent out there that could help this team without having that top end offensive skills?

Seemingly, Kessel always needed that first line center. I say seemingly because he preformed at his best playing with a legitimate No1 skilled passing center in Marc Savard. While that may be the case, what’s also undoubtedly true is that Kessel is still a developing player, even more so when playing in Boston. A sniper like Kessel does indeed need a more skilled center than Bozak but I think that skill is more likely to come from the draft or inside the organization (Kadri, Colborne) than via this year’s free agency. What I’m aiming for in this article is looking at a more balanced approach.

Brooks Laich is likely to be an available UFA as he’s likely to be unavailable and while I know that isn’t saying much, it’s also a motive for reasonable speculation. Laich is a top notch penalty killer, a player who can put up serious numbers when put in a top six role and play great defensively to boot. One way to look at a player like that is as a temporary fix and a permanent solution. Temporary in replacing elite skill on the top line and permanent as in a 27 year old versatile forward with experience that can play LW position. Looking at what Kesler means to Vancouver, it is clear that teams need players of Laich’s skillset to win Stanley Cups. Be it Jordan Staals or John Maddens of this world.

After a campaign that Kesler had, or rather, is having it would be unwise for anyone compare him to Brooks Laich. When looking at him from a purely defensive standpoint, he’s not that far behind. Also, when you compare their numbers during the two more recent campaigns (2007-2008, 2008-2009) they weren’t really that far apart until Vancouver became one of the best NHL teams. During that period Brooks Laich had 90 points in 164 regular season games played (44 goals). Kesler had 96 points in 162 regular season games played. Kesler was plus nine Laich -4 during that period but it is important to note that Vancouver had a better defensive team, a situation that hasn’t changed. Laich had 307 shots on goal, while Kesler fired off 356 pucks on the opposition netminders in the process.

What would Laich bring to this team? Well, first off better special teams. The powerplay would receive a somewhat solid boost, especially given the fact he can play the point on the first PP unit. The real gain would be visible the penalty kill. Next on the list – net presence. Standing at 6-2, Laich is a big body that doesn’t shy away from going to the net and getting those dirty goals, something we desperately needed and lacked this season. He can also create chances with good speed on the forecheck and can be even be used as a third line center.

All that in mind, Laich is still only the 8th highest scoring UFA forward. Not quite an eye popping rating. Furthermore, given the “strength” of UFA center class this year I’m sure if he does indeed opt for free agency, he’ll do so with an intention to sign a deal way more North of his current $2,066,667 deal with the Capitals. To be honest, I don’t think Laich is worth more than 4.5 mil. but signing him to a deal below that doesn’t seem very likely. Don’t get me wrong, I firmly believe it’s good, no scratch that, necessary for a team that has a legitimate first line center (one which you built a team around), to spend even more than the aforementioned sum of 4.5 mil. on a great two way center like Laich, but doing so could mean increasingly less wiggle room in the future for a franchise like Toronto, especially with that No1 line still lacking creativity after the signing. We’re still way off from being sure what Kadri or Colborne can bring at the center position. So, while doing term plus cap hit with a guy like Laich might offer better depth, defensive play and certainly improves us as a hockey team it really doesn’t solve a more pressing need.

My strong belief is, no matter who is currently out there or how tempting improving your team might seem, rebuilding teams, which IS what we still are, should look to solve the future cornerstones of the franchise before moving on to adding the secondary high priced, Stanley Cup contending pieces.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • 4evrblue

    Burtonboy wrote:

    @ 4evrblue:
    But I have to say this is a pile of bogus BS that TSN has going on here. Talk about stuffing ballot boxes. The contest has no credibility imo because to be fair you should only be allowed to vote once.

    very true, now stop writing and keep voting lol :D

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • lister

    4evrblue wrote:

    50.1% for grabs now. Is anybody else voting?

    .
    I’ve voted a couple of times.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CarltontheBear

    Burtonboy wrote:

    @ 4evrblue:
    But I have to say this is a pile of bogus BS that TSN has going on here. Talk about stuffing ballot boxes. The contest has no credibility imo because to be fair you should only be allowed to vote once.

    I personally feel it shouldn’t be up to a vote at all, the voting really has nothing to do with the plays themselves, instead just turns into people voting for the team they like.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • 4evrblue

    down to 50%

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    To put it another way to entice people to vote, if Grabs doesn’t win it will Be Camemberlli and Jesus Price in the final. Who wants that?
    http://www2.tsn.ca/showdown/2011/ for those that don’t know where to vote.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    Pure smoke screen, I am certain.

    http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/rangers/falling_star_PGWYXO8QDp72CdrGfZUASO

    SOunds like Rags cant afford Richards.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • chieften67
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • chieften67
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ canucksnaphook:
    I’ld say that’s exactly what it is. He’s being called greedy now by several other writers and on NYR boards around the web.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    @ chieften67:
    Did you catch the Champions Legue final? Barca made Man U’s back end look like so many pylons. Quite a feat.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    @ MacInMoscow:

    He loves Torts..I see this as hog shit.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    canucksnaphook wrote:

    @ MacInMoscow:
    He loves Torts..I see this as hog shit.

    Could be, but would he love him soo much if it cost him, say, $1 mil per season x 6? According to the NY post he is just a money grubber, lol.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CarltontheBear

    canucksnaphook wrote:

    @ MacInMoscow:
    He loves Torts..I see this as hog shit.

    That’s not going to be a deciding factor for him to sign a long term contract as Torts most likely won’t last for the entire contract

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    Watch, this vote will go down to the wire at 50-50, in the last 5 minutes Scumerlleri picks up the vital 0.1%.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Burtonboy

    @ canucksnaphook:
    Well if he loves Torts so much then he will sign with NYR at 6.5 mil for 5yrs.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    Fuck, I have to go to the store, I’ll be back in 5 minutes. Someone who has been sitting on your ass here, vote for me!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • MacInMoscow

    Burtonboy wrote:

    @ canucksnaphook:
    Well if he loves Torts so much then he will sign with NYR at 6.5 mil for 5yrs.

    Exactly

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • LukeSchenn

    Well if he loves him so much he should marry him

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • canucksnaphook

    DOnt hate the messenger ! Dicks !!

    I actually see Richards as a Red Wing…..perfect fit.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    WHAT THE FUCK IS GRABO LOSING FOR?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)