Richards not interested in Rangers?

by on June 9, 2011 in Uncategorized - 174 Comments

Share

It seems worthwhile to report that we have a major Rangers source in veteran hockey writer Larry Brooks reporting the following, rather definitive piece of news about the Brad Richards sweepstakes:

NYP_Brooksie
@LA_theRiver No. Richards is not coming to NY.

Brooks said in a follow up tweet:

He was [apart of the Rangers' plans] but it doesn’t seem as if interest was mutual.

The three main players in the Richards sweepstakes have long rumoured to be Toronto, Tampa Bay and New York. According to Brooks, you can all but rule out the Rangers. We know Richards would love a return to Tampa Bay, where he never wanted to leave in the first place but in February of 2008 was shipped out due to the Oren Koules and Len Barrie fiasco. With Tampa Bay coming off an impressive playoff run and hoping to take it a step further next season, the timing, cap considerations aside, seems perfect.

“Obviously, fitting in with Tampa wouldn’t be an issue because of my history here,” Richards said. “In this salary-cap world, you have to be aware of each organization’s dynamics. Maybe you couldn’t get top dollar (in Tampa) that you might get somewhere else, but you consider other things.

“I’ve got friends and people I play golf with who constantly hammer me about coming back to Tampa. Even if I tried, I couldn’t get it out of my mind. So yes, it’s there. I’d love to see it progress. But what’s going to happen? Who knows?”
-TBO.com

To what extent Richards would accept less money to return to Tampa Bay seems to be the big question – The Bolts will expand their budget for next season (presumably at or near the cap ceiling, they spent around $50 million this year in player salary) but have 2010-11 playoff dynamos Sean Bergenheim (UFA) and Teddy Purcell (RFA) to resign, don’t have a goaltender signed past the end of this month, and have a minor contract to sort out with some guy named Steven Stamkos. It’s hard to envision Tampa Bay committing 7M + to each of Stamkos, Lecavalier and Richards down the middle.

Burke appears to be willing to go all in on Brad Richards; overpaying for the PEI native on the open market at no cost asset-wise is Plan A in solving a number one center problem that has no in-house solution ready yet.  Richards doesn’t “just” fill the number one center need; he’s the left-handed playmaker Phil Kessel has been waiting for since he and Marc Savard parted ways, and the quarterback the Leafs‘ powerplay has needed since the Kaberle trade. Without putting too much weight into a single player’s stock, he’s a neat, simple answer to the Leafs’ most pressing needs. It will be interesting to see how many of Burke’s cardinal sins when it comes to player contacts (i.e. NTCs, contract length) he’s willing to look the other way on to make it happen. The Maple Leafs appear to have the ability to outbid Tampa Bay here, and Richards for his part sounded far from opposed to the idea last November when Dallas visited Toronto.

We could see the Los Angeles Kings among others enter these sweepstakes as well. The Kings are still looking for a big name forward after losing out on the Kovalchuk sweepstakes, and Richards could be their man as the big ticket free agent forward of the summer. This could come down to Richards deciding between the relative anonymity of a market like LA or a great hockey city but highly scrutinized hotbed like Toronto.

As for any potential rights trade, the words of Richards’ agent Pat Morris appear to tell all. While Dallas didn’t hand out the no-trade clause originally, the smart move for Richards is to exercise the rights given to him by his contract and control his own destiny. Personally I don’t expect this stance from Richards and his agent to change.

“I’m not aware of another player in this situation who has waived his no-trade clause, and I think there is a reason for that,” Morris said. “Accepting a move to another team creates an obligation, and you have to be pretty sure about that obligation. I think Brad has to do what’s best for himself and keep his options open.”

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Print article

  • CaptnClarky

    @Jordan
    No way! A package that incluides Gunner is automatically more attractive than the new york package suggested there. Toronto prospect depth is deeper than a lot of teams, and if Burkie really wants cater we have what it takes to get it done. Im not suggesting I wanna do it, Im just saying if it came down to it, Burkie could definately get er done.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • danvrtsng

    @ Jordan:
    It’s true, Jordan did guess the Kessel and Giggy deals months before they actually happened. I mean… they were somewhat obvious. That’s all incarcerated bob is doing… guessing what is likely to happen.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • danvrtsng

    @ Jordan:
    Then again, if Lecavalier to Toronto ever happens (something Jordan used to push for a lot) then I would suggest you get a twitter account and try to get some buzz off this.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • moimoi28
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptnClarky

    @Bring Home the Cup
    WHOA WHOA WHOA…. lets get some of these kids some playoff experience and wait to see if last years break out years from key guys were flukes or not before we even consider the idea of trading young assets for “temporary pieces”. Lets not get confused herem the rebuild isnt done with a richards signing

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • moimoi28

    CaptnClarky wrote:

    @Jordan
    No way! A package that incluides Gunner is automatically more attractive than the new york package suggested there. Toronto prospect depth is deeper than a lot of teams, and if Burkie really wants cater we have what it takes to get it done. Im not suggesting I wanna do it, Im just saying if it came down to it, Burkie could definately get er done.

    .
    Your kidding yourself there buddy. Anisimov/Del Zotto/Kreider is an elite group of young talent. Much better than what we should be offering.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    danvrtsng wrote:

    @ Jordan:
    Then again, if Lecavalier to Toronto ever happens (something Jordan used to push for a lot) then I would suggest you get a twitter account and try to get some buzz off this.

    that was until I realized how much Burke hated 5+ year contracts

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    Also, me and Cameron called the Kaberle deal a year before it happened. Just added a roster player instead of the conditional pick usually

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptnClarky

    @moimoi28
    Im not saying what we should be offering… im saying what we could be offering… in that package new york is mortgaging the future for a guy who doesnt make them cup contenders, and totally cap fucking themselves at the same time. the elafs could throw gunner kadri and d’amigo at the flyers at the same time, more cap friendly and jsut as attractive.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Bring the Cup Home

    @ moimoi28:

    very good point. i sounded like an old toronto GM there for a minute. thanks for bringing me back to reality, and the plan to stay the course.

    makes me think how lucky we are to have burke who has balls of steel to avoid the ‘toronto trap’ that so many previous GMs fell into.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • danvrtsng

    I remember I used to post on the I Bleed Blue facebook group and someone there (in 2008) predicted this Kaberle deal to Boston:
    .
    - To BOS: Kaberle
    - To TOR: Colborne, Lashoff, 1st rd pick
    .
    Pretty much exactly what happened. Minus Lashoff came to Toronto in a more round about way, but still. At the time he was a Bruin. Go figure.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    Im going to cry again.
    I didnt realize how bad we had it before I was old enough to understand
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRgBFFsLijw&feature=fvwrel

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • danvrtsng

    By the way, I would totally resign Lashoff as a 6th/7th defenceman. Very talented… never reached his full potential, but for a bottom pairing, low minute guy is still very effective. Way better option than Lebda.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • moimoi28
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.talkleafs.com Jordan

    danvrtsng wrote:

    I remember I used to post on the I Bleed Blue facebook group and someone there (in 2008) predicted this Kaberle deal to Boston:
    .
    - To BOS: Kaberle
    - To TOR: Colborne, Lashoff, 1st rd pick
    .
    Pretty much exactly what happened. Minus Lashoff came to Toronto in a more round about way, but still. At the time he was a Bruin. Go figure.

    well there you go. you are no better then Bob. How hard was that?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptnClarky

    @Jordan
    What kind of dog is that dude?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptnClarky

    @moimoi28
    just checked some numbers… i conceed defeat… i didnt know anisimov was as young as he was, and his potential. I think Gunner is still a better fit for phillys current needs than del zotto, but yes that package is quite attractive.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Skar

    *****BREAKING NEWS*******
    Maple Leafs camp in talks with RFA Luke Schenn. Word is a deal is imminent. Maybe within the next 48 hours

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Shotgun Charlie

    Anyone think Wolski is worth a look? I was reading Sather may dump him. BB could get him for cheap.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Skar

    @ Shotgun Charlie:
    maybe…but I don’t think so…if we get Richards he doesn’t crack our top 6 and he’s def not a bottom 6 type player….

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • CaptnClarky

    @Shotgun Charlie
    Its an itneresting idea… he looks like the kind of player where motivation may be the issue. Considering how hard Ronnie W has this team working, I dont know if someone with his work ethic is a good fit. That said, he definately has some talent but i dont see him fitting in our top six.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Shotgun Charlie

    @ Skar:
    this kid is still young. I think being tossed around from the avs, yotes and nyr screwed him up. I guess there has to be a reason……hmmm

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Skar

    @ Shotgun Charlie:
    Like I said…just not sure he fits in our top 6. Maybe if a couple of our top 6 are moved to acquire a single superstar or something, he might be an option though?

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Rick Lanz

    I believe Wolski is from Toronto too….I’m sure he’d love to play here. But, let’s face it, if BB has his sights on forwards, I doubt Wolski is one of them

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)